Pros of TrustKit

• Focused on SSL/TLS pinning for iOS and macOS applications
• Easier to integrate into existing mobile apps
• Provides runtime reporting and monitoring capabilities

Cons of TrustKit

• Limited to iOS and macOS platforms
• Narrower scope, focusing primarily on certificate pinning
• Less comprehensive network security testing compared to nogotofail

Code Comparison

TrustKit (Swift):

let trustKitConfig = [
    kTSKSwizzleNetworkDelegates: false,
    kTSKPinnedDomains: [
        "www.example.com": [
            kTSKPublicKeyAlgorithms: [kTSKAlgorithmRsa2048],
            kTSKPublicKeyHashes: [
                "HXXQgxueCIU5TTLHob/bPbwcKOKw6DkfsTWYHbxbqTY=",
                "0SDf3cRToyZJaMsoS17oF72VMavLxj/N7WBNasNuiR8="
            ]
        ]
    ]
]

nogotofail (Python):

class AttackPlugin(object):
    name = "Example Attack"
    description = "An example attack plugin"
    
    def on_request(self, request):
        # Modify request or perform actions
        pass
    
    def on_response(self, response):
        # Modify response or perform actions
        pass

The code snippets highlight the different focus areas of the two projects. TrustKit emphasizes certificate pinning configuration, while nogotofail provides a framework for creating custom network attack plugins.

Pros of SSLyze

• Focused specifically on SSL/TLS scanning and analysis
• Provides detailed reports on SSL/TLS configuration issues
• Supports scanning multiple servers simultaneously

Cons of SSLyze

• Limited to SSL/TLS vulnerabilities, not a comprehensive network security tool
• May require more technical knowledge to interpret results

Code Comparison

SSLyze (Python):

from sslyze import ServerNetworkLocationViaDirectConnection, ServerConnectivityTester, Scanner, ServerScanRequest, ScanCommand

server_location = ServerNetworkLocationViaDirectConnection("example.com", 443)
server_info = ServerConnectivityTester().perform(server_location)
scanner = Scanner()
scan_request = ServerScanRequest(server_info=server_info, scan_commands={ScanCommand.CERTIFICATE_INFO, ScanCommand.SSL_2_0_CIPHER_SUITES})

Nogotofail (Python):

from nogotofail.mitm import MITMProxy
from nogotofail.mitm.connection import handlers

proxy = MITMProxy()
proxy.add_handler(handlers.LoggingHandler())
proxy.add_handler(handlers.SSLStrippingHandler())
proxy.start()

Both tools focus on network security, but SSLyze specializes in SSL/TLS analysis, while Nogotofail offers a broader range of network attack simulations. SSLyze provides more in-depth SSL/TLS vulnerability scanning, while Nogotofail is designed for testing various network security aspects beyond just SSL/TLS.

Pros of testssl.sh

• More comprehensive SSL/TLS testing capabilities, including cipher suite analysis and protocol support checks
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a large community of contributors
• Can be run as a standalone script without complex setup or dependencies

Cons of testssl.sh

• Focused solely on SSL/TLS testing, lacking the broader network security features of nogotofail
• May require more manual interpretation of results compared to nogotofail's automated analysis

Code Comparison

testssl.sh:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# testssl.sh - Testing TLS/SSL encryption anywhere on any port
TESTSSL_INSTALL_DIR="$(dirname "$0")"
PROG_NAME="$(basename "$0")"

nogotofail:

#!/usr/bin/env python

import sys
from nogotofail.mitm import MITMProxy
from nogotofail.mitm.connection import handlers

Summary

testssl.sh is a specialized tool for in-depth SSL/TLS testing, offering comprehensive analysis of server configurations. It's easy to use and regularly updated. nogotofail, on the other hand, provides a broader range of network security testing features, including MitM attack simulation. While testssl.sh excels in SSL/TLS-specific tests, nogotofail offers a more holistic approach to network security assessment.