Pros of Next.js

• Extensive documentation and large community support
• More flexible and customizable for various project types
• Regular updates and maintenance from Vercel

Cons of Next.js

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Requires more configuration for advanced features
• Less opinionated, which can lead to inconsistent project structures

Code Comparison

Next.js basic page:

export default function Home() {
  return <h1>Welcome to Next.js!</h1>
}

Next-enterprise basic page:

import { NextPage } from 'next';

const Home: NextPage = () => {
  return <h1>Welcome to Next-enterprise!</h1>
};

export default Home;

Next-enterprise provides a more structured approach with TypeScript integration by default, while Next.js offers a simpler starting point that can be expanded as needed.

Next-enterprise is built on top of Next.js, offering a pre-configured enterprise-grade boilerplate. It includes features like TypeScript, testing setup, and CI/CD configurations out of the box, making it easier to start large-scale projects. However, it may be overkill for smaller applications or those requiring unique setups.

Next.js, being the foundation, provides more flexibility but requires additional setup for enterprise-level features. It's ideal for projects of any scale and offers more freedom in terms of project structure and technology choices.

Pros of create-t3-app

• Offers a more opinionated and streamlined setup process
• Includes built-in TypeScript support and type safety
• Provides a well-documented and community-driven development experience

Cons of create-t3-app

• Less comprehensive out-of-the-box features compared to next-enterprise
• May require additional configuration for advanced use cases
• Limited customization options during initial setup

Code Comparison

create-t3-app:

import { createTRPCRouter, publicProcedure } from "~/server/api/trpc";

export const exampleRouter = createTRPCRouter({
  hello: publicProcedure.query(() => {
    return { greeting: "Hello from tRPC!" };
  }),
});

next-enterprise:

import { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next';

export default function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) {
  res.status(200).json({ message: 'Hello from Next.js API!' });
}

Both repositories provide solid foundations for building Next.js applications, but they cater to different developer preferences and project requirements. create-t3-app focuses on type safety and a more opinionated structure, while next-enterprise offers a broader set of features and greater flexibility out of the box.

Pros of tRPC

• Provides end-to-end typesafe APIs, enhancing developer experience and reducing runtime errors
• Offers automatic API documentation generation, simplifying API management
• Supports real-time subscriptions, enabling efficient live data updates

Cons of tRPC

• Requires TypeScript knowledge, which may increase the learning curve for some developers
• Limited to TypeScript ecosystems, potentially reducing flexibility in language choices
• May have a steeper initial setup compared to Next Enterprise's pre-configured structure

Code Comparison

tRPC:

import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server';

const t = initTRPC.create();

const appRouter = t.router({
  hello: t.procedure.query(() => 'Hello, tRPC!'),
});

Next Enterprise:

import { NextApiRequest, NextApiResponse } from 'next';

export default function handler(req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) {
  res.status(200).json({ message: 'Hello, Next Enterprise!' });
}

The tRPC example showcases its type-safe API creation, while Next Enterprise demonstrates a standard Next.js API route. tRPC's approach offers stronger typing and automatic client generation, whereas Next Enterprise provides a more familiar REST-like structure within the Next.js framework.

Pros of ui

• Highly customizable and accessible UI components
• Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing projects
• Extensive documentation and examples for each component

Cons of ui

• Requires more manual setup and configuration
• Limited to UI components, lacking full project structure and tooling
• May require additional styling and theming work

Code Comparison

next-enterprise:

import { Button } from '@/components/Button';

export default function Home() {
  return <Button>Click me</Button>;
}

ui:

import { Button } from "@/components/ui/button"

export default function Home() {
  return <Button variant="outline">Click me</Button>
}

Key Differences

• next-enterprise provides a complete project boilerplate with pre-configured tools and best practices
• ui focuses solely on reusable UI components, offering more flexibility but requiring additional setup
• next-enterprise includes built-in features like authentication and API routes, while ui leaves these aspects to the developer
• ui offers more customization options for individual components, allowing for greater design flexibility
• next-enterprise provides a more opinionated structure, which can be beneficial for larger teams and projects

Both repositories have their merits, with next-enterprise offering a more comprehensive solution for enterprise-level projects, while ui provides greater flexibility and customization for UI components.

Pros of ts-nextjs-tailwind-starter

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier for beginners to understand and customize
• Includes pre-configured Absolute Imports and Module Path Aliases for improved code organization
• Provides a clear folder structure with examples for components, hooks, and pages

Cons of ts-nextjs-tailwind-starter

• Lacks some advanced features like internationalization and advanced testing setup
• Does not include pre-configured CI/CD pipelines or deployment options
• Fewer pre-built components and utilities compared to next-enterprise

Code Comparison

ts-nextjs-tailwind-starter:

import { AppProps } from 'next/app';
import '@/styles/globals.css';

function MyApp({ Component, pageProps }: AppProps) {
  return <Component {...pageProps} />;
}

next-enterprise:

import type { AppProps } from 'next/app';
import { appWithTranslation } from 'next-i18next';
import { ThemeProvider } from 'next-themes';

function App({ Component, pageProps }: AppProps) {
  return (
    <ThemeProvider attribute='class'>
      <Component {...pageProps} />
    </ThemeProvider>
  );
}

export default appWithTranslation(App);

The code comparison shows that next-enterprise includes additional features like internationalization and theme support out of the box, while ts-nextjs-tailwind-starter provides a more basic setup that can be extended as needed.