Convert Figma logo to code with AI

FredKSchott logosnowpack

ESM-powered frontend build tool. Instant, lightweight, unbundled development. ✌️

19,480
921
19,480
389
View on GitHubView on NPM

Top Related Projects

vitejs's avatar

vite

67,112

Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!

webpack's avatar

webpack

64,559

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

parcel-bundler's avatar

parcel

43,380

The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀

evanw's avatar

esbuild

37,921

An extremely fast bundler for the web

rollup's avatar

rollup

25,227

Next-generation ES module bundler

vercel's avatar

turborepo

25,992

Build system optimized for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust

Quick Overview

Snowpack is a modern, lightweight build tool for web development. It leverages JavaScript's native module system (ESM) to provide a faster, more efficient development experience compared to traditional bundlers like webpack or Parcel.

Pros

  • Fast development builds with near-instant startup times
  • No bundling required during development, resulting in quicker refresh times
  • Built-in support for TypeScript, JSX, CSS Modules, and more
  • Optimized production builds with tree-shaking and code-splitting

Cons

  • Relatively new compared to more established build tools
  • May require additional configuration for complex projects
  • Some plugins and integrations might not be as mature as those for other build tools
  • Learning curve for developers accustomed to traditional bundling workflows

Code Examples

  1. Basic Snowpack configuration (snowpack.config.js):
module.exports = {
  mount: {
    public: '/',
    src: '/dist',
  },
  plugins: [
    '@snowpack/plugin-react-refresh',
    '@snowpack/plugin-dotenv',
  ],
};
  1. Using Snowpack's built-in optimization for production builds:
// snowpack.config.js
module.exports = {
  optimize: {
    bundle: true,
    minify: true,
    target: 'es2018',
  },
};
  1. Importing CSS as a module in a React component:
import React from 'react';
import styles from './Button.module.css';

function Button({ children }) {
  return <button className={styles.button}>{children}</button>;
}

export default Button;

Getting Started

  1. Install Snowpack:
npm install --save-dev snowpack
  1. Add Snowpack scripts to your package.json:
"scripts": {
  "start": "snowpack dev",
  "build": "snowpack build"
}
  1. Create a basic HTML file (index.html) in your project root:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="utf-8" />
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
  <title>My Snowpack App</title>
</head>
<body>
  <div id="root"></div>
  <script type="module" src="/dist/index.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
  1. Create a JavaScript file (src/index.js) and start developing:
console.log('Welcome to Snowpack!');
  1. Run the development server:
npm start

Competitor Comparisons

vitejs logo

vite

67,112

Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!

Pros of Vite

  • Faster build times and hot module replacement (HMR)
  • Better support for TypeScript and CSS pre-processors out of the box
  • More active development and larger community support

Cons of Vite

  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to ES modules
  • Less flexible configuration options compared to Snowpack
  • Some plugins may not be compatible or require additional setup

Code Comparison

Vite configuration:

// vite.config.js
export default {
  plugins: [react()],
  build: {
    outDir: 'dist',
  }
}

Snowpack configuration:

// snowpack.config.js
module.exports = {
  plugins: ['@snowpack/plugin-react'],
  buildOptions: {
    out: 'dist',
  }
}

Both Vite and Snowpack aim to provide fast, modern development experiences for web applications. Vite generally offers better performance and more built-in features, while Snowpack provides a simpler, more flexible approach. The choice between the two often depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences.

webpack logo

webpack

64,559

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Pros of webpack

  • More mature and widely adopted in the industry
  • Extensive ecosystem of plugins and loaders
  • Supports complex bundling scenarios and code splitting

Cons of webpack

  • Steeper learning curve and more complex configuration
  • Slower build times, especially for larger projects
  • Requires more setup for modern web development features

Code Comparison

webpack configuration:

module.exports = {
  entry: './src/index.js',
  output: {
    filename: 'bundle.js',
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
  },
  module: {
    rules: [
      { test: /\.js$/, use: 'babel-loader' },
    ],
  },
};

Snowpack configuration:

module.exports = {
  mount: {
    public: '/',
    src: '/dist',
  },
  plugins: [
    '@snowpack/plugin-react-refresh',
  ],
};

Snowpack offers a simpler configuration and faster development experience, especially for modern web applications. It leverages native ES modules and provides near-instantaneous startup times. However, webpack remains a powerful and flexible tool for complex bundling needs and has a larger ecosystem of plugins and integrations. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, team expertise, and development priorities.

parcel-bundler logo

parcel

43,380

The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀

Pros of Parcel

  • Zero configuration: Parcel works out of the box without requiring any setup
  • Faster build times: Parcel's build process is generally quicker than Snowpack's
  • Broader asset support: Handles a wide range of file types natively

