Top Related Projects
The Magic Mask for Android
Notes about tinkering with Android Project Treble
Quick Overview
Chainfire/libsuperuser is a Java library for Android that provides a set of tools to execute commands with root privileges. It simplifies the process of requesting and managing root access in Android applications, offering a convenient API for developers to perform superuser operations.
Pros
- Simplifies root access management in Android apps
- Provides a clean and easy-to-use API for executing root commands
- Supports both synchronous and asynchronous command execution
- Includes utility methods for common root-related tasks
Cons
- Requires root access on the device, limiting its use to rooted Android devices
- May pose security risks if not used carefully
- Potential for abuse if implemented in malicious applications
- Limited documentation and examples available
Code Examples
- Checking for root access:
boolean isRooted = Shell.SU.available();
if (isRooted) {
// Device is rooted
} else {
// Device is not rooted
}
- Executing a single root command:
List<String> output = Shell.SU.run("ls -l /data");
for (String line : output) {
System.out.println(line);
}
- Running multiple root commands asynchronously:
Shell.AsyncSU.run(new String[] {
"mount -o rw,remount /system",
"touch /system/test_file",
"chmod 644 /system/test_file"
}, new Shell.OnCommandResultListener() {
@Override
public void onCommandResult(int commandCode, int exitCode, List<String> output) {
if (exitCode == 0) {
System.out.println("Commands executed successfully");
} else {
System.out.println("Error executing commands");
}
}
});
Getting Started
To use libsuperuser in your Android project:
- Add the library to your project's
build.gradle
file:
dependencies {
implementation 'eu.chainfire:libsuperuser:1.1.1'
}
- Request root access and execute a command:
if (Shell.SU.available()) {
List<String> result = Shell.SU.run("echo 'Hello, root!'");
for (String line : result) {
System.out.println(line);
}
} else {
System.out.println("Root access not available");
}
Remember to handle root access responsibly and inform users about the app's root requirements.
Competitor Comparisons
The Magic Mask for Android
Pros of Magisk
- More comprehensive root solution with module system
- Active development and frequent updates
- Systemless modifications for better compatibility
Cons of Magisk
- More complex setup and usage
- Potentially higher risk of system instability
- Larger codebase and resource footprint
Code Comparison
Magisk (Java):
public class SuFile extends File {
public SuFile(String pathname) {
super(pathname);
}
// ... more methods
}
libsuperuser (Java):
public class Shell {
public static boolean isSELinuxEnforcing() {
return new File("/sys/fs/selinux/enforce").exists();
}
// ... more methods
}
Magisk focuses on providing a complete root solution with a module system, while libsuperuser is a library for root access and shell command execution. Magisk offers more features but is more complex, while libsuperuser is simpler but less comprehensive. The code snippets show Magisk's file handling approach versus libsuperuser's system checks. Both projects serve different purposes in the Android rooting ecosystem.
Notes about tinkering with Android Project Treble
Pros of treble_experimentations
- Focuses on Project Treble and Generic System Images (GSIs), enabling broader device compatibility
- Actively maintained with frequent updates and contributions from the community
- Provides scripts and tools for building and customizing GSIs
Cons of treble_experimentations
- More complex and requires deeper understanding of Android internals
- Less focused on superuser/root access management
- May have compatibility issues with certain devices or Android versions
Code Comparison
treble_experimentations:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
if [ ! -d .repo ]; then
echo "No .repo folder found. Please run this script in a ROM source folder."
exit 1
fi
libsuperuser:
public class Shell {
public static boolean isSU() {
List<String> ret = run("id");
if (ret == null) return false;
return ret.get(0).contains("uid=0");
}
}
The code snippets demonstrate the different focus areas of each project. treble_experimentations deals with ROM building and customization, while libsuperuser provides utilities for root access and shell commands.
Pros of Superuser
- More user-friendly interface and easier to use for non-technical users
- Actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes
- Includes a built-in app for managing root access permissions
Cons of Superuser
- Less flexible for developers who need low-level control
- May have higher resource usage due to the included management app
- Limited customization options compared to libsuperuser
Code Comparison
libsuperuser:
Shell.SU.run("command");
Superuser:
SuShell.runWithSu("command");
Both libraries provide methods to execute commands with root privileges, but libsuperuser offers more granular control over the shell execution process. Superuser focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while libsuperuser provides more advanced features for developers who need fine-grained control over root access.
libsuperuser is generally preferred by developers who need to integrate root functionality directly into their apps, while Superuser is often used as a standalone root management solution. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the level of control needed over root access.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
libsuperuser
Example code for "How-To SU"
For some outdated background details, see:
Even though its outdated with regards to usage of this library, if you're unfamiliar with writing code for root usage, it is not a bad idea to read it.
