Convert Figma logo to code with AI

GoogleContainerTools logocontainer-structure-test

validate the structure of your container images

2,316
198
2,316
77

Top Related Projects

container-diff: Diff your Docker containers

🥑 Language focused docker images, minus the operating system.

10,221

Dockerfile linter, validate inline bash, written in Haskell

2,746

Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best-Practice Docker Image, Easy to start

22,801

Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and more

45,415

A tool for exploring each layer in a docker image

Quick Overview

Container Structure Test is a tool developed by Google for validating the structure of Docker images. It allows users to write tests that check the contents and configuration of a container image, ensuring it meets specific requirements before deployment. This tool is particularly useful for maintaining consistency and quality in containerized applications.

Pros

  • Enhances container image quality assurance and consistency
  • Integrates easily into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing
  • Supports multiple test types, including file existence, command output, and metadata checks
  • Provides a declarative YAML format for writing tests, making them easy to read and maintain

Cons

  • Limited to testing static aspects of container images, not runtime behavior
  • May require additional setup and maintenance in existing workflows
  • Learning curve for writing effective tests, especially for complex scenarios
  • Potential for false positives if tests are not carefully designed

Code Examples

  1. File existence check:
schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
fileExistenceTests:
  - name: 'Check if app binary exists'
    path: '/app/myapp'
    shouldExist: true
  1. Command output test:
schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: 'Check Python version'
    command: 'python'
    args: ['--version']
    expectedOutput: ['Python 3\..*']
  1. Metadata test:
schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
metadataTest:
  env:
    - key: 'PATH'
      value: '/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin'
  exposedPorts: ['8080']
  volumes: ['/data']

Getting Started

  1. Install the container-structure-test binary:
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-structure-test/latest/container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && chmod +x container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && sudo mv container-structure-test-linux-amd64 /usr/local/bin/container-structure-test
  1. Create a test file (e.g., test.yaml) with your desired checks.

  2. Run the test against your image:

container-structure-test test --image your-image:tag --config test.yaml

Competitor Comparisons

container-diff: Diff your Docker containers

Pros of container-diff

  • Focuses on analyzing differences between container images
  • Provides detailed file and package comparisons
  • Supports multiple image formats (Docker, OCI, etc.)

Cons of container-diff

  • Limited to comparison and analysis tasks
  • Doesn't provide testing capabilities for container images
  • May require additional tools for comprehensive container validation

Code comparison

container-diff:

container-diff analyze daemon://image1 daemon://image2 --type=file --type=size

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: 2.0.0
fileExistenceTests:
  - name: 'Check if file exists'
    path: '/path/to/file'
    shouldExist: true

container-diff is primarily used for comparing container images and analyzing their differences, while container-structure-test is designed for testing and validating container images against predefined specifications. container-diff excels at identifying changes between images, making it useful for troubleshooting and optimization. On the other hand, container-structure-test provides a more comprehensive testing framework for ensuring container images meet specific requirements and configurations.

While both tools serve different purposes, they can be complementary in a container development and deployment workflow. container-diff helps identify changes and potential issues between image versions, while container-structure-test ensures that images adhere to desired specifications and best practices.

🥑 Language focused docker images, minus the operating system.

Pros of distroless

  • Minimal base images with reduced attack surface
  • Improved security due to fewer installed packages and vulnerabilities
  • Smaller image sizes, leading to faster deployments and reduced storage costs

Cons of distroless

  • Limited debugging capabilities due to lack of shell and common tools
  • Steeper learning curve for developers accustomed to full-featured base images
  • May require additional configuration for certain applications

Code comparison

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: "Check Python version"
    command: "python"
    args: ["--version"]
    expectedOutput: ["Python 3.9.*"]

distroless:

FROM gcr.io/distroless/python3-debian10
COPY --from=build /app /app
WORKDIR /app
CMD ["./my_python_app"]

Summary

distroless focuses on providing minimal, secure base images for containers, while container-structure-test is a tool for validating container structure and content. distroless offers enhanced security and smaller image sizes but may require additional effort for debugging and configuration. container-structure-test provides a framework for testing container images, ensuring they meet specific requirements and configurations.

