simple.css

Simple.css is a CSS template that allows you to make a good looking website really quickly.

4,098

195

4,098

View on GitHub

Top Related Projects

sakura

4,104

:cherry_blossom: a minimal css framework/theme.

water.css

8,277

A drop-in collection of CSS styles to make simple websites just a little nicer

mvp

4,952

MVP.css — Minimalist classless CSS stylesheet for HTML elements

dropin-minimal-css

1,683

Drop-in switcher for previewing minimal CSS frameworks

Quick Overview

Simple.css is a classless CSS framework that provides a set of default styles for HTML elements. It aims to create clean, readable, and responsive web pages without the need for custom classes or complex CSS. The project emphasizes simplicity and ease of use for basic web design needs.

Pros

Easy to implement with no custom classes required
Lightweight and fast-loading
Responsive design out of the box
Customizable through CSS variables

Cons

Limited design flexibility compared to more comprehensive frameworks
May require additional custom CSS for complex layouts
Not suitable for large-scale or highly customized web applications
Limited browser support for older versions

Code Examples

Basic HTML structure with Simple.css:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>Simple.css Example</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.simplecss.org/simple.min.css">
</head>
<body>
    <header>
        <h1>Welcome to Simple.css</h1>
        <p>A classless CSS framework for clean and simple designs.</p>
    </header>
    <main>
        <article>
            <h2>About Simple.css</h2>
            <p>Simple.css provides default styles for HTML elements without the need for custom classes.</p>
        </article>
    </main>
    <footer>
        <p>&copy; 2023 Your Name</p>
    </footer>
</body>
</html>

Customizing Simple.css using CSS variables:

:root {
    --accent: #0077b6;
    --accent-bg: #caf0f8;
    --text: #333;
    --text-light: #585858;
    --border: #d8d8d8;
    --background: #ffffff;
    --background-alt: #f9f9f9;
}

Adding a custom style for a specific element:

article {
    border: 1px solid var(--border);
    padding: 1rem;
    border-radius: 5px;
}

Getting Started

To use Simple.css in your project, follow these steps:

Add the following line to the <head> of your HTML file:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.simplecss.org/simple.min.css">

Start writing your HTML content using semantic tags like <header>, <main>, <article>, and <footer>.
Customize the default styles by adding your own CSS file and overriding the CSS variables or adding custom styles for specific elements.

That's it! Your web page will now have a clean, responsive design without the need for custom classes or complex CSS.

Competitor Comparisons

minireset.css

2,764

A tiny modern CSS reset

Pros of minireset.css

More lightweight and focused on resetting browser defaults
Provides a clean slate for custom styling without imposing design choices
Suitable for projects that require a minimal reset without additional styling

Cons of minireset.css

Lacks pre-styled elements, requiring more custom CSS for basic styling
Does not provide a complete design system or default styles for common elements
May require more work to achieve a polished look compared to Simple.css

Code Comparison

Simple.css:

body {
  font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', 'Oxygen', 'Ubuntu', 'Cantarell', 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.4;
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 20px auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
  color: #363636;
  background: #fff;
  text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}

minireset.css:

html,
body,
p,
ol,
ul,
li,
dl,
dt,
dd,
blockquote,
figure,
fieldset,
legend,
textarea,
pre,
iframe,
hr,
h1,
h2,
h3,
h4,
h5,
h6 {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 0;
}

The code comparison shows that Simple.css provides default styling for the body element, while minireset.css focuses on resetting margins and paddings for various HTML elements.

sakura

4,104

:cherry_blossom: a minimal css framework/theme.

