marty

Pros of Flux

• Official implementation by Facebook, ensuring alignment with React ecosystem
• Simpler architecture with unidirectional data flow
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of Flux

• Less opinionated, requiring more boilerplate code
• Lacks built-in features like isomorphic support and API integration
• Can be challenging for beginners due to its flexibility

Code Comparison

Flux:

var AppDispatcher = require('./AppDispatcher');
var TodoConstants = require('./TodoConstants');

var TodoActions = {
  create: function(text) {
    AppDispatcher.dispatch({
      actionType: TodoConstants.TODO_CREATE,
      text: text
    });
  }
};

Marty:

var TodoActions = Marty.createActionCreators({
  addTodo: function (text) {
    this.dispatch(TodoConstants.ADD_TODO, text);
  }
});

Key Differences

• Marty provides a more opinionated structure, reducing boilerplate
• Flux offers more flexibility but requires more setup
• Marty includes built-in features like isomorphic rendering and API integration
• Flux has a larger community and more extensive documentation
• Marty's syntax is more concise, while Flux is more verbose but explicit

Both libraries aim to implement the Flux architecture, but Marty offers a more batteries-included approach, while Flux provides a foundation for custom implementations.

Pros of Refluxjs

• Simpler and more lightweight architecture compared to Marty
• Easier to learn and implement for developers new to Flux-like patterns
• More flexible and less opinionated, allowing for easier customization

Cons of Refluxjs

• Less structured approach may lead to inconsistencies in larger applications
• Lacks built-in support for isomorphic/universal JavaScript applications
• Limited tooling and debugging capabilities compared to Marty's ecosystem

Code Comparison

Refluxjs:

var Actions = Reflux.createActions([
  "increment",
  "decrement"
]);

var CounterStore = Reflux.createStore({
  listenables: Actions,
  onIncrement: function() { this.trigger(this.count++); },
  onDecrement: function() { this.trigger(this.count--); }
});

Marty:

var CounterActions = Marty.createActionCreators({
  increment: function() { this.dispatch('INCREMENT'); },
  decrement: function() { this.dispatch('DECREMENT'); }
});

var CounterStore = Marty.createStore({
  handlers: {
    'INCREMENT': 'increment',
    'DECREMENT': 'decrement'
  },
  increment: function() { this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 }); },
  decrement: function() { this.setState({ count: this.state.count - 1 }); }
});

Both libraries aim to implement Flux-like architectures, but Refluxjs offers a more streamlined approach with less boilerplate. Marty provides a more structured and opinionated framework, which can be beneficial for larger applications or teams requiring stricter conventions.

Pros of Alt

• Simpler API with less boilerplate code
• Better documentation and examples
• More active community and frequent updates

Cons of Alt

• Less flexibility in handling complex state management scenarios
• Limited built-in support for isomorphic/universal applications
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Flux architecture

Code Comparison

Alt:

class LocationActions {
  updateLocation(location) {
    return location;
  }
}

class LocationStore {
  constructor() {
    this.location = null;
    this.bindListeners({
      handleUpdateLocation: LocationActions.UPDATE_LOCATION
    });
  }

  handleUpdateLocation(location) {
    this.location = location;
  }
}

Marty:

const LocationConstants = Marty.createConstants([
  'UPDATE_LOCATION'
]);

const LocationActions = Marty.createActionCreators({
  updateLocation(location) {
    this.dispatch(LocationConstants.UPDATE_LOCATION, location);
  }
});

const LocationStore = Marty.createStore({
  handlers: {
    [LocationConstants.UPDATE_LOCATION]: 'handleUpdateLocation'
  },
  getInitialState() {
    return { location: null };
  },
  handleUpdateLocation(location) {
    this.state.location = location;
    this.hasChanged();
  }
});

Both Alt and Marty are Flux implementations for React applications. Alt offers a more straightforward API with less boilerplate, making it easier for beginners to grasp. However, Marty provides more flexibility for complex state management scenarios and better support for isomorphic applications. The code comparison shows that Alt requires less setup code, while Marty offers a more structured approach with separate constants and action creators.

Pros of Redux

• More active development and larger community support
• Better integration with React ecosystem and tooling
• Simpler API and learning curve for beginners

Cons of Redux

• More boilerplate code required for setup and actions
• Can be overkill for smaller applications
• Requires careful management of immutability

Code Comparison

Redux:

const reducer = (state = initialState, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case 'INCREMENT':
      return { ...state, count: state.count + 1 };
    default:
      return state;
  }
};

Marty:

class CounterStore extends Marty.Store {
  constructor(options) {
    super(options);
    this.state = { count: 0 };
    this.handlers = {
      increment: 'handleIncrement'
    };
  }
  handleIncrement() {
    this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 });
  }
}

Redux focuses on a single reducer function and pure state updates, while Marty uses a class-based approach with built-in state management. Redux's approach is more flexible but requires more setup, whereas Marty provides a more structured but opinionated solution.

Pros of Fluxxor

• Simpler API with less boilerplate code
• Better documentation and examples
• More mature and stable project with longer history

Cons of Fluxxor

• Less active development and community support
• Fewer features and integrations compared to Marty
• Limited TypeScript support

Code Comparison

Fluxxor:

var actions = {
  addTodo: function(text) {
    this.dispatch('ADD_TODO', {text: text});
  }
};

var TodoStore = Fluxxor.createStore({
  initialize: function() {
    this.todos = [];
    this.bindActions(
      'ADD_TODO', this.onAddTodo
    );
  },
  onAddTodo: function(payload) {
    this.todos.push({text: payload.text});
    this.emit('change');
  }
});

Marty:

class TodoActions extends Marty.ActionCreators {
  addTodo(text) {
    this.dispatch(TodoConstants.ADD_TODO, text);
  }
}

class TodoStore extends Marty.Store {
  constructor(options) {
    super(options);
    this.state = [];
    this.handlers = {
      addTodo: TodoConstants.ADD_TODO
    };
  }
  addTodo(text) {
    this.state.push({text: text});
    this.hasChanged();
  }
}

Both libraries implement the Flux architecture, but Fluxxor has a more straightforward approach with less boilerplate. Marty offers more structure and features, which can be beneficial for larger applications but may introduce complexity for simpler projects.