Convert Figma logo to code with AI

mui logomaterial-ui

Material UI: Comprehensive React component library that implements Google's Material Design. Free forever.

93,226
32,094
93,226
1,890

Top Related Projects

227,213

The library for web and native user interfaces.

A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.

39,623

🐉 Vue Component Framework

An enterprise-class UI design language and React UI library

37,442

⚡️ Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications

83,945

Storybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolation

Quick Overview

Material-UI is a popular React UI framework that implements Google's Material Design. It provides a comprehensive suite of customizable, pre-built React components that can be used to rapidly develop attractive and functional user interfaces.

Pros

  • Extensive collection of pre-built, customizable components
  • Consistent design language following Material Design principles
  • Strong community support and regular updates
  • Excellent documentation and examples

Cons

  • Learning curve for developers new to Material Design
  • Can be opinionated in terms of styling and theming
  • Large bundle size if not properly optimized
  • Some components may require additional customization for specific use cases

Code Examples

Creating a basic button:

import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

function MyComponent() {
  return <Button variant="contained">Hello World</Button>;
}

Using the Grid system for responsive layouts:

import Grid from '@mui/material/Grid';

function ResponsiveLayout() {
  return (
    <Grid container spacing={2}>
      <Grid item xs={12} md={6}>
        <p>Left column</p>
      </Grid>
      <Grid item xs={12} md={6}>
        <p>Right column</p>
      </Grid>
    </Grid>
  );
}

Implementing a custom theme:

import { createTheme, ThemeProvider } from '@mui/material/styles';

const theme = createTheme({
  palette: {
    primary: {
      main: '#1976d2',
    },
    secondary: {
      main: '#dc004e',
    },
  },
});

function App() {
  return (
    <ThemeProvider theme={theme}>
      {/* Your app components */}
    </ThemeProvider>
  );
}

Getting Started

To start using Material-UI in your React project:

  1. Install the package:

    npm install @mui/material @emotion/react @emotion/styled
    
  2. Import and use components in your React app:

    import React from 'react';
    import Button from '@mui/material/Button';
    
    function App() {
      return (
        <Button variant="contained" color="primary">
          Hello World
        </Button>
      );
    }
    
    export default App;
    
  3. (Optional) Add Roboto font to your project:

    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:300,400,500,700&display=swap" />
    

Competitor Comparisons

227,213

The library for web and native user interfaces.

Pros of React

  • More flexible and can be used with various UI libraries
  • Larger ecosystem and community support
  • Better performance for complex, dynamic applications

Cons of React

  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Requires additional libraries for advanced features
  • More boilerplate code needed for basic functionality

Code Comparison

React:

import React from 'react';

function Button({ onClick, children }) {
  return <button onClick={onClick}>{children}</button>;
}

Material-UI:

import React from 'react';
import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

function MyButton({ onClick, children }) {
  return <Button onClick={onClick}>{children}</Button>;
}

Summary

React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while Material-UI is a comprehensive UI component library built on top of React. React offers more flexibility and better performance for complex applications, but requires more setup and additional libraries for advanced features. Material-UI provides pre-built components following Material Design principles, making it easier to create consistent and visually appealing interfaces quickly. However, it may be less flexible for highly customized designs. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, development speed, and desired level of customization.

A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.

Pros of Tailwind CSS

  • Highly customizable and flexible, allowing for more unique designs
  • Smaller bundle size, leading to faster load times
  • Rapid prototyping and development with utility-first approach

Cons of Tailwind CSS

  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to utility-first CSS
  • Can lead to cluttered HTML with many class names
  • Less out-of-the-box component consistency compared to Material-UI

Code Comparison

Material-UI:

import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

<Button variant="contained" color="primary">
  Click me
</Button>

Tailwind CSS:

<button class="bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-700 text-white font-bold py-2 px-4 rounded">
  Click me
</button>

Both Material-UI and Tailwind CSS are popular choices for building user interfaces in web applications. Material-UI provides a comprehensive set of pre-built components following Google's Material Design guidelines, while Tailwind CSS offers a utility-first approach for building custom designs quickly. The choice between the two often depends on project requirements, team preferences, and the desired level of customization.

39,623

🐉 Vue Component Framework

Pros of Vuetify

  • Designed specifically for Vue.js, offering seamless integration and optimal performance
  • Extensive collection of pre-built components, reducing development time
  • Strong community support and regular updates

Cons of Vuetify

  • Limited customization options compared to Material-UI's more flexible theming system
  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to Vue.js ecosystem
  • Larger bundle size, potentially impacting initial load times

Code Comparison

Material-UI (React):

import React from 'react';
import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

function App() {
  return <Button variant="contained">Hello World</Button>;
}

Vuetify (Vue.js):

<template>
  <v-btn color="primary">Hello World</v-btn>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: 'App'
}
</script>

Both libraries offer similar component-based structures, but Vuetify's syntax is more tightly integrated with Vue.js conventions, while Material-UI follows React patterns. Vuetify uses built-in directives like v-btn, whereas Material-UI imports components individually. This difference reflects their respective framework-specific optimizations.

