Convert Figma logo to code with AI

google-deepmind logosonnet

TensorFlow-based neural network library

9,747
1,292
9,747
38

Top Related Projects

185,446

An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

82,049

Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration

61,580

Deep Learning for humans

scikit-learn: machine learning in Python

17,500

Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK), an open source deep-learning toolkit

29,959

Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs: differentiate, vectorize, JIT to GPU/TPU, and more

Quick Overview

Sonnet is a library for building neural networks using TensorFlow. It provides a high-level API for constructing and training neural networks, with a focus on modularity, reusability, and ease of use. Sonnet is developed and maintained by the Google DeepMind team.

Pros

  • Modular Design: Sonnet encourages a modular approach to building neural networks, making it easier to reuse and compose different components.
  • Ease of Use: The Sonnet API provides a user-friendly interface for defining and training neural networks, abstracting away many low-level TensorFlow details.
  • Flexibility: Sonnet allows for the creation of complex neural network architectures, while still providing a clear and intuitive structure.
  • Integration with TensorFlow: As a TensorFlow-based library, Sonnet seamlessly integrates with the broader TensorFlow ecosystem, allowing for easy integration with other TensorFlow tools and libraries.

Cons

  • Limited Documentation: The Sonnet project has relatively sparse documentation, which can make it challenging for new users to get started and understand the library's capabilities.
  • Steep Learning Curve: While Sonnet aims to simplify the process of building neural networks, the library still has a significant learning curve, especially for users new to TensorFlow.
  • Potential Overhead: The abstraction and modularity provided by Sonnet may introduce some overhead and complexity compared to directly using TensorFlow, which could impact performance in certain scenarios.
  • Dependency on TensorFlow: Sonnet is tightly coupled with TensorFlow, which means that users are required to have a good understanding of TensorFlow in order to effectively use the library.

Code Examples

Here are a few code examples demonstrating the usage of Sonnet:

  1. Creating a Simple Neural Network:
import sonnet as snt
import tensorflow as tf

# Define the neural network module
class MyNetwork(snt.Module):
    def __init__(self, name=None):
        super(MyNetwork, self).__init__(name=name)
        self.dense1 = snt.Linear(10)
        self.dense2 = snt.Linear(1)

    def __call__(self, x):
        x = self.dense1(x)
        x = tf.nn.relu(x)
        x = self.dense2(x)
        return x

# Create an instance of the network and use it
network = MyNetwork()
input_data = tf.random.normal([32, 5])
output = network(input_data)
  1. Defining a Recurrent Neural Network:
import sonnet as snt
import tensorflow as tf

# Define the recurrent neural network module
class MyRNN(snt.RNN):
    def __init__(self, hidden_size, name=None):
        super(MyRNN, self).__init__(name=name)
        self.hidden_size = hidden_size
        self.cell = snt.LSTMCell(hidden_size)

    def _build(self, inputs, prev_state):
        output, next_state = self.cell(inputs, prev_state)
        return output, next_state

# Create an instance of the RNN and use it
rnn = MyRNN(hidden_size=64)
input_sequence = tf.random.normal([10, 32, 20])
initial_state = rnn.initial_state(batch_size=32)
outputs, final_state = rnn(input_sequence, initial_state)
  1. Applying a Custom Module to a TensorFlow Dataset:
import sonnet as snt
import tensorflow as tf

# Define a custom module
class MyPreprocessor(snt.Module):
    def __call__(self, x):
        x = tf.cast(x, tf.float32)
        x = (x - tf.reduce_mean(x)) / tf.sqrt(tf.reduce_variance(x))
        return x

# Apply the custom module to a TensorFlow dataset
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])
preprocessor = MyPreprocessor()
preprocessed_dataset = dataset.map(preprocessor

Competitor Comparisons

185,446

An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

Pros of TensorFlow

  • Larger and more active community, with more resources and support available
  • Wider range of pre-built models and tools, making it easier to get started with deep learning
  • Stronger integration with other Google products and services, such as Google Cloud Platform

Cons of TensorFlow

  • Steeper learning curve, with more complex API and configuration options
  • Potentially slower development and innovation compared to more specialized frameworks
  • Larger codebase and dependencies, which can make it more difficult to deploy in certain environments

Code Comparison

TensorFlow:

import tensorflow as tf

# Create a simple neural network
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
    tf.keras.layers.Dense(64, activation='relu', input_shape=(10,)),
    tf.keras.layers.Dense(32, activation='relu'),
    tf.keras.layers.Dense(1)
])

# Compile and train the model
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='mean_squared_error')
model.fit(X_train, y_train, epochs=10, batch_size=32)

Sonnet:

import sonnet as snt

# Create a simple neural network
model = snt.Sequential([
    snt.Linear(64, name='layer1'),
    tf.nn.relu,
    snt.Linear(32, name='layer2'),
    tf.nn.relu,
    snt.Linear(1, name='output')
])

# Compute the output
output = model(X_train)
82,049

Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration

Pros of PyTorch

  • PyTorch is a more widely adopted and actively maintained deep learning framework, with a large and growing community of users and contributors.
  • PyTorch has a more intuitive and Pythonic API, making it easier for beginners to get started with deep learning.
  • PyTorch provides better support for dynamic computational graphs, which can be more flexible and powerful for certain types of models.