10,221

Dockerfile linter, validate inline bash, written in Haskell

Pros of hadolint

  • Focused specifically on Dockerfile linting, providing in-depth analysis of Dockerfile best practices
  • Integrates easily with CI/CD pipelines and popular code editors
  • Supports custom rule creation and configuration

Cons of hadolint

  • Limited to Dockerfile analysis, not suitable for testing container images or runtime behavior
  • May produce false positives in some cases, requiring careful configuration

Code comparison

hadolint:

hadolint Dockerfile

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: "Check installed packages"
    command: ["dpkg", "-l"]
    expectedOutput: ["ii  nginx"]

Key differences

container-structure-test offers broader container testing capabilities, including file system checks, metadata validation, and command execution tests. It's more suitable for comprehensive container image validation.

hadolint specializes in Dockerfile linting, focusing on static analysis of Dockerfile syntax and best practices. It's ideal for catching issues early in the container build process.

While container-structure-test is more versatile for overall container testing, hadolint excels in providing detailed Dockerfile-specific recommendations and enforcing best practices during development.

2,746

Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best-Practice Docker Image, Easy to start

Pros of Dockle

  • Focuses on security and best practices for Docker images
  • Provides a comprehensive set of built-in rules for image analysis
  • Offers a simple CLI interface for easy integration into CI/CD pipelines

Cons of Dockle

  • Limited customization options compared to container-structure-test
  • Primarily focused on security and best practices, less suitable for general-purpose testing
  • May require additional tools for more complex container testing scenarios

Code Comparison

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: "Check Python version"
    command: "python"
    args: ["--version"]
    expectedOutput: ["Python 3.8"]

Dockle:

dockle --ignore-unfixed your-image:tag

Summary

container-structure-test is a versatile tool for testing container images with a focus on structure and content validation. It offers extensive customization options and supports various test types.

Dockle, on the other hand, specializes in security and best practices analysis for Docker images. It provides a simpler interface and a set of predefined rules, making it easier to use for security-focused checks but less flexible for general-purpose testing.

Choose container-structure-test for comprehensive, customizable container testing, and Dockle for quick security and best practices assessments of Docker images.

22,801

Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and more

Pros of Trivy

  • Comprehensive vulnerability scanning for containers, filesystems, and Git repositories
  • Supports multiple operating systems and package managers
  • Regularly updated vulnerability database with fast scanning capabilities

Cons of Trivy

  • Focuses primarily on vulnerability scanning, lacking extensive configuration testing
  • May produce more false positives compared to container-structure-test
  • Requires more setup and configuration for custom policies

Code Comparison

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: "Check Python version"
    command: "python"
    args: ["--version"]
    expectedOutput: ["Python 3.8"]

Trivy:

ignore:
  - vulnerability: CVE-2021-12345
    package:
      name: openssl
      version: 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2

Summary

Trivy excels in comprehensive vulnerability scanning across various environments, while container-structure-test focuses on container configuration and behavior testing. Trivy offers broader security coverage but may require more fine-tuning to reduce false positives. container-structure-test provides more precise container-specific tests but lacks extensive vulnerability scanning capabilities.

45,415

A tool for exploring each layer in a docker image

Pros of dive

  • Provides a visual interface for exploring Docker image layers
  • Allows real-time analysis of image efficiency and wasted space
  • Offers a more interactive and user-friendly experience for image inspection

Cons of dive

  • Focused primarily on image layer analysis, not comprehensive testing
  • May require more manual interpretation of results
  • Limited automated testing capabilities compared to container-structure-test

Code Comparison

container-structure-test:

schemaVersion: '2.0.0'
commandTests:
  - name: "Check Python version"
    command: "python"
    args: ["--version"]
    expectedOutput: ["Python 3.8"]

dive:

dive <image-name>
# Interactive CLI interface opens for exploration

Summary

container-structure-test is a robust tool for automated testing of container images, offering a wide range of test types and assertions. It's ideal for CI/CD pipelines and ensuring image consistency.

dive, on the other hand, excels in providing an interactive, visual approach to exploring Docker image layers. It's particularly useful for optimizing image size and understanding layer composition.

While container-structure-test focuses on automated testing and validation, dive offers a more hands-on approach to image analysis and optimization. The choice between the two depends on specific use cases and workflow preferences.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Container Structure Tests

The Container Structure Tests provide a powerful framework to validate the structure of a container image. These tests can be used to check the output of commands in an image, as well as verify metadata and contents of the filesystem.

Tests can be run either through a standalone binary, or through a Docker image.

Note: container-structure-test is not an officially supported Google project, and is currently in maintainence mode. Contributions are still welcome!

