mitosis

Pros of React

• Mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and community support
• Well-established patterns and best practices for building complex applications
• Robust performance optimizations and virtual DOM implementation

Cons of React

• Steeper learning curve for beginners, especially with JSX syntax
• Requires additional tools and setup for state management in large applications
• More opinionated approach to component structure and lifecycle

Code Comparison

React:

function Welcome(props) {
  return <h1>Hello, {props.name}</h1>;
}

const element = <Welcome name="Sara" />;

Mitosis:

import { useStore } from '@builder.io/mitosis';

export default function Welcome(props) {
  return <h1>Hello, {props.name}</h1>;
}

Key Differences

• Mitosis focuses on cross-framework compatibility, while React is specific to its ecosystem
• Mitosis generates code for multiple frameworks, React requires manual porting
• React has a more extensive set of built-in features and hooks
• Mitosis aims for a simpler API and easier migration between frameworks

Use Cases

• React: Large-scale applications, complex user interfaces, single-framework projects
• Mitosis: Multi-framework projects, component libraries, design systems

Pros of Vue

• Mature ecosystem with extensive documentation and community support
• Gentle learning curve, making it accessible for beginners
• Flexible and scalable for both small and large applications

Cons of Vue

• Less suitable for cross-platform development
• Limited native mobile development capabilities
• Smaller job market compared to React or Angular

Code Comparison

Vue component:

<template>
  <div>{{ message }}</div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      message: 'Hello Vue!'
    }
  }
}
</script>

Mitosis component:

import { useState } from '@builder.io/mitosis';

export default function MyComponent() {
  const state = useState({
    message: 'Hello Mitosis!'
  });

  return <div>{state.message}</div>;
}

Key Differences

• Mitosis focuses on cross-framework compatibility, while Vue is a standalone framework
• Vue uses a template-based approach, whereas Mitosis uses JSX-like syntax
• Mitosis generates code for multiple frameworks, while Vue code is specific to the Vue ecosystem

Use Cases

• Vue: Web applications, single-page applications, progressive enhancement of existing sites
• Mitosis: Cross-framework component libraries, design systems, code that needs to work across multiple frameworks

Pros of Angular

• Comprehensive framework with built-in features for large-scale applications
• Strong TypeScript integration and tooling support
• Extensive ecosystem and community resources

Cons of Angular

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Heavier bundle size compared to more lightweight solutions
• Opinionated structure may be restrictive for some projects

Code Comparison

Angular component:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-example',
  template: '<h1>{{ title }}</h1>'
})
export class ExampleComponent {
  title = 'Hello, Angular!';
}

Mitosis component:

import { useState } from '@builder.io/mitosis';

export default function ExampleComponent() {
  const [title] = useState('Hello, Mitosis!');
  return <h1>{title}</h1>;
}

Key Differences

• Angular uses a more verbose, class-based approach with decorators
• Mitosis employs a functional component style similar to React
• Angular has a built-in templating system, while Mitosis uses JSX-like syntax
• Mitosis aims for framework-agnostic components, whereas Angular is a complete framework

Use Cases

Angular is well-suited for large enterprise applications with complex requirements, while Mitosis is designed for creating reusable UI components that can be compiled to multiple frameworks, making it ideal for design systems or cross-framework projects.

Pros of Svelte

• Mature and widely adopted framework with a large community and ecosystem
• Offers a complete solution for building web applications, including routing and state management
• Produces highly optimized and efficient output with smaller bundle sizes

Cons of Svelte

• Less flexible for cross-framework component development
• Requires learning Svelte-specific syntax and conventions
• Limited options for integrating with existing projects using other frameworks

Code Comparison

Svelte component:

<script>
  export let name = 'World';
</script>

<h1>Hello {name}!</h1>

Mitosis component:

import { useStore } from '@builder.io/mitosis';

export default function MyComponent(props) {
  const state = useStore({ name: props.name || 'World' });
  return <h1>Hello {state.name}!</h1>;
}

Mitosis aims to be framework-agnostic, allowing developers to write components once and compile them to multiple frameworks, including Svelte. This approach offers greater flexibility but may lack some of the optimizations and features specific to Svelte's compiler. Svelte, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated and integrated development experience, with its own syntax and tooling designed for building complete web applications.

Pros of Preact

• Smaller bundle size and faster performance compared to React
• Extensive ecosystem and community support
• Compatible with most React libraries and tools

Cons of Preact

• Less feature-rich compared to full React implementation
• May require additional configuration for some React-specific features
• Smaller community and fewer dedicated resources compared to React

Code Comparison

Preact:

import { h, render } from 'preact';

const App = () => <h1>Hello, World!</h1>;

render(<App />, document.body);

Mitosis:

import { component } from '@builder.io/mitosis';

export default component({
  render() {
    return <h1>Hello, World!</h1>;
  }
});

Key Differences

• Mitosis focuses on cross-framework compatibility, while Preact is a lightweight alternative to React
• Preact aims to be a drop-in replacement for React, whereas Mitosis generates code for multiple frameworks
• Mitosis uses a custom component syntax, while Preact closely mimics React's syntax
• Preact is primarily for runtime use, while Mitosis is a build-time tool for generating framework-specific code

Use Cases

• Choose Preact for lightweight React-like applications with smaller bundle sizes
• Use Mitosis when developing components that need to work across multiple frameworks or platforms

Pros of Solid

• Mature and stable framework with a larger community and ecosystem
• Better performance and smaller bundle size for production applications
• More comprehensive documentation and learning resources

Cons of Solid

• Less flexible for cross-framework compatibility
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to reactive programming
• Limited tooling for converting existing components from other frameworks

Code Comparison

Solid:

import { createSignal } from "solid-js";

function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = createSignal(0);
  return <button onClick={() => setCount(count() + 1)}>{count()}</button>;
}

Mitosis:

import { useStore } from "@builder.io/mitosis";

function Counter() {
  const state = useStore({ count: 0 });
  return <button onClick={() => state.count++}>{state.count}</button>;
}

Solid is a complete framework for building user interfaces, while Mitosis is a tool for converting components between different frameworks. Solid offers a more opinionated and optimized approach, whereas Mitosis prioritizes flexibility and cross-framework compatibility. The code comparison shows that Solid uses signals for reactivity, while Mitosis employs a more traditional state management approach that can be easily translated to various frameworks.