License
Copyright © 2012-2019 Jorrit Chainfire Jongma
This code is released under the Apache License version 2.0.
Deprecated
This library is not under active development right now, as I've mostly moved away from the Android world. While I believe it still works great, if it breaks due to changes on new Android versions or root solutions, fixes may be slow to appear.
If you're writing a new app, you might consider using TopJohnWu's libsu instead. Barring some edge-cases (that I personally seem to be the biggest user of) the capabilities should be similar, but it's likely to be better maintained.
v1.1.0 update
It is now 2019, 7 years since the initial release of libsuperuser, and I have finally gotten around to releasing v1.1.0, and writing an updated how-to. See, I don't need reminding every 6 months.
This update brings support for commands returning an InputStream
for
STDOUT, as well as adding per-line and buffered STDERR support to
various methods.
As Shell.Interactive
can be a bit tricky to use and understand
callback and threading wise, especially when used from a background
thread, the Shell.Threaded
subclass has been added. This class
maintains its own dedicated background thread, upon which all the
callbacks are executed.
Shell.Interactive
(and Shell.Threaded
) have gained synchronous
methods, that may be easier to handle than the asynchronous ones, when
used from a background thread. Obviously one cannot use them from the
main UI thread, as this would block the UI.
Last but not least, Shell.Pool
has been added, which maintains a
pool of Shell.Threaded
instances for your app to use; created, cached,
and closed on-demand. For new users, Shell.Pool
is the place to start.
If you're looking at the source of the library, Shell.java
has
become way too large and would look better broken up. This is
intentionally not done to maintain better backward compatibility
with old code, of which there is quite a bit.
Upgrading from v1.0.0 to v1.1.0
No functionality has been removed, but some of the method signatures
have subtly changed, and a lot of methods have been deprecated
(though they will not be removed). The compiler will certainly tell
you about these. Some interface have been renamed, and some methods
were added to existing interfaces. All Exception
based classes have
moved to inner classes of Shell
.
Shell.run(...)
, and all Shell.SH.xxx
and Shell.SU.xxx
methods
automatically redirect to their Shell.Pool.xxx
counterparts. This
is a free speed-up for code using these methods. The redirection
can be turned off by calling Shell.setRedirectDeprecated(false)
from something like Application::onCreate()
.
While most code should run the same without issue, you should definitely double check, especially for complicated scripts or commands that set specific environment variables.
Shell.Interactive
should work exactly as it always has, but
since some threading-related code has changed internally, it is
always wise to check if everything still works as expected.
There is no need to migrate existing Shell.Interactive
code to
Shell.Threaded
, unless you want to use the functionality
provided by Shell.Pool
. Be sure to read about the usage difference
between them below.
Last but not least, minSdkVersion
was updated from 4 to 5, so
we're losing compatibility with Android 1.6 Donut users, sorry.
Example project
The example project is very old, and does not follow current best
practises. While PooledActivity
has been added demonstrating
some calls using Shell.Threaded
and Shell.Pool
, they aren't
particularly good. The old code demonstrating both legacy and
interactive modes remains present. Use the mode button at the bottom
to switch between activities.
Basics
This page is not intended as a full reference, just to get you started off. There are many methods and classes in the library not explained here. For more advanced usages, consult the source code - over 1/3rd of the lines belong to comments.
Some of the below may seem out-of-order, you might want to read this entire section twice.
Blocking, threads, and ShellOnMainThreadException
Running subprocesses is expensive and timings cannot be predicted.
For something like running "su" even more so, as it can launch
a dialog waiting for user interaction. Many methods in this library
may be blocking (taking unpredictable time to return). When you
attempt to call any of these methods from the main UI thread, the
library will throw a Shell.ShellOnMainThreadException
at you, if
your app is compiled in debug mode. (Note that this behavior can
be disabled through the Debug.setSanityChecksEnabled(false)
call).
Methods that may throw this exception include any of the run(...)
,
waitFor...()
, and close...()
methods, with the exception of
closeWhenIdle()
.
The Shell.Builder
, Shell.Interactive
and Shell.Threaded
classes
provide addCommand(...)
methods, which run asynchronously and provide
completion callbacks. addCommand(...)
can safely be called from
the main UI thread.
Shell.Interactive
(and its Shell.Threaded
subclass) is a class
wrapping a running instance of a shell (such as "sh" or "su"),
providing methods to run commands in that shell and return the output
of each individual command and its exit code. As opening a shell
itself can be very expensive (especially so with "su"), it is
preferred to use few interactive shells to run many commands rather
than executing a single shell for each individual command.