Installation

OS X

Install via brew:

$ brew install container-structure-test
curl -LO https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/container-structure-test/releases/latest/download/container-structure-test-darwin-arm64 && chmod +x container-structure-test-darwin-amd64 && sudo mv container-structure-test-darwin-amd64 /usr/local/bin/container-structure-test

Linux

curl -LO https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/container-structure-test/releases/latest/download/container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && chmod +x container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && sudo mv container-structure-test-linux-amd64 /usr/local/bin/container-structure-test

If you want to avoid using sudo:

curl -LO https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/container-structure-test/releases/latest/download/container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && chmod +x container-structure-test-linux-amd64 && mkdir -p $HOME/bin && export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin && mv container-structure-test-linux-amd64 $HOME/bin/container-structure-test

[!warning] Container builds are currently not updated with new releases

Additionally, a container image for running tests through Google Cloud Builder can be found at gcr.io/gcp-runtimes/container-structure-test:latest.

Setup

To use container structure tests to validate your containers, you'll need the following:

  • The container structure test binary or docker image
  • A container image to test against
  • A test .yaml or .json file with user defined structure tests to run inside of the specified container image

Note that the test framework looks for the provided image in the local Docker daemon (if it is not provided as a tar). The --pull flag can optionally be provided to force a pull of a remote image before running the tests.

Example Run

An example run of the test framework:

container-structure-test test --image gcr.io/registry/image:latest \
--config config.yaml

Tests within this framework are specified through a YAML or JSON config file, which is provided to the test driver via a CLI flag. Multiple config files may be specified in a single test run. The config file will be loaded in by the test driver, which will execute the tests in order. Within this config file, four types of tests can be written:

  • Command Tests (testing output/error of a specific command issued)
  • File Existence Tests (making sure a file is, or isn't, present in the file system of the image)
  • File Content Tests (making sure files in the file system of the image contain, or do not contain, specific contents)
  • Metadata Test, singular (making sure certain container metadata is correct)

Command Tests

Command tests ensure that certain commands run properly in the target image. Regexes can be used to check for expected or excluded strings in both stdout and stderr. Additionally, any number of flags can be passed to the argument as normal. Each command in the setup section will run in a separate container and then commits a modified image to be the new base image for the test run.

Supported Fields:

NOTE: schemaVersion must be specified in all container-structure-test yamls. The current version is 2.0.0.

  • Name (string, required): The name of the test
  • Setup ([][]string, optional): A list of commands (each with optional flags) to run before the actual command under test.
  • Teardown ([][]string, optional): A list of commands (each with optional flags) to run after the actual command under test.
  • Command (string, required): The command to run in the test.
  • Args ([]string, optional): The arguments to pass to the command.
  • EnvVars ([]EnvVar, optional): A list of environment variables to set for the individual test. See the Environment Variables section for more info.
  • Expected Output ([]string, optional): List of regexes that should match the stdout from running the command.
  • Excluded Output ([]string, optional): List of regexes that should not match the stdout from running the command.
  • Expected Error ([]string, optional): List of regexes that should match the stderr from running the command.
  • Excluded Error ([]string, optional): List of regexes that should not match the stderr from running the command.
  • Exit Code (int, optional): Exit code that the command should exit with.

Example:

commandTests:
  - name: "gunicorn flask"
    setup: [["virtualenv", "/env"], ["pip", "install", "gunicorn", "flask"]]
    command: "which"
    args: ["gunicorn"]
    expectedOutput: ["/env/bin/gunicorn"]
  - name:  "apt-get upgrade"
    command: "apt-get"
    args: ["-qqs", "upgrade"]
    excludedOutput: [".*Inst.*Security.* | .*Security.*Inst.*"]
    excludedError: [".*Inst.*Security.* | .*Security.*Inst.*"]

Depending on your command the argument section can get quite long. Thus, you can make use of YAML's list style option for separation of arguments and the literal style option to preserve newlines like so:

commandTests:
  - name: "say hello world"
    command: "bash"
    args:
      - -c
      - |
         echo hello &&
         echo world

Image Entrypoint

To avoid unexpected behavior and output when running commands in the containers, all entrypoints are overwritten by default. If your entrypoint is necessary for the structure of your container, use the setup field to call any scripts or commands manually before running the tests.

commandTests:
  ...
  setup: [["my_image_entrypoint.sh"]]
  ...

Intermediate Artifacts

Each command test run creates either a container (with the docker driver) or tar artifact (with the tar driver). By default, these are deleted after the test run finishes, but the --save flag can optionally be passed to keep these around. This would normally be used for debugging purposes.

File Existence Tests

File existence tests check to make sure a specific file (or directory) exist within the file system of the image. No contents of the files or directories are checked. These tests can also be used to ensure a file or directory is not present in the file system.

