Pros of realworld

• Comprehensive collection of example apps in various frameworks and languages
• Serves as a learning resource for multiple tech stacks
• Provides a standardized, real-world application structure across different implementations

Cons of realworld

• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the large number of implementations
• Requires more time to navigate and find specific examples
• Potentially less focused on in-depth React and Redux specifics

Code Comparison

react-redux-realworld-example-app:

import { createStore, applyMiddleware, combineReducers } from 'redux';
import { promiseMiddleware, localStorageMiddleware } from './middleware';
import auth from './reducers/auth';
import common from './reducers/common';
import home from './reducers/home';

realworld:

// No direct code comparison available as realworld is a collection of implementations
// Each implementation may have its own structure and code organization

The react-redux-realworld-example-app provides a specific React and Redux implementation, while realworld offers a broader range of examples across different frameworks and languages. The former is more focused and potentially easier for React developers to dive into, while the latter provides a wider perspective on building real-world applications using various technologies.

Pros of angular-realworld-example-app

• Built with Angular, offering a robust framework with strong typing and dependency injection
• Utilizes RxJS for reactive programming, enhancing state management and asynchronous operations
• Follows Angular's modular architecture, promoting better code organization and reusability

Cons of angular-realworld-example-app

• Steeper learning curve compared to React, especially for developers new to TypeScript
• More opinionated structure, which may limit flexibility in certain scenarios
• Potentially larger bundle size due to Angular's comprehensive feature set

Code Comparison

angular-realworld-example-app:

@Component({
  selector: 'app-article-list',
  templateUrl: './article-list.component.html'
})
export class ArticleListComponent implements OnInit {
  constructor(private articlesService: ArticlesService) {}
  ngOnInit() {
    this.articlesService.getArticles().subscribe(articles => {
      // Handle articles
    });
  }
}

react-redux-realworld-example-app:

const ArticleList = () => {
  const dispatch = useDispatch();
  const articles = useSelector(state => state.articles);
  
  useEffect(() => {
    dispatch(fetchArticles());
  }, [dispatch]);

  return (
    // Render articles
  );
};

The Angular example uses dependency injection and RxJS observables, while the React example utilizes hooks and Redux for state management. Angular's approach is more structured, while React's is more flexible and functional.

Pros of vue-realworld-example-app

• Simpler state management with Vue's built-in reactivity system
• More concise and readable code due to Vue's template syntax
• Easier learning curve for developers new to frontend frameworks

Cons of vue-realworld-example-app

• Smaller ecosystem and community compared to React and Redux
• Less flexibility for complex state management scenarios
• Fewer job opportunities in the market compared to React

Code Comparison

vue-realworld-example-app:

<template>
  <div class="article-meta">
    <a href=""><img :src="article.author.image" /></a>
    <div class="info">
      <a href="" class="author">{{ article.author.username }}</a>
      <span class="date">{{ article.createdAt | date }}</span>
    </div>
    <button class="btn btn-sm btn-outline-secondary">
      <i class="ion-plus-round"></i>
      &nbsp;
      Follow {{ article.author.username }}
    </button>
  </div>
</template>

react-redux-realworld-example-app:

const ArticleMeta = ({ article }) => {
  return (
    <div className="article-meta">
      <Link to={`/@${article.author.username}`}>
        <img src={article.author.image} alt={article.author.username} />
      </Link>
      <div className="info">
        <Link to={`/@${article.author.username}`} className="author">
          {article.author.username}
        </Link>
        <span className="date">
          {new Date(article.createdAt).toDateString()}
        </span>
      </div>
      <ArticleActions article={article} />
    </div>
  );
};

Pros of node-express-realworld-example-app

• Backend-focused, providing a robust API implementation
• Simpler architecture, easier to understand for backend developers
• Better suited for microservices and scalable backend systems

Cons of node-express-realworld-example-app

• Lacks frontend implementation, requiring additional work for a complete application
• May require more setup for developers primarily focused on frontend development
• Less comprehensive for full-stack JavaScript developers

Code Comparison

node-express-realworld-example-app:

router.post('/users', function(req, res, next){
  var user = new User();

  user.username = req.body.user.username;
  user.email = req.body.user.email;
  user.setPassword(req.body.user.password);

  user.save().then(function(){
    return res.json({user: user.toAuthJSON()});
  }).catch(next);
});

react-redux-realworld-example-app:

export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(React.memo(Register));

function Register(props) {
  const [username, setUsername] = useState('');
  const [email, setEmail] = useState('');
  const [password, setPassword] = useState('');

  const submitForm = (username, email, password) => ev => {
    ev.preventDefault();
    props.onSubmit(username, email, password);
  };

The node-express example focuses on server-side user creation, while the react-redux example demonstrates client-side form handling and state management. This highlights the different focuses of the two repositories, with node-express handling backend logic and react-redux managing frontend interactions.

Pros of aspnetcore-realworld-example-app

• Built with ASP.NET Core, offering better performance and cross-platform compatibility
• Utilizes Entity Framework Core for efficient database operations
• Implements a clean architecture pattern, promoting separation of concerns

Cons of aspnetcore-realworld-example-app

• Less frontend flexibility compared to the React-Redux implementation
• Steeper learning curve for developers not familiar with .NET ecosystem
• Limited hot-reloading capabilities during development

Code Comparison

react-redux-realworld-example-app (Redux action):

export const ARTICLE_PAGE_LOADED = 'ARTICLE_PAGE_LOADED';
export const ARTICLE_PAGE_UNLOADED = 'ARTICLE_PAGE_UNLOADED';

export function articlePageLoaded(payload) {
  return { type: ARTICLE_PAGE_LOADED, payload };
}

aspnetcore-realworld-example-app (Controller action):

[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Get([FromQuery] string slug)
{
    var article = await _articleRepository.GetArticleAsync(slug);
    return Ok(article);
}

The React-Redux example uses actions and reducers for state management, while the ASP.NET Core example utilizes controller actions and dependency injection. The ASP.NET Core implementation provides a more structured backend approach, whereas the React-Redux version offers greater frontend flexibility and component-based architecture.