Pros of dotnet

• More comprehensive and official repository for .NET development
• Includes source code for .NET runtime and libraries
• Provides a centralized hub for .NET-related resources and documentation

Cons of dotnet

• Larger and more complex repository, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• May contain more advanced topics that are not immediately relevant for new developers
• Updates and changes might be more frequent, requiring users to stay up-to-date

Code Comparison

samples:

// Simple console application
using System;

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
    }
}

dotnet:

// More advanced example from CoreCLR
public static unsafe int Main(string[] args)
{
    fixed (char* pArgs = args.Length > 0 ? args[0] : null)
    {
        return RuntimeAugments.CallMain(MainMethod, pArgs, args.Length);
    }
}

The samples repository focuses on simpler, beginner-friendly examples, while dotnet includes more complex, low-level code used in the .NET runtime itself.

Pros of aspnetcore

• Comprehensive framework for building web applications and services
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and new features
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of aspnetcore

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex for beginners
• Focused specifically on web development, less versatile for other .NET projects

Code Comparison

aspnetcore:

app.MapGet("/", () => "Hello World!");
app.MapPost("/api/data", (MyData data) => {
    // Process data
});
app.Run();

samples:

Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
var result = MyMethod();
Console.WriteLine($"Result: {result}");

Summary

aspnetcore is a robust framework for web development, offering a wide range of features and active maintenance. However, it may be overwhelming for beginners and is less suitable for non-web projects. samples, on the other hand, provides a variety of smaller, focused examples across different .NET technologies, making it easier for learners to grasp specific concepts. The code comparison illustrates the web-centric nature of aspnetcore versus the more general-purpose examples in samples.

Pros of runtime

• Comprehensive implementation of .NET runtime and core libraries
• Highly optimized for performance and efficiency
• Extensive documentation and active community support

Cons of runtime

• Steeper learning curve due to complex codebase
• Requires more system resources for development and testing
• Less beginner-friendly compared to samples

Code Comparison

runtime:

public static unsafe int Main(string[] args)
{
    if (!TypeLoader.Initialize())
        return -1;
    return RuntimeEntryPoint.MainInner(args);
}

samples:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
}

The runtime code snippet shows a more complex entry point with low-level operations, while the samples code demonstrates a simple "Hello World" program, highlighting the difference in complexity between the two repositories.

runtime focuses on core .NET functionality and performance optimization, making it suitable for advanced developers and those working on the .NET framework itself. samples, on the other hand, provides practical examples and tutorials, making it ideal for beginners and those learning .NET development.

Pros of core

• More comprehensive and official .NET runtime repository
• Contains the core runtime, libraries, and SDK components
• Offers deeper insights into .NET internals and development

Cons of core

• Larger and more complex codebase, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• Less focused on providing ready-to-use code examples
• Requires more in-depth knowledge of .NET architecture

Code Comparison

samples:

// From dotnet/samples/csharp/getting-started/console-teleprompter/Program.cs
static async Task ShowTeleprompter()
{
    var words = ReadFrom("sampleQuotes.txt");
    foreach (var line in words)
    {
        Console.Write(line);
        if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(line))
        {
            await Task.Delay(200);
        }
    }
}

core:

// From dotnet/core/src/libraries/System.Console/src/System/Console.cs
public static ConsoleColor ForegroundColor
{
    get { return ConsolePal.ForegroundColor; }
    set { ConsolePal.ForegroundColor = value; }
}

The samples repository focuses on providing practical, self-contained examples for developers to learn and use .NET features. In contrast, the core repository contains the actual implementation of .NET runtime and libraries, offering a deeper look into the framework's internals but requiring more expertise to navigate and understand.

Pros of corefx

• Comprehensive core framework implementation
• Deeper insight into .NET internals and performance optimizations
• More extensive API coverage and functionality

Cons of corefx

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less focused on educational examples
• Larger codebase, potentially overwhelming for newcomers

Code Comparison

samples:

public static async Task Main(string[] args)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
    await Task.Delay(1000);
}

corefx:

public static class Console
{
    public static void WriteLine(string value)
    {
        // Complex implementation details
    }
}

Summary

samples is designed to provide clear, concise examples for learning and reference, making it ideal for beginners and those looking for quick implementation guides. It offers a wide range of topics but with less depth than corefx.

corefx, on the other hand, is the core framework implementation, providing in-depth functionality and performance optimizations. It's more suitable for advanced developers looking to understand the inner workings of .NET or contribute to the framework itself.

While samples focuses on readability and simplicity, corefx prioritizes robustness and efficiency, often at the cost of immediate comprehension for newcomers to the .NET ecosystem.

Pros of Roslyn

• Provides deep insights into C# and Visual Basic compilers
• Offers powerful APIs for code analysis and manipulation
• Enables creation of custom analyzers and code fixes

Cons of Roslyn

• Steeper learning curve due to complexity
• Larger codebase, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• Focused on compiler internals rather than general .NET usage

Code Comparison

Roslyn (syntax tree manipulation):

var tree = CSharpSyntaxTree.ParseText("class C { }");
var root = tree.GetRoot();
var newRoot = root.ReplaceNode(
    root.DescendantNodes().OfType<ClassDeclarationSyntax>().First(),
    SyntaxFactory.ClassDeclaration("NewClass")
);

Samples (basic C# usage):

public class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
    }
}

Summary

Roslyn is a powerful toolkit for working with C# and VB compilers, offering advanced capabilities for code analysis and manipulation. It's ideal for developers creating language tools or deep .NET integrations. Samples, on the other hand, provides a broad range of .NET code examples, making it more accessible for learners and developers seeking practical implementations across various .NET technologies.