Cons of PyTorch

  • Sonnet, being a part of the Google DeepMind ecosystem, may have better integration with other Google tools and services, such as TensorFlow.
  • Sonnet may have more advanced features and functionality for certain specialized deep learning tasks, such as reinforcement learning.
  • The learning curve for Sonnet may be steeper than PyTorch, especially for those new to deep learning.

Code Comparison

PyTorch:

import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class MyModel(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super(MyModel, self).__init__()
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(10, 5)
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(5, 1)

Sonnet:

import sonnet as snt

class MyModel(snt.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super(MyModel, self).__init__()
        self.fc1 = snt.Linear(10, 5)
        self.fc2 = snt.Linear(5, 1)

The code for both PyTorch and Sonnet is very similar, with the main difference being the use of nn.Module and snt.Module respectively. The overall structure and functionality of the model are the same.

61,580

Deep Learning for humans

Pros of Keras

  • Simplicity: Keras provides a high-level, user-friendly API that makes it easy to build and train neural networks, even for beginners.
  • Flexibility: Keras supports multiple backend engines (TensorFlow, Theano, CNTK), allowing users to choose the one that best fits their needs.
  • Extensive Documentation: Keras has excellent documentation, with detailed tutorials, examples, and API references, making it easy to get started and learn.

Cons of Keras

  • Limited Customization: Keras is designed to be a high-level library, which means that it may not provide as much flexibility and control as lower-level libraries like Sonnet.
  • Performance: Keras may not be as performant as lower-level libraries, especially for complex or highly optimized models.

Code Comparison

Keras:

from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Activation

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(64, input_dim=100))
model.add(Activation('relu'))

Sonnet:

import sonnet as snt
import tensorflow as tf

model = snt.Sequential([
    snt.Linear(64),
    tf.nn.relu,
])

scikit-learn: machine learning in Python

Pros of scikit-learn

  • Extensive documentation and community support
  • Wide range of machine learning algorithms and models
  • Easy-to-use and intuitive API

Cons of scikit-learn

  • Limited support for deep learning
  • May not be as performant as specialized deep learning libraries
  • Fewer features for advanced model tuning and optimization

Code Comparison

scikit-learn

from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
model = LogisticRegression()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)

Sonnet

import sonnet as snt
model = snt.nets.MLP([64, 32, 1])
optimizer = snt.optimizers.Adam(0.001)
model(x_train)
model.train(optimizer, loss_fn, x_train, y_train)
17,500

Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK), an open source deep-learning toolkit

Pros of CNTK

  • CNTK is a highly scalable and efficient deep learning framework, capable of running on a wide range of hardware, including GPUs and CPUs.
  • CNTK provides a comprehensive set of pre-built layers and models, making it easier to build and train complex neural networks.
  • CNTK has a strong focus on performance and optimization, with features like automatic mixed precision training and distributed training support.

Cons of CNTK

  • CNTK has a steeper learning curve compared to Sonnet, especially for developers who are new to deep learning.
  • The documentation for CNTK can be less comprehensive and user-friendly than Sonnet's.
  • CNTK is primarily developed and maintained by Microsoft, which may be a concern for developers who prefer a more community-driven project.

Code Comparison

Sonnet (Google DeepMind):

import sonnet as snt

class MyModule(snt.Module):
    def __init__(self, name=None):
        super(MyModule, self).__init__(name=name)
        self.linear = snt.Linear(output_size=10)

    def __call__(self, x):
        return self.linear(x)

CNTK (Microsoft):

import cntk as C

x = C.input_variable(shape=(1,))
model = C.layers.Dense(10)(x)

# Train the model
trainer = C.Trainer(model, C.squared_error(model, x), [C.sgd(model.parameters, 0.01)])
29,959

Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs: differentiate, vectorize, JIT to GPU/TPU, and more

Pros of JAX

  • More flexible and lower-level, allowing for greater customization
  • Supports automatic differentiation and GPU/TPU acceleration
  • Provides a wider range of numerical computing capabilities

Cons of JAX

  • Steeper learning curve, especially for those new to functional programming
  • Less built-in high-level neural network functionality compared to Sonnet

Code Comparison

Sonnet example:

import sonnet as snt

linear = snt.Linear(output_size=10)
output = linear(input_data)

JAX example:

import jax.numpy as jnp
from jax import random

key = random.PRNGKey(0)
W = random.normal(key, (10, input_data.shape[1]))
b = random.normal(key, (10,))
output = jnp.dot(W, input_data) + b

While Sonnet provides a higher-level API for building neural networks, JAX offers more flexibility and control over computations, allowing for custom implementations of linear layers and other operations.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Sonnet

Sonnet

Documentation | Examples

Sonnet is a library built on top of TensorFlow 2 designed to provide simple, composable abstractions for machine learning research.