Shell.Interactive
(and its Shell.Threaded
subclass) uses two
background threads to continuously gobble the input from STDOUT and
STDERR. This is an (unfortunate) requirement to prevent the underlying
shell from possibly deadlocking if it produces large amounts of output.
When an instance of Shell.Interactive
is created, it determines if
the calling thread has an Android Looper
attached, if it does, it
creates an Android Handler
, to which all callbacks (such as the
interfaces passed to addCommand(...)
) are passed. The callbacks
are then executed on the original calling thread. If a Looper
is
not available, callbacks are usually executed on the gobbler threads
(which increases the risk of deadlocks, and should be avoided), but
may also be executed on the calling thread (which can cause deadlocks
in your own threading code).
(Didn't make sense? Don't worry about it, and just follow the advice and examples below)
Shell.Interactive
vs Shell.Threaded
Shell.Interactive
's threading/callback model can be fine when it's
used from the main UI thread. As the main UI thread most certainly has
a Looper
, there is no problem creating a Handler
, and the callbacks
are run directly on the main UI thread. While this does allow you to
directly manipulate UI elements from the callbacks, it also causes
jank if your callbacks take too long to execute.
However, when Shell.Interactive
is used from a background thread,
unless you manually create and manage a special secondary thread for
it (a HandlerThread
), callbacks run on the gobbler threads, which is
potentially bad.
The Shell.Threaded
subclass specifically creates and manages this
secondary HandlerThread
for you, and guarantees all callbacks are
executed on that thread. This prevents most deadlock situations from
happening, and is consistent in its behavior across the board.
The drawback there is that you cannot directly manipulate UI elements
from the callbacks passed to addCommand(...)
(or any other methods),
but that is probably not what you end up wanting to do in any
real-world app anyway. When the need arises, you can use something
like Activity::runOnUiThread(...)
to call code that adjusts the UI.
Additionally, Shell.Threaded
is easier to setup and supports pooling
via Shell.Pool
(explained further below). The choice which to use
should be easy at this point, unless you have some very specific needs.
If you are porting from Shell.Interactive
to Shell.Threaded
, please
note that the behavior of the close()
method is different between
the two. In Shell.Interactive
it redirects to closeImmediately()
,
which waits for all commands to complete and then closes the shell.
In Shell.Threaded
it returns the shell to the pool if it is
part of one, and otherwise redirects to closeWhenIdle()
, which
schedules the actual close when all commands have completed, but
returns immediately. This discrepancy is unfortunate but required
to maintain both good backwards compatibility and support pooling
with try-with-resources.
Common methods
Examples follow further below, which make use of pooling. But before pooling can be explained, the common methods you will use with different classes need a quick walk-through.
Common methods: addCommand(...)
The Shell.Builder
(used to manually construct Shell.Interactive
and Shell.Threaded
instances), Shell.Interactive
and
Shell.Threaded
classes provide addCommand(...)
methods. These
run asynchronously and are safe to call from the main UI thread: they
return before the commands complete, and an optionally provided
callback is executed when the command does complete:
-
addCommand(Object commands)
-
addCommand(Object commands, int code, OnResult onResultListener)
commands
accepts a String
, a List<String>
, or a String[]
.
onResultListener
is one of:
-
OnCommandResultListener2
, which buffers STDOUT and STDERR and returns them to the callback all in one go -
OnCommandLineListener
, which is unbuffered and is called once for each line read from STDOUT or STDERR -
OnCommandInputStreamListener
, which is called with anInputStream
you can use to read raw data from the shell. You should continue reading theInputStream
until -1 is returned (not 0 as is sometimes done), or further commands on this shell will not execute. You can callInputStream::close()
to do this for you. Additionally, if the shell is closed during reading, then (and only then) anIOException
will be thrown.
All of these provide an onCommandResult
method that is called
with the code
you passed in, and the exit code of the (last) of the
commands passed in. Note that the exit code will be < 0 if an error
occurs, such as the shell being closed.
The addCommand(...)
calls will not be further explained in this
document, consult the example project (InteractiveActivity.java
)
and the library source for further details.
Common methods: run(...)
The Shell.Interactive
, Shell.Threaded
, and Shell.PoolWrapper
classes provide run(...)
methods. These run synchronously and are
not safe to call from the main UI thread: they return when the
command is completed:
-
int run(Object commands)
-
int run(Object commands, List<String> STDOUT, List<String> STDERR, boolean clear)
-
int run(Object commands, OnSyncCommandLineListener onSyncCommandLineListener)
-
int run(Object commands, OnSyncCommandInputStreamListener onSyncCommandInputStreamListener)
As before, commands
accepts a String
, a List<String>
, or a String[]
.
