Pros of awesome-for-beginners

• Provides a curated list of projects across various programming languages and technologies
• Offers a wider range of difficulty levels for beginners
• Includes detailed descriptions and labels for each project

Cons of awesome-for-beginners

• Less hands-on guidance for making the first contribution
• May be overwhelming due to the large number of options
• Requires more self-direction from the user to choose a project

Code Comparison

While both repositories are primarily focused on documentation and lists, awesome-for-beginners uses markdown for organization:

## JavaScript

- [Leaflet](https://github.com/Leaflet/Leaflet) - JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. (Label: good first issue)
- [Brackets](https://github.com/adobe/brackets) - An open source code editor for the web, written in JavaScript, HTML and CSS. (Label: good first issue)

first-contributions provides a step-by-step guide with code snippets:

git clone https://github.com/firstcontributions/first-contributions.git
cd first-contributions
git checkout -b add-your-name
git add Contributors.md
git commit -m "Add <your-name> to Contributors list"

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for beginners, with awesome-for-beginners offering a broader selection of projects and first-contributions providing a more structured, hands-on approach to making the first contribution.

Pros of Up-for-grabs.net

• Provides a curated list of projects seeking contributions, making it easier for beginners to find suitable projects
• Offers a wider range of projects across various programming languages and technologies
• Includes a tagging system to filter projects based on skills or interests

Cons of Up-for-grabs.net

• Requires more effort to get started, as users need to navigate through project listings
• May be overwhelming for absolute beginners due to the variety of projects available
• Less hands-on guidance for making the first contribution compared to First-contributions

Code Comparison

Up-for-grabs.net (JavaScript):

$(function () {
  var projects = projectsService.get().then(function (projectsInformation) {
    var projects = projectsInformation.projects;
    renderProjects(projects);
  });
});

First-contributions (Markdown):

# First Contributions

This project aims to simplify and guide the way beginners make their first contribution. If you are looking to make your first contribution, follow the steps below.

The code comparison shows that Up-for-grabs.net uses JavaScript to fetch and render project information, while First-contributions primarily uses Markdown to provide step-by-step instructions for making contributions.

Pros of opensource.guide

• Comprehensive guide covering various aspects of open source, including starting and maintaining projects
• Well-structured content with detailed sections on best practices, community building, and legal considerations
• Regularly updated with contributions from the open source community

Cons of opensource.guide

• More theoretical and less hands-on compared to first-contributions
• May be overwhelming for absolute beginners looking for a quick start
• Requires more time investment to digest the extensive information

Code comparison

first-contributions:

# First Contributions

This project aims to simplify and guide the way beginners make their first contribution. If you are looking to make your first contribution, follow the steps below.

opensource.guide:

<h1 class="alt-h1 text-center">Open Source Guides</h1>
<p class="alt-lead text-center">Open source software is made by people just like you. Learn how to launch and grow your project.</p>

Summary

first-contributions focuses on providing a practical, step-by-step guide for making a first contribution to open source projects. It's ideal for beginners who want to quickly understand the process of contributing.

opensource.guide offers a comprehensive resource covering various aspects of open source development and maintenance. It's better suited for those looking to gain a deeper understanding of open source principles and practices.

Both repositories serve valuable purposes in the open source ecosystem, catering to different needs and experience levels of contributors and project maintainers.

Pros of how-to-contribute-to-open-source

• Comprehensive guide covering various aspects of open-source contribution
• Includes a curated list of resources and projects for beginners
• Provides information on different programming languages and technologies

Cons of how-to-contribute-to-open-source

• More theoretical approach, lacking hands-on practice
• Can be overwhelming for absolute beginners due to the amount of information
• Requires more time to navigate and understand the content

Code comparison

While both repositories focus on guiding newcomers to open-source contributions, they don't contain significant code examples. However, here's a comparison of their README structures:

how-to-contribute-to-open-source:

# How to Contribute to Open Source

## Table of Contents
- [Contributing to open source in general](#contributing-to-open-source-in-general)
- [Direct GitHub searches](#direct-github-searches)
- [Mozilla's contributor ecosystem](#mozillas-contributor-ecosystem)

first-contributions:

# First Contributions

This project aims to simplify and guide the way beginners make their first contribution. If you are looking to make your first contribution, follow the steps below.

_If you're not comfortable with command line, [here are tutorials using GUI tools.](#tutorials-using-other-tools)_

The how-to-contribute-to-open-source README provides a more structured and comprehensive approach, while first-contributions focuses on a step-by-step guide for making the first contribution.