Pros of Speed-Test

• More comprehensive UI with additional features like multi-server testing
• Supports WebSocket for real-time data transfer
• Includes a mobile-friendly interface

Cons of Speed-Test

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex to set up and maintain
• Less actively maintained (fewer recent commits and releases)
• May have higher resource requirements due to additional features

Code Comparison

Speed-Test (JavaScript):

function getSpeedMbps(bytes, elapsedMs) {
    return ((bytes * 8) / elapsedMs / 1000).toFixed(2);
}

speedtest (PHP):

function format($d){
    if($d<10) return number_format($d,2,".","");
    if($d<100) return number_format($d,1,".","");
    return number_format($d,0,".","");
}

Both projects aim to provide web-based speed testing solutions, but they differ in their approach and feature set. Speed-Test offers a more feature-rich experience with a polished UI, while speedtest focuses on simplicity and ease of deployment. The code snippets show different approaches to formatting speed results, with Speed-Test using JavaScript and speedtest using PHP. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific requirements and preferences for UI complexity and deployment ease.

Pros of Wallabag

• More comprehensive functionality as a full-featured read-it-later application
• Supports multiple platforms and integrations (web, mobile apps, browser extensions)
• Actively maintained with regular updates and a larger community

Cons of Wallabag

• More complex setup and configuration compared to Speedtest
• Requires more server resources and maintenance
• Steeper learning curve for users and administrators

Code Comparison

Wallabag (PHP):

public function getContent($url)
{
    $this->url = $url;
    $html = $this->getHtml($url);
    $this->parseContent($html);
    return $this->content;
}

Speedtest (JavaScript):

function getMbps(speed) {
    return (speed * 8 / 1000000).toFixed(2);
}

function getIpInfo(done) {
    xhr.onload = function () {
        done(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText));
    }
    xhr.open("GET", "backend/getIP.php", true);
    xhr.send();
}

While both projects are open-source and self-hosted, Wallabag is a more feature-rich application for saving and organizing web content, whereas Speedtest focuses on network performance testing. Wallabag requires more setup and resources but offers a broader range of functionality. Speedtest is simpler to deploy and use but has a more specific purpose.

Pros of github-readme-activity-graph

• Focuses on visualizing GitHub activity, providing a unique and engaging way to showcase contributions
• Highly customizable with various themes and color options
• Integrates seamlessly with GitHub profile READMEs

Cons of github-readme-activity-graph

• Limited to GitHub activity visualization, lacking broader functionality
• May require more setup and configuration compared to speedtest
• Potential for rate limiting issues when fetching data from GitHub API

Code Comparison

speedtest:

function runTest() {
    var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
    xhr.onload = function() {
        // Process speed test results
    };
    xhr.open("GET", testUrl, true);
    xhr.send();
}

github-readme-activity-graph:

const fetchContributions = async (username) => {
  const query = `query ($username: String!) {
    user(login: $username) {
      contributionsCollection {
        contributionCalendar {
          totalContributions
          weeks {
            contributionDays {
              contributionCount
              date
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }`;
  // Fetch and process GitHub contributions data
};

Pros of speed-test

• Command-line interface for easy integration into scripts and workflows
• Lightweight and fast, with minimal dependencies
• Uses multiple servers for more accurate results

Cons of speed-test

• Limited to testing download and upload speeds only
• Lacks a graphical interface for less technical users
• May not be as comprehensive as full-featured speed testing solutions

Code Comparison

speed-test:

const speedTest = require('speedtest-net');

(async () => {
  try {
    const result = await speedTest({maxTime: 5000});
    console.log(result.server.ping);
    console.log(result.speeds.download);
    console.log(result.speeds.upload);
  } catch (err) {
    console.error(err);
  }
})();

speedtest:

<?php
require_once 'speedtest.php';
$st = new SpeedTest();
$result = $st->getResult();
echo "Ping: " . $result['ping'] . " ms\n";
echo "Download: " . $result['download'] . " Mbps\n";
echo "Upload: " . $result['upload'] . " Mbps\n";
?>

speed-test is a Node.js-based CLI tool, while speedtest is a more comprehensive PHP-based solution with both CLI and web interfaces. speedtest offers more features like server selection, telemetry, and a customizable web interface, making it suitable for self-hosted speed testing. speed-test, on the other hand, is more focused on simplicity and ease of use in command-line environments.