An enterprise-class UI design language and React UI library

Pros of Ant Design

  • More comprehensive component library with a wider range of specialized components
  • Better support for internationalization and localization out of the box
  • Stronger focus on enterprise-level applications and data-heavy interfaces

Cons of Ant Design

  • Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and configuration options
  • Less flexibility in customizing the overall look and feel compared to Material-UI
  • Larger bundle size, which may impact initial load times for smaller applications

Code Comparison

Ant Design button example:

import { Button } from 'antd';

const MyButton = () => (
  <Button type="primary" size="large">
    Click me
  </Button>
);

Material-UI button example:

import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

const MyButton = () => (
  <Button variant="contained" size="large">
    Click me
  </Button>
);

Both libraries offer similar component APIs, but Ant Design tends to use more descriptive prop names (e.g., type="primary") compared to Material-UI's more concise approach (e.g., variant="contained"). This reflects Ant Design's focus on clarity and Material-UI's emphasis on flexibility and customization.

37,442

⚡️ Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications

Pros of Chakra UI

  • More lightweight and flexible, allowing for easier customization
  • Offers a more modern and minimalist design approach
  • Better out-of-the-box dark mode support

Cons of Chakra UI

  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Material-UI
  • Less comprehensive documentation and fewer pre-built components
  • May require more custom styling for complex UI elements

Code Comparison

Chakra UI:

import { Button } from "@chakra-ui/react"

function MyComponent() {
  return <Button colorScheme="blue">Click me</Button>
}

Material-UI:

import Button from "@mui/material/Button"

function MyComponent() {
  return <Button variant="contained" color="primary">Click me</Button>
}

Both libraries offer a similar component-based approach, but Chakra UI tends to use more utility-based props for styling, while Material-UI relies more on predefined variants and themes. Chakra UI's API is often considered more intuitive and easier to customize on-the-fly, whereas Material-UI provides a more structured and opinionated design system out of the box.

83,945

Storybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolation

Pros of Storybook

  • Supports multiple frameworks (React, Vue, Angular, etc.), not limited to React like Material-UI
  • Provides a dedicated environment for developing and testing UI components in isolation
  • Offers extensive documentation and addons ecosystem for enhanced functionality

Cons of Storybook

  • Requires additional setup and configuration compared to Material-UI's ready-to-use components
  • Can increase project complexity and build time, especially for smaller projects
  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to the tool

Code Comparison

Material-UI (React component usage):

import Button from '@mui/material/Button';

function App() {
  return <Button variant="contained">Hello World</Button>;
}

Storybook (Story definition):

import { Button } from './Button';

export default {
  title: 'Components/Button',
  component: Button,
};

export const Primary = () => <Button primary>Button</Button>;

While Material-UI focuses on providing pre-built React components, Storybook offers a development environment for showcasing and testing components from various frameworks. Material-UI's approach is more straightforward for quick implementation, while Storybook provides a comprehensive tool for component-driven development and documentation.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

Material UI logo

Material UI

license npm latest package npm next package npm downloads GitHub branch status Coverage Status Follow on X Renovate status Average time to resolve an issue Open Collective backers and sponsors CII Best Practices

Material UI is a comprehensive library of React components that features our independent implementation of Google's Material Design system. It's trusted by some of the world's greatest product teams because it's been rigorously battle-tested through more than a decade of development by thousands of open-source contributors.

Material UI's core functionality is extended by MUI X, a suite of complex components for advanced use cases.

Documentation

Get started in the Material UI documentation.

Older versions

Note: @next points to pre-releases. Use @latest for the latest stable release.

Joy UI

This repository also contains Joy UI, an experimental component library that implements our own in-house Joy Design. Joy UI is in beta and development is currently on hold. When starting a new project from scratch, we recommend Material UI over Joy UI because we can guarantee ongoing support.

You're welcome to open new issues and PRs to help improve Joy UI, but please keep in mind that the maintainers are primarily focused on other projects and may not be able to respond in a timely manner.

View the Joy UI documentation.

Sponsors

Diamond 💎

octopus doit marblism

Diamond sponsors are those who have pledged $1,500/month or more to MUI.

Gold 🏆

via Open Collective or via Patreon

tidelift.com Spotify Icons8 RxDB text-em-all.com megafamous.com dialmycalls.com goread.io copycopter.ai

buzzoid.comBuzzoid twicsy.comTwicsy

Gold sponsors are those who have pledged $500/month or more to MUI.

More backers

See the full list of our backers.

Questions

For how-to questions that don't involve making changes to the code base, please use Stack Overflow instead of GitHub issues.

Examples

Our documentation features a collection of example projects.

Premium templates

You can find complete templates and themes in the MUI Store.

Contributing

Read the contributing guide to learn about our development process, how to propose bug fixes and improvements, and how to build and test your changes.

Contributing is about more than just issues and pull requests! There are many other ways to support Material UI beyond contributing to the code base.

Changelog

The changelog is regularly updated to reflect what's changed in each new release.

Roadmap

Future plans and high-priority features and enhancements can be found in the roadmap.

License

This project is licensed under the terms of the MIT license.

Security

For details on supported versions and contact information for reporting security issues, please refer to the security policy.

Sponsoring services

These great services sponsor MUI's core infrastructure:

GitHub logo

GitHub lets us host the Git repository and coordinate contributions.

Netlify logo

Netlify lets us distribute the documentation.

BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack lets us test in real browsers.

CodeCov logo

CodeCov lets us monitor test coverage.

NPM DownloadsLast 30 Days