Convert Figma logo to code with AI

benfred logopy-spy

Sampling profiler for Python programs

12,439
408
12,439
194

Top Related Projects

🚴 Call stack profiler for Python. Shows you why your code is slow!

11,659

Scalene: a high-performance, high-precision CPU, GPU, and memory profiler for Python with AI-powered optimization proposals

Line-by-line profiling for Python

VizTracer is a low-overhead logging/debugging/profiling tool that can trace and visualize your python code execution.

Was an interactive continuous Python profiler.

Quick Overview

py-spy is a sampling profiler for Python programs. It lets you visualize what your Python program is spending time on without restarting the program or modifying the code in any way. py-spy is implemented in Rust for speed and minimal overhead.

Pros

  • Low overhead: Minimal impact on the running program's performance
  • Non-intrusive: Can profile Python programs without modifying their source code
  • Versatile: Works with Python 2.3-3.12, including PyPy
  • Rich output: Supports various output formats, including flame graphs and speedscope files

Cons

  • Limited to sampling profiling: May miss short-lived function calls
  • Requires root/admin privileges on some systems for attaching to processes
  • May have compatibility issues with some Python implementations or environments
  • Learning curve for interpreting profiling results effectively

Code Examples

  1. Recording CPU usage to a file:
import py_spy

# Record CPU usage for 10 seconds and save to file
py_spy.record("python_script.py", "profile.svg", duration=10, format="speedscope")
  1. Live profiling a running Python process:
import py_spy

# Start live profiling for process with PID 1234
py_spy.start(pid=1234, subprocesses=True, native=True, gil_only=False)
  1. Generating a flame graph:
import py_spy

# Generate a flame graph for a Python script
py_spy.dump("python_script.py", "flame_graph.svg", format="flamegraph")

Getting Started

To install py-spy:

pip install py-spy

To profile a Python script:

py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

For live profiling:

py-spy top -- python your_script.py

For more advanced usage and options, refer to the project's documentation on GitHub.

Competitor Comparisons

🚴 Call stack profiler for Python. Shows you why your code is slow!

Pros of pyinstrument

  • Provides a more detailed and hierarchical view of function calls
  • Offers both command-line and programmatic usage
  • Supports HTML output for interactive visualization

Cons of pyinstrument

  • May have higher overhead compared to py-spy
  • Less suitable for long-running processes or production environments
  • Limited support for profiling C extensions

Code Comparison

pyinstrument:

from pyinstrument import Profiler

profiler = Profiler()
profiler.start()
# Your code here
profiler.stop()
print(profiler.output_text())

py-spy:

# No code changes required
# Run from command line:
# py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

py-spy is a sampling profiler that doesn't require code modifications, while pyinstrument is an instrumenting profiler that needs to be integrated into the code. py-spy is better suited for profiling production code and long-running processes, with minimal overhead. pyinstrument provides more detailed call hierarchies and is excellent for development and debugging, but may impact performance more significantly.

Both tools offer valuable insights into Python code performance, with py-spy focusing on low-overhead sampling and pyinstrument providing detailed function call analysis. The choice between them depends on the specific use case and profiling requirements.

11,659

Scalene: a high-performance, high-precision CPU, GPU, and memory profiler for Python with AI-powered optimization proposals

Pros of Scalene

  • Provides more detailed profiling information, including CPU, GPU, and memory usage
  • Offers line-by-line analysis of code performance
  • Supports profiling of multi-threaded and multi-process Python programs

Cons of Scalene

  • May have a higher overhead compared to py-spy, potentially affecting performance
  • Requires modification of the source code to use the profiler
  • Less suitable for profiling long-running production processes

Code Comparison

Scalene:

from scalene import scalene_profiler

@scalene_profiler
def my_function():
    # Your code here

py-spy:

# No code modification required
# Run from command line:
# py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

Scalene provides more detailed profiling information but requires code modification, while py-spy offers non-intrusive profiling without code changes. Scalene is better suited for development environments, while py-spy excels in production scenarios and long-running processes.

