Pros of react-router

• Larger community and ecosystem, with more resources and third-party integrations
• More advanced features like nested routing and data loading
• Supports both client-side and server-side rendering

Cons of react-router

• More complex API, which can be overwhelming for beginners
• Heavier bundle size due to additional features
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to svelte-routing

Code Comparison

react-router:

import { BrowserRouter, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom";

function App() {
  return (
    <BrowserRouter>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Home</Link>
        <Link to="/about">About</Link>
      </nav>
      <Route exact path="/" component={Home} />
      <Route path="/about" component={About} />
    </BrowserRouter>
  );
}

svelte-routing:

<script>
  import { Router, Link, Route } from "svelte-routing";
</script>

<Router>
  <nav>
    <Link to="/">Home</Link>
    <Link to="/about">About</Link>
  </nav>
  <Route path="/" component={Home} />
  <Route path="/about" component={About} />
</Router>

Both libraries offer similar basic routing functionality, but react-router provides more advanced features and flexibility at the cost of increased complexity. svelte-routing offers a simpler, more lightweight solution that integrates seamlessly with Svelte's component-based architecture.

Pros of reach/router

• More mature and widely adopted in the React ecosystem
• Supports nested routing and relative links
• Provides accessibility features out of the box

Cons of reach/router

• Specifically designed for React, not optimized for Svelte
• Larger bundle size due to additional features
• May require more setup and configuration

Code Comparison

reach/router:

import { Router, Link } from "@reach/router"

const App = () => (
  <Router>
    <Home path="/" />
    <Dashboard path="dashboard" />
  </Router>
)

svelte-routing:

<script>
  import { Router, Link, Route } from "svelte-routing";
</script>

<Router>
  <Route path="/" component={Home} />
  <Route path="dashboard" component={Dashboard} />
</Router>

Key Differences

• Syntax: reach/router uses JSX, while svelte-routing uses Svelte's template syntax
• Integration: svelte-routing is specifically designed for Svelte, offering better integration
• Simplicity: svelte-routing provides a more straightforward API for basic routing needs
• Performance: svelte-routing likely has better performance in Svelte applications due to its lightweight nature and Svelte-specific optimizations

Conclusion

While reach/router offers more features and wider adoption, svelte-routing is the better choice for Svelte projects due to its seamless integration and optimized performance within the Svelte ecosystem.

Pros of wouter

• Framework-agnostic: Works with React, Preact, and other libraries
• Lightweight: Smaller bundle size (1.5kB vs 3kB for svelte-routing)
• More flexible: Supports custom hooks and location strategies

Cons of wouter

• Less Svelte-specific optimizations
• Fewer built-in features compared to svelte-routing
• May require additional configuration for Svelte projects

Code Comparison

svelte-routing:

import { Router, Link, Route } from "svelte-routing";

<Router>
  <nav>
    <Link to="/">Home</Link>
    <Link to="/about">About</Link>
  </nav>
  <Route path="/" component={Home} />
  <Route path="/about" component={About} />
</Router>

wouter:

import { Router, Link, Route } from "wouter";

<Router>
  <nav>
    <Link href="/">Home</Link>
    <Link href="/about">About</Link>
  </nav>
  <Route path="/" component={Home} />
  <Route path="/about" component={About} />
</Router>

Both libraries offer similar syntax for basic routing, with minor differences in attribute names (e.g., to vs href for links). wouter's framework-agnostic approach may require additional setup for Svelte-specific features, while svelte-routing provides a more tailored experience for Svelte applications out of the box.

Pros of TanStack Router

• Framework-agnostic, supporting React, Vue, and Solid.js
• Advanced features like type-safe routing and automatic code-splitting
• Active development and community support

Cons of TanStack Router

• Steeper learning curve due to its more complex API
• Potentially overkill for simple routing needs in Svelte projects
• Less Svelte-specific optimizations and integrations

Code Comparison

svelte-routing:

import { Router, Link, Route } from "svelte-routing";

<Router>
  <nav>
    <Link to="/">Home</Link>
    <Link to="/about">About</Link>
  </nav>
  <Route path="/" component={Home} />
  <Route path="/about" component={About} />
</Router>

TanStack Router:

import { Router, Link, Route, RootRoute } from '@tanstack/router'

const rootRoute = new RootRoute()
const indexRoute = new Route({
  getParentRoute: () => rootRoute,
  path: '/',
  component: Home,
})
const aboutRoute = new Route({
  getParentRoute: () => rootRoute,
  path: '/about',
  component: About,
})

const routeTree = rootRoute.addChildren([indexRoute, aboutRoute])
const router = new Router({ routeTree })