wiki

Pros of new-pac

• More frequently updated with recent commits
• Provides ready-to-use VPN and proxy configurations
• Offers a wider variety of circumvention tools and methods

Cons of new-pac

• Less focus on documentation and educational content
• Primarily in Chinese, which may limit accessibility for non-Chinese speakers
• More complex setup process for some tools

Code Comparison

new-pac:

./start.bat

wiki:

# How to bypass internet censorship
1. Use a VPN
2. Use Tor
3. Use proxy servers

The code comparison highlights the different approaches of the two repositories. new-pac focuses on providing executable scripts for circumvention tools, while wiki emphasizes educational content and instructions in markdown format.

new-pac is more suited for users seeking immediate access to circumvention tools, while wiki is better for those looking to understand the concepts and methods of bypassing censorship. Both repositories serve valuable purposes in the fight against internet censorship, catering to different user needs and preferences.

Pros of GoodbyeDPI

• Focuses specifically on DPI circumvention techniques
• Provides a Windows executable for easy implementation
• Offers multiple modes and customization options

Cons of GoodbyeDPI

• Limited to Windows operating systems
• Requires administrative privileges to run effectively
• May not work against all types of censorship or blocking

Code Comparison

GoodbyeDPI:

int dpi_desync_fooling_mode = 0;
int dpi_desync_fooling_http_fragment = 0;
int dpi_desync_fooling_https_fragment = 0;

wiki:

def get_random_wikipedia_article():
    response = requests.get(
        'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php',
        params={
            'action': 'query',
            'format': 'json',
            'list': 'random',
            'rnlimit': 1
        }
    )

The code snippets highlight the different approaches of the two projects. GoodbyeDPI focuses on DPI circumvention techniques, while wiki appears to be centered around accessing Wikipedia content.

GoodbyeDPI is a specialized tool for bypassing Deep Packet Inspection, offering various modes and customization options. However, it's limited to Windows and requires administrative privileges. On the other hand, wiki seems to be a more general-purpose tool for accessing Wikipedia content, potentially useful in censored environments but with a different approach to circumvention.

Pros of gfwlist

• More frequently updated and maintained
• Larger community contribution and user base
• More comprehensive list of blocked domains and URLs

Cons of gfwlist

• Focuses primarily on domain-level blocking
• Less detailed information about specific censorship techniques
• Limited to URL-based filtering information

Code comparison

gfwlist:

||example.com
||blocked-site.org
@@||whitelist.com
/^https?:\/\/[^\/]+example\.org/

wiki:

# Example.com
- Blocked on: 2023-01-15
- Method: DNS poisoning
- Alternative access: VPN, mirror sites

Summary

gfwlist is a more actively maintained and comprehensive list of blocked domains, while wiki provides more detailed information about censorship methods and workarounds. gfwlist is better suited for automated filtering tools, whereas wiki offers a more educational approach to understanding internet censorship in China.

Pros of v2ray-core

• More active development with frequent updates and releases
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Highly customizable with a wide range of protocols and transport options

Cons of v2ray-core

• Steeper learning curve due to complex configuration options
• Higher resource consumption compared to simpler alternatives
• May be overkill for basic censorship circumvention needs

Code Comparison

v2ray-core (Go):

type User struct {
    Level uint32
    Email string
}

type Account struct {
    Id      string
    AlterId uint32
}

wiki (Python):

class WikiPage(models.Model):
    title = models.CharField(max_length=200)
    content = models.TextField()
    last_edited = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)

The code snippets highlight the different focus of these projects. v2ray-core is designed for network protocol implementation, while wiki is a web application for managing wiki pages.

v2ray-core offers a more comprehensive solution for network traffic obfuscation and proxying, making it suitable for advanced users and complex scenarios. On the other hand, wiki provides a simpler, more focused approach to creating and managing wiki content, which may be preferable for users seeking a straightforward solution for information sharing and collaboration.