Supported Fields:

  • Name (string, required): The name of the test
  • Path (string, required): Path to the file or directory under test
  • ShouldExist (boolean, required): Whether or not the specified file or directory should exist in the file system
  • Permissions (string, optional): The expected Unix permission string (e.g. drwxrwxrwx) of the files or directory.
  • Uid (int, optional): The expected Unix user ID of the owner of the file or directory.
  • Gid (int, optional): The expected Unix group ID of the owner of the file or directory.
  • IsExecutableBy (string, optional): Checks if file is executable by a given user. One of owner, group, other or any

Example:

fileExistenceTests:
- name: 'Root'
  path: '/'
  shouldExist: true
  permissions: '-rw-r--r--'
  uid: 1000
  gid: 1000
  isExecutableBy: 'group'

File Content Tests

File content tests open a file on the file system and check its contents. These tests assume the specified file is a file, and that it exists (if unsure about either or these criteria, see the above File Existence Tests section). Regexes can again be used to check for expected or excluded content in the specified file.

Supported Fields:

  • Name (string, required): The name of the test
  • Path (string, required): Path to the file under test
  • ExpectedContents (string[], optional): List of regexes that should match the contents of the file
  • ExcludedContents (string[], optional): List of regexes that should not match the contents of the file

Example:

fileContentTests:
- name: 'Debian Sources'
  path: '/etc/apt/sources.list'
  expectedContents: ['.*httpredir\.debian\.org.*']
  excludedContents: ['.*gce_debian_mirror.*']

Metadata Test

The Metadata test ensures the container is configured correctly. All of these checks are optional.

Supported Fields:

  • EnvVars ([]EnvVar): A list of environment variable key/value pairs that should be set in the container. isRegex (optional) interpretes the value as regex.
  • UnboundEnvVars ([]EnvVar): A list of environment variable keys that should NOT be set in the container.
  • Labels ([]Label): A list of image labels key/value pairs that should be set on the container. isRegex (optional) interpretes the value as regex.
  • Entrypoint ([]string): The entrypoint of the container.
  • Cmd ([]string): The CMD specified in the container.
  • Exposed Ports ([]string): The ports exposed in the container.
  • Unexposed Ports ([]string): The ports NOT exposed in the container.
  • Volumes ([]string): The volumes exposed in the container.
  • UnmountedVolumes ([]string): The volumes NOT exposed in the container.
  • Workdir (string): The default working directory of the container.
  • User (user): The default user of the container.

Example:

metadataTest:
  envVars:
    - key: foo
      value: baz
  labels:
    - key: 'com.example.vendor'
      value: 'ACME Incorporated'
    - key: 'build-date'
      value: '^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{6}$'
      isRegex: true
  exposedPorts: ["8080", "2345"]
  volumes: ["/test"]
  entrypoint: []
  cmd: ["/bin/bash"]
  workdir: "/app"
  user: "luke"

License Tests

License tests check a list of copyright files and makes sure all licenses are allowed at Google. By default it will look at where Debian lists all copyright files, but can also look at an arbitrary list of files.

Supported Fields:

  • Debian (bool, required): If the image is based on Debian, check where Debian lists all licenses.
  • Files (string[], optional): A list of other files to check.

Example:

licenseTests:
- debian: true
  files: ["/foo/bar", "/baz/bat"]

Environment Variables

A list of environment variables can optionally be specified as part of the test setup. They can either be set up globally (for all test runs), or test-local as part of individual command test runs (see the Command Tests section above). Each environment variable is specified as a key-value pair. Unix-style environment variable substitution is supported.

To specify, add a section like this to your config:

globalEnvVars:
  - key: "VIRTUAL_ENV"
    value: "/env"
  - key: "PATH"
    value: "/env/bin:$PATH"

Additional Options

The following fields are used to control various options and flags that may be desirable to set for the running container used to perform a structure test against an image. This allows an image author to validate certain runtime behavior that cannot be modified in the image-under-test such as running a container with an alternative user/UID or mounting a volume.

Note that these options are currently only supported with the docker driver.

