Pros of public-apis

• Extensive collection of APIs covering a wide range of categories
• Well-organized with clear categorization and descriptions
• Regularly updated with new APIs and community contributions

Cons of public-apis

• Not focused on a specific region or country
• May include APIs that are not relevant to all users
• Potentially overwhelming due to the large number of options

Code comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of lists and don't contain much code, here's a comparison of how they structure their API listings:

DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA:

| Nama API        | Developer | URL | Status  | Deskripsi | Auth |
|-----------------|-----------|-----|---------|-----------|------|
| Nama API Disini | Nama Dev  | URL | Status  | Deskripsi | Auth |

public-apis:

### Category Name
| API | Description | Auth | HTTPS | CORS |
|-----|-------------|------|-------|------|
| API Name | Description | Auth | HTTPS | CORS |

The public-apis repository uses a more detailed structure, including information about HTTPS and CORS support, which can be valuable for developers considering API integration.

Pros of Public-APIs

• Broader scope, covering APIs from various countries and categories
• Larger collection of APIs, providing more options for developers
• Better organization with categorization and sorting of APIs

Cons of Public-APIs

• Less focused on a specific region or country
• May include outdated or deprecated APIs due to its larger size
• Potentially overwhelming for developers looking for specific local APIs

Code Comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of markdown files listing APIs, Public-APIs includes a JSON file for programmatic access:

Public-APIs:

{
  "API": "API Name",
  "Description": "API Description",
  "Auth": "API Authentication Method",
  "HTTPS": true,
  "Cors": "yes"
}

DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA:

| API Name | Developer | URL | Status | Description |
|----------|-----------|-----|--------|-------------|
| Example API | Developer Name | https://api.example.com | ✓ | API Description |

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for developers, with Public-APIs offering a more extensive collection of global APIs, while DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA focuses specifically on Indonesian APIs. The choice between them depends on the developer's needs and target region.

Pros of awesome-api

• Broader scope, covering APIs from various domains and countries
• More extensive list with a larger number of APIs
• Better organized with clear categorization and subcategories

Cons of awesome-api

• Less focused on a specific region or country
• May not include as many local or niche APIs for specific areas
• Potentially overwhelming due to the large number of entries

Code comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of lists and don't contain much code, here's a comparison of their README structure:

DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA:

## Daftar API Lokal Indonesia

### Daftar dalam bahasa lain
- [English](README-EN.md)
- [Bahasa Indonesia](README.md)

### Daftar Isi
- [Daftar API Lokal Indonesia](#daftar-api-lokal-indonesia)

awesome-api:

# Awesome API [![Awesome](https://cdn.rawgit.com/sindresorhus/awesome/d7305f38d29fed78fa85652e3a63e154dd8e8829/media/badge.svg)](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)

A curated list of awesome API's, libraries and software.

## Contents
- [API](#api)

Both repositories use Markdown for their README files, but awesome-api has a more structured and comprehensive approach to organizing its content.

Pros of public-api

• Broader scope with APIs from various categories and countries
• More actively maintained with frequent updates
• Includes additional metadata like HTTPS support and authentication requirements

Cons of public-api

• Less focused on a specific region or country
• May include APIs that are not relevant to all users
• Potentially overwhelming due to the large number of APIs listed

Code Comparison

While both repositories primarily consist of lists of APIs, public-api includes a JSON file with structured data:

{
  "API": "AdoptAPet",
  "Description": "Resource to help get pets adopted",
  "Auth": "apiKey",
  "HTTPS": true,
  "Cors": "yes",
  "Link": "https://www.adoptapet.com/public/apis/pet_list.html",
  "Category": "Animals"
}

DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA uses a simpler markdown format:

| Nama API        | Developer | URL | Status  | Deskripsi | Auth |
|-----------------|-----------|-----|---------|-----------|------|
| Jadwal Sholat   | Wahid     | [Link](https://waktusholat.org/api/docs) | Aktif | Jadwal sholat Indonesia | No |

Both approaches have their merits, with public-api's JSON format being more machine-readable and DAFTAR-API-LOKAL-INDONESIA's markdown being more human-readable.