angular-example-app

Pros of angular

• Official Angular framework repository with comprehensive documentation
• Larger community support and more frequent updates
• Contains core Angular libraries and tools for development

Cons of angular

• More complex and overwhelming for beginners
• Lacks practical, ready-to-use application examples
• Steeper learning curve for new developers

Code comparison

angular-example-app:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-hero-detail',
  templateUrl: './hero-detail.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./hero-detail.component.scss']
})
export class HeroDetailComponent implements OnInit {
  @Input() hero: Hero;

angular:

@Component({
  selector: 'example-component',
  template: `<h1>Hello, {{name}}!</h1>`,
  styles: [`h1 { font-family: Lato; }`]
})
export class ExampleComponent  {
  @Input() name: string;

The angular-example-app repository provides a more comprehensive, real-world example of component implementation, while the angular repository showcases a simpler, bare-bones component structure. This difference highlights how angular-example-app is more focused on practical application, whereas angular serves as the foundation for Angular development.

Pros of angular-ngrx-material-starter

• Implements NgRx for state management, providing a more robust solution for complex applications
• Includes a wider range of Angular Material components and features
• Offers more comprehensive documentation and a detailed wiki

Cons of angular-ngrx-material-starter

• Higher learning curve due to NgRx integration
• More complex project structure, which may be overwhelming for beginners
• Less focus on internationalization (i18n) compared to angular-example-app

Code Comparison

angular-ngrx-material-starter:

@Effect()
login = this.actions$.pipe(
  ofType(AuthActionTypes.LOGIN),
  map((action: Login) => action.payload),
  exhaustMap((auth) =>
    this.authService.login(auth).pipe(
      map(user => new LoginSuccess({ user })),
      catchError(error => of(new LoginFailure({ error })))
    )
  )
);

angular-example-app:

login(email: string, password: string): Observable<User> {
  return this.http.post<User>(`${environment.apiUrl}/login`, { email, password })
    .pipe(
      tap(user => this.setSession(user)),
      shareReplay()
    );
}

The code snippets demonstrate the difference in state management approaches. angular-ngrx-material-starter uses NgRx effects for handling authentication, while angular-example-app uses a more straightforward service-based approach.

Pros of angular-realworld-example-app

• Implements a real-world application (Medium clone) with more complex features
• Follows RealWorld spec, making it easier to compare with other framework implementations
• Includes authentication and API integration

Cons of angular-realworld-example-app

• Less focus on Angular-specific best practices and optimizations
• Fewer examples of advanced Angular features like custom directives or pipes
• Less comprehensive documentation and comments in the codebase

Code Comparison

angular-realworld-example-app:

export class ArticleListComponent implements OnInit {
  constructor(
    private articlesService: ArticlesService,
    private route: ActivatedRoute
  ) {}

  ngOnInit() {
    this.route.data.subscribe(
      (data: { articles: Article[] }) => {
        this.articles = data.articles;
      }
    );
  }
}

angular-example-app:

export class HeroesComponent implements OnInit {
  constructor(
    private heroService: HeroService,
    private translateService: TranslateService
  ) {}

  ngOnInit() {
    this.getHeroes();
    this.translateService.onLangChange.subscribe(() => {
      this.getHeroes();
    });
  }
}

The angular-realworld-example-app focuses on implementing a real-world application with API integration, while angular-example-app emphasizes Angular-specific features like internationalization. Both examples demonstrate proper use of dependency injection and component lifecycle hooks.

Pros of ngx-admin

• More comprehensive UI components and layouts
• Better suited for large-scale enterprise applications
• Includes advanced features like authentication and role-based access control

Cons of ngx-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• May be overkill for smaller projects or learning purposes
• Less focus on best practices and clean code structure

Code Comparison

ngx-admin:

@Component({
  selector: 'ngx-dashboard',
  styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.scss'],
  templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html',
})
export class DashboardComponent implements OnDestroy {
  private alive = true;

angular-example-app:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-heroes',
  templateUrl: './heroes.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./heroes.component.scss']
})
export class HeroesComponent implements OnInit {
  heroes: Hero[];

ngx-admin uses a more complex component structure with lifecycle hooks and private properties, while angular-example-app focuses on simplicity and readability. The ngx-admin example shows a dashboard component, indicating its focus on admin interfaces, whereas angular-example-app demonstrates a basic heroes component, highlighting its educational nature.

Both repositories serve different purposes: ngx-admin is a feature-rich admin template for building large-scale applications, while angular-example-app is a simpler, more educational project focused on Angular fundamentals and best practices. Choose based on your project requirements and learning goals.

Pros of Angular-JumpStart

• More comprehensive documentation and setup instructions
• Includes a basic backend server for API simulation
• Focuses on core Angular concepts without additional libraries

Cons of Angular-JumpStart

• Less extensive feature set compared to angular-example-app
• Fewer examples of advanced Angular techniques
• Simpler UI design, which may be less visually appealing

Code Comparison

Angular-JumpStart:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-customers',
  templateUrl: './customers.component.html'
})
export class CustomersComponent implements OnInit {
  title: string;
  people: any[] = [];

angular-example-app:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-heroes',
  templateUrl: './heroes.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./heroes.component.scss'],
  changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
})
export class HeroesComponent implements OnInit {
  heroes$: Observable<Hero[]>;

The Angular-JumpStart example shows a simpler component structure, while the angular-example-app demonstrates more advanced techniques like change detection strategy and observables.

Angular-JumpStart is ideal for beginners looking to grasp fundamental Angular concepts, offering a straightforward approach with basic examples. On the other hand, angular-example-app provides a more feature-rich environment, showcasing advanced Angular practices and a polished UI, making it suitable for developers seeking to explore more complex Angular applications.