Pros of normalize.css

• More comprehensive browser consistency, addressing a wider range of default styles
• Preserves useful browser defaults rather than eliminating them entirely
• Extensively documented, explaining the reasoning behind each normalization

Cons of normalize.css

• Larger file size, potentially impacting page load times
• May require additional resets or overrides for specific project needs
• More complex, which can make customization more challenging

Code Comparison

normalize.css:

html {
  line-height: 1.15;
  -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;
}
body {
  margin: 0;
}

minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

normalize.css focuses on normalizing specific elements and properties across browsers, while minireset.css takes a more aggressive approach by resetting margins, paddings, and other properties to zero for many elements.

normalize.css aims to maintain useful defaults and correct inconsistencies, whereas minireset.css provides a clean slate for developers to build upon. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, desired level of control, and preference for preserving or resetting browser defaults.

Pros of sanitize.css

• More comprehensive normalization, addressing a wider range of browser inconsistencies
• Includes modern CSS features and normalizations for newer HTML5 elements
• Actively maintained with regular updates and improvements

Cons of sanitize.css

• Larger file size, which may impact page load times slightly
• More opinionated styling choices, which might require additional overrides
• Steeper learning curve due to its more extensive feature set

Code Comparison

sanitize.css:

*, ::before, ::after {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

html {
  cursor: default;
  line-height: 1.5;
  -moz-tab-size: 4;
  tab-size: 4;
  -webkit-tap-highlight-color: transparent;
}

minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li,
dl,
dt,
dd,
blockquote,
figure,
fieldset,
legend,
textarea,
pre,
iframe,
hr,
h1,
h2,
h3,
h4,
h5,
h6 {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

The code comparison shows that sanitize.css focuses on setting default styles and addressing specific browser inconsistencies, while minireset.css takes a more aggressive approach by removing margins and paddings from a wide range of elements.

Pros of modern-normalize

• More comprehensive browser compatibility, including newer browsers and mobile
• Preserves useful default styles while normalizing inconsistencies
• Actively maintained with regular updates

Cons of modern-normalize

• Slightly larger file size due to more comprehensive coverage
• May require additional customization for specific project needs
• Less opinionated approach, which might not suit all developers

Code Comparison

modern-normalize:

html {
  line-height: 1.15;
  -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;
}

body {
  margin: 0;
}

minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

modern-normalize focuses on normalizing browser inconsistencies while preserving useful defaults, whereas minireset.css takes a more aggressive approach by resetting many elements to a blank slate.

modern-normalize is better suited for projects requiring broader browser support and a less opinionated starting point. It's ideal for developers who want to build upon existing browser defaults while ensuring consistency across different environments.

minireset.css is more appropriate for projects where developers prefer a minimal starting point and want to define their own styles from scratch. It's lighter and more straightforward but may require more initial styling work.

The choice between the two depends on the project's specific requirements, target browsers, and the developer's preferred approach to CSS normalization and resetting.

Pros of Water.css

• Provides a complete set of styles for common HTML elements, creating a cohesive design
• Offers dark mode support out of the box
• Includes responsive design features for better mobile compatibility

Cons of Water.css

• Larger file size due to more comprehensive styling
• Less customizable, as it applies opinionated styles to many elements
• May require overriding styles for specific design needs

Code Comparison

Minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li,
dl,
dt,
dd,
blockquote,
figure,
fieldset,
legend,
textarea,
pre,
iframe,
hr,
h1,
h2,
h3,
h4,
h5,
h6 {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

Water.css:

body {
  font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', 'Oxygen', 'Ubuntu', 'Cantarell', 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.4;
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 20px auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
  color: #363636;
  background: #ffffff;
  text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}

Minireset.css focuses on resetting default styles, while Water.css provides a complete styling solution with opinionated defaults. Minireset.css offers more flexibility for custom designs, while Water.css provides a quick way to create a visually appealing website with minimal effort.

Pros of Sakura

• Provides a complete classless CSS framework for quick, elegant styling
• Offers a more opinionated design with pre-styled elements
• Includes responsive design and dark mode support out of the box

Cons of Sakura

• Larger file size due to more comprehensive styling
• Less flexibility for custom designs without overriding styles
• May require additional effort to integrate with existing projects

Code Comparison

Sakura:

body {
  font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.8;
  max-width: 38em;
  margin: auto;
  color: #4a4a4a;
  background-color: #f9f9f9;
  padding: 13px;
}

minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li,
dl,
dt,
dd,
blockquote,
figure,
fieldset,
legend,
textarea,
pre,
iframe,
hr,
h1,
h2,
h3,
h4,
h5,
h6 {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

Sakura provides a more complete styling solution with specific font choices and layout settings, while minireset.css focuses on resetting default browser styles for a clean slate.

Pros of Tacit

• Provides a complete CSS framework with pre-styled elements
• Offers a more opinionated design, suitable for quick prototyping
• Includes responsive design features out of the box

Cons of Tacit

• Larger file size due to more comprehensive styling
• Less flexibility for custom designs without overriding styles
• May require more effort to integrate with existing projects

Code Comparison

Tacit (sample):

body {
  font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.6;
  color: #566b78;
}

Minireset.css (sample):

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

Tacit provides more opinionated styling, while Minireset.css focuses on resetting default browser styles. Tacit's approach results in a larger codebase but offers a more complete out-of-the-box solution. Minireset.css provides a minimal reset, allowing for more flexibility in custom designs but requiring additional styling for a complete look.