CoreStore
Unleashing the real power of Core Data with the elegance and safety of Swift
Top Related Projects
Realm is a mobile database: a replacement for Core Data & SQLite
Write great asynchronous code in Swift using futures and promises
A toolkit for SQLite databases, with a focus on application development
A type-safe, Swift-language layer over SQLite3.
A Cocoa / Objective-C wrapper around SQLite
Vapor ORM (queries, models, and relations) for NoSQL and SQL databases
Quick Overview
CoreStore is a powerful and elegant Swift framework for handling Core Data operations. It provides a high-level, expressive API that simplifies complex Core Data tasks, making it easier for developers to work with persistent data in iOS and macOS applications.
Pros
- Intuitive and type-safe API for Core Data operations
- Supports multiple persistent stores and configurations
- Provides advanced features like thread-safe transactions and observers
- Excellent documentation and comprehensive examples
Cons
- Steeper learning curve for developers new to Core Data
- May be overkill for simple data persistence needs
- Requires Swift knowledge, not suitable for Objective-C projects
- Limited community support compared to Apple's Core Data framework
Code Examples
Creating a new entity:
let person = try dataStack.perform(synchronous: { transaction -> Person in
let person = transaction.create(Into<Person>())
person.name = "John Doe"
person.age = 30
return person
})
Fetching entities:
let people = try dataStack.perform(synchronous: { transaction in
let people = try transaction.fetchAll(From<Person>()
.where(\.age > 18)
.orderBy(.ascending(\.name)))
return people
})
Updating an entity:
try dataStack.perform(synchronous: { transaction in
let person = try transaction.fetchOne(From<Person>().where(\.name == "John Doe"))
person?.age = 31
})
Getting Started
- Install CoreStore using Swift Package Manager by adding it to your
Package.swift
file:
dependencies: [
.package(url: "https://github.com/JohnEstropia/CoreStore.git", from: "9.0.0")
]
- Import CoreStore in your Swift file:
import CoreStore
- Set up a
DataStack
:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyDataModel",
bundle: Bundle.main
)
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait()
Now you're ready to use CoreStore in your project!
Competitor Comparisons
Realm is a mobile database: a replacement for Core Data & SQLite
Pros of Realm
- Faster performance for large datasets and complex queries
- Cross-platform support (iOS, Android, and more)
- Real-time synchronization capabilities
Cons of Realm
- Steeper learning curve for developers familiar with Core Data
- Less flexibility in data model design due to stricter requirements
- Potential migration challenges when updating schema
Code Comparison
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyModel"
)
let object = try dataStack.perform(
synchronous: { transaction in
let person = transaction.create(Into<Person>())
person.name = "John"
return person
}
)
Realm:
let realm = try! Realm()
try! realm.write {
let person = Person()
person.name = "John"
realm.add(person)
}
Both CoreStore and Realm offer robust solutions for data persistence in iOS applications. CoreStore provides a more familiar API for developers experienced with Core Data, while Realm offers superior performance and cross-platform capabilities. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements, team expertise, and scalability needs.
Write great asynchronous code in Swift using futures and promises
Pros of BrightFutures
- Focuses on futures and promises, providing a more specialized solution for asynchronous programming
- Lightweight and easy to integrate into existing projects
- Supports both Swift and Objective-C
Cons of BrightFutures
- Limited to futures and promises, not a comprehensive data management solution
- Requires additional libraries or frameworks for more complex data persistence tasks
- Less active development and community support compared to CoreStore
Code Comparison
BrightFutures:
let future = Future<String, NoError> { complete in
DispatchQueue.main.async {
complete(.success("Hello, World!"))
}
}
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyStore"
)
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait()
BrightFutures focuses on handling asynchronous operations using futures and promises, while CoreStore provides a comprehensive solution for Core Data stack management and CRUD operations. BrightFutures is more suitable for projects requiring lightweight asynchronous programming, whereas CoreStore is better suited for applications with complex data persistence needs and Core Data integration.
A toolkit for SQLite databases, with a focus on application development
Pros of GRDB.swift
- Direct SQLite access, offering more flexibility and control over database operations
- Supports both Swift structs and classes, providing greater versatility in data modeling
- Offers a query interface that closely resembles SQL, making it easier for developers familiar with SQL
Cons of GRDB.swift
- Steeper learning curve compared to CoreStore's more abstracted approach
- Less automatic handling of Core Data-like features such as relationships and migrations
- May require more manual configuration and setup for complex data models
Code Comparison
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyStore"
)
try dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(fileName: "MyStore.sqlite")
)
GRDB.swift:
let dbQueue = try DatabaseQueue(path: "/path/to/database.sqlite")
try dbQueue.write { db in
try db.create(table: "users") { t in
t.column("id", .integer).primaryKey()
t.column("name", .text)
}
}
Both libraries provide powerful tools for managing databases in Swift applications. CoreStore offers a higher level of abstraction and seamless integration with Core Data, while GRDB.swift provides more direct control over SQLite operations and a SQL-like query interface. The choice between them depends on the specific needs of the project and the developer's familiarity with Core Data or SQLite.
A type-safe, Swift-language layer over SQLite3.
Pros of SQLite.swift
- Lightweight and focused specifically on SQLite operations
- Provides a type-safe layer over SQLite with Swift-friendly syntax
- Supports custom functions and aggregates for advanced SQLite usage
Cons of SQLite.swift
- Limited to SQLite database operations only
- Lacks higher-level abstractions for complex data modeling
- May require more manual management of database schema and migrations
Code Comparison
SQLite.swift:
let db = try Connection("path/to/db.sqlite3")
try db.run("CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT)")
try db.run("INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES (?)", "Alice")
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack(
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<User>("User")
]
)
)
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait()
Summary
SQLite.swift is a lightweight wrapper for SQLite operations in Swift, offering type-safe queries and low-level database control. CoreStore, on the other hand, provides a higher-level abstraction for Core Data, simplifying complex data modeling and persistence tasks. SQLite.swift is ideal for projects requiring direct SQLite access, while CoreStore is better suited for applications needing robust data management features built on top of Core Data.
A Cocoa / Objective-C wrapper around SQLite
Pros of FMDB
- Lightweight and simple to use, focusing solely on SQLite database operations
- Provides direct SQL query execution, offering more control over database interactions
- Suitable for projects that require low-level database access or have specific SQLite requirements
Cons of FMDB
- Lacks high-level abstractions and object-relational mapping (ORM) features
- Requires manual management of database schema and migrations
- Less integrated with Core Data and iOS/macOS ecosystem compared to CoreStore
Code Comparison
FMDB:
let db = FMDatabase(path: "path/to/database.sqlite")
db.open()
db.executeUpdate("INSERT INTO users (name, age) VALUES (?, ?)", withArgumentsIn: ["John", 30])
let results = db.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM users", withArgumentsIn: nil)
db.close()
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack()
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait(SQLiteStore(fileName: "database.sqlite"))
try dataStack.perform(synchronous: { transaction in
let user = transaction.create(Into<User>())
user.name = "John"
user.age = 30
})
let users = try dataStack.fetchAll(From<User>())
Vapor ORM (queries, models, and relations) for NoSQL and SQL databases
Pros of Fluent
- Designed specifically for server-side Swift and Vapor framework
- Supports multiple databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite)
- Provides a powerful query builder for complex database operations
Cons of Fluent
- Steeper learning curve for developers new to Vapor ecosystem
- Limited support for Core Data-specific features
- May require more manual configuration for complex data models
Code Comparison
CoreStore:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyModel"
)
let object = try dataStack.perform(
synchronous: { transaction in
let person = transaction.create(Into<Person>())
person.name = "John"
return person
}
)
Fluent:
let person = Person(name: "John")
try await person.save(on: database)
let savedPerson = try await Person.query(on: database)
.filter(\.$name == "John")
.first()
Summary
CoreStore is tailored for iOS/macOS development with Core Data, offering a simpler API for common tasks. Fluent, on the other hand, is designed for server-side Swift and provides more flexibility for different database backends. The choice between them depends on the specific project requirements and the target platform.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Unleashing the real power of Core Data with the elegance and safety of Swift
Dependency managers
Contact
- Swift 5.9: iOS 13+ / macOS 10.15+ / watchOS 7.4+ / tvOS 13.0+
- Previously supported Swift versions: Swift 5.4, Swift 5.3, Swift 5.7
Upgrading from previous CoreStore versions? Check out the ð features and make sure to read the Change logs.
CoreStore is part of the Swift Source Compatibility projects.
Contents
- TL;DR (a.k.a. sample codes)
- Why use CoreStore?
- Architecture
- CoreStore Tutorials (All of these have demos in the Demo app project!)
- Setting up
- Migrations
- Saving and processing transactions
- Importing data
- Fetching and querying
- Logging and error reporting
- Observing changes and notifications
- Type-safe
CoreStoreObject
s - Reactive Programming
- ðSwiftUI Utilities
- ðSwiftUI Views`
- ð
ListReader
- ð
ObjectReader
- ð
- ðSwiftUI Property Wrappers
- ð
ListState
- ð
ObjectState
- ð
- ðSwiftUI Extensions
- ð
ForEach
- ð
- ðSwiftUI Views`
- Roadmap
- Installation
- Changesets
- Contact
- Who uses CoreStore?
- License
TL;DR (a.k.a. sample codes)
Pure-Swift models:
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("name")
var name: String = ""
@Field.Relationship("pets", inverse: \Dog.$master)
var pets: Set<Dog>
}
(Classic NSManagedObject
s also supported)
Setting-up with progressive migration support:
dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyStore",
migrationChain: ["MyStore", "MyStoreV2", "MyStoreV3"]
)
Adding a store:
dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(fileName: "MyStore.sqlite"),
completion: { (result) -> Void in
// ...
}
)
Starting transactions:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let person = transaction.create(Into<Person>())
person.name = "John Smith"
person.age = 42
},
completion: { (result) -> Void in
switch result {
case .success: print("success!")
case .failure(let error): print(error)
}
}
)
Fetching objects (simple):
let people = try dataStack.fetchAll(From<Person>())
Fetching objects (complex):
let people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<Person>()
.where(\.age > 30),
.orderBy(.ascending(\.name), .descending(.\age)),
.tweak({ $0.includesPendingChanges = false })
)
Querying values:
let maxAge = try dataStack.queryValue(
From<Person>()
.select(Int.self, .maximum(\.age))
)
But really, there's a reason I wrote this huge README. Read up on the details!
