Pros of object-fit-images

• Focuses on image sizing and fitting, addressing a specific CSS property
• Lightweight solution for cross-browser compatibility of object-fit
• Simpler implementation for image-related tasks

Cons of object-fit-images

• Limited to image handling, not addressing video playback issues
• May require additional solutions for video-related challenges
• Less versatile for multimedia content manipulation

Code Comparison

object-fit-images:

objectFitImages('img.object-fit');
objectFitImages();
objectFitImages('img.object-fit', {watchMQ: true});

iphone-inline-video:

enableInlineVideo(videoElement);
enableInlineVideo(videoElement, {
    everywhere: true,
    iPad: true
});

Summary

object-fit-images is a specialized tool for handling image fitting across browsers, while iphone-inline-video focuses on enabling inline video playback on iOS devices. The former is more suitable for projects dealing primarily with image layout issues, while the latter addresses specific video playback challenges on mobile platforms. object-fit-images offers a simpler API for image-related tasks, but iphone-inline-video provides more comprehensive solutions for video content on iOS devices.

Pros of video.js

• More comprehensive and feature-rich video player solution
• Supports a wide range of video formats and platforms
• Extensive plugin ecosystem and customization options

Cons of video.js

• Larger file size and potentially heavier performance impact
• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API and configuration options
• May be overkill for simple inline video playback on iOS devices

Code Comparison

iphone-inline-video:

import makeVideoPlayableInline from 'iphone-inline-video';

const video = document.querySelector('video');
makeVideoPlayableInline(video);

video.js:

import videojs from 'video.js';

const player = videojs('my-video', {
  controls: true,
  sources: [{ src: 'path/to/video.mp4', type: 'video/mp4' }]
});

Summary

iphone-inline-video is a lightweight solution specifically designed for enabling inline video playback on iOS devices. It's simple to use and has a small footprint, making it ideal for projects that only need to address this specific issue.

video.js, on the other hand, is a full-featured video player library that offers cross-platform compatibility, extensive customization options, and support for various video formats. While it provides a more comprehensive solution, it may be excessive for projects that only require inline video playback on iOS.

Choose iphone-inline-video for a focused, lightweight solution to iOS inline video playback, or opt for video.js when you need a versatile, feature-rich video player across multiple platforms.

Pros of Plyr

• More comprehensive media player solution, supporting HTML5 video, audio, YouTube, and Vimeo
• Extensive customization options and API for advanced control
• Active development with regular updates and a larger community

Cons of Plyr

• Larger file size and potentially more complex setup
• May include unnecessary features for simple inline video playback
• Requires more configuration for basic use cases

Code Comparison

Plyr initialization:

const player = new Plyr('#player', {
  controls: ['play-large', 'play', 'progress', 'current-time', 'mute', 'volume', 'captions', 'settings', 'pip', 'airplay', 'fullscreen'],
  settings: ['captions', 'quality', 'speed', 'loop']
});

iPhone-inline-video usage:

import makeVideoPlayableInline from 'iphone-inline-video';

const video = document.querySelector('video');
makeVideoPlayableInline(video);

Summary

Plyr is a feature-rich media player library offering extensive customization and support for various media types. It's ideal for projects requiring a full-featured player with advanced controls. iPhone-inline-video, on the other hand, is a lightweight solution specifically designed to enable inline video playback on iOS devices. It's more suitable for simple use cases where only inline video functionality is needed, especially on iOS.

Pros of MediaElement

• More comprehensive media player solution with support for various audio and video formats
• Cross-browser compatibility, including older browsers and mobile devices
• Extensive plugin system for customization and additional features

Cons of MediaElement

• Larger file size and potentially more complex setup
• May be overkill for simple inline video playback on iOS devices
• Requires more resources and can be slower to load

Code Comparison

MediaElement:

var player = new MediaElementPlayer('player1', {
    features: ['playpause', 'progress', 'current', 'duration', 'volume'],
    success: function(mediaElement, domObject) {
        // Player initialization successful
    }
});

iPhone-inline-video:

import makeVideoPlayableInline from 'iphone-inline-video';

const video = document.querySelector('video');
makeVideoPlayableInline(video);

Summary

MediaElement is a full-featured media player solution with broad compatibility and customization options, while iPhone-inline-video focuses specifically on enabling inline video playback on iOS devices. MediaElement offers more functionality but comes with increased complexity and resource requirements. iPhone-inline-video provides a simpler, lightweight solution for its specific use case. The choice between the two depends on the project's requirements and target platforms.

Pros of Clappr

• More feature-rich and versatile, supporting multiple video sources and plugins
• Actively maintained with regular updates and a larger community
• Cross-platform compatibility, including desktop and mobile devices

Cons of Clappr

• Larger file size and potentially more complex setup
• May be overkill for simple inline video playback on iOS devices
• Steeper learning curve for basic implementation

Code Comparison

iphone-inline-video:

import makeVideoPlayableInline from 'iphone-inline-video';

const video = document.querySelector('video');
makeVideoPlayableInline(video);

Clappr:

var player = new Clappr.Player({
  source: "http://your.video/here.mp4",
  parentId: "#player"
});

Summary

iphone-inline-video is a lightweight solution specifically designed for enabling inline video playback on iOS devices. It's simple to implement and has a small footprint, making it ideal for projects with focused requirements.

Clappr, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive video player solution with broader compatibility and extensive features. It's suitable for projects requiring advanced video playback capabilities across multiple platforms, but may be excessive for simpler use cases.

Choose iphone-inline-video for iOS-specific inline video needs, and Clappr for more complex, cross-platform video player requirements.

Pros of JW Player

• More comprehensive video player solution with advanced features
• Supports a wider range of platforms and devices
• Offers analytics and monetization options

Cons of JW Player

• Larger file size and more complex implementation
• Requires a license for commercial use
• May be overkill for simple inline video playback needs

Code Comparison

iPhone Inline Video:

makeVideoPlayableInline(video, {
  playsinline: true,
  muted: true,
  autoplay: true
});

JW Player:

jwplayer("myElement").setup({
  file: "path/to/video.mp4",
  width: "100%",
  aspectratio: "16:9",
  autostart: true
});

Summary

iPhone Inline Video is a lightweight solution specifically designed for enabling inline video playback on iOS devices. It's simple to implement and focuses on solving a specific problem.

JW Player, on the other hand, is a full-featured video player with support for various platforms, advanced customization options, and additional features like analytics and monetization. It's more suitable for complex video playback requirements and large-scale implementations.

Choose iPhone Inline Video for simple inline video playback on iOS, and JW Player for more comprehensive video player needs across multiple platforms.