sui

Pros of Whoogle-search

• Offers a privacy-focused Google search experience without ads or tracking
• Provides customizable search settings and appearance options
• Can be self-hosted for complete control over data and privacy

Cons of Whoogle-search

• Requires more technical setup and maintenance compared to SUI
• May have slower search performance due to proxying requests through a server
• Limited to Google search functionality, while SUI can integrate multiple services

Code comparison

Whoogle-search (Python):

@app.route('/search', methods=['GET'])
def search():
    config = request.args.to_dict()
    query = config.get('q')
    return show_results(query, config)

SUI (JavaScript):

const searchApps = () => {
  const searchTerm = searchInput.value.toLowerCase();
  const filteredApps = apps.filter(app =>
    app.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm)
  );
  renderApps(filteredApps);
};

Both projects handle search functionality, but Whoogle-search focuses on proxying Google searches, while SUI implements a local search for configured apps and bookmarks.

Pros of Flame

• More feature-rich with built-in weather, system monitoring, and Docker integration
• Supports user authentication and multi-user setups
• Offers a more modern and polished user interface

Cons of Flame

• Requires more system resources due to additional features
• Setup process is more complex compared to SUI
• Less customizable in terms of appearance and layout

Code Comparison

SUI (HTML structure):

<div class="container">
  <div class="category">
    <h2>Category Name</h2>
    <div class="bookmarks">
      <!-- Bookmark items -->
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

Flame (React component):

const Category = ({ name, items }) => (
  <div className="category">
    <h2>{name}</h2>
    <div className="items">
      {items.map(item => <Item key={item.id} {...item} />)}
    </div>
  </div>
);

Both projects aim to provide a customizable startpage for web browsers, but they differ in their approach and feature set. SUI focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while Flame offers a more comprehensive solution with additional functionality. The code comparison shows that SUI uses plain HTML structure, whereas Flame utilizes React components for a more dynamic and modular approach to rendering the user interface.

Pros of Homer

• More actively maintained with frequent updates
• Supports multiple themes and customization options
• Includes a built-in search functionality

Cons of Homer

• Requires more configuration and setup compared to SUI
• Less minimalistic design, which may not suit all users
• Slightly steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

Homer configuration (YAML):

---
title: "Dashboard"
subtitle: "Homer"
logo: "assets/logo.png"
header: true
footer: '<p>Created with <a href="https://github.com/bastienwirtz/homer">Homer</a></p>'

services:
  - name: "Category 1"
    icon: "fas fa-cloud"
    items:
      - name: "Service 1"
        logo: "assets/tools/sample.png"
        url: "https://example.com"

SUI configuration (JSON):

{
  "name": "Dashboard",
  "categories": [
    {
      "name": "Category 1",
      "items": [
        {
          "name": "Service 1",
          "url": "https://example.com",
          "icon": "fas fa-cloud"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Both Homer and SUI are popular dashboard solutions for self-hosted services. Homer offers more features and customization options, while SUI provides a simpler, more minimalistic approach. The choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs and preferences.

Pros of Dashy

• More feature-rich with extensive customization options
• Active development with frequent updates and community contributions
• Built-in authentication and multi-user support

Cons of Dashy

• Higher complexity and steeper learning curve
• Requires more system resources due to additional features

Code Comparison

Dashy (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="item-icon">
    <img v-if="icon" :src="icon" :alt="title" />
    <FontAwesomeIcon v-else :icon="['fas', 'cube']" />
  </div>
</template>

SUI (HTML structure):

<div id="apps" class="apps">
  <div class="app">
    <a class="applink" href="">
      <img src="" />
    </a>
  </div>
</div>

Summary

Dashy offers a more comprehensive solution with advanced features and customization options, making it suitable for complex setups and multi-user environments. However, this comes at the cost of increased complexity and resource usage.

SUI, on the other hand, provides a simpler, lightweight alternative that's easier to set up and maintain. It's ideal for users who prefer a minimalist approach and don't require advanced features.

Both projects serve as personal startpages or application dashboards, but cater to different user needs and preferences.

Pros of Homepage

• More active development with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Extensive customization options and widget support
• Docker support for easier deployment

Cons of Homepage

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex configuration
• Requires more system resources to run

Code Comparison

SUI:

<div class="container">
  <div class="row">
    <div class="col-md-4 col-sm-6">
      <div class="serviceBox">
        <h3>Service Title</h3>
        <p>Service description goes here.</p>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

Homepage:

- Resources:
    - My Home Server:
        - Plex:
            icon: plex
            href: http://plex.example.com
        - Sonarr:
            icon: sonarr
            href: http://sonarr.example.com

Summary

Both SUI and Homepage are dashboard solutions for self-hosted services. SUI offers a simpler, more lightweight approach with a focus on ease of use. Homepage provides more features and customization options but requires more setup time and resources. SUI uses HTML/CSS for layout, while Homepage relies on YAML configuration. Choose SUI for a quick, straightforward dashboard, or Homepage for a feature-rich, highly customizable solution.