Check out the Demo app project for sample codes as well!
Why use CoreStore?
CoreStore was (and is) heavily shaped by real-world needs of developing data-dependent apps. It enforces safe and convenient Core Data usage while letting you take advantage of the industry's encouraged best practices.
Features
- ðSwiftUI and Combine API utilities.
ListPublisher
s andObjectPublisher
s now have their@ListState
and@ObjectState
SwiftUI property wrappers. CombinePublisher
s are also available through theListPublisher.reactive
,ObjectPublisher.reactive
, andDataStack.reactive
namespaces. - Backwards-portable DiffableDataSources implementation!
UITableViews
andUICollectionViews
now have a new ally:ListPublisher
s provide diffable snapshots that make reloading animations very easy and very safe. Say goodbye toUITableViews
andUICollectionViews
reload errors! - ðTight design around Swiftâs code elegance and type safety. CoreStore fully utilizes Swift's community-driven language features.
- ð¦Safer concurrency architecture. CoreStore makes it hard to fall into common concurrency mistakes. The main
NSManagedObjectContext
is strictly read-only, while all updates are done through serial transactions. (See Saving and processing transactions) - ðClean fetching and querying API. Fetching objects is easy, but querying for raw aggregates (
min
,max
, etc.) and raw property values is now just as convenient. (See Fetching and querying) - ðType-safe, easy to configure observers. You don't have to deal with the burden of setting up
NSFetchedResultsController
s and KVO. As an added bonus, list and object observable types all support multiple observers. This means you can have multiple view controllers efficiently share a single resource! (See Observing changes and notifications) - ð¥Efficient importing utilities. Map your entities once with their corresponding import source (JSON for example), and importing from transactions becomes elegant. Uniquing is also done with an efficient find-and-replace algorithm. (See Importing data)
- ðSay goodbye to .xcdatamodeld files! While CoreStore supports
NSManagedObject
s, it offersCoreStoreObject
whose subclasses can declare type-safe properties all in Swift code without the need to maintain separate resource files for the models. As bonus, these special properties support custom types, and can be used to create type-safe keypaths and queries. (See Type-safeCoreStoreObject
s) - ðProgressive migrations. No need to think how to migrate from all previous model versions to your latest model. Just tell the
DataStack
the sequence of version strings (MigrationChain
s) and CoreStore will automatically use progressive migrations when needed. (See Migrations) - Easier custom migrations. Say goodbye to .xcmappingmodel files; CoreStore can now infer entity mappings when possible, while still allowing an easy way to write custom mappings. (See Migrations)
- ðPlug-in your own logging framework. Although a default logger is built-in, all logging, asserting, and error reporting can be funneled to
CoreStoreLogger
protocol implementations. (See Logging and error reporting) - âHeavy support for multiple persistent stores per data stack. CoreStore lets you manage separate stores in a single
DataStack
, just the way .xcdatamodeld configurations are designed to. CoreStore will also manage one stack by default, but you can create and manage as many as you need. (See Setting up) - ð¯Free to name entities and their class names independently. CoreStore gets around a restriction with other Core Data wrappers where the entity name should be the same as the
NSManagedObject
subclass name. CoreStore loads entity-to-class mappings from the managed object model file, so you can assign independent names for the entities and their class names. - ðFull Documentation. No magic here; all public classes, functions, properties, etc. have detailed Apple Docs. This README also introduces a lot of concepts and explains a lot of CoreStore's behavior.
- â¹ï¸Informative (and pretty) logs. All CoreStore and Core Data-related types now have very informative and pretty print outputs! (See Logging and error reporting)
- ð¡More extensive Unit Tests. Extending CoreStore is safe without having to worry about breaking old behavior.
Have ideas that may benefit other Core Data users? Feature Requests are welcome!
Architecture
For maximum safety and performance, CoreStore will enforce coding patterns and practices it was designed for. (Don't worry, it's not as scary as it sounds.) But it is advisable to understand the "magic" of CoreStore before you use it in your apps.
If you are already familiar with the inner workings of CoreData, here is a mapping of CoreStore
abstractions:
Core Data | CoreStore |
---|---|
NSPersistentContainer (.xcdatamodeld file) | DataStack |
NSPersistentStoreDescription ("Configuration"s in the .xcdatamodeld file) | StorageInterface implementations( InMemoryStore , SQLiteStore ) |
NSManagedObjectContext | BaseDataTransaction subclasses( SynchronousDataTransaction , AsynchronousDataTransaction , UnsafeDataTransaction ) |
A lot of Core Data wrapper libraries set up their NSManagedObjectContext
s this way:
Nesting saves from child context to the root context ensures maximum data integrity between contexts without blocking the main queue. But in reality, merging contexts is still by far faster than saving contexts. CoreStore's DataStack
takes the best of both worlds by treating the main NSManagedObjectContext
as a read-only context (or "viewContext"), and only allows changes to be made within transactions on the child context:
This allows for a butter-smooth main thread, while still taking advantage of safe nested contexts.
Setting up
The simplest way to initialize CoreStore is to add a default store to the default stack:
try CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack.addStorageAndWait()
This one-liner does the following:
- Triggers the lazy-initialization of
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack
with a defaultDataStack
- Sets up the stack's
NSPersistentStoreCoordinator
, the root savingNSManagedObjectContext
, and the read-only mainNSManagedObjectContext
- Adds an
SQLiteStore
in the "Application Support/" directory (or the "Caches/" directory on tvOS) with the file name "[App bundle name].sqlite" - Creates and returns the
NSPersistentStore
instance on success, or anNSError
on failure
For most cases, this configuration is enough as it is. But for more hardcore settings, refer to this extensive example:
let dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyModel", // loads from the "MyModel.xcdatamodeld" file
migrationChain: ["MyStore", "MyStoreV2", "MyStoreV3"] // model versions for progressive migrations
)
let migrationProgress = dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(
fileURL: sqliteFileURL, // set the target file URL for the sqlite file
configuration: "Config2", // use entities from the "Config2" configuration in the .xcdatamodeld file
localStorageOptions: .recreateStoreOnModelMismatch // if migration paths cannot be resolved, recreate the sqlite file
),
completion: { (result) -> Void in
switch result {
case .success(let storage):
print("Successfully added sqlite store: \(storage)")
case .failure(let error):
print("Failed adding sqlite store with error: \(error)")
}
}
)
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = dataStack // pass the dataStack to CoreStore for easier access later on
ð¡If you have never heard of "Configurations", you'll find them in your .xcdatamodeld file
In our sample code above, note that you don't need to do the CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = dataStack
line. You can just as well hold a reference to the DataStack
like below and call all its instance methods directly:
class MyViewController: UIViewController {
let dataStack = DataStack(xcodeModelName: "MyModel") // keep reference to the stack
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
do {
try self.dataStack.addStorageAndWait(SQLiteStore.self)
}
catch { // ...
}
}
func methodToBeCalledLaterOn() {
let objects = self.dataStack.fetchAll(From<MyEntity>())
print(objects)
}
}
ð¡By default, CoreStore will initialize
NSManagedObject
s from .xcdatamodeld files, but you can create models completely from source code usingCoreStoreObject
s andCoreStoreSchema
. To use this feature, refer to Type-safeCoreStoreObject
s.
Notice that in our previous examples, addStorageAndWait(_:)
and addStorage(_:completion:)
both accept either InMemoryStore
, or SQLiteStore
. These implement the StorageInterface
protocol.
In-memory store
The most basic StorageInterface
concrete type is the InMemoryStore
, which just stores objects in memory. Since InMemoryStore
s always start with a fresh empty data, they do not need any migration information.
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait(
InMemoryStore(
configuration: "Config2" // optional. Use entities from the "Config2" configuration in the .xcdatamodeld file
)
)
Asynchronous variant:
try dataStack.addStorage(
InMemoryStore(
configuration: "Config2
),
completion: { storage in
// ...
}
)
(A reactive-programming variant of this method is explained in detail in the section on DataStack
Combine publishers)
Local Store
The most common StorageInterface
you will probably use is the SQLiteStore
, which saves data in a local SQLite file.
let migrationProgress = dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(
fileName: "MyStore.sqlite",
configuration: "Config2", // optional. Use entities from the "Config2" configuration in the .xcdatamodeld file
migrationMappingProviders: [Bundle.main], // optional. The bundles that contain required .xcmappingmodel files
localStorageOptions: .recreateStoreOnModelMismatch // optional. Provides settings that tells the DataStack how to setup the persistent store
),
completion: { /* ... */ }
)
Refer to the SQLiteStore.swift source documentation for detailed explanations for each of the default values.
CoreStore can decide the default values for these properties, so SQLiteStore
s can be initialized with no arguments:
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait(SQLiteStore())
(The asynchronous variant of this method is explained further in the next section on Migrations, and a reactive-programming variant in the section on DataStack
Combine publishers)
The file-related properties of SQLiteStore
are actually requirements of another protocol that it implements, the LocalStorage
protocol:
public protocol LocalStorage: StorageInterface {
var fileURL: NSURL { get }
var migrationMappingProviders: [SchemaMappingProvider] { get }
var localStorageOptions: LocalStorageOptions { get }
func dictionary(forOptions: LocalStorageOptions) -> [String: AnyObject]?
func cs_eraseStorageAndWait(metadata: [String: Any], soureModelHint: NSManagedObjectModel?) throws
}
If you have custom NSIncrementalStore
or NSAtomicStore
subclasses, you can implement this protocol and use it similarly to SQLiteStore
.
Migrations
Declaring model versions
Model versions are now expressed as a first-class protocol, DynamicSchema
. CoreStore currently supports the following schema classes:
XcodeDataModelSchema
: a model version with entities loaded from a .xcdatamodeld file.CoreStoreSchema
: a model version created withCoreStoreObject
entities. (See Type-safeCoreStoreObject
s)UnsafeDataModelSchema
: a model version created with an existingNSManagedObjectModel
instance.
All the DynamicSchema
for all model versions are then collected within a single SchemaHistory
instance, which is then handed to the DataStack
. Here are some common use cases:
Multiple model versions grouped in a .xcdatamodeld file (Core Data standard method)
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = DataStack(
xcodeModelName: "MyModel",
bundle: Bundle.main,
migrationChain: ["MyAppModel", "MyAppModelV2", "MyAppModelV3", "MyAppModelV4"]
)
CoreStoreSchema
-based model version (No .xcdatamodeld file needed)
(For more details, see also Type-safe CoreStoreObject
s)
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
class Dog: Animal {
// ...
}
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = DataStack(
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<Person>("Person")
]
)
)
Models in a .xcdatamodeld file during past app versions, but migrated to the new CoreStoreSchema
method
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
class Dog: Animal {
// ...
}
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
let legacySchema = XcodeDataModelSchema.from(
modelName: "MyModel", // .xcdatamodeld name
bundle: bundle,
migrationChain: ["MyAppModel", "MyAppModelV2", "MyAppModelV3", "MyAppModelV4"]
)
let newSchema = CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<Person>("Person")
]
)
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = DataStack(
schemaHistory: SchemaHistory(
legacySchema + [newSchema],
migrationChain: ["MyAppModel", "MyAppModelV2", "MyAppModelV3", "MyAppModelV4", "V1"]
)
)
CoreStoreSchema
-based model versions with progressive migration
typealias Animal = V2.Animal
typealias Dog = V2.Dog
typealias Person = V2.Person
enum V2 {
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
class Dog: Animal {
// ...
}
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
}
enum V1 {
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
class Dog: Animal {
// ...
}
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
// ...
}
}
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = DataStack(
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<V1.Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<V1.Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<V1.Person>("Person")
]
),
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V2",
entities: [
Entity<V2.Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<V2.Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<V2.Person>("Person")
]
),
migrationChain: ["V1", "V2"]
)
Starting migrations
We have seen addStorageAndWait(...)
used to initialize our persistent store. As the method name's ~AndWait suffix suggests though, this method blocks so it should not do long tasks such as data migrations. In fact CoreStore will only attempt a synchronous lightweight migration if you explicitly provide the .allowSynchronousLightweightMigration
option:
try dataStack.addStorageAndWait(
SQLiteStore(
fileURL: sqliteFileURL,
localStorageOptions: .allowSynchronousLightweightMigration
)
}
if you do so, any model mismatch will be thrown as an error.
In general though, if migrations are expected the asynchronous variant addStorage(_:completion:)
method is recommended instead:
let migrationProgress: Progress? = try dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(
fileName: "MyStore.sqlite",
configuration: "Config2"
),
completion: { (result) -> Void in
switch result {
case .success(let storage):
print("Successfully added sqlite store: \(storage)")
case .failure(let error):
print("Failed adding sqlite store with error: \(error)")
}
}
)
The completion
block reports a SetupResult
that indicates success or failure.
(A reactive-programming variant of this method is explained further in the section on DataStack
Combine publishers)
Notice that this method also returns an optional Progress
. If nil
, no migrations are needed, thus progress reporting is unnecessary as well. If not nil
, you can use this to track migration progress by using standard KVO on the "fractionCompleted"
key, or by using a closure-based utility exposed in Progress+Convenience.swift:
migrationProgress?.setProgressHandler { [weak self] (progress) -> Void in
self?.progressView?.setProgress(Float(progress.fractionCompleted), animated: true)
self?.percentLabel?.text = progress.localizedDescription // "50% completed"
self?.stepLabel?.text = progress.localizedAdditionalDescription // "0 of 2"
}
This closure is executed on the main thread so UIKit and AppKit calls can be done safely.
Progressive migrations
By default, CoreStore uses Core Data's default automatic migration mechanism. In other words, CoreStore will try to migrate the existing persistent store until it matches the SchemaHistory
's currentModelVersion
. If no mapping model path is found from the store's version to the data model's version, CoreStore gives up and reports an error.
The DataStack
lets you specify hints on how to break a migration into several sub-migrations using a MigrationChain
. This is typically passed to the DataStack
initializer and will be applied to all stores added to the DataStack
with addSQLiteStore(...)
and its variants:
let dataStack = DataStack(migrationChain:
["MyAppModel", "MyAppModelV2", "MyAppModelV3", "MyAppModelV4"])
The most common usage is to pass in the model version (.xcdatamodeld version names for NSManagedObject
s, or the modelName
for CoreStoreSchema
s) in increasing order as above.
For more complex, non-linear migration paths, you can also pass in a version tree that maps the key-values to the source-destination versions:
let dataStack = DataStack(migrationChain: [
"MyAppModel": "MyAppModelV3",
"MyAppModelV2": "MyAppModelV4",
"MyAppModelV3": "MyAppModelV4"
])
This allows for different migration paths depending on the starting version. The example above resolves to the following paths:
- MyAppModel-MyAppModelV3-MyAppModelV4
- MyAppModelV2-MyAppModelV4
- MyAppModelV3-MyAppModelV4
Initializing with empty values (either nil
, []
, or [:]
) instructs the DataStack
to disable progressive migrations and revert to the default migration behavior (i.e. use the .xcdatamodeld's current version as the final version):
let dataStack = DataStack(migrationChain: nil)
The MigrationChain
is validated when passed to the DataStack
and unless it is empty, will raise an assertion if any of the following conditions are met:
- a version appears twice in an array
- a version appears twice as a key in a dictionary literal
- a loop is found in any of the paths
â ï¸Important: If a
MigrationChain
is specified, the .xcdatamodeld's "Current Version" will be bypassed and theMigrationChain
's leafmost version will be theDataStack
's base model version.
Forecasting migrations
Sometimes migrations are huge and you may want prior information so your app could display a loading screen, or to display a confirmation dialog to the user. For this, CoreStore provides a requiredMigrationsForStorage(_:)
method you can use to inspect a persistent store before you actually call addStorageAndWait(_:)
or addStorage(_:completion:)
:
do {
let storage = SQLiteStorage(fileName: "MyStore.sqlite")
let migrationTypes: [MigrationType] = try dataStack.requiredMigrationsForStorage(storage)
if migrationTypes.count > 1
|| (migrationTypes.filter { $0.isHeavyweightMigration }.count) > 0 {
// ... will migrate more than once. Show special waiting screen
}
else if migrationTypes.count > 0 {
// ... will migrate just once. Show simple activity indicator
}
else {
// ... Do nothing
}
dataStack.addStorage(storage, completion: { /* ... */ })
}
catch {
// ... either inspection of the store failed, or if no mapping model was found/inferred
}
requiredMigrationsForStorage(_:)
returns an array of MigrationType
s, where each item in the array may be either of the following values:
case lightweight(sourceVersion: String, destinationVersion: String)
case heavyweight(sourceVersion: String, destinationVersion: String)
Each MigrationType
indicates the migration type for each step in the MigrationChain
. Use these information as fit for your app.
Custom migrations
CoreStore offers several ways to declare migration mappings:
CustomSchemaMappingProvider
: A mapping provider that infers mapping initially, but also accepts custom mappings for specified entities. This was added to support custom migrations withCoreStoreObject
s as well, but may also be used withNSManagedObject
s.XcodeSchemaMappingProvider
: A mapping provider which loads entity mappings from .xcmappingmodel files in a specifiedBundle
.InferredSchemaMappingProvider
: The default mapping provider which tries to infer model migration between twoDynamicSchema
versions either by searching all .xcmappingmodel files fromBundle.allBundles
, or by relying on lightweight migration if possible.
These mapping providers conform to SchemaMappingProvider
and can be passed to SQLiteStore
's initializer:
let dataStack = DataStack(migrationChain: ["MyAppModel", "MyAppModelV2", "MyAppModelV3", "MyAppModelV4"])
_ = try dataStack.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(
fileName: "MyStore.sqlite",
migrationMappingProviders: [
XcodeSchemaMappingProvider(from: "V1", to: "V2", mappingModelBundle: Bundle.main),
CustomSchemaMappingProvider(from: "V2", to: "V3", entityMappings: [.deleteEntity("Person") ])
]
),
completion: { (result) -> Void in
// ...
}
)
For version migrations present in the DataStack
's MigrationChain
but not handled by any of the SQLiteStore
's migrationMappingProviders
array, CoreStore will automatically try to use InferredSchemaMappingProvider
as fallback. Finally if the InferredSchemaMappingProvider
could not resolve any mapping, the migration will fail and the DataStack.addStorage(...)
method will report the failure.
For CustomSchemaMappingProvider
, more granular updates are supported through the dynamic objects UnsafeSourceObject
and UnsafeDestinationObject
. The example below allows the migration to conditionally ignore some objects:
let person_v2_to_v3_mapping = CustomSchemaMappingProvider(
from: "V2",
to: "V3",
entityMappings: [
.transformEntity(
sourceEntity: "Person",
destinationEntity: "Person",
transformer: { (sourceObject: UnsafeSourceObject, createDestinationObject: () -> UnsafeDestinationObject) in
if (sourceObject["isVeryOldAccount"] as! Bool?) == true {
return // this account is too old, don't migrate
}
// migrate the rest
let destinationObject = createDestinationObject()
destinationObject.enumerateAttributes { (attribute, sourceAttribute) in
if let sourceAttribute = sourceAttribute {
destinationObject[attribute] = sourceObject[sourceAttribute]
}
}
)
]
)
SQLiteStore(
fileName: "MyStore.sqlite",
migrationMappingProviders: [person_v2_to_v3_mapping]
)
The UnsafeSourceObject
is a read-only proxy for an object existing in the source model version. The UnsafeDestinationObject
is a read-write object that is inserted (optionally) to the destination model version. Both classes' properties are accessed through key-value-coding.
Saving and processing transactions
To ensure deterministic state for objects in the read-only NSManagedObjectContext
, CoreStore does not expose API's for updating and saving directly from the main context (or any other context for that matter.) Instead, you spawn transactions from DataStack
instances:
let dataStack = self.dataStack
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
// make changes
},
completion: { (result) -> Void in
// ...
}
)
Transaction closures automatically save changes once the closures completes. To cancel and rollback a transaction, throw a CoreStoreError.userCancelled
from inside the closure by calling try transaction.cancel()
:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
// ...
if shouldCancel {
try transaction.cancel()
}
// ...
},
completion: { (result) -> Void in
if case .failure(.userCancelled) = result {
// ... cancelled
}
}
)
â ï¸Important: Never use
try?
ortry!
on atransaction.cancel()
call. Always usetry
. Usingtry?
will swallow the cancellation and the transaction will proceed to save as normal. Usingtry!
will crash the app astransaction.cancel()
will always throw an error.
The examples above use perform(asynchronous:...)
, but there are actually 3 types of transactions at your disposal: asynchronous, synchronous, and unsafe.
Transaction types
Asynchronous transactions
are spawned from perform(asynchronous:...)
. This method returns immediately and executes its closure from a background serial queue. The return value for the closure is declared as a generic type, so any value returned from the closure can be passed to the completion result:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Bool in
// make changes
return transaction.hasChanges
},
completion: { (result) -> Void in
switch result {
case .success(let hasChanges): print("success! Has changes? \(hasChanges)")
case .failure(let error): print(error)
}
}
)
The success and failure can also be declared as separate handlers:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Int in
// make changes
return transaction.delete(objects)
},
success: { (numberOfDeletedObjects: Int) -> Void in
print("success! Deleted \(numberOfDeletedObjects) objects")
},
failure: { (error) -> Void in
print(error)
}
)
â ï¸Be careful when returning
NSManagedObject
s orCoreStoreObject
s from the transaction closure. Those instances are for the transaction's use only. See Passing objects safely.
Transactions created from perform(asynchronous:...)
are instances of AsynchronousDataTransaction
.
Synchronous transactions
are created from perform(synchronous:...)
. While the syntax is similar to its asynchronous counterpart, perform(synchronous:...)
waits for its transaction block to complete before returning:
let hasChanges = dataStack.perform(
synchronous: { (transaction) -> Bool in
// make changes
return transaction.hasChanges
}
)
transaction
above is a SynchronousDataTransaction
instance.
Since perform(synchronous:...)
technically blocks two queues (the caller's queue and the transaction's background queue), it is considered less safe as it's more prone to deadlock. Take special care that the closure does not block on any other external queues.
By default, perform(synchronous:...)
will wait for observers such as ListMonitor
s to be notified before the method returns. This may cause deadlocks, especially if you are calling this from the main thread. To reduce this risk, you may try to set the waitForAllObservers:
parameter to false
. Doing so tells the SynchronousDataTransaction
to block only until it completes saving. It will not wait for other context's to receive those changes. This reduces deadlock risk but may have surprising side-effects:
dataStack.perform(
synchronous: { (transaction) in
let person = transaction.create(Into<Person>())
person.name = "John"
},
waitForAllObservers: false
)
let newPerson = dataStack.fetchOne(From<Person>.where(\.name == "John"))
// newPerson may be nil!
// The DataStack may have not yet received the update notification.
Due to this complicated nature of synchronous transactions, if your app has very heavy transaction throughput it is highly recommended to use asynchronous transactions instead.
Unsafe transactions
are special in that they do not enclose updates within a closure:
let transaction = dataStack.beginUnsafe()
// make changes
downloadJSONWithCompletion({ (json) -> Void in
// make other changes
transaction.commit()
})
downloadAnotherJSONWithCompletion({ (json) -> Void in
// make some other changes
transaction.commit()
})
This allows for non-contiguous updates. Do note that this flexibility comes with a price: you are now responsible for managing concurrency for the transaction. As uncle Ben said, "with great power comes great race conditions."
As the above example also shows, with unsafe transactions commit()
can be called multiple times.
You've seen how to create transactions, but we have yet to see how to make creates, updates, and deletes. The 3 types of transactions above are all subclasses of BaseDataTransaction
, which implements the methods shown below.
Creating objects
The create(...)
method accepts an Into
clause which specifies the entity for the object you want to create:
let person = transaction.create(Into<MyPersonEntity>())
While the syntax is straightforward, CoreStore does not just naively insert a new object. This single line does the following:
- Checks that the entity type exists in any of the transaction's parent persistent store
- If the entity belongs to only one persistent store, a new object is inserted into that store and returned from
create(...)
- If the entity does not belong to any store, an assertion failure will be raised. This is a programmer error and should never occur in production code.
- If the entity belongs to multiple stores, an assertion failure will be raised. This is also a programmer error and should never occur in production code. Normally, with Core Data you can insert an object in this state but saving the
NSManagedObjectContext
will always fail. CoreStore checks this for you at creation time when it makes sense (not during save).
If the entity exists in multiple configurations, you need to provide the configuration name for the destination persistent store:
let person = transaction.create(Into<MyPersonEntity>("Config1"))
or if the persistent store is the auto-generated "Default" configuration, specify nil
:
let person = transaction.create(Into<MyPersonEntity>(nil))
Note that if you do explicitly specify the configuration name, CoreStore will only try to insert the created object to that particular store and will fail if that store is not found; it will not fall back to any other configuration that the entity belongs to.
Updating objects
After creating an object from the transaction, you can simply update its properties as normal:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let person = transaction.create(Into<MyPersonEntity>())
person.name = "John Smith"
person.age = 30
},
completion: { _ in }
)
To update an existing object, fetch the object's instance from the transaction:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let person = try transaction.fetchOne(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.name == "Jane Smith")
)
person.age = person.age + 1
},
completion: { _ in }
)
(For more about fetching, see Fetching and querying)
Do not update an instance that was not created/fetched from the transaction. If you have a reference to the object already, use the transaction's edit(...)
method to get an editable proxy instance for that object:
let jane: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
// WRONG: jane.age = jane.age + 1
// RIGHT:
let jane = transaction.edit(jane)! // using the same variable name protects us from misusing the non-transaction instance
jane.age = jane.age + 1
},
completion: { _ in }
)
This is also true when updating an object's relationships. Make sure that the object assigned to the relationship is also created/fetched from the transaction:
let jane: MyPersonEntity = // ...
let john: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
// WRONG: jane.friends = [john]
// RIGHT:
let jane = transaction.edit(jane)!
let john = transaction.edit(john)!
jane.friends = NSSet(array: [john])
},
completion: { _ in }
)
Deleting objects
Deleting an object is simpler because you can tell a transaction to delete an object directly without fetching an editable proxy (CoreStore does that for you):
let john: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
transaction.delete(john)
},
completion: { _ in }
)
or several objects at once:
let john: MyPersonEntity = // ...
let jane: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
try transaction.delete(john, jane)
// try transaction.delete([john, jane]) is also allowed
},
completion: { _ in }
)
If you do not have references yet to the objects to be deleted, transactions have a deleteAll(...)
method you can pass a query to:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
try transaction.deleteAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.age > 30)
)
},
completion: { _ in }
)
Passing objects safely
Always remember that the DataStack
and individual transactions manage different NSManagedObjectContext
s so you cannot just use objects between them. That's why transactions have an edit(...)
method:
let jane: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let jane = transaction.edit(jane)!
jane.age = jane.age + 1
},
completion: { _ in }
)
But CoreStore
, DataStack
and BaseDataTransaction
have a very flexible fetchExisting(...)
method that you can pass instances back and forth with:
let jane: MyPersonEntity = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> MyPersonEntity in
let jane = transaction.fetchExisting(jane)! // instance for transaction
jane.age = jane.age + 1
return jane
},
success: { (transactionJane) in
let jane = dataStack.fetchExisting(transactionJane)! // instance for DataStack
print(jane.age)
},
failure: { (error) in
// ...
}
)
fetchExisting(...)
also works with multiple NSManagedObject
s, CoreStoreObject
s, or with NSManagedObjectID
s:
var peopleIDs: [NSManagedObjectID] = // ...
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let jane = try transaction.fetchOne(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.name == "Jane Smith")
)
jane.friends = NSSet(array: transaction.fetchExisting(peopleIDs)!)
// ...
},
completion: { _ in }
)
Importing data
Some times, if not most of the time, the data that we save to Core Data comes from external sources such as web servers or external files. If you have a JSON dictionary for example, you may be extracting values as such:
let json: [String: Any] = // ...
person.name = json["name"] as? NSString
person.age = json["age"] as? NSNumber
// ...
If you have many attributes, you don't want to keep repeating this mapping everytime you want to import data. CoreStore lets you write the data mapping code just once, and all you have to do is call importObject(...)
or importUniqueObject(...)
through BaseDataTransaction
subclasses:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let json: [String: Any] = // ...
try! transaction.importObject(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
source: json
)
},
completion: { _ in }
)
To support data import for an entity, implement either ImportableObject
or ImportableUniqueObject
on the NSManagedObject
or CoreStoreObject
subclass:
ImportableObject
: Use this protocol if the object have no inherent uniqueness and new objects should always be added when callingimportObject(...)
.ImportableUniqueObject
: Use this protocol to specify a unique ID for an object that will be used to distinguish whether a new object should be created or if an existing object should be updated when callingimportUniqueObject(...)
.
Both protocols require implementers to specify an ImportSource
which can be set to any type that the object can extract data from:
typealias ImportSource = NSDictionary
typealias ImportSource = [String: Any]
typealias ImportSource = NSData
You can even use external types from popular 3rd-party JSON libraries, or just simple tuples or primitives.
ImportableObject
ImportableObject
is a very simple protocol:
public protocol ImportableObject: AnyObject {
typealias ImportSource
static func shouldInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) -> Bool
func didInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws
}
First, set ImportSource
to the expected type of the data source:
typealias ImportSource = [String: Any]
This lets us call importObject(_:source:)
with any [String: Any]
type as the argument to source
:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let json: [String: Any] = // ...
try! transaction.importObject(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
source: json
)
// ...
},
completion: { _ in }
)
The actual extraction and assignment of values should be implemented in the didInsert(from:in:)
method of the ImportableObject
protocol:
func didInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws {
self.name = source["name"] as? NSString
self.age = source["age"] as? NSNumber
// ...
}
Transactions also let you import multiple objects at once using the importObjects(_:sourceArray:)
method:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let jsonArray: [[String: Any]] = // ...
try! transaction.importObjects(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
sourceArray: jsonArray // make sure this is of type Array<MyPersonEntity.ImportSource>
)
// ...
},
completion: { _ in }
)
Doing so tells the transaction to iterate through the array of import sources and calls shouldInsert(from:in:)
on the ImportableObject
to determine which instances should be created. You can do validations and return false
from shouldInsert(from:in:)
if you want to skip importing from a source and continue on with the other sources in the array.
If on the other hand, your validation in one of the sources failed in such a manner that all other sources should also be rolled back and cancelled, you can throw
from within didInsert(from:in:)
:
func didInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws {
self.name = source["name"] as? NSString
self.age = source["age"] as? NSNumber
// ...
if self.name == nil {
throw Errors.InvalidNameError
}
}
Doing so can let you abandon an invalid transaction immediately:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let jsonArray: [[String: Any]] = // ...
try transaction.importObjects(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
sourceArray: jsonArray
)
},
success: {
// ...
},
failure: { (error) in
switch error {
case Errors.InvalidNameError: print("Invalid name")
// ...
}
}
)
ImportableUniqueObject
Typically, we don't just keep creating objects every time we import data. Usually we also need to update already existing objects. Implementing the ImportableUniqueObject
protocol lets you specify a "unique ID" that transactions can use to search existing objects before creating new ones:
public protocol ImportableUniqueObject: ImportableObject {
typealias ImportSource
typealias UniqueIDType: ImportableAttributeType
static var uniqueIDKeyPath: String { get }
var uniqueIDValue: UniqueIDType { get set }
static func shouldInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) -> Bool
static func shouldUpdate(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) -> Bool
static func uniqueID(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws -> UniqueIDType?
func didInsert(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws
func update(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws
}
Notice that it has the same insert methods as ImportableObject
, with additional methods for updates and for specifying the unique ID:
class var uniqueIDKeyPath: String {
return #keyPath(MyPersonEntity.personID)
}
var uniqueIDValue: Int {
get { return self.personID }
set { self.personID = newValue }
}
class func uniqueID(from source: ImportSource, in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) throws -> Int? {
return source["id"] as? Int
}
For ImportableUniqueObject
, the extraction and assignment of values should be implemented from the update(from:in:)
method. The didInsert(from:in:)
by default calls update(from:in:)
, but you can separate the implementation for inserts and updates if needed.
You can then create/update an object by calling a transaction's importUniqueObject(...)
method:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let json: [String: Any] = // ...
try! transaction.importUniqueObject(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
source: json
)
// ...
},
completion: { _ in }
)
or multiple objects at once with the importUniqueObjects(...)
method:
dataStack.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> Void in
let jsonArray: [[String: AnyObject]] = // ...
try! transaction.importUniqueObjects(
Into<MyPersonEntity>(),
sourceArray: jsonArray
)
// ...
},
completion: { _ in }
)
As with ImportableObject
, you can control whether to skip importing an object by implementing
shouldInsert(from:in:)
and shouldUpdate(from:in:)
, or to cancel all objects by throw
ing an error from the uniqueID(from:in:)
, didInsert(from:in:)
or update(from:in:)
methods.
Fetching and Querying
Before we dive in, be aware that CoreStore distinguishes between fetching and querying:
- A fetch executes searches from a specific transaction or data stack. This means fetches can include pending objects (i.e. before a transaction calls on
commit()
.) Use fetches when:- results need to be
NSManagedObject
orCoreStoreObject
instances - unsaved objects should be included in the search (though fetches can be configured to exclude unsaved ones)
- results need to be
- A query pulls data straight from the persistent store. This means faster searches when computing aggregates such as count, min, max, etc. Use queries when:
- you need to compute aggregate functions (see below for a list of supported functions)
- results can be raw values like
NSString
s,NSNumber
s,Int
s,NSDate
s, anNSDictionary
of key-values, or any type that conform toQueryableAttributeType
. (See QueryableAttributeType.swift for a list of built-in types) - only values for specified attribute keys need to be included in the results
- unsaved objects should be ignored
From
clause
The search conditions for fetches and queries are specified using clauses. All fetches and queries require a From
clause that indicates the target entity type:
let people = try dataStack.fetchAll(From<MyPersonEntity>())
people
in the example above will be of type [MyPersonEntity]
. The From<MyPersonEntity>()
clause indicates a fetch to all persistent stores that MyPersonEntity
belong to.
If the entity exists in multiple configurations and you need to only search from a particular configuration, indicate in the From
clause the configuration name for the destination persistent store:
let people = try dataStack.fetchAll(From<MyPersonEntity>("Config1")) // ignore objects in persistent stores other than the "Config1" configuration
or if the persistent store is the auto-generated "Default" configuration, specify nil
:
let person = try dataStack.fetchAll(From<MyPersonEntity>(nil))
Now we know how to use a From
clause, let's move on to fetching and querying.
Fetching
There are currently 5 fetch methods you can call from CoreStore
, from a DataStack
instance, or from a BaseDataTransaction
instance. All of the methods below accept the same parameters: a required From
clause, and an optional series of Where
, OrderBy
, and/or Tweak
clauses.
fetchAll(...)
- returns an array of all objects that match the criteria.fetchOne(...)
- returns the first object that match the criteria.fetchCount(...)
- returns the number of objects that match the criteria.fetchObjectIDs(...)
- returns an array ofNSManagedObjectID
s for all objects that match the criteria.fetchObjectID(...)
- returns theNSManagedObjectID
s for the first objects that match the criteria.
Each method's purpose is straightforward, but we need to understand how to set the clauses for the fetch.
Where
clause
The Where
clause is CoreStore's NSPredicate
wrapper. It specifies the search filter to use when fetching (or querying). It implements all initializers that NSPredicate
does (except for -predicateWithBlock:
, which Core Data does not support):
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Where<MyPersonEntity>("%K > %d", "age", 30) // string format initializer
)
people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Where<MyPersonEntity>(true) // boolean initializer
)
If you do have an existing NSPredicate
instance already, you can pass that to Where
as well:
let predicate = NSPredicate(...)
var people = dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Where<MyPersonEntity>(predicate) // predicate initializer
)
Where
clauses are generic types. To avoid verbose repetition of the generic object type, fetch methods support Fetch Chain builders. We can also use Swift's Smart KeyPaths as the Where
clause expression:
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.age > 30) // Type-safe!
)
Where
clauses also implement the &&
, ||
, and !
logic operators, so you can provide logical conditions without writing too much AND
, OR
, and NOT
strings:
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.age > 30 && \.gender == "M")
)
If you do not provide a Where
clause, all objects that belong to the specified From
will be returned.
OrderBy
clause
The OrderBy
clause is CoreStore's NSSortDescriptor
wrapper. Use it to specify attribute keys in which to sort the fetch (or query) results with.
var mostValuablePeople = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
OrderBy<MyPersonEntity>(.descending("rating"), .ascending("surname"))
)
As seen above, OrderBy
accepts a list of SortKey
enumeration values, which can be either .ascending
or .descending
.
As with Where
clauses, OrderBy
clauses are also generic types. To avoid verbose repetition of the generic object type, fetch methods support Fetch Chain builders. We can also use Swift's Smart KeyPaths as the OrderBy
clause expression:
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.orderBy(.descending(\.rating), .ascending(\.surname)) // Type-safe!
)
You can use the +
and +=
operator to append OrderBy
s together. This is useful when sorting conditionally:
var orderBy = OrderBy<MyPersonEntity>(.descending(\.rating))
if sortFromYoungest {
orderBy += OrderBy(.ascending(\.age))
}
var mostValuablePeople = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
orderBy
)
Tweak
clause
The Tweak
clause lets you, uh, tweak the fetch (or query). Tweak
exposes the NSFetchRequest
in a closure where you can make changes to its properties:
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Where<MyPersonEntity>("age > %d", 30),
OrderBy<MyPersonEntity>(.ascending("surname")),
Tweak { (fetchRequest) -> Void in
fetchRequest.includesPendingChanges = false
fetchRequest.returnsObjectsAsFaults = false
fetchRequest.includesSubentities = false
}
)
Tweak
also supports Fetch Chain builders:
var people = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
.where(\.age > 30)
.orderBy(.ascending(\.surname))
.tweak {
$0.includesPendingChanges = false
$0.returnsObjectsAsFaults = false
$0.includesSubentities = false
}
)
The clauses are evaluated the order they appear in the fetch/query, so you typically need to set Tweak
as the last clause.
Tweak
's closure is executed only just before the fetch occurs, so make sure that any values captured by the closure is not prone to race conditions.
While Tweak
lets you micro-configure the NSFetchRequest
, note that CoreStore already preconfigured that NSFetchRequest
to suitable defaults. Only use Tweak
when you know what you are doing!
Querying
One of the functionalities overlooked by other Core Data wrapper libraries is raw properties fetching. If you are familiar with NSDictionaryResultType
and -[NSFetchedRequest propertiesToFetch]
, you probably know how painful it is to setup a query for raw values and aggregate values. CoreStore makes this easy by exposing the 2 methods below:
queryValue(...)
- returns a single raw value for an attribute or for an aggregate value. If there are multiple results,queryValue(...)
only returns the first item.queryAttributes(...)
- returns an array of dictionaries containing attribute keys with their corresponding values.
Both methods above accept the same parameters: a required From
clause, a required Select<T>
clause, and an optional series of Where
, OrderBy
, GroupBy
, and/or Tweak
clauses.
Setting up the From
, Where
, OrderBy
, and Tweak
clauses is similar to how you would when fetching. For querying, you also need to know how to use the Select<T>
and GroupBy
clauses.
Select<T>
clause
The Select<T>
clause specifies the target attribute/aggregate key, as well as the expected return type:
let johnsAge = try dataStack.queryValue(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select<Int>("age"),
Where<MyPersonEntity>("name == %@", "John Smith")
)
The example above queries the "age" property for the first object that matches the Where
condition. johnsAge
will be bound to type Int?
, as indicated by the Select<Int>
generic type. For queryValue(...)
, types that conform to QueryableAttributeType
are allowed as the return type (and therefore as the generic type for Select<T>
).
For queryAttributes(...)
, only NSDictionary
is valid for Select
, thus you are allowed to omit the generic type:
let allAges = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select("age")
)
query methods also support Query Chain builders. We can also use Swift's Smart KeyPaths to use in the expressions:
let johnsAge = try dataStack.queryValue(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.select(\.age) // binds the result to Int
.where(\.name == "John Smith")
)
If you only need a value for a particular attribute, you can just specify the key name (like we did with Select<Int>("age")
), but several aggregate functions can also be used as parameter to Select
:
.average(...)
.count(...)
.maximum(...)
.minimum(...)
.sum(...)
let oldestAge = try dataStack.queryValue(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select<Int>(.maximum("age"))
)
For queryAttributes(...)
which returns an array of dictionaries, you can specify multiple attributes/aggregates to Select
:
let personJSON = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select("name", "age")
)
personJSON
will then have the value:
[
[
"name": "John Smith",
"age": 30
],
[
"name": "Jane Doe",
"age": 22
]
]
You can also include an aggregate as well:
let personJSON = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select("name", .count("friends"))
)
which returns:
[
[
"name": "John Smith",
"count(friends)": 42
],
[
"name": "Jane Doe",
"count(friends)": 231
]
]
The "count(friends)"
key name was automatically used by CoreStore, but you can specify your own key alias if you need:
let personJSON = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select("name", .count("friends", as: "friendsCount"))
)
which now returns:
[
[
"name": "John Smith",
"friendsCount": 42
],
[
"name": "Jane Doe",
"friendsCount": 231
]
]
GroupBy
clause
The GroupBy
clause lets you group results by a specified attribute/aggregate. This is useful only for queryAttributes(...)
since queryValue(...)
just returns the first value.
let personJSON = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>(),
Select("age", .count("age", as: "count")),
GroupBy("age")
)
GroupBy
clauses are also generic types and support Query Chain builders. We can also use Swift's Smart KeyPaths to use in the expressions:
let personJSON = try dataStack.queryAttributes(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.select(.attribute(\.age), .count(\.age, as: "count"))
.groupBy(\.age)
)
this returns dictionaries that shows the count for each "age"
:
[
[
"age": 42,
"count": 1
],
[
"age": 22,
"count": 1
]
]
Logging and error reporting
One unfortunate thing when using some third-party libraries is that they usually pollute the console with their own logging mechanisms. CoreStore provides its own default logging class, but you can plug-in your own favorite logger by implementing the CoreStoreLogger
protocol.
public protocol CoreStoreLogger {
func log(level level: LogLevel, message: String, fileName: StaticString, lineNumber: Int, functionName: StaticString)
func log(error error: CoreStoreError, message: String, fileName: StaticString, lineNumber: Int, functionName: StaticString)
func assert(@autoclosure condition: () -> Bool, @autoclosure message: () -> String, fileName: StaticString, lineNumber: Int, functionName: StaticString)
func abort(message: String, fileName: StaticString, lineNumber: Int, functionName: StaticString)
}
Implement this protocol with your custom class then pass the instance to CoreStoreDefaults.logger
:
CoreStoreDefaults.logger = MyLogger()
Doing so channels all logging calls to your logger.
Note that to keep the call stack information intact, all calls to these methods are NOT thread-managed. Therefore you have to make sure that your logger is thread-safe or you may otherwise have to dispatch your logging implementation to a serial queue.
Take special care when implementing CoreStoreLogger
's assert(...)
and abort(...)
functions:
assert(...)
: The behavior betweenDEBUG
and release builds, or-O
and-Onone
, are all left to the implementers' responsibility. CoreStore callsCoreStoreLogger.assert(...)
only for invalid but usually recoverable errors (for example, early validation failures that may cause an error thrown and handled somewhere else)abort(...)
: This method is the last-chance for your app to synchronously log a fatal error within CoreStore. The app will be terminated right after this function is called (CoreStore callsfatalError()
internally)
All CoreStore types have very useful (and pretty formatted!) print(...)
outputs.
A couple of examples, ListMonitor
:
CoreStoreError.mappingModelNotFoundError
:
These are all implemented with CustomDebugStringConvertible.debugDescription
, so they work with lldb's po
command as well.
Observing changes and notifications
CoreStore provides type-safe wrappers for observing managed objects:
ðObjectPublisher | ObjectMonitor | ðListPublisher | ListMonitor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of objects | 1 | 1 | N | N |
Allows multiple observers | â | â | â | â |
Emits fine-grained changes | â | â | â | â |
Emits DiffableDataSource snapshots | â | â | â | â |
Delegate methods | â | â | â | â |
Closure callback | â | â | â | â |
SwiftUI support | â | â | â | â |
Observe a single property
To get notifications for single property changes in an object, there are two methods depending on the object's base class.
- For
NSManagedObject
subclasses: Use the standard KVO method:
let observer = person.observe(\.age, options: [.new]) { (person, change)
print("Happy \(change.newValue)th birthday!")
}
- For
CoreStoreObject
subclasses: Call theobserve(...)
method directly on the property. You'll notice that the API itself is a bit similar to the KVO method:
let observer = person.age.observe(options: [.new]) { (person, change)
print("Happy \(change.newValue)th birthday!")
}
For both methods, you will need to keep a reference to the returned observer
for the duration of the observation.
Observe a single object's updates
Observers of an ObjectPublisher
can receive notifications if any of the object's property changes. You can create an ObjectPublisher
from the object directly:
let objectPublisher: ObjectPublisher<Person> = person.asPublisher(in: dataStack)
or by indexing a ListPublisher
's ListSnapshot
:
let listPublisher: ListPublisher<Person> = // ...
// ...
let objectPublisher = listPublisher.snapshot[indexPath]
(See ListPublisher
examples below)
To receive notifications, call the ObjectPublisher
's addObserve(...)
method passing the owner of the callback closure:
objectPublisher.addObserver(self) { [weak self] (objectPublisher) in
let snapshot: ObjectSnapshot<Person> = objectPublisher.snapshot
// handle changes
}
Note that the owner instance will not be retained. You may call ObjectPublisher.removeObserver(...)
explicitly to stop receiving notifications, but the ObjectPublisher
also discontinues sending events to deallocated observers.
The ObjectSnapshot
returned from the ObjectPublisher.snapshot
property returns a full-copy struct
of all properties of the object. This is ideal for managing states as they are thread-safe and are not affected by further changes to the actual object. ObjectPublisher
automatically updates its snapshot
value to the latest state of the object.
(A reactive-programming variant of this method is explained in detail in the section on ObjectPublisher
Combine publishers)
Observe a single object's per-property updates
If you need to track specifically which properties change in an object, implement the ObjectObserver
protocol and specify the EntityType
:
class MyViewController: UIViewController, ObjectObserver {
func objectMonitor(monitor: ObjectMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, willUpdateObject object: MyPersonEntity) {
// ...
}
func objectMonitor(monitor: ObjectMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didUpdateObject object: MyPersonEntity, changedPersistentKeys: Set<KeyPathString>) {
// ...
}
func objectMonitor(monitor: ObjectMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didDeleteObject object: MyPersonEntity) {
// ...
}
}
We then need to keep an ObjectMonitor
instance and register our ObjectObserver
as an observer:
let person: MyPersonEntity = // ...
self.monitor = dataStack.monitorObject(person)
self.monitor.addObserver(self)
The controller will then notify our observer whenever the object's attributes change. You can add multiple ObjectObserver
s to a single ObjectMonitor
without any problem. This means you can just share around the ObjectMonitor
instance to different screens without problem.
You can get ObjectMonitor
's object through its object
property. If the object is deleted, the object
property will become nil
to prevent further access.
While ObjectMonitor
exposes removeObserver(...)
as well, it only stores weak
references of the observers and will safely unregister deallocated observers.
Observe a diffable list
Observers of a ListPublisher
can receive notifications whenever its fetched result set changes. You can create a ListPublisher
by fetching from the DataStack
:
let listPublisher = dataStack.listPublisher(
From<Person>()
.sectionBy(\.age") { "Age \($0)" } // sections are optional
.where(\.title == "Engineer")
.orderBy(.ascending(\.lastName))
)
To receive notifications, call the ListPublisher
's addObserve(...)
method passing the owner of the callback closure:
listPublisher.addObserver(self) { [weak self] (listPublisher) in
let snapshot: ListSnapshot<Person> = listPublisher.snapshot
// handle changes
}
Note that the owner instance will not be retained. You may call ListPublisher.removeObserver(...)
explicitly to stop receiving notifications, but the ListPublisher
also discontinues sending events to deallocated observers.
The ListSnapshot
returned from the ListPublisher.snapshot
property returns a full-copy struct
of all sections and NSManagedObject
items in the list. This is ideal for managing states as they are thread-safe and are not affected by further changes to the result set. ListPublisher
automatically updates its snapshot
value to the latest state of the fetch.
(A reactive-programming variant of this method is explained in detail in the section on ListPublisher
Combine publishers)
Unlike ListMonitor
s (See ListMonitor
examples below), a ListPublisher
does not track detailed inserts, deletes, and moves. In return, a ListPublisher
is a lot more lightweight and are designed to work well with DiffableDataSource.TableViewAdapter
s and DiffableDataSource.CollectionViewAdapter
s:
self.dataSource = DiffableDataSource.CollectionViewAdapter<Person>(
collectionView: self.collectionView,
dataStack: CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack,
cellProvider: { (collectionView, indexPath, person) in
let cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell(withReuseIdentifier: "PersonCell") as! PersonCell
cell.setPerson(person)
return cell
}
)
// ...
listPublisher.addObserver(self) { [weak self] (listPublisher) in
self?.dataSource?.apply(
listPublisher.snapshot, animatingDifferences: true
)
}
Observe detailed list changes
If you need to track each object's inserts, deletes, moves, and updates, implement one of the ListObserver
protocols and specify the EntityType
:
class MyViewController: UIViewController, ListObserver {
func listMonitorDidChange(monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>) {
// ...
}
func listMonitorDidRefetch(monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>) {
// ...
}
}
Including ListObserver
, there are 3 observer protocols you can implement depending on how detailed you need to handle a change notification:
ListObserver
: lets you handle these callback methods:
func listMonitorWillChange(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>)
func listMonitorDidChange(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>)
func listMonitorWillRefetch(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>)
func listMonitorDidRefetch(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>)
listMonitorDidChange(_:)
and listMonitorDidRefetch(_:)
implementations are both required. listMonitorDidChange(_:)
is called whenever the ListMonitor
's count, order, or filtered objects change. listMonitorDidRefetch(_:)
is called when the ListMonitor.refetch()
was executed or if the internal persistent store was changed.
ListObjectObserver
: in addition toListObserver
methods, also lets you handle object inserts, updates, and deletes:
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didInsertObject object: MyPersonEntity, toIndexPath indexPath: IndexPath)
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didDeleteObject object: MyPersonEntity, fromIndexPath indexPath: IndexPath)
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didUpdateObject object: MyPersonEntity, atIndexPath indexPath: IndexPath)
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didMoveObject object: MyPersonEntity, fromIndexPath: IndexPath, toIndexPath: IndexPath)
ListSectionObserver
: in addition toListObjectObserver
methods, also lets you handle section inserts and deletes:
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didInsertSection sectionInfo: NSFetchedResultsSectionInfo, toSectionIndex sectionIndex: Int)
func listMonitor(_ monitor: ListMonitor<MyPersonEntity>, didDeleteSection sectionInfo: NSFetchedResultsSectionInfo, fromSectionIndex sectionIndex: Int)
We then need to create a ListMonitor
instance and register our ListObserver
as an observer:
self.monitor = dataStack.monitorList(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.where(\.age > 30)
.orderBy(.ascending(\.name))
.tweak { $0.fetchBatchSize = 20 }
)
self.monitor.addObserver(self)
Similar to ObjectMonitor
, a ListMonitor
can also have multiple ListObserver
s registered to a single ListMonitor
.