It should be obvious that these are simply the synchronous counterparts
of the asynchronous addCommand(...)
methods.
Instead of calling a callback interface with the exit code, it is
returned directly, and instead of returning a negative exit code on
error, Shell.ShellDiedException
is thrown.
Pooling
The Shell.Pool
class provides shell pooling. It will create new
shell instances on-demand, and keep a set number of them around for
reuse later (4 by default for "su" instances, 1 for non-"su" instances).
Shell.Pool.SH
and Shell.Pool.SU
are pre-created instances of
Shell.PoolWrapper
for "sh" and "su", providing get()
and the
earlier mentions run(...)
methods for the pool.
The get()
method can be used to retrieve a Shell.Threaded
instance
from the pool, which you should later return to the pool by calling
it's close()
method.
The run(...)
methods, instead of operating on a specific
Shell.Threaded
instance you manage, retrieve an instance from the
pool, proxies the call to that instance's run(...)
method, and
then immediately returns the instance to the pool.
Sound complex? Maybe, but it all comes together so you can sprinkle
Shell.Pool.SU.run(...)
calls throughout as many threads as you wish
(barring of course the main UI thread), running simultaneously or not,
with instances being created, reused, and closed automatically. All of
this without you ever having to worry about managing the instances,
and only having to catch a single Shell.ShellDiedException
.
Examples
It is assumed all the code following is run from a background thread,
such as Thread
, AsyncTask
, or (Job)IntentService
.
Running some basic commands:
try {
List<String> STDOUT = new ArrayList<String>();
List<String> STDERR = new ArrayList<String>();
int exitCode;
exitCode = Shell.Pool.SU.run("echo nobody will ever see this");
// we have only an exit code
exitCode = Shell.Pool.SU.run("ls -l /", STDOUT, STDERR, true);
// exit code, and STDOUT/STDERR output
exitCode = Shell.Pool.SU.run("cat /init.rc", new Shell.OnSyncCommandInputStreamListener() {
@Override
public void onInputStream(InputStream inputStream) {
try {
byte[] buf = new byte[16384];
int r;
while ((r = inputStream.read(buf)) >= 0) {
// do something with buf
// if we decide to abort before r == -1, call inputStream.close()
}
} catch (IOException e) {
// shell died during read
}
}
@Override
public void onSTDERR(String line) {
// hey, some output on STDERR!
}
});
Shell.Pool.SU.run("logcat -d", new Shell.OnSyncCommandLineListener() {
@Override
public void onSTDOUT(String line) {
// hey, some output on STDOUT!
}
@Override
public void onSTDERR(String line) {
// hey, some output on STDERR!
}
});
} catch (Shell.ShellDiedException e) {
// su isn't present, access was denied, or the shell terminated while 'run'ing
}
When running multiple commands in quick succession, it is slightly
cheaper to get()
an instance and close()
it when done, and using
the returned instance. But keep in mind if there is a longer period
between your calls, and another thread wants to call su, the shell you
have not close()
'd yet cannot be reused by that thread:
try {
// get an instance from the pool
Shell.Threaded shell = Shell.Pool.SU.get();
try {
// this is very useful
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
shell.run("echo nobody will ever see this");
}
} finally {
// return the instance to the pool
shell.close();
}
} catch (Shell.ShellDiedException e) {
// su isn't present, access was denied, or the shell terminated while 'run'ing
}
If you're targeting API >= 19 and Java 1.8, you can use
try-with-resources with Shell.Threaded::ac()
, which casts the
instance to a Shell.ThreadedAutoCloseable
:
try {
// get an instance from the pool, automatically returning it at the end of the try block
try (Shell.ThreadedAutoCloseable shell = Shell.Pool.SU.get().ac()) {
// this is very useful
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
shell.run("echo nobody will ever see this");
}
}
} catch (Shell.ShellDiedException e) {
// su isn't present, access was denied, or the shell terminated while 'run'ing
}
libRootJava
For more advanced usages of root, such as running Java/Kotlin code as root directly, please see my libRootJava library.
Annotations
Nullity and thread annotations have recently been added.
Please note that all methods that may be problematic on the UI
thread have been marked as @WorkerThread
. Some of these methods
can be called from the UI thread without issue in specific conditions.
If so, those conditions should be noted in the method's javadoc.
Gradle
Root build.gradle
:
allprojects {
repositories {
...
maven { url 'https://jitpack.io' }
}
}
Module build.gradle
:
dependencies {
implementation 'eu.chainfire:libsuperuser:1.1.1'
}
Top Related Projects
The Magic Mask for Android
Notes about tinkering with Android Project Treble
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot