webshell-detect-bypass

Pros of Th3inspector

• Th3inspector provides a comprehensive set of tools for web application security testing, including vulnerability scanning, information gathering, and exploitation capabilities.
• The tool is actively maintained and regularly updated, ensuring that it stays up-to-date with the latest security threats and techniques.
• Th3inspector has a user-friendly interface and provides detailed reports, making it easier for users to understand and act on the findings.

Cons of Th3inspector

• Th3inspector is a larger and more complex tool compared to webshell-detect-bypass, which may make it less suitable for users who require a more focused and lightweight solution.
• The tool may have a steeper learning curve, as it offers a wide range of features and functionalities that users need to familiarize themselves with.
• Th3inspector is primarily focused on web application security testing, while webshell-detect-bypass is specifically designed for detecting and bypassing webshell detection.

Code Comparison

Here's a brief code comparison between the two projects:

webshell-detect-bypass:

def bypass_webshell_detect(code):
    """
    Bypass webshell detection by obfuscating the code.
    """
    obfuscated_code = ""
    for char in code:
        obfuscated_code += hex(ord(char))[2:]
    return obfuscated_code

Th3inspector:

def get_robots_txt(self):
    """
    Get the contents of the robots.txt file.
    """
    try:
        response = requests.get(self.url + "/robots.txt")
        if response.status_code == 200:
            return response.text
        else:
            return None
    except:
        return None

Pros of RED_HAWK

• RED_HAWK is a comprehensive tool that combines multiple security scanning and information gathering features, making it a versatile option for security professionals.
• The tool is actively maintained and regularly updated, ensuring it stays relevant and effective.
• RED_HAWK provides a user-friendly interface, making it accessible to both experienced and novice users.

Cons of RED_HAWK

• RED_HAWK may have a larger attack surface due to its broad feature set, potentially making it more vulnerable to security issues.
• The tool's extensive functionality may result in a higher resource consumption, which could be a concern for users with limited system resources.
• Some users may prefer a more focused and specialized tool like webshell-detect-bypass for specific tasks.

Code Comparison

Here's a brief code comparison between the two projects:

webshell-detect-bypass:

def detect_webshell(file_path):
    with open(file_path, 'r') as f:
        content = f.read()
    for pattern in WEBSHELL_PATTERNS:
        if re.search(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE):
            return True
    return False

RED_HAWK:

def cms_fingerprint(url):
    try:
        response = requests.get(url)
        if response.status_code == 200:
            for cms, pattern in CMS_PATTERNS.items():
                if re.search(pattern, response.text, re.IGNORECASE):
                    return cms
    except:
        pass
    return 'Unknown'

Both code snippets demonstrate the core functionality of the respective projects, with webshell-detect-bypass focusing on detecting webshells and RED_HAWK providing CMS fingerprinting capabilities.