Introduction

Sonnet has been designed and built by researchers at DeepMind. It can be used to construct neural networks for many different purposes (un/supervised learning, reinforcement learning, ...). We find it is a successful abstraction for our organization, you might too!

More specifically, Sonnet provides a simple but powerful programming model centered around a single concept: snt.Module. Modules can hold references to parameters, other modules and methods that apply some function on the user input. Sonnet ships with many predefined modules (e.g. snt.Linear, snt.Conv2D, snt.BatchNorm) and some predefined networks of modules (e.g. snt.nets.MLP) but users are also encouraged to build their own modules.

Unlike many frameworks Sonnet is extremely unopinionated about how you will use your modules. Modules are designed to be self contained and entirely decoupled from one another. Sonnet does not ship with a training framework and users are encouraged to build their own or adopt those built by others.

Sonnet is also designed to be simple to understand, our code is (hopefully!) clear and focussed. Where we have picked defaults (e.g. defaults for initial parameter values) we try to point out why.

Getting Started

Examples

The easiest way to try Sonnet is to use Google Colab which offers a free Python notebook attached to a GPU or TPU.

Installation

To get started install TensorFlow 2.0 and Sonnet 2:

$ pip install tensorflow tensorflow-probability
$ pip install dm-sonnet

You can run the following to verify things installed correctly:

import tensorflow as tf
import sonnet as snt

print("TensorFlow version {}".format(tf.__version__))
print("Sonnet version {}".format(snt.__version__))

Using existing modules

Sonnet ships with a number of built in modules that you can trivially use. For example to define an MLP we can use the snt.Sequential module to call a sequence of modules, passing the output of a given module as the input for the next module. We can use snt.Linear and tf.nn.relu to actually define our computation:

mlp = snt.Sequential([
    snt.Linear(1024),
    tf.nn.relu,
    snt.Linear(10),
])

To use our module we need to "call" it. The Sequential module (and most modules) define a __call__ method that means you can call them by name:

logits = mlp(tf.random.normal([batch_size, input_size]))

It is also very common to request all the parameters for your module. Most modules in Sonnet create their parameters the first time they are called with some input (since in most cases the shape of the parameters is a function of the input). Sonnet modules provide two properties for accessing parameters.

The variables property returns all tf.Variables that are referenced by the given module:

all_variables = mlp.variables

It is worth noting that tf.Variables are not just used for parameters of your model. For example they are used to hold state in metrics used in snt.BatchNorm. In most cases users retrieve the module variables to pass them to an optimizer to be updated. In this case non-trainable variables should typically not be in that list as they are updated via a different mechanism. TensorFlow has a built in mechanism to mark variables as "trainable" (parameters of your model) vs. non-trainable (other variables). Sonnet provides a mechanism to gather all trainable variables from your module which is probably what you want to pass to an optimizer:

model_parameters = mlp.trainable_variables

Building your own module

Sonnet strongly encourages users to subclass snt.Module to define their own modules. Let's start by creating a simple Linear layer called MyLinear:

class MyLinear(snt.Module):

  def __init__(self, output_size, name=None):
    super(MyLinear, self).__init__(name=name)
    self.output_size = output_size

  @snt.once
  def _initialize(self, x):
    initial_w = tf.random.normal([x.shape[1], self.output_size])
    self.w = tf.Variable(initial_w, name="w")
    self.b = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([self.output_size]), name="b")

  def __call__(self, x):
    self._initialize(x)
    return tf.matmul(x, self.w) + self.b

Using this module is trivial:

mod = MyLinear(32)
mod(tf.ones([batch_size, input_size]))

By subclassing snt.Module you get many nice properties for free. For example a default implementation of __repr__ which shows constructor arguments (very useful for debugging and introspection):

>>> print(repr(mod))
MyLinear(output_size=10)

You also get the variables and trainable_variables properties:

>>> mod.variables
(<tf.Variable 'my_linear/b:0' shape=(10,) ...)>,
 <tf.Variable 'my_linear/w:0' shape=(1, 10) ...)>)

You may notice the my_linear prefix on the variables above. This is because Sonnet modules also enter the modules name scope whenever methods are called. By entering the module name scope we provide a much more useful graph for tools like TensorBoard to consume (e.g. all operations that occur inside my_linear will be in a group called my_linear).

Additionally your module will now support TensorFlow checkpointing and saved model which are advanced features covered later.

Serialization

Sonnet supports multiple serialization formats. The simplest format we support is Python's pickle, and all built in modules are tested to make sure they can be saved/loaded via pickle in the same Python process. In general we discourage the use of pickle, it is not well supported by many parts of TensorFlow and in our experience can be quite brittle.

TensorFlow Checkpointing

Reference: https://www.tensorflow.org/alpha/guide/checkpoints

TensorFlow checkpointing can be used to save the value of parameters periodically during training. This can be useful to save the progress of training in case your program crashes or is stopped. Sonnet is designed to work cleanly with TensorFlow checkpointing:

checkpoint_root = "/tmp/checkpoints"
checkpoint_name = "example"
save_prefix = os.path.join(checkpoint_root, checkpoint_name)

my_module = create_my_sonnet_module()  # Can be anything extending snt.Module.

# A `Checkpoint` object manages checkpointing of the TensorFlow state associated
# with the objects passed to it's constructor. Note that Checkpoint supports
# restore on create, meaning that the variables of `my_module` do **not** need
# to be created before you restore from a checkpoint (their value will be
# restored when they are created).
checkpoint = tf.train.Checkpoint(module=my_module)

# Most training scripts will want to restore from a checkpoint if one exists. This
# would be the case if you interrupted your training (e.g. to use your GPU for
# something else, or in a cloud environment if your instance is preempted).
latest = tf.train.latest_checkpoint(checkpoint_root)
if latest is not None:
  checkpoint.restore(latest)

for step_num in range(num_steps):
  train(my_module)

  # During training we will occasionally save the values of weights. Note that
  # this is a blocking call and can be slow (typically we are writing to the
  # slowest storage on the machine). If you have a more reliable setup it might be
  # appropriate to save less frequently.
  if step_num and not step_num % 1000:
    checkpoint.save(save_prefix)

# Make sure to save your final values!!
checkpoint.save(save_prefix)

TensorFlow Saved Model

Reference: https://www.tensorflow.org/alpha/guide/saved_model

TensorFlow saved models can be used to save a copy of your network that is decoupled from the Python source for it. This is enabled by saving a TensorFlow graph describing the computation and a checkpoint containing the value of weights.

The first thing to do in order to create a saved model is to create a snt.Module that you want to save:

my_module = snt.nets.MLP([1024, 1024, 10])
my_module(tf.ones([1, input_size]))

Next, we need to create another module describing the specific parts of our model that we want to export. We advise doing this (rather than modifying the original model in-place) so you have fine grained control over what is actually exported. This is typically important to avoid creating very large saved models, and such that you only share the parts of your model you want to (e.g. you only want to share the generator for a GAN but keep the discriminator private).

@tf.function(input_signature=[tf.TensorSpec([None, input_size])])
def inference(x):
  return my_module(x)

to_save = snt.Module()
to_save.inference = inference
to_save.all_variables = list(my_module.variables)
tf.saved_model.save(to_save, "/tmp/example_saved_model")

We now have a saved model in the /tmp/example_saved_model folder:

$ ls -lh /tmp/example_saved_model
total 24K
drwxrwsr-t 2 tomhennigan 154432098 4.0K Apr 28 00:14 assets
-rw-rw-r-- 1 tomhennigan 154432098  14K Apr 28 00:15 saved_model.pb
drwxrwsr-t 2 tomhennigan 154432098 4.0K Apr 28 00:15 variables

Loading this model is simple and can be done on a different machine without any of the Python code that built the saved model:

loaded = tf.saved_model.load("/tmp/example_saved_model")

# Use the inference method. Note this doesn't run the Python code from `to_save`
# but instead uses the TensorFlow Graph that is part of the saved model.
loaded.inference(tf.ones([1, input_size]))

# The all_variables property can be used to retrieve the restored variables.
assert len(loaded.all_variables) > 0

Note that the loaded object is not a Sonnet module, it is a container object that has the specific methods (e.g. inference) and properties (e.g. all_variables) that we added in the previous block.

Distributed training

Example: https://github.com/deepmind/sonnet/blob/v2/examples/distributed_cifar10.ipynb

Sonnet has support for distributed training using custom TensorFlow distribution strategies.

A key difference between Sonnet and distributed training using tf.keras is that Sonnet modules and optimizers do not behave differently when run under distribution strategies (e.g. we do not average your gradients or sync your batch norm stats). We believe that users should be in full control of these aspects of their training and they should not be baked into the library. The trade off here is that you need to implement these features in your training script (typically this is just 2 lines of code to all reduce your gradients before applying your optimizer) or swap in modules that are explicitly distribution aware (e.g. snt.distribute.CrossReplicaBatchNorm).

Our distributed Cifar-10 example walks through doing multi-GPU training with Sonnet.