Pros of xyflow

• More active development and larger community support
• Extensive documentation and examples
• Better TypeScript support and type definitions

Cons of xyflow

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
• Potentially higher bundle size due to additional features

Code Comparison

react-flow-chart:

import { FlowChart } from '@mrblenny/react-flow-chart'

<FlowChart
  chart={chartSimple}
  callbacks={callbacks}
/>

xyflow:

import ReactFlow from 'reactflow'

<ReactFlow
  nodes={nodes}
  edges={edges}
  onNodesChange={onNodesChange}
  onEdgesChange={onEdgesChange}
  onConnect={onConnect}
/>

xyflow offers a more modular approach with separate state management for nodes and edges, while react-flow-chart uses a single chart object. xyflow also provides more granular control over interactions and changes to the flow chart.

Both libraries allow for customization of nodes and edges, but xyflow's API is more extensive and flexible. xyflow also includes features like minimap, background patterns, and advanced edge routing out of the box, which are not available in react-flow-chart.

Overall, xyflow is more feature-rich and actively maintained, making it a better choice for complex projects. However, react-flow-chart may be simpler to set up for basic use cases.

Pros of react-diagrams

• More mature and feature-rich library with a larger community
• Supports custom node and link types out of the box
• Offers a powerful event system for fine-grained control

Cons of react-diagrams

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Requires more boilerplate code to set up basic diagrams
• Less intuitive API compared to react-flow-chart

Code Comparison

react-diagrams:

const engine = new DiagramEngine();
engine.installDefaultFactories();

const model = new DiagramModel();
const node1 = new DefaultNodeModel('Node 1', 'rgb(0,192,255)');
node1.setPosition(100, 100);

react-flow-chart:

const chart = {
  offset: {
    x: 0,
    y: 0,
  },
  nodes: {
    node1: {
      id: 'node1',
      type: 'default',
      position: {
        x: 100,
        y: 100,
      },
      properties: {
        title: 'Node 1',
      },
    },
  },
};

Both libraries offer powerful diagramming capabilities, but react-diagrams provides more advanced features at the cost of complexity, while react-flow-chart offers a simpler API for basic use cases.

Pros of X6

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wide range of graph editing capabilities
• Better performance for large-scale graphs with thousands of nodes and edges
• Extensive documentation and examples, making it easier to implement complex functionalities

Cons of X6

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and features
• Larger bundle size, which may impact initial load times for web applications

Code Comparison

X6:

import { Graph } from '@antv/x6';

const graph = new Graph({
  container: document.getElementById('container'),
  width: 800,
  height: 600,
});

graph.addNode({ x: 100, y: 100, width: 80, height: 40, label: 'Hello' });

react-flow-chart:

import { FlowChartWithState } from '@mrblenny/react-flow-chart';

const chartSimple = {
  offset: { x: 0, y: 0 },
  nodes: {
    node1: { type: 'output-only', position: { x: 100, y: 100 }, properties: { label: 'Hello' } },
  },
  links: {},
};

<FlowChartWithState initialValue={chartSimple} />;

Pros of Drawflow

• Lightweight and dependency-free, making it easier to integrate into various projects
• Supports both mouse and touch events, enhancing usability across devices
• Offers a simple and intuitive API for creating and manipulating nodes and connections

Cons of Drawflow

• Less extensive documentation compared to react-flow-chart
• Fewer built-in features and customization options out of the box
• Limited community support and fewer examples available

Code Comparison

react-flow-chart:

import { FlowChart } from 'react-flow-chart'

const chartSimple = {
  offset: {
    x: 0,
    y: 0,
  },
  nodes: {
    node1: {
      id: 'node1',
      type: 'output-only',
      position: {
        x: 300,
        y: 100,
      },
      ports: {
        port1: {
          id: 'port1',
          type: 'output',
          properties: {
            value: 'yes',
          },
        },
      },
    },
  },
}

<FlowChart
  chart={chartSimple}
  callbacks={callbacks}
/>

Drawflow:

import Drawflow from 'drawflow'

const drawflow = new Drawflow(document.getElementById('drawflow'))

drawflow.addNode('github', 1, 1, 150, 100, 'github', {}, 'Github')
drawflow.addNode('telegram', 10, 10, 150, 100, 'telegram', {}, 'Telegram')

drawflow.addConnection(1, 2, 'output_1', 'input_1')

Pros of xyflow

• More active development and larger community support
• Extensive documentation and examples
• Better TypeScript support and type definitions

Cons of xyflow

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
• Potentially higher bundle size due to additional features

Code Comparison

react-flow-chart:

import { FlowChart } from '@mrblenny/react-flow-chart'

<FlowChart
  chart={chartSimple}
  callbacks={callbacks}
/>

xyflow:

import ReactFlow from 'reactflow'

<ReactFlow
  nodes={nodes}
  edges={edges}
  onNodesChange={onNodesChange}
  onEdgesChange={onEdgesChange}
  onConnect={onConnect}
/>

xyflow offers a more modular approach with separate state management for nodes and edges, while react-flow-chart uses a single chart object. xyflow also provides more granular control over interactions and changes to the flow chart.

Both libraries allow for customization of nodes and edges, but xyflow's API is more extensive and flexible. xyflow also includes features like minimap, background patterns, and advanced edge routing out of the box, which are not available in react-flow-chart.

Overall, xyflow is more feature-rich and actively maintained, making it a better choice for complex projects. However, react-flow-chart may be simpler to set up for basic use cases.

Pros of Rete

• More versatile and feature-rich, supporting various node types and complex logic
• Better performance for large-scale diagrams with many nodes and connections
• Active development and community support, with regular updates and improvements

Cons of Rete

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive API
• Less focused on React integration, potentially requiring more setup for React projects
• Heavier bundle size, which may impact initial load times for web applications

Code Comparison

React Flow Chart:

import { FlowChart } from '@mrblenny/react-flow-chart'

const Chart = () => (
  <FlowChart
    chart={chartState}
    callbacks={callbacks}
  />
)

Rete:

import Rete from "rete";
import ReactRenderPlugin from "rete-react-render-plugin";

const editor = new Rete.NodeEditor("demo@0.1.0", container);
editor.use(ReactRenderPlugin);

Both libraries offer ways to create flow charts and node-based editors, but Rete provides a more powerful and flexible system for complex node-based applications. React Flow Chart is more straightforward and React-focused, making it easier to integrate into React projects but with fewer advanced features. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project, such as complexity, performance needs, and integration preferences.