Convert Figma logo to code with AI

hexojs logohexo

A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js.

39,168
4,810
39,168
91

Top Related Projects

74,645

The world’s fastest framework for building websites.

48,920

:globe_with_meridians: Jekyll is a blog-aware static site generator in Ruby

16,839

A simpler site generator. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML.

55,199

The best React-based framework with performance, scalability and security built in.

22,485

📝 Minimalistic Vue-powered static site generator

12,482

Static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Powered by Python.

Quick Overview

Hexo is a fast, simple, and powerful blog framework powered by Node.js. It allows users to quickly generate static websites and blogs using Markdown (or other languages) and deploy them effortlessly. Hexo provides a robust plugin system and powerful theming capabilities.

Pros

  • Fast and efficient static site generation
  • Extensive plugin ecosystem for added functionality
  • Flexible theming system with numerous pre-built themes available
  • Easy deployment to various platforms (GitHub Pages, Heroku, etc.)

Cons

  • Learning curve for users new to static site generators or Node.js
  • Limited built-in features compared to some other blogging platforms
  • Dependency on Node.js ecosystem, which may not be ideal for all users
  • Some advanced customizations may require coding knowledge

Code Examples

  1. Creating a new Hexo project:
hexo init my-blog
cd my-blog
npm install
  1. Generating static files:
hexo generate
  1. Creating a new blog post:
hexo new "My First Blog Post"
  1. Starting a local server for preview:
hexo server

Getting Started

To get started with Hexo, follow these steps:

  1. Install Node.js and npm
  2. Install Hexo CLI globally:
    npm install -g hexo-cli
    
  3. Create a new Hexo project:
    hexo init my-blog
    cd my-blog
    npm install
    
  4. Start the local server:
    hexo server
    
  5. Open your browser and visit http://localhost:4000 to see your new blog

For more detailed instructions and customization options, refer to the Hexo documentation.

Competitor Comparisons

74,645

The world’s fastest framework for building websites.

Pros of Hugo

  • Faster build times, especially for large sites
  • Single binary with no dependencies, making installation and deployment simpler
  • More built-in features and themes out of the box

Cons of Hugo

  • Steeper learning curve, especially for those new to Go templating
  • Less extensible compared to Hexo's plugin system
  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Node.js-based alternatives

Code Comparison

Hexo (JavaScript):

hexo.extend.helper.register('example', function(text){
  return text.toUpperCase();
});

Hugo (Go):

{{ define "example" }}
  {{ .Title | upper }}
{{ end }}

Both Hexo and Hugo are popular static site generators, but they cater to different preferences and use cases. Hexo, built on Node.js, offers a familiar environment for JavaScript developers and a robust plugin system. Hugo, written in Go, focuses on speed and simplicity, making it an excellent choice for larger sites or those seeking faster build times.

The code comparison showcases the different approaches to extending functionality. Hexo uses JavaScript functions for helpers, while Hugo relies on Go templating for similar tasks. This difference reflects the overall philosophy of each project, with Hexo offering more flexibility through its plugin system and Hugo emphasizing performance and built-in features.

48,920

:globe_with_meridians: Jekyll is a blog-aware static site generator in Ruby

Pros of Jekyll

  • Mature ecosystem with extensive plugin support and themes
  • Native GitHub Pages integration for easy deployment
  • Ruby-based, which may be preferred by some developers

Cons of Jekyll

  • Slower build times for large sites compared to Hexo
  • Less flexibility in content organization and structure
  • Steeper learning curve for non-Ruby developers

Code Comparison

Jekyll:

---
layout: post
title: "Hello World"
---

{{ content }}

Hexo:

---
layout: post
title: Hello World
---

<%- page.content %>

Both Jekyll and Hexo are popular static site generators, but they have different approaches. Jekyll uses Liquid templating and is built with Ruby, while Hexo uses EJS, Pug, or other templating engines and is built with Node.js. Jekyll's syntax is more Ruby-like, whereas Hexo's is more JavaScript-oriented.

Jekyll has been around longer and has a larger community, which means more resources and plugins. However, Hexo offers faster build times and more flexibility in content structure. Jekyll integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages, making it a popular choice for project documentation and personal blogs. Hexo, on the other hand, provides better support for multilingual sites and has a more modular architecture.

Ultimately, the choice between Jekyll and Hexo depends on your specific needs, preferred programming language, and desired features for your static site.

16,839

A simpler site generator. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML.

Pros of Eleventy

  • Faster build times, especially for larger sites
  • More flexible templating options (supports multiple languages)
  • Simpler configuration and setup process

Cons of Eleventy

  • Smaller ecosystem and fewer plugins compared to Hexo
  • Less built-in functionality, requiring more custom code for advanced features
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners due to its flexibility

Code Comparison

Hexo configuration (_config.yml):

title: My Blog
author: John Doe
language: en
theme: landscape

Eleventy configuration (.eleventy.js):

module.exports = function(eleventyConfig) {
  // Add custom filters, shortcodes, etc.
  return {
    dir: {
      input: "src",
      output: "dist"
    }
  };
};

Both Hexo and Eleventy are popular static site generators, but they cater to different needs. Hexo is more opinionated and blog-focused, offering a larger ecosystem of themes and plugins. It's easier for beginners to get started with Hexo due to its conventions and built-in features.