If you have noticed, the monitorList(...)
method accepts Where
, OrderBy
, and Tweak
clauses exactly like a fetch. As the list maintained by ListMonitor
needs to have a deterministic order, at least the From
and OrderBy
clauses are required.
A ListMonitor
created from monitorList(...)
will maintain a single-section list. You can therefore access its contents with just an index:
let firstPerson = self.monitor[0]
If the list needs to be grouped into sections, create the ListMonitor
instance with the monitorSectionedList(...)
method and a SectionBy
clause:
self.monitor = dataStack.monitorSectionedList(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.sectionBy(\.age)
.where(\.gender == "M")
.orderBy(.ascending(\.age), .ascending(\.name))
.tweak { $0.fetchBatchSize = 20 }
)
A list controller created this way will group the objects by the attribute key indicated by the SectionBy
clause. One more thing to remember is that the OrderBy
clause should sort the list in such a way that the SectionBy
attribute would be sorted together (a requirement shared by NSFetchedResultsController
.)
The SectionBy
clause can also be passed a closure to transform the section name into a displayable string:
self.monitor = dataStack.monitorSectionedList(
From<MyPersonEntity>()
.sectionBy(\.age) { (sectionName) -> String? in
"\(sectionName) years old"
}
.orderBy(.ascending(\.age), .ascending(\.name))
)
This is useful when implementing a UITableViewDelegate
's section header:
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, titleForHeaderInSection section: Int) -> String? {
let sectionInfo = self.monitor.sectionInfoAtIndex(section)
return sectionInfo.name
}
To access the objects of a sectioned list, use an IndexPath
or a tuple:
let indexPath = IndexPath(row: 2, section: 1)
let person1 = self.monitor[indexPath]
let person2 = self.monitor[1, 2]
// person1 and person2 are the same object
Type-safe CoreStoreObject
s
Starting CoreStore 4.0, we can now create persisted objects without depending on .xcdatamodeld Core Data files. The new CoreStoreObject
subclass replaces NSManagedObject
, and specially-typed properties declared on these classes will be synthesized as Core Data attributes.
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("species")
var species: String = ""
}
class Dog: Animal {
@Field.Stored("nickname")
var nickname: String?
@Field.Relationship("master")
var master: Person?
}
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("name")
var name: String = ""
@Field.Relationship("pets", inverse: \Dog.$master)
var pets: Set<Dog>
}
The property names to be saved to Core Data is specified as the keyPath
argument. This lets us refactor our Swift code without affecting the underlying database. For example:
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("name")
private var internalName: String = ""
// note property name is independent of the storage key name
}
Here we used the property name internalName
and made it private
, but the underlying key-path "name"
was unchanged so our model will not trigger a data migration.
To tell the DataStack
about these types, add all CoreStoreObject
s' entities to a CoreStoreSchema
:
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack = DataStack(
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<Person>("Person")
]
)
)
CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack.addStorage(/* ... */)
And that's all CoreStore needs to build the model; we don't need .xcdatamodeld files anymore.
In addition, @Field
properties can be used to create type-safe key-path strings
let keyPath = String(keyPath: \Dog.$nickname)
as well as Where
and OrderBy
clauses
let puppies = try dataStack.fetchAll(
From<Dog>()
.where(\.$age < 5)
.orderBy(.ascending(\.$age))
)
All CoreStore APIs that are usable with NSManagedObject
s are also available for CoreStoreObject
s. These include ListMonitor
s, ImportableObject
s, fetching, etc.
New @Field
Property Wrapper syntax
â ï¸Important:
@Field
properties are only supported forCoreStoreObject
subclasses. If you are usingNSManagedObject
s, you need to keep using@NSManaged
for your attributes.
Starting CoreStore 7.1.0, CoreStoreObject
properties may be converted to @Field
Property Wrappers.
â¼ï¸ Please take note of the warnings below before converting or else the model's hash might change.
If conversion is too risky, the current Value.Required
, Value.Optional
, Transformable.Required
, Transformable.Optional
, Relationship.ToOne
, Relationship.ToManyOrdered
, and Relationship.ToManyUnordered
will all be supported for while so you can opt to use them as is for now.
â¼ï¸ This cannot be stressed enough, but please make sure to set your schema's
VersionLock
before converting!
@Field.Stored
The @Field.Stored
property wrapper is used for persisted value types. This is the replacement for "non-transient" Value.Required
and Value.Optional
properties.
Before | @Field.Stored |
---|---|
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
|
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
|
â ï¸ Only
Value.Required
andValue.Optional
that are NOT transient values can be converted toField.Stored
. For transient/computed properties, refer to@Field.Virtual
properties in the next section. â ï¸ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.
@Field.Virtual
The @Field.Virtual
property wrapper is used for unsaved, computed value types. This is the replacement for "transient" Value.Required
and Value.Optional
properties.
Before | @Field.Virtual |
---|---|
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
|
class Animal: CoreStoreObject {
|
â ï¸ Only
Value.Required
andValue.Optional
that ARE transient values can be converted toField.Virtual
. For non-transient properties, refer to@Field.Stored
properties in the previous section. â ï¸ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.
@Field.Coded
The @Field.Coded
property wrapper is used for binary-codable values. This is the new counterpart, not replacement, for Transformable.Required
and Transformable.Optional
properties. @Field.Coded
also supports other encodings such as JSON and custom binary converters.
â¼ï¸ The current
Transformable.Required
andTransformable.Optional
mechanism have no safe one-to-one conversion to@Field.Coded
. Please use@Field.Coded
only for newly added attributes.
Before | @Field.Coded |
---|---|
class Vehicle: CoreStoreObject {
|
class Vehicle: CoreStoreObject {
|
Built-in encoders such as FieldCoders.NSCoding
, FieldCoders.Json
, and FieldCoders.Plist
are available, and custom encoding/decoding is also supported:
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
struct CustomInfo: Codable {
// ...
}
@Field.Coded("otherInfo", coder: FieldCoders.Json.self)
var otherInfo: CustomInfo?
@Field.Coded(
"photo",
coder: {
encode: { $0.toData() },
decode: { Photo(fromData: $0) }
}
)
var photo: Photo?
}
â¼ï¸Important: Any changes in the encoders/decoders are not reflected in the
VersionLock
, so make sure that the encoder and decoder logic is compatible for all versions of your persistent store.
@Field.Relationship
The @Field.Relationship
property wrapper is used for link relationships with other CoreStoreObject
s. This is the replacement for Relationship.ToOne
, Relationship.ToManyOrdered
, and Relationship.ToManyUnordered
properties.
The type of relationship is determined by the @Field.Relationship
generic type:
Optional<T>
: To-one relationshipArray<T>
: To-many ordered relationshipSet<T>
: To-many unordered relationship
Before | @Field.Stored |
---|---|
class Pet: CoreStoreObject {
|
class Pet: CoreStoreObject {
|
â ï¸ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.
Also note how Relationship
s are linked statically with the inverse:
argument. All relationships are required to have an "inverse" relationship. Unfortunately, due to Swift compiler limitation we can declare the inverse:
on only one of the relationship-pair.
@Field
usage notes
Accessor syntax
When using key-path utilities, properties using @Field
property wrappers need to use the $
syntax:
- Before:
From<Person>.where(\.title == "Mr.")
- After:
From<Person>.where(\.$title == "Mr.")
This applies to property access using ObjectPublisher
s and ObjectSnapshot
s.
- Before:
let name = personSnapshot.name
- After:
let name = personSnapshot.$name
Default values vs. Initial values
One common mistake when assigning default values to CoreStoreObject
properties is to assign it a value and expect it to be evaluated whenever an object is created:
// â
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("identifier")
var identifier: UUID = UUID() // Wrong!
@Field.Stored("createdDate")
var createdDate: Date = Date() // Wrong!
}
This default value will be evaluated only when the DataStack
sets up the schema, and all instances will end up having the same values. This syntax for "default values" are usually used only for actual reasonable constant values, or sentinel values such as ""
or 0
.
For actual "initial values", @Field.Stored
and @Field.Coded
now supports dynamic evaluation during object creation via the dynamicInitialValue:
argument:
// â
class Person: CoreStoreObject {
@Field.Stored("identifier", dynamicInitialValue: { UUID() })
var identifier: UUID
@Field.Stored("createdDate", dynamicInitialValue: { Date() })
var createdDate: Date
}
When using this feature, a "default value" should not be assigned (i.e. no =
expression).
VersionLock
s
While it is convenient to be able to declare entities only in code, it is worrying that we might accidentally change the CoreStoreObject
's properties and break our users' model version history. For this, the CoreStoreSchema
allows us to "lock" our properties to a particular configuration. Any changes to that VersionLock
will raise an assertion failure during the CoreStoreSchema
initialization, so you can then look for the commit which changed the VersionLock
hash.
To use VersionLock
s, create the CoreStoreSchema
, run the app, and look for a similar log message that is automatically printed to the console:
Copy this dictionary value and use it as the versionLock:
argument of the CoreStoreSchema
initializer:
CoreStoreSchema(
modelVersion: "V1",
entities: [
Entity<Animal>("Animal", isAbstract: true),
Entity<Dog>("Dog"),
Entity<Person>("Person"),
],
versionLock: [
"Animal": [0x1b59d511019695cf, 0xdeb97e86c5eff179, 0x1cfd80745646cb3, 0x4ff99416175b5b9a],
"Dog": [0xe3f0afeb109b283a, 0x29998d292938eb61, 0x6aab788333cfc2a3, 0x492ff1d295910ea7],
"Person": [0x66d8bbfd8b21561f, 0xcecec69ecae3570f, 0xc4b73d71256214ef, 0x89b99bfe3e013e8b]
]
)
You can also get this hash after the DataStack
has been fully set up by printing to the console:
print(CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack.modelSchema.printCoreStoreSchema())
Once the version lock is set, any changes in the properties or to the model will trigger an assertion failure similar to this:
Reactive Programming
RxSwift
RxSwift utilities are available through the RxCoreStore external module.