Cons of Parcel

  • Larger bundle sizes: May produce larger output files compared to Snowpack
  • Less flexibility: Fewer configuration options for advanced use cases
  • Slower hot module replacement (HMR): HMR can be slower than Snowpack's

Code Comparison

Parcel:

// No configuration needed, just run:
parcel index.html

Snowpack:

// snowpack.config.js
module.exports = {
  mount: {
    public: '/',
    src: '/dist',
  },
};

Parcel requires no configuration to get started, while Snowpack typically needs a basic configuration file. Snowpack's approach offers more control but requires additional setup. Parcel's simplicity makes it ideal for quick prototypes or smaller projects, while Snowpack's flexibility suits larger, more complex applications. Both tools aim to simplify the build process, but they achieve this goal through different approaches.

evanw logo

esbuild

37,921

An extremely fast bundler for the web

Pros of esbuild

  • Extremely fast build times due to its Go-based implementation
  • Supports a wide range of modern JavaScript and TypeScript features
  • Minimal configuration required for basic use cases

Cons of esbuild

  • Less mature ecosystem and plugin support compared to Snowpack
  • Primarily focused on bundling, lacking some of Snowpack's development-oriented features
  • May require additional tools for a complete development workflow

Code Comparison

esbuild:

require('esbuild').build({
  entryPoints: ['app.js'],
  bundle: true,
  outfile: 'out.js',
}).catch(() => process.exit(1))

Snowpack:

module.exports = {
  mount: {
    public: '/',
    src: '/dist',
  },
  plugins: ['@snowpack/plugin-react-refresh'],
};

esbuild focuses on simple, fast bundling configuration, while Snowpack provides a more comprehensive development setup out of the box. esbuild excels in build performance and simplicity, whereas Snowpack offers a richer development experience with features like hot module replacement and built-in optimization for production builds. The choice between the two depends on project requirements and developer preferences.

rollup logo

rollup

25,227

Next-generation ES module bundler

Pros of Rollup

  • More mature and established project with a larger ecosystem
  • Excellent tree-shaking capabilities for smaller bundle sizes
  • Supports a wide range of output formats (ES modules, CommonJS, UMD, etc.)

Cons of Rollup

  • Slower build times for large projects compared to Snowpack
  • Requires more configuration and plugins for advanced use cases
  • Less optimized for modern web development workflows

Code Comparison

Rollup configuration:

export default {
  input: 'src/main.js',
  output: {
    file: 'bundle.js',
    format: 'iife'
  }
};

Snowpack configuration:

module.exports = {
  mount: {
    public: '/',
    src: '/dist'
  },
  plugins: ['@snowpack/plugin-react-refresh']
};

Both Rollup and Snowpack are popular build tools for JavaScript projects, but they have different focuses. Rollup is primarily a module bundler, while Snowpack is designed for fast, unbundled development. Rollup excels at creating optimized production builds, while Snowpack offers a more streamlined development experience with instant updates. The choice between the two depends on project requirements and development preferences.

vercel logo

turborepo

25,992

Build system optimized for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust

Pros of Turborepo

  • Optimized for monorepo management with advanced caching and task orchestration
  • Integrates seamlessly with other Vercel tools and services
  • Supports incremental builds, reducing overall build times in large projects

Cons of Turborepo

  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to monorepo architectures
  • May be overkill for smaller projects or single-package repositories
  • Requires more initial setup and configuration compared to Snowpack

Code Comparison

Snowpack configuration:

{
  "scripts": {
    "start": "snowpack dev",
    "build": "snowpack build"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "snowpack": "^3.8.8"
  }
}

Turborepo configuration:

{
  "pipeline": {
    "build": {
      "dependsOn": ["^build"],
      "outputs": ["dist/**", ".next/**"]
    },
    "test": {
      "dependsOn": ["build"],
      "outputs": []
    }
  }
}

While Snowpack focuses on providing a fast, lightweight build tool for modern web applications, Turborepo is designed to optimize workflows in monorepo environments. Snowpack excels in simplicity and quick start times, whereas Turborepo offers powerful features for managing complex, multi-package projects with shared dependencies and build processes.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Update (April 20, 2022): Snowpack is no longer actively maintained and is not recommended for new projects.

Check out Vite for a well-maintained Snowpack alternative.
See also: esbuild, parcel

Snowpack

Snowpack is a lightning-fast frontend build tool, designed to leverage JavaScript's native module system (known as ESM). It is an alternative to heavier, more complex bundlers like webpack or Parcel in your development workflow.

Key Features

💁 More info at the official Snowpack website ➞


Contributor Guidelines: CONTRIBUTING.md
License: MIT

NPM DownloadsLast 30 Days