Eleventy, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and faster build times, making it suitable for a wider range of projects. It supports multiple templating languages and allows for more customization, but this can also lead to a steeper learning curve.

Ultimately, the choice between Hexo and Eleventy depends on the specific requirements of your project and your preferred level of control over the site's structure and functionality.

55,199

The best React-based framework with performance, scalability and security built in.

Pros of Gatsby

  • More powerful and flexible, with a rich ecosystem of plugins and themes
  • Better performance optimization, including automatic code splitting and image optimization
  • Strong support for GraphQL, enabling efficient data querying and management

Cons of Gatsby

  • Steeper learning curve, especially for developers new to React and GraphQL
  • Longer build times for large sites, which can slow down development workflow
  • Higher resource requirements, both in terms of development and hosting

Code Comparison

Hexo (JavaScript):

hexo.extend.generator.register('post', function(locals){
  return locals.posts.map(function(post){
    return {
      path: post.path,
      data: post.content
    };
  });
});

Gatsby (JavaScript/React):

exports.createPages = async ({ actions }) => {
  const { createPage } = actions
  const result = await fetchPosts()
  result.forEach((post) => {
    createPage({
      path: post.slug,
      component: path.resolve(`./src/templates/post.js`),
      context: { id: post.id },
    })
  })
}

Both Hexo and Gatsby are popular static site generators, but they cater to different needs and skill levels. Hexo is simpler and faster to set up, making it ideal for bloggers and smaller projects. Gatsby, while more complex, offers greater flexibility and performance optimizations, making it suitable for larger, more dynamic websites and web applications.

22,485

📝 Minimalistic Vue-powered static site generator

Pros of VuePress

  • Built on Vue.js, offering a more modern and flexible frontend framework
  • Better out-of-the-box performance and SEO optimization
  • Seamless integration with Vue components for enhanced functionality

Cons of VuePress

  • Smaller ecosystem and plugin availability compared to Hexo
  • Steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with Vue.js
  • Less flexibility in terms of themes and customization options

Code Comparison

VuePress configuration (.vuepress/config.js):

module.exports = {
  title: 'My Site',
  description: 'A VuePress site',
  themeConfig: {
    nav: [{ text: 'Home', link: '/' }]
  }
}

Hexo configuration (_config.yml):

title: My Site
description: A Hexo site
theme: landscape
url: http://example.com

Both Hexo and VuePress are static site generators, but they cater to different needs. Hexo is more blog-oriented and has a larger ecosystem, while VuePress is better suited for documentation sites and offers tighter integration with Vue.js. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project and your familiarity with their respective ecosystems.

12,482

Static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Powered by Python.

Pros of Pelican

  • Written in Python, making it more accessible for Python developers
  • Supports reStructuredText alongside Markdown for content creation
  • Has a strong focus on simplicity and ease of use

Cons of Pelican

  • Slower build times compared to Hexo, especially for larger sites
  • Less extensive plugin ecosystem and theme options
  • Limited built-in internationalization support

Code Comparison

Pelican configuration (pelicanconf.py):

AUTHOR = 'Your Name'
SITENAME = 'My Blog'
SITEURL = ''
PATH = 'content'
TIMEZONE = 'Europe/Paris'

Hexo configuration (_config.yml):

title: My Blog
author: Your Name
url: http://example.com
root: /
timezone: Europe/Paris

Both Hexo and Pelican are popular static site generators, but they cater to different audiences. Hexo, built with Node.js, offers faster build times and a larger ecosystem of plugins and themes. It's particularly popular among developers who are comfortable with JavaScript.

Pelican, on the other hand, appeals to Python enthusiasts and those who prefer a simpler, more straightforward approach to site generation. Its support for reStructuredText alongside Markdown provides additional flexibility in content creation.

While Hexo generally outperforms Pelican in terms of build speed and extensibility, Pelican's Python-based architecture and focus on simplicity make it an attractive option for many users, especially those already familiar with Python ecosystems.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Hexo logo

Hexo

A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js.

Website | Documentation | Installation Guide | Contribution Guide | Code of Conduct | API | Twitter

NPM version Required Node version Build Status dependencies Status Coverage Status Gitter Discord Chat Telegram Chat FOSSA Status Contributor Covenant

Features

  • Blazing fast generating
  • Support for GitHub Flavored Markdown and most Octopress plugins
  • One-command deploy to GitHub Pages, Heroku, etc.
  • Powerful API for limitless extensibility
  • Hundreds of themes & plugins

Quick Start

Install Hexo

$ npm install hexo-cli -g

Install with brew on macOS and Linux:

$ brew install hexo

Setup your blog

$ hexo init blog
$ cd blog

Start the server

$ hexo server

Create a new post

$ hexo new "Hello Hexo"

Generate static files

$ hexo generate

More Information

Contributing

We welcome you to join the development of Hexo. Please see contributing document. 🤗

Also, we welcome PR or issue to official-plugins.

Contributors

Backers

Backers

Sponsors

Sponsors

License

FOSSA Status

NPM DownloadsLast 30 Days