Pros of Sakura

More extensive color palette and theming options
Includes additional elements like blockquotes and code blocks
Smaller file size (9.4 KB vs 10.3 KB minified)

Cons of Sakura

Less focus on accessibility features
Fewer utility classes for quick styling
Limited browser support documentation

Code Comparison

Sakura:

html {
  font-size: 62.5%;
  font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif;
}

Simple.css:

:root {
  --font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', 'Oxygen', 'Ubuntu', 'Cantarell', 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
  --line-height: 1.5;
  --font-weight: 400;
}

Both projects aim to provide classless CSS frameworks for quick and easy styling of HTML elements. Sakura offers more design flexibility with its color options and additional element styles, while Simple.css focuses on simplicity and accessibility. The code comparison shows different approaches to setting default font styles, with Sakura using direct HTML element targeting and Simple.css utilizing CSS variables for easier customization.

water.css

8,277

A drop-in collection of CSS styles to make simple websites just a little nicer

Pros of Water.css

More comprehensive set of elements styled out-of-the-box
Offers multiple themes (light and dark)
Smaller file size, potentially faster loading times

Cons of Water.css

Less customization options without modifying the source
May not be as visually appealing for some users
Lacks some advanced features like responsive navigation

Code Comparison

Water.css:

body {
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 20px auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
  font-family: sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.5;
}

Simple.css:

body {
  max-width: 70ch;
  padding: 2rem;
  margin: auto;
  font-family: system-ui, sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.5;
}

Both CSS frameworks aim to provide a minimal, classless styling solution for quick prototyping or simple websites. Water.css focuses on a broader range of elements and offers multiple themes, while Simple.css emphasizes simplicity and ease of customization. The code comparison shows similar approaches to basic body styling, with slight differences in max-width, padding, and font choices. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and personal preferences.

mvp

4,952

MVP.css — Minimalist classless CSS stylesheet for HTML elements

Pros of MVP

More comprehensive styling, including pre-styled components like buttons and forms
Includes a dark mode option out of the box
Offers more customization options through CSS variables

Cons of MVP

Larger file size, potentially impacting page load times
More opinionated design, which may require more overrides for custom styling
Steeper learning curve due to more features and options

Code Comparison

Simple.css:

body {
  font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', 'Oxygen', 'Ubuntu', 'Cantarell', 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.4;
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 20px auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
  color: #363636;
  background: #fff;
}

MVP:

:root {
  --border-radius: 5px;
  --box-shadow: 2px 2px 10px;
  --color: #118bee;
  --color-accent: #118bee15;
  --color-bg: #fff;
  --color-bg-secondary: #e9e9e9;
  --color-secondary: #920de9;
  --color-secondary-accent: #920de90b;
  --color-shadow: #f4f4f4;
  --color-text: #000;
  --color-text-secondary: #999;
}

Both CSS frameworks aim to provide simple, classless styling for HTML elements. Simple.css focuses on minimalism and ease of use, while MVP offers more features and customization options at the cost of complexity.

dropin-minimal-css

1,683

Drop-in switcher for previewing minimal CSS frameworks

Pros of dropin-minimal-css

Offers multiple CSS themes, providing more variety and flexibility
Includes a theme switcher, allowing easy comparison and selection of styles
Smaller file sizes for individual themes, potentially faster loading times

Cons of dropin-minimal-css

Less comprehensive styling, focusing mainly on basic elements
Limited documentation and examples compared to Simple.css
May require more customization for a polished look

Code Comparison

Simple.css:

body {
  font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', 'Oxygen', 'Ubuntu', 'Cantarell', 'Fira Sans', 'Droid Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.4;
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 20px auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
  color: #363636;
  background: #ffffff;
  text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}

dropin-minimal-css (base.css):

body {
  font-family: sans-serif;
  line-height: 1.4;
  max-width: 800px;
  margin: 0 auto;
  padding: 0 10px;
}

The code comparison shows that Simple.css provides more detailed styling with specific font choices, colors, and text rendering options, while dropin-minimal-css offers a more basic approach, allowing for easier customization but requiring more work for a refined appearance.

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Simple.css {}

Simple.css is a CSS template that allows you to make a good looking website really quickly.

Find out more at https://simplecss.org.

Screenshot of Simple.css

Supported Browsers

Any evergreen browser > IE11 (why is IE still a thing?)

Top Related Projects

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot