Pros of Jekyll

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering greater customization options
• Actively maintained with regular updates and a larger community
• Supports plugins, allowing for extended functionality

Cons of Jekyll

• Steeper learning curve, especially for beginners
• Requires more setup and configuration
• May be overkill for simple blog projects

Code Comparison

Jekyll-now:

# Site settings
title: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png

Jekyll:

# _config.yml
title: Your awesome title
email: your-email@example.com
description: >-
  Write an awesome description for your new site here.
baseurl: "" # the subpath of your site, e.g. /blog
url: "" # the base hostname & protocol for your site, e.g. http://example.com

Jekyll-now provides a simpler configuration with fewer options, while Jekyll offers more detailed settings for greater control over the site's behavior and appearance.

Pros of Minimal Mistakes

• More feature-rich and customizable theme with extensive documentation
• Regular updates and active community support
• Responsive design with multiple layout options

Cons of Minimal Mistakes

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More complex setup process
• Potentially overwhelming for simple blog projects

Code Comparison

Jekyll Now:

# Site settings
title: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png

Minimal Mistakes:

# Site settings
locale: "en-US"
title: "Your Site Title"
subtitle: "A subtitle for your site"
name: "Your Name"
description: "Web Developer from Somewhere"
url: "https://yourdomain.com"

Summary

Minimal Mistakes offers a more robust and feature-rich Jekyll theme compared to Jekyll Now. It provides greater customization options and regular updates but may be more complex for beginners. Jekyll Now, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for those new to Jekyll or looking for a quick setup. The choice between the two depends on the project's requirements and the user's experience level with Jekyll and web development.

Pros of Poole

• More minimalist and lightweight design, easier to customize
• Includes built-in support for Sass and CoffeeScript
• Better organized file structure for easier maintenance

Cons of Poole

• Less beginner-friendly, requires more Jekyll knowledge
• Fewer pre-built features and layouts out of the box
• Less active community and fewer recent updates

Code Comparison

Jekyll-now _config.yml:

name: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png
footer-links:
  dribbble:
  email:
  facebook:
  flickr:

Poole _config.yml:

# Setup
title:               Poole
tagline:             The Jekyll Butler
url:                 http://getpoole.com
paginate:            1
baseurl:             ""

Jekyll-now focuses on social media links and personal information, while Poole's configuration is more centered on site structure and pagination. Poole's approach is more minimalist, allowing for greater customization but requiring more effort to set up initially.

Both repositories serve as starting points for Jekyll-based websites, but cater to different user needs and skill levels. Jekyll-now is more suited for beginners looking for a quick setup, while Poole appeals to developers seeking a cleaner slate for customization.

Pros of Beautiful Jekyll

• More feature-rich with built-in support for tags, search functionality, and social media integration
• Highly customizable with numerous configuration options and pre-built color themes
• Responsive design that works well on various devices and screen sizes

Cons of Beautiful Jekyll

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex structure and configuration options
• Requires more setup time compared to the simpler Jekyll Now template
• May be overkill for users seeking a basic, minimalist blog

Code Comparison

Beautiful Jekyll configuration snippet:

title: My Website
author: Your Name
navbar-links:
  About Me: "aboutme"
  Resources:
    - Beautiful Jekyll: "https://beautifuljekyll.com"
    - Learn markdown: "https://www.markdowntutorial.com/"

Jekyll Now configuration snippet:

name: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png
footer-links:
  dribbble:
  email:
  facebook:

Both repositories provide Jekyll-based templates for creating personal websites or blogs. Beautiful Jekyll offers more features and customization options, while Jekyll Now focuses on simplicity and ease of use for beginners.

Pros of academicpages.github.io

• Tailored for academic portfolios with specific sections for publications, talks, and teaching
• More customizable with additional features like Google Analytics integration
• Includes a data-driven CV page

Cons of academicpages.github.io

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex structure and features
• Requires more setup and configuration compared to the simpler jekyll-now
• May be overwhelming for users who don't need academic-specific features

Code Comparison

jekyll-now:

name: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png

academicpages.github.io:

name: Your Name
bio: "Your biography for the about page"
location: "Location"
employer: "Your Employer"
googlescholar: "http://yourfullgooglescholarurl.com"
orcid: "your ORCID ID"

The code snippets show that academicpages.github.io includes more academic-specific fields in its configuration, while jekyll-now keeps it simpler with basic personal information.

Pros of minimal

• More lightweight and focused theme, ideal for simple project pages
• Actively maintained with regular updates and improvements
• Better accessibility and responsive design out of the box

Cons of minimal

• Less feature-rich compared to jekyll-now, requiring more customization
• Limited layout options and predefined styles
• Steeper learning curve for beginners due to minimal default content

Code Comparison

minimal:

theme: jekyll-theme-minimal
title: [The title of your site]
description: [A short description of your site's purpose]

jekyll-now:

name: Your Name
description: Web Developer from Somewhere
avatar: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/barryclark/jekyll-now/master/images/jekyll-logo.png
footer-links:
  dribbble:
  email:
  facebook:
  flickr:

The minimal theme uses a simpler configuration approach, while jekyll-now provides more detailed customization options in the default configuration.