Pros of PhotoPrism

• More active development with frequent updates and releases
• Larger community and better documentation
• Advanced features like facial recognition and geo-tagging

Cons of PhotoPrism

• Higher system requirements and resource usage
• More complex setup process
• Steeper learning curve for new users

Code Comparison

PhotoPrism (Go)

func (m *Search) Photos(o PhotoSearchOptions) (photos Photos, err error) {
    if err := o.ParseQueryString(); err != nil {
        return photos, err
    }

    s := UnscopedDb().Table("photos").Select("photos.*")
    s = s.Joins("JOIN cameras ON cameras.id = photos.camera_id")
}

OwnPhotos (Python)

def search(request):
    query = request.GET.get('q', None)
    if query is not None:
        photos = Photo.objects.filter(
            Q(image_path__icontains=query) |
            Q(thumbnail_big__icontains=query)
        )
    return render(request, 'search.html', {'photos': photos})

Both projects aim to provide self-hosted photo management solutions, but PhotoPrism offers more advanced features and has a larger community. OwnPhotos is simpler and may be easier for beginners to set up and use. PhotoPrism is written in Go, while OwnPhotos uses Python and Django. The code snippets show different approaches to photo searching, with PhotoPrism using a more complex query builder and OwnPhotos using Django's ORM.

Pros of immich

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Supports both mobile and web applications for a comprehensive photo management experience
• Offers live photo and video support, enhancing media functionality

Cons of immich

• Requires more system resources due to its comprehensive feature set
• May have a steeper learning curve for setup and configuration compared to simpler alternatives

Code Comparison

immich (TypeScript):

export async function generateAuthToken(user: User): Promise<string> {
  const payload: JwtPayload = { sub: user.id };
  return jwt.sign(payload, JWT_SECRET, { expiresIn: '1d' });
}

ownphotos (Python):

def generate_auth_token(user):
    payload = {'user_id': user.id, 'exp': datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(days=1)}
    return jwt.encode(payload, SECRET_KEY, algorithm='HS256')

Both projects implement JWT-based authentication, but immich uses TypeScript with a more concise approach, while ownphotos uses Python with explicit expiration time handling.

Pros of LibrePhotos

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Enhanced features, including improved face recognition and location tagging
• Better documentation and community support

Cons of LibrePhotos

• Higher system requirements due to additional features
• Potentially more complex setup process for new users
• Larger codebase, which may lead to longer loading times

Code Comparison

OwnPhotos:

def scan_photos():
    image_paths = get_image_paths()
    for image_path in image_paths:
        process_image(image_path)

LibrePhotos:

def scan_photos():
    image_paths = get_image_paths()
    with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
        futures = [executor.submit(process_image, path) for path in image_paths]
        concurrent.futures.wait(futures)

The code comparison shows that LibrePhotos implements multi-threading for photo scanning, potentially improving performance on systems with multiple cores. OwnPhotos uses a simpler, single-threaded approach, which may be more suitable for less powerful hardware but could be slower for large photo libraries.

Both projects aim to provide self-hosted photo management solutions, with LibrePhotos offering more features and active development at the cost of increased complexity and system requirements. OwnPhotos may be a better choice for users seeking a simpler, lightweight solution.

Pros of Lychee

• More active development with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Better documentation and community support
• Supports multiple languages and has a more polished user interface

Cons of Lychee

• Lacks advanced facial recognition and object detection features
• Does not offer automatic album creation based on metadata
• Limited customization options compared to Ownphotos

Code Comparison

Lychee (PHP):

public function add(Request $request)
{
    $request->validate([
        'albumID' => 'required|string',
        'function' => 'required|string',
    ]);

    // Process photo upload
}

Ownphotos (Python):

@api_view(['POST'])
def upload_photos(request):
    image_files = request.FILES.getlist('images')
    album_id = request.POST.get('album')
    
    # Process photo upload and perform AI analysis

The code snippets show different approaches to handling photo uploads. Lychee uses a more structured request validation, while Ownphotos focuses on processing multiple files and integrating AI analysis.