The following list of options are currently supported:

containerRunOptions:
  user: "root"                  # set the --user/-u flag
  privileged: true              # set the --privileged flag (default: false)
  allocateTty: true             # set the --tty flag (default: false)
  envFile: path/to/.env         # load environment variables from file and pass to container (equivalent to --env-file)
  envVars:                      # if not empty, read each envVar from the environment and pass to test (equivalent to --env/e)
    - SECRET_KEY_FOO
    - OTHER_SECRET_BAR
  capabilities:                 # Add list of Linux capabilities (--cap-add)
    - NET_BIND_SERVICE
  bindMounts:                   # Bind mount a volume (--volume, -v)
    - /etc/example/dir:/etc/dir

Running Tests On Google Cloud Build

This tool is released as a builder image, tagged as gcr.io/gcp-runtimes/container-structure-test, so you can specify tests in your cloudbuild.yaml:


steps:
# Build an image.
- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/docker'
  args: ['build', '-t', 'gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/image', '.']
# Test the image.
- name: 'gcr.io/gcp-runtimes/container-structure-test'
  args: ['test', '--image', 'gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/image', '--config', 'test_config.yaml']

# Push the image.
images: ['gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/image']

Running File Tests Without Docker

Container images can be represented in multiple formats, and the Docker image is just one of them. At their core, images are just a series of layers, each of which is a tarball, and so can be interacted with without a working Docker daemon. While running command tests currently requires a functioning Docker daemon on the host machine, File Existence/Content tests do not. This can be useful when dealing with images which have been docker exported or saved in a different image format than the Docker format, or when you're simply trying to run structure tests in an environment where Docker can't be installed.

To run tests without using a Docker daemon, users can specify a different "driver" to use in the tests, with the --driver flag.

An example test run with a different driver looks like:

container-structure-test test --driver tar --image gcr.io/registry/image:latest \
--config config.yaml

The currently supported drivers in the framework are:

  • docker: the default driver. Supports all tests, and uses the Docker daemon on the host to run them. You can set the runtime to use (by example runsc to run with gVisor) using --runtime flag.
  • tar: a tar driver, which extracts an image filesystem to wherever tests are running, and runs file/metadata tests against it. Does not support command tests.

Running Structure Tests Through Bazel

Structure tests can also be run through bazel.

With Bazel 6 and bzlmod, just see https://registry.bazel.build/modules/container_structure_test. Otherwise, load the rule and its dependencies in your WORKSPACE, see bazel/test/WORKSPACE.bazel in this repo.

Load the rule definition in your BUILD file and declare a container_structure_test target, passing in your image and config file as parameters:

load("@container_structure_test//:defs.bzl", "container_structure_test")

container_structure_test(
    name = "hello_test",
    configs = ["testdata/hello.yaml"],
    image = ":hello",
)

Flags:

container-structure-test test -h

  -c, --config stringArray             test config files
      --default-image-tag string       default image tag to used when loading images to the daemon. required when --image-from-oci-layout refers to a oci layout lacking the reference annotation.
  -d, --driver string                  driver to use when running tests (default "docker")
  -f, --force                          force run of host driver (without user prompt)
  -h, --help                           help for test
  -i, --image string                   path to test image
      --image-from-oci-layout string   path to the oci layout to test against
      --metadata string                path to image metadata file
      --no-color                       no color in the output
  -o, --output string                  output format for the test report (available format: text, json, junit) (default "text")
      --platform string                Set platform if host is multi-platform capable (default "linux/amd64")
      --pull                           force a pull of the image before running tests
  -q, --quiet                          flag to suppress output
      --runtime string                 runtime to use with docker driver
      --save                           preserve created containers after test run
      --test-report string             generate test report and write it to specified file (supported format: json, junit; default: json)

See this example repo for a full working example.

Output formats

Reports are generated using one of the following output formats: text, json or junit. Formats like json and junit can also be used to write a report to a specified file using the --test-report.

Output samples

Text

====================================
====== Test file: config.yaml ======
====================================
=== RUN: File Existence Test: whoami
--- PASS
duration: 0s
=== RUN: Metadata Test
--- PASS
duration: 0s

=====================================
============== RESULTS ==============
=====================================
Passes:      2
Failures:    0
Duration:    0s
Total tests: 2

PASS

JSON

The following sample has been formatted.

{
  "Pass": 2,
  "Fail": 0,
  "Total": 2,
  "Duration": 0,
  "Results": [
    {
      "Name": "File Existence Test: whoami",
      "Pass": true,
      "Duration": 0
    },
    {
      "Name": "Metadata Test",
      "Pass": true,
      "Duration": 0
    }
  ]
}

JUnit

The following sample has been formatted.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<testsuites failures="0" tests="2" time="0">
  <testsuite>
    <testcase name="File Existence Test: whoami" time="0"/>
    <testcase name="Metadata Test" time="0"/>
  </testsuite>
</testsuites>