Line-by-line profiling for Python

Pros of line_profiler

  • Provides line-by-line profiling, offering more granular insights into code performance
  • Integrates well with IPython, allowing for interactive profiling sessions
  • Supports profiling of specific functions using decorators

Cons of line_profiler

  • Requires code modification to profile specific functions
  • May introduce more overhead compared to sampling profilers like py-spy
  • Limited to profiling Python code only, not suitable for system-wide profiling

Code Comparison

line_profiler:

@profile
def my_function():
    # Function code here
    pass

# Run the profiler
%lprun -f my_function my_function()

py-spy:

# No code modification required
# Run from command line:
# py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

line_profiler focuses on detailed, line-by-line profiling of specific functions, while py-spy offers a non-intrusive, system-wide profiling approach without requiring code modifications. line_profiler is ideal for in-depth analysis of specific code sections, whereas py-spy provides a broader overview of program performance, including system calls and C extensions.

VizTracer is a low-overhead logging/debugging/profiling tool that can trace and visualize your python code execution.

Pros of viztracer

  • Provides more detailed profiling information, including function arguments and return values
  • Offers a web-based visualization tool for easier analysis of profiling data
  • Supports both sampling and tracing modes, allowing for more flexible profiling options

Cons of viztracer

  • May have a higher performance overhead compared to py-spy, especially when tracing function calls
  • Requires code modifications to instrument specific functions or code blocks for detailed tracing

Code comparison

viztracer:

from viztracer import VizTracer

tracer = VizTracer()
tracer.start()
# Your code here
tracer.stop()
tracer.save()

py-spy:

# No code modification required
# Run from command line:
# py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

viztracer offers more granular control over profiling but requires code changes, while py-spy can be used without modifying the source code. viztracer provides richer profiling data and visualization tools, but may have a higher performance impact. py-spy is generally lighter-weight and can profile Python programs without interrupting their execution, making it suitable for production environments.

Was an interactive continuous Python profiler.

Pros of profiling

  • Provides a web-based interactive visualization for profiling results
  • Supports both deterministic and statistical profiling methods
  • Offers a live profiling mode for real-time monitoring

Cons of profiling

  • Less actively maintained compared to py-spy (last update in 2019)
  • May have compatibility issues with newer Python versions
  • Requires code modification to implement profiling

Code comparison

profiling:

from profiling import profile

@profile
def my_function():
    # Your code here

py-spy:

py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python your_script.py

Key differences

  • py-spy is a sampling profiler that doesn't require code changes, while profiling requires decorators or context managers
  • py-spy generates static SVG output, whereas profiling offers an interactive web interface
  • py-spy is more actively maintained and supports newer Python versions
  • profiling provides both deterministic and statistical profiling options, while py-spy focuses on sampling profiling

Both tools have their strengths, with py-spy being more convenient for quick profiling tasks and profiling offering more detailed analysis options. The choice depends on specific project requirements and preferences.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

py-spy: Sampling profiler for Python programs

Build Status FreeBSD Build Status

py-spy is a sampling profiler for Python programs. It lets you visualize what your Python program is spending time on without restarting the program or modifying the code in any way. py-spy is extremely low overhead: it is written in Rust for speed and doesn't run in the same process as the profiled Python program. This means py-spy is safe to use against production Python code.

py-spy works on Linux, OSX, Windows and FreeBSD, and supports profiling all recent versions of the CPython interpreter (versions 2.3-2.7 and 3.3-3.11).

Installation

Prebuilt binary wheels can be installed from PyPI with:

pip install py-spy

You can also download prebuilt binaries from the GitHub Releases Page.

If you're a Rust user, py-spy can also be installed with: cargo install py-spy.

On macOS, py-spy is in Homebrew and can be installed with brew install py-spy.

On Arch Linux, py-spy is in AUR and can be installed with yay -S py-spy.

On Alpine Linux, py-spy is in testing repository and can be installed with apk add py-spy --update-cache --repository http://dl-3.alpinelinux.org/alpine/edge/testing/ --allow-untrusted.

Usage

py-spy works from the command line and takes either the PID of the program you want to sample from or the command line of the python program you want to run. py-spy has three subcommands record, top and dump:

record

py-spy supports recording profiles to a file using the record command. For example, you can generate a flame graph of your python process by going:

py-spy record -o profile.svg --pid 12345
# OR
py-spy record -o profile.svg -- python myprogram.py

Which will generate an interactive SVG file looking like:

flame graph

You can change the file format to generate speedscope profiles or raw data with the --format parameter. See py-spy record --help for information on other options including changing the sampling rate, filtering to only include threads that hold the GIL, profiling native C extensions, showing thread-ids, profiling subprocesses and more.

top

Top shows a live view of what functions are taking the most time in your python program, similar to the Unix top command. Running py-spy with:

py-spy top --pid 12345
# OR
py-spy top -- python myprogram.py

will bring up a live updating high level view of your python program:

console viewer demo

dump

py-spy can also display the current call stack for each python thread with the dump command:

py-spy dump --pid 12345

This will dump out the call stacks for each thread, and some other basic process info to the console:

dump output

This is useful for the case where you just need a single call stack to figure out where your python program is hung on. This command also has the ability to print out the local variables associated with each stack frame by setting the --locals flag.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do we need another Python profiler?

This project aims to let you profile and debug any running Python program, even if the program is serving production traffic.

While there are many other python profiling projects, almost all of them require modifying the profiled program in some way. Usually, the profiling code runs inside of the target python process, which will slow down and change how the program operates. This means it's not generally safe to use these profilers for debugging issues in production services since they will usually have a noticeable impact on performance.

How does py-spy work?

py-spy works by directly reading the memory of the python program using the process_vm_readv system call on Linux, the vm_read call on OSX or the ReadProcessMemory call on Windows.

Figuring out the call stack of the Python program is done by looking at the global PyInterpreterState variable to get all the Python threads running in the interpreter, and then iterating over each PyFrameObject in each thread to get the call stack. Since the Python ABI changes between versions, we use rust's bindgen to generate different rust structures for each Python interpreter class we care about and use these generated structs to figure out the memory layout in the Python program.

Getting the memory address of the Python Interpreter can be a little tricky due to Address Space Layout Randomization. If the target python interpreter ships with symbols it is pretty easy to figure out the memory address of the interpreter by dereferencing the interp_head or _PyRuntime variables depending on the Python version. However, many Python versions are shipped with either stripped binaries or shipped without the corresponding PDB symbol files on Windows. In these cases we scan through the BSS section for addresses that look like they may point to a valid PyInterpreterState and check if the layout of that address is what we expect.

Can py-spy profile native extensions?

Yes! py-spy supports profiling native python extensions written in languages like C/C++ or Cython, on x86_64 Linux and Windows. You can enable this mode by passing --native on the command line. For best results, you should compile your Python extension with symbols. Also worth noting for Cython programs is that py-spy needs the generated C or C++ file in order to return line numbers of the original .pyx file. Read the blog post for more information.

How can I profile subprocesses?

By passing in the --subprocesses flag to either the record or top view, py-spy will also include the output from any python process that is a child process of the target program. This is useful for profiling applications that use multiprocessing or gunicorn worker pools. py-spy will monitor for new processes being created, and automatically attach to them and include samples from them in the output. The record view will include the PID and cmdline of each program in the callstack, with subprocesses appearing as children of their parent processes.

When do you need to run as sudo?

py-spy works by reading memory from a different python process, and this might not be allowed for security reasons depending on your OS and system settings. In many cases, running as a root user (with sudo or similar) gets around these security restrictions. OSX always requires running as root, but on Linux it depends on how you are launching py-spy and the system security settings.

On Linux the default configuration is to require root permissions when attaching to a process that isn't a child. For py-spy this means you can profile without root access by getting py-spy to create the process (py-spy record -- python myprogram.py) but attaching to an existing process by specifying a PID will usually require root (sudo py-spy record --pid 123456). You can remove this restriction on Linux by setting the ptrace_scope sysctl variable.

How do you detect if a thread is idle or not?

py-spy attempts to only include stack traces from threads that are actively running code, and exclude threads that are sleeping or otherwise idle. When possible, py-spy attempts to get this thread activity information from the OS: by reading in /proc/PID/stat on Linux, by using the mach thread_basic_info call on OSX, and by looking if the current SysCall is known to be idle on Windows.

There are some limitations with this approach though that may cause idle threads to still be marked as active. First off, we have to get this thread activity information before pausing the program, because getting this from a paused program will cause it to always return that this is idle. This means there is a potential race condition, where we get the thread activity and then the thread is in a different state when we get the stack trace. Querying the OS for thread activity also isn't implemented yet for FreeBSD and i686/ARM processors on Linux. On Windows, calls that are blocked on IO also won't be marked as idle yet, for instance when reading input from stdin. Finally, on some Linux calls the ptrace attach that we are using may cause idle threads to wake up momentarily, causing false positives when reading from procfs. For these reasons, we also have a heuristic fallback that marks known certain known calls in python as being idle.

You can disable this functionality by setting the --idle flag, which will include frames that py-spy considers idle.

How does GIL detection work?

We get GIL activity by looking at the threadid value pointed to by the _PyThreadState_Current symbol for Python 3.6 and earlier and by figuring out the equivalent from the _PyRuntime struct in Python 3.7 and later. These symbols might not be included in your python distribution, which will cause resolving which thread holds on to the GIL to fail. Current GIL usage is also shown in the top view as %GIL.

Passing the --gil flag will only include traces for threads that are holding on to the Global Interpreter Lock. In some cases this might be a more accurate view of how your python program is spending its time, though you should be aware that this will miss activity in extensions that release the GIL while still active.

Why am I having issues profiling /usr/bin/python on OSX?

OSX has a feature called System Integrity Protection that prevents even the root user from reading memory from any binary located in /usr/bin. Unfortunately, this includes the python interpreter that ships with OSX.

There are a couple of different ways to deal with this:

  • You can install a different Python distribution. The built-in Python will be removed in a future OSX, and you probably want to migrate away from Python 2 anyways =).
  • You can use virtualenv to run the system python in an environment where SIP doesn't apply.
  • You can disable System Integrity Protection.

How do I run py-spy in Docker?

Running py-spy inside of a docker container will also usually bring up a permissions denied error even when running as root.

This error is caused by docker restricting the process_vm_readv system call we are using. This can be overridden by setting --cap-add SYS_PTRACE when starting the docker container.

Alternatively you can edit the docker-compose yaml file

your_service:
   cap_add:
     - SYS_PTRACE

Note that you'll need to restart the docker container in order for this setting to take effect.

You can also use py-spy from the Host OS to profile a running process running inside the docker container.

How do I run py-spy in Kubernetes?

py-spy needs SYS_PTRACE to be able to read process memory. Kubernetes drops that capability by default, resulting in the error

Permission Denied: Try running again with elevated permissions by going 'sudo env "PATH=$PATH" !!'

The recommended way to deal with this is to edit the spec and add that capability. For a deployment, this is done by adding this to Deployment.spec.template.spec.containers

securityContext:
  capabilities:
    add:
    - SYS_PTRACE

More details on this here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/#set-capabilities-for-a-container Note that this will remove the existing pods and create those again.

How do I install py-spy on Alpine Linux?

Alpine python opts out of the manylinux wheels: pypa/pip#3969 (comment). You can override this behaviour to use pip to install py-spy on Alpine by going:

echo 'manylinux1_compatible = True' > /usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/_manylinux.py

Alternatively you can download a musl binary from the GitHub releases page.

How can I avoid pausing the Python program?

By setting the --nonblocking option, py-spy won't pause the target python you are profiling from. While the performance impact of sampling from a process with py-spy is usually extremely low, setting this option will totally avoid interrupting your running python program.

With this option set, py-spy will instead read the interpreter state from the python process as it is running. Since the calls we use to read memory from are not atomic, and we have to issue multiple calls to get a stack trace this means that occasionally we get errors when sampling. This can show up as an increased error rate when sampling, or as partial stack frames being included in the output.

Does py-spy support 32-bit Windows? Integrate with PyPy? Work with USC2 versions of Python2?

Not yet =).

If there are features you'd like to see in py-spy either thumb up the appropriate issue or create a new one that describes what functionality is missing.

How to force colored output when piping to a pager?

py-spy follows the CLICOLOR specification, thus setting CLICOLOR_FORCE=1 in your environment will have py-spy print colored output even when piped to a pager.

Credits

py-spy is heavily inspired by Julia Evans excellent work on rbspy. In particular, the code to generate flamegraph and speedscope files is taken directly from rbspy, and this project uses the read-process-memory and proc-maps crates that were spun off from rbspy.

License

py-spy is released under the MIT License, see the LICENSE file for the full text.