nextdns

NextDNS CLI client (DoH Proxy)

3,124

192

3,124

View on GitHub

Top Related Projects

AdGuardHome

24,491

Network-wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server

pi-hole

48,426

A black hole for Internet advertisements

dnscrypt-proxy

11,288

dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols.

Quick Overview

NextDNS is an open-source DNS client for Linux, macOS, and Windows. It provides a lightweight and efficient way to connect to NextDNS, a privacy-focused DNS service that offers ad blocking, malware protection, and customizable filtering options.

Pros

Easy to install and configure on various operating systems
Supports DoH (DNS over HTTPS) for enhanced privacy and security
Offers automatic updates and seamless integration with the NextDNS service
Lightweight and resource-efficient

Cons

Limited to use with the NextDNS service only
May require additional configuration for complex network setups
Depends on the availability and reliability of NextDNS servers
Some advanced features may require a paid NextDNS subscription

Code Examples

This project is not a code library but rather a DNS client application. Therefore, there are no code examples to provide.

Getting Started

To get started with NextDNS:

Download the appropriate binary for your operating system from the releases page.
Install the binary using the provided installation script or package manager.
Configure NextDNS by running:
```
sudo nextdns install -config <your_config_id>
```
Replace <your_config_id> with your NextDNS configuration ID.
Start the NextDNS service:
```
sudo nextdns start
```

For more detailed instructions and advanced configuration options, refer to the NextDNS documentation.

Competitor Comparisons

AdGuardHome

24,491

Network-wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server

Pros of AdGuardHome

Self-hosted solution with full control over data and privacy
More customizable with advanced filtering options
Supports multiple upstream DNS providers

Cons of AdGuardHome

Requires more technical knowledge to set up and maintain
May consume more system resources compared to cloud-based solutions
Potential for misconfiguration leading to security vulnerabilities

Code Comparison

AdGuardHome configuration example:

dns:
  bind_hosts:
    - 0.0.0.0
  upstream_dns:
    - https://dns.cloudflare.com/dns-query
filters:
  - enabled: true
    url: https://adguardteam.github.io/AdGuardSDNSFilter/Filters/filter.txt

NextDNS configuration example:

{
  "profile": "abcdef",
  "config": {
    "blocklists": ["oisd"],
    "settings": {
      "logs": {
        "enabled": true
      }
    }
  }
}

AdGuardHome offers more granular control over DNS settings and filtering, while NextDNS provides a simpler, cloud-based approach with pre-configured options. AdGuardHome's self-hosted nature allows for greater customization but requires more setup and maintenance. NextDNS offers easier deployment but with less control over the underlying infrastructure.

pi-hole

48,426

A black hole for Internet advertisements

Pros of Pi-hole

Self-hosted solution, offering complete control over data and privacy
Extensive customization options and community-driven blocklists
Works network-wide, protecting all devices without individual configuration

Cons of Pi-hole

Requires hardware setup and maintenance
May need manual updates and configuration adjustments
Can potentially cause false positives, blocking legitimate content

Code Comparison

Pi-hole (JavaScript):

function getQueryTypes() {
    var queryTypes = {};
    $.each(queries, function (idx, query) {
        if (queryTypes.hasOwnProperty(query.type)) {
            queryTypes[query.type]++;
        } else {
            queryTypes[query.type] = 1;
        }
    });
    return queryTypes;
}

NextDNS (Go):

func (c *Client) Profiles(ctx context.Context) ([]Profile, error) {
    var profiles []Profile
    err := c.get(ctx, "/profiles", &profiles)
    return profiles, err
}

While both projects aim to provide DNS-based ad blocking and privacy protection, Pi-hole focuses on self-hosted solutions with extensive customization, while NextDNS offers a cloud-based service with easier setup and management. The code snippets showcase different languages and approaches, with Pi-hole using JavaScript for client-side functionality and NextDNS utilizing Go for server-side operations.

dnscrypt-proxy

11,288

dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols.

Pros of dnscrypt-proxy

Open-source and community-driven, allowing for greater transparency and customization
Supports a wide range of DNS protocols, including DNSCrypt, DNS-over-HTTPS, and DNS-over-TLS
Offers advanced features like DNS caching, filtering, and load balancing

Cons of dnscrypt-proxy

Requires more technical knowledge to set up and configure
May have a steeper learning curve for non-technical users
Less user-friendly interface compared to NextDNS

Code Comparison

dnscrypt-proxy configuration example:

server_names = ['cloudflare', 'google']
listen_addresses = ['127.0.0.1:53', '[::1]:53']
max_clients = 250
ipv4_servers = true
ipv6_servers = false
dnscrypt_servers = true
doh_servers = true

NextDNS configuration example:

dns:
  - 45.90.28.0
  - 2a07:a8c0::
tls:
  hostname: dns.nextdns.io
  servername: id.dns.nextdns.io

Both projects aim to enhance DNS privacy and security, but dnscrypt-proxy offers more flexibility and advanced features at the cost of complexity, while NextDNS provides a more streamlined and user-friendly experience.

mosdns

2,827

一个 DNS 转发器

Pros of mosdns

More flexible and customizable DNS configuration options
Supports advanced features like DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DoT)
Lightweight and efficient, suitable for various deployment scenarios

Cons of mosdns

Steeper learning curve due to more complex configuration options
Less user-friendly interface compared to NextDNS
May require more manual setup and maintenance

Code Comparison

mosdns configuration example:

log:
  level: info
plugins:
  - tag: forward
    type: forward
    args:
      upstream:
        - addr: https://dns.google/dns-query

NextDNS configuration example:

upstream_dns:
  - https://dns.google/dns-query
log_level: info

While both projects aim to provide DNS services, mosdns offers more granular control and advanced features, making it suitable for power users and complex network setups. NextDNS, on the other hand, provides a more streamlined and user-friendly approach, focusing on ease of use and quick setup for general users. The code comparison shows that mosdns configuration tends to be more detailed and structured, allowing for greater customization, while NextDNS configuration is typically simpler and more straightforward.

naiveproxy

6,519

Make a fortune quietly

Pros of naiveproxy

Focuses on censorship circumvention and traffic obfuscation
Built on Chromium's network stack for robust performance
Supports multiple protocols including HTTP/2 and QUIC

Cons of naiveproxy

More complex setup and configuration compared to NextDNS
Primarily designed for proxy functionality, not DNS-specific features
May require more technical knowledge to implement effectively

Code Comparison

NextDNS (configuration example):

upstream:
  - https://dns.nextdns.io/12345
  - https://dns.nextdns.io/67890

naiveproxy (configuration example):

{
  "listen": "socks://127.0.0.1:1080",
  "proxy": "https://example.com",
  "concurrency": 4
}

While NextDNS focuses on DNS-level filtering and security, naiveproxy is designed for broader proxy functionality. NextDNS offers a simpler configuration for DNS-specific use cases, while naiveproxy provides more advanced options for traffic obfuscation and censorship bypass. The code examples highlight the different focus areas, with NextDNS emphasizing DNS upstream configuration and naiveproxy showcasing proxy and connection settings.

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

NextDNS CLI Client

NextDNS CLI is a command-line tool that allows you to use NextDNS's DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) service with advanced capabilities. Although the most advanced features will only work with NextDNS, this program can work as a client for any DoH provider or a mix of NextDNS + another DNS (split horizon).

This CLI is mostly aimed at routers and UNIX based systems, but it is also a great client for Windows and macOS, especially for people who prefer a fully open-source client and don't mind the lack of a GUI.

See the wiki for installation and usage instructions.

Top Related Projects

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot