Organizr

Pros of Heimdall

• Simpler and more lightweight interface
• Easier setup and configuration for beginners
• Better support for Docker deployments

Cons of Heimdall

• Less customization options for advanced users
• Fewer built-in integrations with other services
• Limited user management and authentication features

Code Comparison

Heimdall (PHP):

public function index()
{
    $apps = App::all();
    $tiles = $apps->where('pinned', true);
    return view('index', compact('apps', 'tiles'));
}

Organizr (JavaScript):

function buildHomePage() {
    let tabs = getActiveTabs();
    let html = '';
    tabs.forEach(tab => {
        html += buildTabContent(tab);
    });
    document.getElementById('homepage').innerHTML = html;
}

Both projects serve as application dashboards, but they differ in their approach and feature set. Heimdall focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for users who want a quick setup. Organizr offers more advanced features and customization options, catering to power users who need granular control over their dashboard.

Heimdall's code structure is more straightforward, using a traditional MVC pattern with PHP. Organizr, on the other hand, utilizes JavaScript for dynamic content generation, allowing for more interactive and responsive user interfaces.

Pros of Flame

• Lightweight and minimalist design, focusing on simplicity
• Built with modern technologies (React, TypeScript)
• Supports Docker deployment out of the box

Cons of Flame

• Less customizable compared to Organizr
• Fewer advanced features and integrations
• Smaller community and less frequent updates

Code Comparison

Flame (React component):

const App = () => {
  return (
    <div className="App">
      <Header />
      <Bookmarks />
      <Footer />
    </div>
  );
};

Organizr (PHP template):

<div id="organizr-content">
    <?php include('header.php'); ?>
    <div id="homepageOrder">
        <?php echo printHomepage(); ?>
    </div>
    <?php include('footer.php'); ?>
</div>

Both projects aim to provide a dashboard for organizing and accessing self-hosted services. Flame offers a more streamlined approach with a focus on simplicity, while Organizr provides more extensive customization options and features. Flame's modern tech stack may appeal to developers familiar with React and TypeScript, whereas Organizr's PHP-based architecture might be preferred by those with traditional web development backgrounds. The choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs, desired level of customization, and preferred technology stack.

Pros of Homer

• Lightweight and minimalist design, focusing on simplicity
• Easy to configure using a single YAML file
• Supports custom CSS for advanced customization

Cons of Homer

• Limited built-in features compared to Organizr
• Lacks user authentication and access control
• No built-in tab or iframe support for integrated app views

Code Comparison

Homer configuration (YAML):

---
title: "Dashboard"
subtitle: "Homer"
logo: "logo.png"
header: true
footer: '<p>Created with <span class="has-text-danger">❤️</span></p>'

services:
  - name: "Category 1"
    items:
      - name: "App 1"
        logo: "app1-logo.png"
        subtitle: "Subtitle"
        tag: "app"
        url: "http://app1.example.com"

Organizr configuration (PHP):

$config['tabs'] = [
    'Category 1' => [
        'name' => 'Category 1',
        'url' => 'http://app1.example.com',
        'image' => 'app1-logo.png',
        'type' => 'iframe'
    ]
];

Homer offers a more straightforward configuration approach using YAML, while Organizr provides more advanced features and integration options through its PHP-based configuration.

Pros of Dashy

• More customizable and flexible UI with a wider range of themes and layout options
• Supports a larger variety of widget types and integrations
• Easier to set up and configure, with a user-friendly config editor

Cons of Dashy

• Less focused on media server management compared to Organizr
• May have a steeper learning curve for advanced customizations
• Lacks some specific features tailored for home server environments

Code Comparison

Dashy configuration (YAML):

sections:
  - name: Getting Started
    icon: fas fa-rocket
    items:
      - title: Dashy Live
        description: Development a project management links
        icon: https://i.ibb.co/qWWpD0v/astro-dab-128.png
        url: https://live.dashy.to/

Organizr configuration (PHP):

$config['tabs'] = [
    [
        'name' => 'Home',
        'url' => 'home',
        'icon' => 'fa fa-home',
        'default' => true
    ]
];

Both projects offer dashboard solutions for organizing and accessing web services, but Dashy provides more flexibility in terms of customization and widget types. Organizr, on the other hand, is more tailored for media server management and may be easier to set up for specific home server use cases.

Pros of Homepage

• Lightweight and fast, with a clean and modern UI
• Easy to set up and configure using YAML files
• Supports a wide range of services and widgets out of the box

Cons of Homepage

• Less customizable than Organizr in terms of layout and design
• Fewer advanced features like user management and access control
• Limited theming options compared to Organizr's extensive theme support

Code Comparison

Homepage (YAML configuration):

---
# Homepage Configuration
services:
  - name: My Service
    icon: favicon
    url: https://example.com
    tag: tag1

Organizr (PHP configuration):

<?php
$config['tabs'] = [
    'My Service' => [
        'url' => 'https://example.com',
        'icon' => 'fas fa-home'
    ]
];

Both projects use different approaches for configuration. Homepage uses YAML files for a more straightforward setup, while Organizr uses PHP arrays for more advanced configuration options. Homepage's configuration is generally simpler and more readable, but Organizr's approach allows for more complex customization.