code-guide

Pros of idiomatic-css

• More comprehensive and detailed guidelines
• Includes explanations and rationale for each rule
• Provides examples of both good and bad practices

Cons of idiomatic-css

• Less frequently updated compared to code-guide
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to its depth

Code Comparison

idiomatic-css:

.selector,
.selector-secondary,
.selector[type="text"] {
    padding: 15px;
    margin: 0 0 15px;
    background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
    box-shadow: 0 1px 2px #ccc, inset 0 1px 0 #fff;
}

code-guide:

.selector {
  padding: 15px;
  margin-bottom: 15px;
  background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
  box-shadow: 0 1px 2px #ccc, inset 0 1px 0 #fff;
}

Summary

Both idiomatic-css and code-guide are valuable resources for CSS coding standards. idiomatic-css offers more in-depth guidelines and explanations, making it suitable for developers seeking a comprehensive understanding of CSS best practices. On the other hand, code-guide provides a more concise set of rules, which may be preferable for quick reference or for teams looking for a simpler standard to follow. The code comparison shows that idiomatic-css tends to group related selectors, while code-guide focuses on individual selectors, reflecting their different approaches to CSS organization.

Pros of JavaScript

• More comprehensive and detailed, covering a wide range of JavaScript-specific topics
• Regularly updated with contributions from a large community
• Includes explanations and examples for each rule

Cons of JavaScript

• Can be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive nature
• Focuses solely on JavaScript, lacking guidance for other web technologies
• Some rules may be opinionated and not universally accepted

Code Comparison

Code Guide:

<div class="modal">
  <h1 class="modal-title">Title</h1>
  <p class="modal-body">Hello World!</p>
</div>

JavaScript:

const greeting = 'Hello World!';
const modal = {
  title: 'Title',
  body: greeting
};

function showModal({ title, body }) {
  // Implementation
}

The Code Guide example focuses on HTML structure and class naming, while the JavaScript example demonstrates object structuring and function parameter destructuring.

Summary

Code Guide provides a broader, more general set of guidelines for HTML and CSS, making it suitable for beginners and quick reference. JavaScript offers an in-depth, JavaScript-specific style guide with extensive rules and explanations, ideal for teams seeking consistent JavaScript coding practices. The choice between the two depends on the project's scope and the team's needs.

Pros of idiomatic.js

• More comprehensive JavaScript-specific guidelines
• Detailed explanations and rationale for each rule
• Active community contributions and discussions

Cons of idiomatic.js

• Focused solely on JavaScript, limiting its applicability
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to its depth

Code Comparison

idiomatic.js:

var foo = {
  bar: function() {
    // ...
  },
  baz: function() {
    // ...
  }
};

code-guide:

<nav class="navbar">
  <ul>
    <li><a href="#">Home</a></li>
    <li><a href="#">About</a></li>
  </ul>
</nav>

Key Differences

• Scope: idiomatic.js focuses exclusively on JavaScript, while code-guide covers HTML, CSS, and general coding practices.
• Depth: idiomatic.js provides more in-depth JavaScript guidelines, whereas code-guide offers broader, more general coding principles.
• Format: idiomatic.js is presented as a single, detailed document, while code-guide is organized into separate sections for different languages and concepts.

Similarities

• Both aim to improve code quality and consistency
• Open-source projects with community involvement
• Provide examples to illustrate best practices

Use Cases

• idiomatic.js: Ideal for JavaScript-heavy projects or teams looking to standardize their JavaScript coding style
• code-guide: Better suited for full-stack developers or projects involving multiple languages and technologies

Pros of CSS-Guidelines

• More comprehensive coverage of CSS-specific topics
• Includes detailed sections on naming conventions and BEM methodology
• Provides practical examples and explanations for each guideline

Cons of CSS-Guidelines

• Less focus on general coding practices and other languages
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to its depth and length
• Last updated in 2016, potentially missing newer CSS features and best practices

Code Comparison

CSS-Guidelines:

.c-button {
    display: inline-block;
    padding: 1em;
}

.c-button--primary {
    background-color: #0070c9;
}

Code Guide:

.btn {
  display: inline-block;
  padding: 1rem;
}

.btn-primary {
  background-color: #0070c9;
}

Both repositories provide valuable guidelines for writing clean, maintainable CSS code. CSS-Guidelines offers a more in-depth exploration of CSS-specific topics, including naming conventions and methodologies like BEM. It provides detailed explanations and examples for each guideline, making it an excellent resource for intermediate to advanced CSS developers.

Code Guide, on the other hand, offers a broader perspective on coding practices, covering HTML, CSS, and some general principles. It's more concise and easier to digest, making it suitable for beginners or those looking for quick reference.

The code comparison shows slight differences in naming conventions, with CSS-Guidelines following BEM methodology more strictly. Both examples demonstrate clean, readable code structure.

Pros of js

• More comprehensive JavaScript-specific guidelines
• Includes modern JS practices and ES6+ features
• Provides detailed explanations and rationales for recommendations

Cons of js

• Focuses solely on JavaScript, lacking guidance for HTML/CSS
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to its depth and complexity
• Less emphasis on general coding principles and practices

Code Comparison

js:

const foo = 1
let bar = foo

bar = 9

console.log(foo, bar) // => 1, 9

code-guide:

<div class="modal">
  <h1 class="modal-title">This is a modal</h1>
  <p class="modal-body">Hello there!</p>
</div>

Summary

js is a comprehensive JavaScript style guide, offering in-depth recommendations for modern JS development. It excels in providing detailed explanations and covering advanced topics. However, it lacks guidance for other web technologies and may be too complex for beginners.

code-guide, on the other hand, offers a broader perspective on web development, covering HTML, CSS, and basic JavaScript. It provides simpler, more general coding principles that are accessible to developers of all levels. While less detailed in JavaScript-specific areas, it offers a well-rounded approach to web development practices.

Choose js for in-depth JavaScript guidance or code-guide for a more holistic web development style guide.

Pros of styleguide

• Comprehensive coverage of multiple programming languages
• Detailed explanations and rationale for style choices
• Regularly updated and maintained by Google engineers

Cons of styleguide

• Can be overwhelming due to its extensive nature
• May not be suitable for smaller projects or teams
• Some guidelines may be specific to Google's internal practices

Code comparison

code-guide (HTML):

<div class="module">
  <h3 class="module-title">Example</h3>
  <p class="module-content">Content here</p>
</div>

styleguide (HTML):

<div class="module">
  <h3>Example</h3>
  <p>Content here</p>
</div>

The code-guide example uses more specific class names, while the styleguide example keeps it simpler. This reflects the different approaches: code-guide focuses on maintainability and scalability, while styleguide emphasizes simplicity and consistency across large codebases.

Both repositories provide valuable guidance for code style and best practices. code-guide is more focused on front-end development, particularly HTML and CSS, while styleguide covers a broader range of languages and is more suitable for larger teams and projects. The choice between them depends on the specific needs and scale of your development efforts.