Combine
Combine publishers are available from the DataStack
, ListPublisher
, and ObjectPublisher
's .reactive
namespace property.
DataStack.reactive
Adding a storage through DataStack.reactive.addStorage(_:)
returns a publisher that reports a MigrationProgress
enum
value. The .migrating
value is only emitted if the storage goes through a migration. Refer to the Setting up section for details on the storage setup process itself.
dataStack.reactive
.addStorage(
SQLiteStore(fileName: "core_data.sqlite")
)
.sink(
receiveCompletion: { result in
// ...
},
receiveValue: { (progress) in
print("\(round(progress.fractionCompleted * 100)) %") // 0.0 ~ 1.0
switch progress {
case .migrating(let storage, let nsProgress):
// ...
case .finished(let storage, let migrationRequired):
// ...
}
}
)
.store(in: &cancellables)
Transactions are also available as publishers through DataStack.reactive.perform(_:)
, which returns a Combine Future
that emits any type returned from the closure parameter:
dataStack.reactive
.perform(
asynchronous: { (transaction) -> (inserted: Set<NSManagedObject>, deleted: Set<NSManagedObject>) in
// ...
return (
transaction.insertedObjects(),
transaction.deletedObjects()
)
}
)
.sink(
receiveCompletion: { result in
// ...
},
receiveValue: { value in
let inserted = dataStack.fetchExisting(value0.inserted)
let deleted = dataStack.fetchExisting(value0.deleted)
// ...
}
)
.store(in: &cancellables)
For importing convenience, ImportableObject
and ImportableUniqueObjects
can be imported directly through DataStack.reactive.import[Unique]Object(_:source:)
and DataStack.reactive.import[Unique]Objects(_:sourceArray:)
without having to create a transaction block. In this case the publisher emits objects that are already usable directly from the main queue:
dataStack.reactive
.importUniqueObjects(
Into<Person>(),
sourceArray: [
["name": "John"],
["name": "Bob"],
["name": "Joe"]
]
)
.sink(
receiveCompletion: { result in
// ...
},
receiveValue: { (people) in
XCTAssertEqual(people?.count, 3)
// ...
}
)
.store(in: &cancellables)
ListPublisher.reactive
ListPublisher
s can be used to emit ListSnapshot
s through Combine using ListPublisher.reactive.snapshot(emitInitialValue:)
. The snapshot values are emitted in the main queue:
listPublisher.reactive
.snapshot(emitInitialValue: true)
.sink(
receiveCompletion: { result in
// ...
},
receiveValue: { (listSnapshot) in
dataSource.apply(
listSnapshot,
animatingDifferences: true
)
}
)
.store(in: &cancellables)
ObjectPublisher.reactive
ObjectPublisher
s can be used to emit ObjectSnapshot
s through Combine using ObjectPublisher.reactive.snapshot(emitInitialValue:)
. The snapshot values are emitted in the main queue:
objectPublisher.reactive
.snapshot(emitInitialValue: true)
.sink(
receiveCompletion: { result in
// ...
},
receiveValue: { (objectSnapshot) in
tableViewCell.setObject(objectSnapshot)
}
)
.store(in: &tableViewCell.cancellables)
SwiftUI Utilities
Observing list and object changes in SwiftUI can be done through a couple of approaches. One is by creating views that autoupdates their contents, or by declaring property wrappers that trigger view updates. Both approaches are implemented almost the same internally, but this lets you be flexible depending on the structure of your custom View
s.
SwiftUI Views
CoreStore provides View
containers that automatically update their contents when data changes.
ListReader
A ListReader
observes changes to a ListPublisher
and creates its content views dynamically. The builder closure receives a ListSnapshot
value that can be used to create the contents:
let people: ListPublisher<Person>
var body: some View {
List {
ListReader(self.people) { listSnapshot in
ForEach(objectIn: listSnapshot) { person in
// ...
}
}
}
.animation(.default)
}
As shown above, a typical use case is to use it together with CoreStore's ForEach
extensions.
A KeyPath
can also be optionally provided to extract specific properties of the ListSnapshot
:
let people: ListPublisher<Person>
var body: some View {
ListReader(self.people, keyPath: \.count) { count in
Text("Number of members: \(count)")
}
}
ObjectReader
An ObjectReader
observes changes to an ObjectPublisher
and creates its content views dynamically. The builder closure receives an ObjectSnapshot
value that can be used to create the contents:
let person: ObjectPublisher<Person>
var body: some View {
ObjectReader(self.person) { objectSnapshot in
// ...
}
.animation(.default)
}
A KeyPath
can also be optionally provided to extract specific properties of the ObjectSnapshot
:
let person: ObjectPublisher<Person>
var body: some View {
ObjectReader(self.person, keyPath: \.fullName) { fullName in
Text("Name: \(fullName)")
}
}
By default, an ObjectReader
does not create its views wheen the object observed is deleted from the store. In those cases, the placeholder:
argument can be used to provide a custom View
to display when the object is deleted:
let person: ObjectPublisher<Person>
var body: some View {
ObjectReader(
self.person,
content: { objectSnapshot in
// ...
},
placeholder: { Text("Record not found") }
)
}
SwiftUI Property Wrappers
As an alternative to ListReader
and ObjectReader
, CoreStore also provides property wrappers that trigger view updates when the data changes.
ListState
A @ListState
property exposes a ListSnapshot
value that automatically updates to the latest changes.
@ListState
var people: ListSnapshot<Person>
init(listPublisher: ListPublisher<Person>) {
self._people = .init(listPublisher)
}
var body: some View {
List {
ForEach(objectIn: self.people) { objectSnapshot in
// ...
}
}
.animation(.default)
}
As shown above, a typical use case is to use it together with CoreStore's ForEach
extensions.
If a ListPublisher
instance is not available yet, the fetch can be done inline by providing the fetch clauses and the DataStack
instance. By doing so the property can be declared without an initial value:
@ListState(
From<Person>()
.sectionBy(\.age)
.where(\.isMember == true)
.orderBy(.ascending(\.lastName))
)
var people: ListSnapshot<Person>
var body: some View {
List {
ForEach(sectionIn: self.people) { section in
Section(header: Text(section.sectionID)) {
ForEach(objectIn: section) { person in
// ...
}
}
}
}
.animation(.default)
}
For other initialization variants, refer to the ListState.swift source documentations.
ObjectState
An @ObjectState
property exposes an optional ObjectSnapshot
value that automatically updates to the latest changes.
@ObjectState
var person: ObjectSnapshot<Person>?
init(objectPublisher: ObjectPublisher<Person>) {
self._person = .init(objectPublisher)
}
var body: some View {
HStack {
if let person = self.person {
AsyncImage(person.$avatarURL)
Text(person.$fullName)
}
else {
Text("Record removed")
}
}
}
As shown above, the property's value will be nil
if the object has been deleted, so this can be used to display placeholders if needed.
SwiftUI Extensions
For convenience, CoreStore provides extensions to the standard SwiftUI types.
ForEach
Several ForEach
initializer overloads are available. Choose depending on your input data and the expected closure data. Refer to the table below (Take note of the argument labels as they are important):
Data | Example |
---|---|
Signature:
ForEach(_: [ObjectSnapshot<O>])
Closure:
ObjectSnapshot<O>
|
let array: [ObjectSnapshot<Person>]
|
Signature:
ForEach(objectIn: ListSnapshot<O>)
Closure:
ObjectPublisher<O>
|
let listSnapshot: ListSnapshot<Person>
|
Signature:
ForEach(objectIn: [ObjectSnapshot<O>])
Closure:
ObjectPublisher<O>
|
let array: [ObjectSnapshot<Person>]
|
Signature:
ForEach(sectionIn: ListSnapshot<O>)
Closure:
[ListSnapshot<O>.SectionInfo]
|
let listSnapshot: ListSnapshot<Person>
|
Signature:
ForEach(objectIn: ListSnapshot<O>.SectionInfo)
Closure:
ObjectPublisher<O>
|
let listSnapshot: ListSnapshot<Person>
|
Roadmap
Prototyping stage
- Widget/Extensions storage-sharing support
- CloudKit support
Under consideration
- Derived attributes
- Cross-storage relationships (via Fetched Attributes)
Installation
- Requires:
- Dependencies:
- None
- Other notes:
- The
com.apple.CoreData.ConcurrencyDebug
debug argument should be turned off for the app. CoreStore already guarantees safety for you by making the main context read-only, and by only executing transactions serially.
- The
Install with CocoaPods
In your Podfile
, add
pod 'CoreStore', '~> 9.1'
and run
pod update
This installs CoreStore as a framework. Declare import CoreStore
in your swift file to use the library.
Install with Carthage
In your Cartfile
, add
github "JohnEstropia/CoreStore" >= 9.2.0
and run
carthage update
This installs CoreStore as a framework. Declare import CoreStore
in your swift file to use the library.
Install with Swift Package Manager:
dependencies: [
.package(url: "https://github.com/JohnEstropia/CoreStore.git", from: "9.2.0"))
]
Declare import CoreStore
in your swift file to use the library.
Install as Git Submodule
git submodule add https://github.com/JohnEstropia/CoreStore.git <destination directory>
Drag and drop CoreStore.xcodeproj to your project.
Install through Xcode's Swift Package Manager
From the File - Swift Packages - Add Package Dependency⦠menu, search for
CoreStore
where JohnEstropia
is the Owner (forks may appear as well). Then add to your project
Changesets
For the full Changelog, refer to the Releases page.
Contact
You can reach me on Twitter @JohnEstropia
or join our Slack team at swift-corestore.slack.com
æ¥æ¬èªã®å¯¾å¿ãå¯è½ãªã®ã§æ¯éï¼
Who uses CoreStore?
I'd love to hear about apps using CoreStore. Send me a message and I'll welcome any feedback!
License
CoreStore is released under an MIT license. See the LICENSE file for more information
Top Related Projects
Realm is a mobile database: a replacement for Core Data & SQLite
Write great asynchronous code in Swift using futures and promises
A toolkit for SQLite databases, with a focus on application development
A type-safe, Swift-language layer over SQLite3.
A Cocoa / Objective-C wrapper around SQLite
Vapor ORM (queries, models, and relations) for NoSQL and SQL databases
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot