Convert Figma logo to code with AI

hashicorp logoterraform-provider-aws

The AWS Provider enables Terraform to manage AWS resources.

9,730
9,086
9,730
3,887

Top Related Projects

Terraform provider for Azure Resource Manager

Terraform Provider for Google Cloud Platform

Terraform Kubernetes provider

20,922

Pulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀

Quick Overview

The terraform-provider-aws is an official Terraform provider for Amazon Web Services (AWS). It allows users to manage AWS resources using Terraform, an infrastructure-as-code tool. This provider enables the creation, modification, and deletion of AWS resources through declarative configuration files.

Pros

  • Comprehensive coverage of AWS services and resources
  • Regular updates to support new AWS features and services
  • Well-documented and maintained by HashiCorp and the community
  • Integrates seamlessly with Terraform's ecosystem and workflow

Cons

  • Complex configurations for some advanced AWS features
  • Learning curve for users new to both Terraform and AWS
  • Occasional lag in supporting the latest AWS features
  • Resource-intensive for large-scale infrastructures

Code Examples

  1. Creating an EC2 instance:
resource "aws_instance" "example" {
  ami           = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
  instance_type = "t2.micro"

  tags = {
    Name = "ExampleInstance"
  }
}
  1. Setting up an S3 bucket:
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "example" {
  bucket = "my-terraform-bucket"

  tags = {
    Environment = "Dev"
  }
}
  1. Creating a VPC:
resource "aws_vpc" "main" {
  cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"

  tags = {
    Name = "MainVPC"
  }
}

Getting Started

  1. Install Terraform and configure AWS credentials.
  2. Create a new directory for your Terraform project.
  3. Create a file named main.tf with the following content:
terraform {
  required_providers {
    aws = {
      source  = "hashicorp/aws"
      version = "~> 4.0"
    }
  }
}

provider "aws" {
  region = "us-west-2"
}

# Add your AWS resource configurations here
  1. Run terraform init to initialize the project.
  2. Use terraform plan to preview changes and terraform apply to create resources.

Competitor Comparisons

Terraform provider for Azure Resource Manager

Pros of terraform-provider-azurerm

  • Better integration with Azure-specific features and services
  • More comprehensive support for Azure Resource Manager (ARM) templates
  • Faster adoption of new Azure services and features

Cons of terraform-provider-azurerm

  • Smaller community and fewer third-party modules compared to AWS provider
  • Less mature and may have more bugs or inconsistencies
  • Limited support for older Azure classic resources

Code Comparison

terraform-provider-aws:

resource "aws_instance" "example" {
  ami           = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
  instance_type = "t2.micro"
}

terraform-provider-azurerm:

resource "azurerm_virtual_machine" "example" {
  name                  = "example-vm"
  location              = "East US"
  resource_group_name   = azurerm_resource_group.example.name
  vm_size               = "Standard_DS1_v2"
}

Both providers offer similar functionality for creating virtual machines, but the syntax and resource names differ. The Azure provider requires more configuration, including specifying a resource group, which is an Azure-specific concept. The AWS provider's syntax is generally simpler, reflecting the differences in how resources are organized and managed between the two cloud platforms.

Terraform Provider for Google Cloud Platform

Pros of terraform-provider-google

  • More comprehensive support for Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services
  • Better integration with GCP-specific features and APIs
  • Faster adoption of new GCP product releases and updates

Cons of terraform-provider-google

  • Smaller community and fewer third-party resources compared to AWS provider
  • Less mature ecosystem due to GCP's younger age in the cloud market
  • Some GCP-specific concepts may require a learning curve for AWS-familiar users

Code Comparison

terraform-provider-aws:

resource "aws_instance" "example" {
  ami           = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
  instance_type = "t2.micro"
}

terraform-provider-google:

resource "google_compute_instance" "example" {
  name         = "example-instance"
  machine_type = "e2-micro"
  zone         = "us-central1-a"
}

Both providers offer similar syntax for resource creation, but with platform-specific attributes. The Google provider requires explicit zone specification, while AWS uses the default VPC's availability zone. The Google provider also uses "compute_instance" instead of "instance" in the resource name, reflecting GCP's terminology.

Terraform Kubernetes provider

Pros of terraform-provider-kubernetes

  • More focused and specialized for Kubernetes deployments
  • Better integration with native Kubernetes resources and concepts
  • Simpler configuration for Kubernetes-specific use cases

Cons of terraform-provider-kubernetes

  • Limited scope compared to the broader AWS provider
  • May require additional providers for non-Kubernetes resources
  • Less extensive documentation and community support

Code Comparison

terraform-provider-kubernetes:

resource "kubernetes_deployment" "example" {
  metadata {
    name = "example-deployment"
  }
  spec {
    replicas = 3
    selector {
      match_labels = {
        app = "example"
      }
    }
  }
}

terraform-provider-aws:

resource "aws_eks_cluster" "example" {
  name     = "example-cluster"
  role_arn = aws_iam_role.example.arn

  vpc_config {
    subnet_ids = ["subnet-12345678", "subnet-87654321"]
  }
}

The terraform-provider-kubernetes code focuses on deploying Kubernetes resources directly, while the terraform-provider-aws code manages AWS-specific resources like EKS clusters. The Kubernetes provider offers more granular control over Kubernetes objects, whereas the AWS provider provides broader infrastructure management capabilities.

20,922

Pulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀

Pros of Pulumi

  • Supports multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Go, etc.), offering more flexibility
  • Provides stronger type checking and IDE support due to use of general-purpose languages
  • Allows for more complex logic and reusable components in infrastructure code

Cons of Pulumi

  • Steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with the chosen programming language
  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Terraform
  • Potentially more challenging to maintain consistency across teams using different languages

Code Comparison

Terraform (AWS Provider):

resource "aws_instance" "example" {
  ami           = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
  instance_type = "t2.micro"
}

Pulumi (Python):

import pulumi_aws as aws

instance = aws.ec2.Instance("example",
    ami="ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0",
    instance_type="t2.micro"
)

Both examples create an AWS EC2 instance, but Pulumi uses Python syntax and allows for more programmatic approaches to infrastructure definition. Terraform uses its domain-specific language (HCL), which is more declarative but less flexible for complex logic.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Terraform logo

Terraform AWS Provider

Forums

The AWS Provider enables Terraform to manage AWS resources.

Please note: We take Terraform's security and our users' trust very seriously. If you believe you have found a security issue in the Terraform AWS Provider, please responsibly disclose it by contacting us at security@hashicorp.com.