Pros of ONNX Runtime

• Focused on machine learning inference optimization
• Cross-platform support for various hardware accelerators
• Active development with frequent updates and releases

Cons of ONNX Runtime

• Limited to machine learning tasks, not a general-purpose library
• Steeper learning curve for non-ML developers
• Requires understanding of ONNX format and model conversion

Code Comparison

ONNX Runtime (C++):

Ort::Env env(ORT_LOGGING_LEVEL_WARNING, "test");
Ort::Session session(env, model_path, Ort::SessionOptions{nullptr});
auto output_tensors = session.Run(Ort::RunOptions{nullptr}, input_names, &input_tensor, 1, output_names, 1);

Apache POI (Java):

Workbook workbook = new XSSFWorkbook(new FileInputStream("example.xlsx"));
Sheet sheet = workbook.getSheetAt(0);
Row row = sheet.getRow(0);
Cell cell = row.getCell(0);
String value = cell.getStringCellValue();

Summary

ONNX Runtime is specialized for machine learning inference optimization, offering cross-platform support and frequent updates. However, it has a narrower focus and steeper learning curve compared to Apache POI. POI is a more general-purpose library for working with Microsoft Office documents, making it easier to use for non-ML tasks but lacking the specialized ML capabilities of ONNX Runtime.

Pros of PHPExcel

• Easier to use and set up for PHP developers
• Better documentation and community support for PHP-specific use cases
• Lighter weight and faster for simple spreadsheet operations

Cons of PHPExcel

• Limited functionality compared to POI's extensive feature set
• Less actively maintained (last release in 2015)
• Performance issues with large spreadsheets

Code Comparison

PHPExcel:

$objPHPExcel = new PHPExcel();
$objPHPExcel->getActiveSheet()->setCellValue('A1', 'Hello World');
$objWriter = PHPExcel_IOFactory::createWriter($objPHPExcel, 'Excel2007');
$objWriter->save('myfile.xlsx');

POI:

Workbook workbook = new XSSFWorkbook();
Sheet sheet = workbook.createSheet("Sheet1");
Row row = sheet.createRow(0);
Cell cell = row.createCell(0);
cell.setCellValue("Hello World");
FileOutputStream out = new FileOutputStream("myfile.xlsx");
workbook.write(out);
out.close();

Both libraries allow for creating and manipulating Excel files, but POI offers more extensive features and better performance for complex operations. PHPExcel is simpler to use for basic tasks in PHP environments but lacks the robustness and ongoing development of POI. The choice between them depends on the specific project requirements, programming language preference, and the complexity of the spreadsheet operations needed.

Pros of Pandoc

• More versatile, supporting a wider range of document formats
• Lightweight and faster for simple document conversions
• Better suited for academic and technical writing with LaTeX support

Cons of Pandoc

• Less specialized for handling Microsoft Office formats
• Limited support for complex spreadsheet operations
• Smaller community and fewer enterprise-level features

Code Comparison

Pandoc (Haskell):

readDocx :: PandocMonad m => ReaderOptions -> B.ByteString -> m Pandoc
readDocx opts b = do
  archiveFiles <- getZipArchive b
  let contentTypesEntry = findEntryByPath "[Content_Types].xml" archiveFiles

POI (Java):

Workbook wb = WorkbookFactory.create(new File("workbook.xlsx"));
Sheet sheet = wb.getSheetAt(0);
Row row = sheet.getRow(2);
Cell cell = row.getCell(3);
System.out.println(cell.getNumericCellValue());

Pandoc excels in document format conversion and is ideal for academic writing, while POI specializes in manipulating Microsoft Office files, particularly Excel spreadsheets. Pandoc's code focuses on parsing document structures, whereas POI's code demonstrates direct interaction with spreadsheet elements. Choose Pandoc for versatile document conversions or POI for in-depth Office file manipulation.

Pros of easyexcel

• Faster processing speed and lower memory usage
• Simpler API and easier to use for basic Excel operations
• Built-in support for annotation-based mapping

Cons of easyexcel

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to POI
• Limited support for older Excel formats (mainly focuses on XLSX)
• Smaller community and fewer third-party resources

Code Comparison

POI:

Workbook workbook = new XSSFWorkbook();
Sheet sheet = workbook.createSheet("Sheet1");
Row row = sheet.createRow(0);
Cell cell = row.createCell(0);
cell.setCellValue("Hello, POI!");

easyexcel:

EasyExcel.write("output.xlsx", Data.class)
    .sheet("Sheet1")
    .doWrite(dataList);

Summary

POI is a more mature and feature-rich library with extensive support for various Microsoft Office formats. It offers greater flexibility and control but can be more complex to use and resource-intensive.

easyexcel, developed by Alibaba, focuses on simplicity and performance, particularly for large Excel files. It provides a more streamlined API for common Excel operations but may lack some advanced features found in POI.

Choose POI for comprehensive Office document manipulation or when working with older formats. Opt for easyexcel when dealing with large Excel files or if you prefer a simpler API for basic Excel operations.