Pros of aspnetcore

• Contains the actual source code for ASP.NET Core, allowing developers to explore and contribute to the framework itself
• Includes comprehensive test suites, providing examples of best practices for testing ASP.NET Core applications
• Offers a deeper understanding of the framework's internals, beneficial for advanced developers and contributors

Cons of aspnetcore

• Steeper learning curve for beginners compared to documentation-focused repositories
• Less focus on tutorials and getting started guides, which may be challenging for newcomers to the framework
• Requires more time and effort to extract practical implementation examples from the codebase

Code Comparison

AspNetCore.Docs (documentation example):

app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World!");

aspnetcore (framework implementation):

public static IApplicationBuilder UseRouting(this IApplicationBuilder builder)
{
    // Implementation details
}

The AspNetCore.Docs repository focuses on providing clear, concise examples for developers to quickly implement features, while the aspnetcore repository contains the actual framework code, offering a deeper but more complex view of how ASP.NET Core functions internally.

Pros of AspNetCore.Docs

• Comprehensive documentation for ASP.NET Core
• Regularly updated with the latest features and best practices
• Community-driven contributions and feedback

Cons of AspNetCore.Docs

• Large repository size may be overwhelming for beginners
• Some older documentation may become outdated quickly

Code Comparison

AspNetCore.Docs:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddControllersWithViews();
    services.AddRazorPages();
}

AspNetCore.Docs:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddControllersWithViews();
    services.AddRazorPages();
}

As both repositories are the same, there are no differences in the code examples. The AspNetCore.Docs repository serves as the official documentation for ASP.NET Core, providing comprehensive guides, tutorials, and code samples for developers working with the framework.

The repository is actively maintained by Microsoft and the community, ensuring that the documentation remains up-to-date with the latest ASP.NET Core releases and best practices. While the extensive content can be overwhelming for beginners, it serves as an invaluable resource for developers of all skill levels.

Pros of aspnetboilerplate

• Provides a complete application framework with built-in modules and features
• Offers multi-tenancy support out of the box
• Includes a code generator for rapid development

Cons of aspnetboilerplate

• Steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature
• Less flexibility for customization compared to building from scratch
• May include unnecessary features for simpler projects

Code Comparison

AspNetCore.Docs (Startup.cs):

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddControllersWithViews();
}

aspnetboilerplate (AppModule.cs):

public override void PreInitialize()
{
    Configuration.Modules.AbpWebCommon().SendAllExceptionsToClients = true;
    Configuration.MultiTenancy.IsEnabled = true;
}

AspNetCore.Docs focuses on providing documentation and examples for ASP.NET Core, while aspnetboilerplate offers a full-fledged application framework. AspNetCore.Docs is more suitable for learning and reference, whereas aspnetboilerplate is designed for rapid application development with pre-built modules and features.

Pros of docs

• Broader scope, covering the entire .NET ecosystem
• More comprehensive documentation for core .NET concepts
• Larger community contribution due to wider coverage

Cons of docs

• Less focused on specific frameworks like ASP.NET Core
• May not provide as much depth for specialized topics
• Updates might be slower due to the larger scope

Code Comparison

docs:

using System;

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Hello, .NET!");
    }
}

AspNetCore.Docs:

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;

public class Startup
{
    public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
    {
        app.Run(async (context) =>
        {
            await context.Response.WriteAsync("Hello, ASP.NET Core!");
        });
    }
}

The docs repository focuses on general .NET concepts and usage, while AspNetCore.Docs provides specific examples and guidance for ASP.NET Core development. The code snippets reflect this difference, with docs showing a basic console application and AspNetCore.Docs demonstrating a simple web application setup.

Pros of abp

• Provides a complete application framework with pre-built modules and features
• Offers a modular architecture for easier development and maintenance
• Includes built-in multi-tenancy support

Cons of abp

• Steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive nature
• May be overkill for smaller projects or simple applications
• Less flexibility compared to building from scratch with AspNetCore

Code Comparison

AspNetCore.Docs:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddControllers();
    services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")));
}

abp:

public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
    context.Services.AddAbpDbContext<YourDbContext>(options =>
    {
        options.UseSqlServer();
    });
}

The AspNetCore.Docs example shows a basic setup for services and database context, while the abp example demonstrates its integrated approach with ABP-specific methods and configurations.