Pros of Remodal

• Lightweight and simple to use
• Supports responsive design out of the box
• Customizable with CSS variables

Cons of Remodal

• Less actively maintained (last update in 2017)
• Fewer built-in features and customization options
• Limited browser support for older versions

Code Comparison

Remodal:

$('[data-remodal-id=modal]').remodal();

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
    title: "Welcome",
    subtitle: "Subtitle",
    icon: "icon-home"
});

Remodal uses a more straightforward approach with data attributes, while iziModal offers more configuration options in the JavaScript initialization. iziModal provides built-in support for titles, subtitles, and icons, which Remodal lacks by default.

Both libraries aim to simplify modal creation, but iziModal offers more features and customization options out of the box. Remodal focuses on simplicity and lightweight implementation, making it a good choice for basic modal needs. However, iziModal's active development and extensive feature set make it more suitable for complex modal requirements and modern web applications.

Pros of SweetAlert2

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Supports TypeScript out of the box

Cons of SweetAlert2

• Larger file size, which may impact page load times
• More complex API, potentially steeper learning curve
• Less customizable animations compared to iziModal

Code Comparison

SweetAlert2:

Swal.fire({
  title: 'Are you sure?',
  text: "You won't be able to revert this!",
  icon: 'warning',
  showCancelButton: true,
  confirmButtonText: 'Yes, delete it!'
})

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
  title: 'Are you sure?',
  subtitle: "You won't be able to revert this!",
  icon: 'fa fa-warning',
  headerColor: '#FFA500',
  width: 600,
  timeout: 10000
});

Both libraries offer easy-to-use APIs for creating modals, but SweetAlert2 focuses more on alert-style popups, while iziModal provides a broader range of modal types. SweetAlert2's syntax is more concise, but iziModal offers more granular control over appearance and behavior.

SweetAlert2 is generally better suited for quick alerts and confirmations, while iziModal excels in creating more complex, customized modal experiences. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project and the level of customization needed.

Pros of SweetAlert

• More popular and widely adopted (50k+ stars vs 2k+ for iziModal)
• Simpler API for basic use cases
• Built-in themes and customizable appearance

Cons of SweetAlert

• Less flexible for complex modal scenarios
• Fewer configuration options compared to iziModal
• Larger file size (40KB vs 20KB for iziModal)

Code Comparison

SweetAlert:

Swal.fire({
  title: 'Are you sure?',
  text: "You won't be able to revert this!",
  icon: 'warning',
  showCancelButton: true,
  confirmButtonText: 'Yes, delete it!'
})

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
  title: 'Are you sure?',
  subtitle: "You won't be able to revert this!",
  icon: 'fa fa-warning',
  headerColor: '#FFA500',
  width: 600,
  padding: 20
});

Both libraries offer easy-to-use APIs for creating modals, but SweetAlert focuses on simplicity and pre-defined styles, while iziModal provides more customization options. SweetAlert is better suited for quick, simple alerts, whereas iziModal excels in creating complex, highly customized modal windows. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the level of customization needed.

Pros of intl-tel-input

• Specialized for international telephone input handling
• Extensive country code and flag support
• Robust validation and formatting features

Cons of intl-tel-input

• Limited to telephone input functionality
• May require additional setup for non-telephone form elements
• Potentially larger file size due to comprehensive country data

Code Comparison

intl-tel-input:

$("#phone").intlTelInput({
  initialCountry: "auto",
  geoIpLookup: function(callback) {
    $.get('https://ipinfo.io', function() {}, "jsonp").always(function(resp) {
      var countryCode = (resp && resp.country) ? resp.country : "";
      callback(countryCode);
    });
  },
  utilsScript: "path/to/utils.js"
});

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
  title: 'Welcome',
  subtitle: 'Subtitle',
  headerColor: '#88A0B9',
  width: 600,
  onOpening: function(modal){
    modal.startLoading();
  }
});

While intl-tel-input focuses on telephone input functionality with country-specific features, iziModal is a more general-purpose modal plugin with customizable appearance and behavior. The code examples highlight their distinct purposes, with intl-tel-input configuring telephone input options and iziModal setting up a customizable modal dialog.

Pros of tingle

• Smaller file size (4.1KB minified and gzipped) compared to iziModal's larger footprint
• More customizable with options for custom CSS classes and content
• Simpler API with fewer methods, making it easier to learn and use

Cons of tingle

• Fewer built-in features compared to iziModal's extensive options
• Less active development, with fewer recent updates
• Limited animation options compared to iziModal's variety of effects

Code Comparison

tingle:

var modal = new tingle.modal({
    footer: true,
    stickyFooter: false,
    closeMethods: ['overlay', 'button', 'escape'],
    closeLabel: "Close",
    cssClass: ['custom-class-1', 'custom-class-2']
});

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
    title: 'Welcome',
    subtitle: 'Subtitle',
    headerColor: '#88A0B9',
    background: null,
    theme: '',  // light
    icon: null,
    iconText: null,
    iconColor: '',
    rtl: false,
    width: 600,
    top: null,
    bottom: null,
    borderBottom: true,
    padding: 0,
    radius: 3,
    zindex: 999,
    iframe: false,
    iframeHeight: 400,
    iframeURL: null,
    focusInput: true,
    group: '',
    loop: false,
    navigateCaption: true,
    navigateArrows: true, // Boolean, 'closeToModal', 'closeScreenEdge'
    history: false,
    restoreDefaultContent: false,
    autoOpen: 0, // Boolean, Number
    bodyOverflow: false,
    fullscreen: false,
    openFullscreen: false,
    closeOnEscape: true,
    closeButton: true,
    appendTo: 'body', // or false
    appendToOverlay: 'body', // or false
    overlay: true,
    overlayClose: true,
    overlayColor: 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4)',
    timeout: false,
    timeoutProgressbar: false,
    pauseOnHover: false,
    timeoutProgressbarColor: 'rgba(255,255,255,0.5)',
    transitionIn: 'comingIn',
    transitionOut: 'comingOut',
    transitionInOverlay: 'fadeIn',
    transitionOutOverlay: 'fadeOut',
    onFullscreen: function(){},
    onResize: function(){},
    onOpening: function(){},
    onOpened: function(){},
    onClosing: function(){},
    onClosed: function(){},
    afterRender: function(){}
});

Pros of cookieconsent

• Specifically designed for cookie consent management, offering more tailored features for GDPR compliance
• Supports multiple languages and customizable consent types (necessary, analytics, marketing, etc.)
• Lightweight and dependency-free, reducing overall page load impact

Cons of cookieconsent

• Limited to cookie consent functionality, unlike iziModal's versatile modal system
• May require more setup for non-cookie-related use cases
• Less extensive styling options compared to iziModal's rich customization features

Code Comparison

cookieconsent:

CookieConsent.run({
    categories: {
        necessary: {},
        analytics: {}
    },
    language: {
        default: 'en',
        translations: {
            en: {
                consentModal: {
                    title: 'We use cookies!',
                    description: 'Hi, this website uses essential cookies...'
                }
            }
        }
    }
});

iziModal:

$("#modal").iziModal({
    title: 'Welcome',
    subtitle: 'Subtitle',
    headerColor: '#88A0B9',
    width: 600,
    timeout: 10000,
    timeoutProgressbar: true,
    transitionIn: 'fadeInDown'
});

The code snippets highlight the different focus areas of each library, with cookieconsent emphasizing cookie management and iziModal showcasing its flexible modal configuration options.