Pros of Cleave.js

• Lightweight and focused on input formatting
• Easy to set up and use with minimal configuration
• Supports both vanilla JavaScript and popular frameworks like React and Angular

Cons of Cleave.js

• Limited customization options compared to Inputmask
• Fewer input types and formatting options available
• Less active development and community support

Code Comparison

Cleave.js:

new Cleave('.input-phone', {
    phone: true,
    phoneRegionCode: 'US'
});

Inputmask:

Inputmask({
    mask: '(999) 999-9999',
    placeholder: ' '
}).mask('.input-phone');

Both libraries aim to simplify input formatting, but Inputmask offers more advanced features and customization options. Cleave.js is easier to set up and use for basic formatting needs, while Inputmask provides greater flexibility for complex input scenarios.

Cleave.js is ideal for projects requiring simple, lightweight input formatting, whereas Inputmask is better suited for applications with diverse and complex input requirements. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project and the level of customization required.

Pros of text-mask

• Lightweight and focused solely on input masking
• Easy to integrate with various frameworks (React, Angular, Vue, etc.)
• Supports both vanilla JavaScript and framework-specific implementations

Cons of text-mask

• Less feature-rich compared to Inputmask
• Smaller community and fewer updates
• Limited options for complex masking scenarios

Code Comparison

text-mask:

import { createTextMaskInputElement } from 'text-mask-core'

const phoneMask = ['(', /[1-9]/, /\d/, /\d/, ')', ' ', /\d/, /\d/, /\d/, '-', /\d/, /\d/, /\d/, /\d/]
const maskedInputElement = createTextMaskInputElement({
  inputElement: document.querySelector('#phone-input'),
  mask: phoneMask
})

Inputmask:

import Inputmask from "inputmask";

Inputmask("(999) 999-9999").mask(document.querySelector("#phone-input"));

Both libraries offer input masking functionality, but Inputmask provides a more concise syntax for common use cases. text-mask offers more granular control over mask definition, while Inputmask has a wider range of pre-defined masks and options. Inputmask is generally more feature-rich and flexible, but text-mask may be preferred for simpler use cases or when a lightweight solution is needed.

Pros of jQuery-Mask-Plugin

• Lightweight and simple to use, with a focus on jQuery integration
• Extensive documentation and examples for common use cases
• Supports custom definitions for creating unique mask patterns

Cons of jQuery-Mask-Plugin

• Dependent on jQuery, which may not be ideal for modern web applications
• Less flexible for complex masking scenarios compared to Inputmask
• Limited built-in mask types and fewer configuration options

Code Comparison

jQuery-Mask-Plugin:

$('#date').mask('00/00/0000');
$('#phone').mask('(000) 000-0000');
$('#custom').mask('AA-00-SSSS');

Inputmask:

Inputmask("datetime", {
    inputFormat: "dd/mm/yyyy"
}).mask("#date");
Inputmask("(999) 999-9999").mask("#phone");
Inputmask("aa-99-****", {
    definitions: {'*': {validator: "[A-Za-z0-9]"}}
}).mask("#custom");

The code comparison shows that jQuery-Mask-Plugin offers a simpler syntax for basic masking, while Inputmask provides more detailed configuration options for complex scenarios. Inputmask's approach allows for greater flexibility in defining masks and handling various input types, but may require more setup for simple use cases.

Pros of jquery.maskedinput

• Lightweight and simple to use
• Well-established with a long history of development
• Good compatibility with older jQuery versions

Cons of jquery.maskedinput

• Requires jQuery as a dependency
• Less actively maintained compared to Inputmask
• Limited features and customization options

Code Comparison

jquery.maskedinput:

$("#phone").mask("(999) 999-9999");
$("#date").mask("99/99/9999");

Inputmask:

Inputmask("(999) 999-9999").mask("#phone");
Inputmask("99/99/9999").mask("#date");

Both libraries offer similar syntax for basic masking, but Inputmask provides more advanced features and options for complex scenarios. Inputmask supports various input types, including numeric, currency, and date inputs, with extensive customization possibilities.

While jquery.maskedinput is simpler and may be suitable for basic masking needs, Inputmask offers a more comprehensive solution with better performance and flexibility. Inputmask is also actively maintained and doesn't require jQuery, making it a more future-proof choice for modern web development projects.