Pros of aspnetboilerplate

• Comprehensive framework with built-in modules for common enterprise application features
• Supports multi-tenancy out of the box
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of aspnetboilerplate

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive features
• May be overkill for smaller projects or simple applications
• Less flexibility in architectural choices due to its opinionated nature

Code Comparison

aspnetboilerplate:

[AbpAuthorize(PermissionNames.Pages_Tenants)]
public class TenantAppService : AsyncCrudAppService<Tenant, TenantDto, int, PagedTenantResultRequestDto, CreateTenantDto, TenantDto>, ITenantAppService
{
    // Implementation
}

eShopOnWeb:

public class CatalogController : Controller
{
    private readonly IMediator _mediator;
    public CatalogController(IMediator mediator) => _mediator = mediator;

    public async Task<IActionResult> Index(CatalogIndexViewModel viewModel)
    {
        // Implementation
    }
}

The aspnetboilerplate example showcases its built-in multi-tenancy and authorization features, while eShopOnWeb demonstrates a simpler, more straightforward controller implementation using the mediator pattern.

Pros of nopCommerce

• Full-featured, production-ready e-commerce solution
• Extensive plugin ecosystem and customization options
• Active community and regular updates

Cons of nopCommerce

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier resource usage for smaller projects
• Less focused on demonstrating architectural patterns

Code Comparison

eShopOnWeb (Catalog Controller):

public async Task<IActionResult> Index(CatalogIndexViewModel viewModel, int? brandId, int? typeId, int? page)
{
    var itemsPage = await _catalogViewModelService.GetCatalogItems(page ?? 0, Constants.ITEMS_PER_PAGE, brandId, typeId);
    viewModel.CatalogItems = itemsPage.Data;
    viewModel.PaginationInfo = new PaginationInfoViewModel()
    {
        // ... pagination logic
    };
    return View(viewModel);
}

nopCommerce (Product Controller):

public virtual async Task<IActionResult> ProductDetails(int productId, int updatecartitemid = 0)
{
    var product = await _productService.GetProductByIdAsync(productId);
    if (product == null || product.Deleted)
        return InvokeHttp404();

    var model = await _productModelFactory.PrepareProductDetailsModelAsync(product, updatecartitemid);
    return View(model);
}

Both repositories showcase different approaches to e-commerce architecture. eShopOnWeb focuses on demonstrating clean architecture and modern development practices, while nopCommerce provides a comprehensive, production-ready solution with more features but increased complexity.

Pros of grandnode

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution with advanced features like multi-vendor support and marketplace functionality
• Highly customizable and extendable architecture
• Active community and regular updates

Cons of grandnode

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• May be overkill for simpler e-commerce projects
• Less focus on educational purposes compared to eShopOnWeb

Code Comparison

eShopOnWeb (Catalog Controller):

public async Task<IActionResult> Index(CatalogIndexViewModel viewModel, int? pageId)
{
    var itemsPage = await _catalogViewModelService.GetCatalogItems(pageId ?? 0, Constants.ITEMS_PER_PAGE, viewModel.BrandFilterApplied, viewModel.TypesFilterApplied);
    viewModel.CatalogItems = itemsPage.Data;
    viewModel.PaginationInfo = new PaginationInfoViewModel()
    {
        // Pagination logic
    };
    return View(viewModel);
}

grandnode (Product Controller):

public virtual async Task<IActionResult> ProductDetails(string productId, string attributes = "")
{
    var product = await _productService.GetProductById(productId);
    if (product == null || product.Deleted || !product.Published)
        return RedirectToRoute("HomePage");

    var model = await _productViewModelService.PrepareProductDetailsModel(product, attributes);
    return View(model);
}

Both repositories use ASP.NET Core MVC, but grandnode's codebase is more extensive and complex, reflecting its broader feature set. eShopOnWeb focuses on simplicity and educational value, while grandnode prioritizes a full-featured e-commerce solution.

Pros of Smartstore

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution with advanced features like multi-store support and plugin system
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a larger community
• Includes a fully-featured admin panel and storefront out of the box

Cons of Smartstore

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive codebase
• May be overkill for simple e-commerce projects or learning purposes
• Less focus on demonstrating clean architecture patterns compared to eShopOnWeb

Code Comparison

Smartstore (Product entity):

public partial class Product : BaseEntity, ISoftDeletable, ITransient
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string ShortDescription { get; set; }
    public string FullDescription { get; set; }
    public bool Published { get; set; }
    // ... more properties and methods
}

eShopOnWeb (CatalogItem entity):

public class CatalogItem : BaseEntity
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Description { get; set; }
    public decimal Price { get; set; }
    public string PictureUri { get; set; }
    public int CatalogTypeId { get; set; }
    public CatalogType CatalogType { get; set; }
    public int CatalogBrandId { get; set; }
    public CatalogBrand CatalogBrand { get; set; }
}

Pros of vc-platform

• More comprehensive e-commerce solution with advanced features like multi-store management and B2B capabilities
• Highly modular architecture allowing for easier customization and extension
• Active community with regular updates and contributions

Cons of vc-platform

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• Potentially higher resource requirements for hosting and maintenance
• Less beginner-friendly documentation compared to eShopOnWeb

Code Comparison

vc-platform (Startup.cs):

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddVirtoCommerce(Configuration);
    services.AddSwagger();
    services.AddMvc().AddVirtoCommerce();
}

eShopOnWeb (Startup.cs):

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddDbContext<CatalogContext>(c => c.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("CatalogConnection")));
    services.AddIdentity<ApplicationUser, IdentityRole>().AddEntityFrameworkStores<AppIdentityDbContext>().AddDefaultTokenProviders();
    services.AddMvc();
}

The code comparison shows that vc-platform uses a more abstracted approach with its custom extension methods, while eShopOnWeb configures services more explicitly. This reflects the difference in complexity and modularity between the two projects.

Pros of opensourcepos

• More focused on a specific use case (Point of Sale) compared to the broader e-commerce approach of eShopOnWeb
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and contributions from the community
• Includes features specific to physical retail environments, such as barcode scanning and receipt printing

Cons of opensourcepos

• Less comprehensive documentation and architectural guidance compared to eShopOnWeb
• Smaller community and fewer stars on GitHub, potentially indicating less widespread adoption
• Limited to PHP, while eShopOnWeb showcases modern .NET development practices

Code Comparison

opensourcepos (PHP):

public function get_info($item_id)
{
    $this->db->from('items');
    $this->db->join('suppliers', 'suppliers.person_id = items.supplier_id', 'left');
    $this->db->where('item_id', $item_id);

    $query = $this->db->get();

    if ($query->num_rows() == 1) {
        return $query->row();
    } else {
        //Get empty base parent object, as $item_id is NOT an item
        $item_obj = new stdClass();

        //Get all the fields from items table
        foreach ($this->db->list_fields('items') as $field) {
            $item_obj->$field = '';
        }

        return $item_obj;
    }
}

eShopOnWeb (C#):

public async Task<CatalogItem> GetByIdAsync(int id)
{
    var item = await _dbContext.CatalogItems
        .Include(ci => ci.CatalogBrand)
        .Include(ci => ci.CatalogType)
        .FirstOrDefaultAsync(ci => ci.Id == id);
    return item;
}