Pros of React Router

• Deeply integrated with React ecosystem, offering seamless component-based routing
• Extensive documentation and large community support
• Supports nested routing and dynamic route matching

Cons of React Router

• Larger bundle size compared to Router5
• More opinionated approach, which may limit flexibility in some scenarios
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to React

Code Comparison

React Router:

import { BrowserRouter, Route, Switch } from 'react-router-dom';

<BrowserRouter>
  <Switch>
    <Route path="/about" component={About} />
    <Route path="/" exact component={Home} />
  </Switch>
</BrowserRouter>

Router5:

import createRouter from 'router5';
import browserPlugin from 'router5-plugin-browser';

const router = createRouter([
  { name: 'home', path: '/' },
  { name: 'about', path: '/about' }
]);
router.usePlugin(browserPlugin());
router.start();

React Router focuses on declarative, component-based routing within React applications, while Router5 provides a more generic routing solution that can be used with various frameworks. React Router's tight integration with React makes it a popular choice for React developers, but Router5's lightweight and framework-agnostic approach offers more flexibility for projects using different technologies or requiring custom routing logic.

Pros of Reach Router

• Designed specifically for React applications, offering seamless integration
• Provides accessible navigation out of the box
• Supports relative routing, making nested routes easier to manage

Cons of Reach Router

• Less flexible for non-React applications
• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Router5
• Limited support for complex routing scenarios

Code Comparison

Reach Router:

import { Router, Link } from "@reach/router"

const App = () => (
  <Router>
    <Home path="/" />
    <Dashboard path="dashboard" />
  </Router>
)

Router5:

import createRouter from 'router5'

const routes = [
  { name: 'home', path: '/' },
  { name: 'dashboard', path: '/dashboard' }
]
const router = createRouter(routes)

Key Differences

• Reach Router is React-specific, while Router5 is framework-agnostic
• Router5 offers more granular control over routing behavior
• Reach Router provides built-in accessibility features
• Router5 has a larger ecosystem and community support
• Reach Router uses a component-based approach, while Router5 uses a configuration object

Both routers have their strengths, with Reach Router excelling in React applications and accessibility, while Router5 offers more flexibility and control across different frameworks.

Pros of wouter

• Lightweight and minimalistic, with a smaller bundle size
• Simple API, easy to learn and use
• Hooks-based approach, aligning well with modern React practices

Cons of wouter

• Less feature-rich compared to router5
• May require additional libraries for more complex routing scenarios
• Limited support for nested routing

Code Comparison

wouter:

import { Route, Switch } from "wouter";

<Switch>
  <Route path="/users/:id" component={UserProfile} />
  <Route path="/about" component={About} />
</Switch>

router5:

import { RouterProvider, Route } from "react-router5";

<RouterProvider router={router}>
  <Route name="users.view" component={UserProfile} />
  <Route name="about" component={About} />
</RouterProvider>

Summary

wouter is a lightweight, hooks-based routing solution for React applications, offering simplicity and ease of use. It's ideal for smaller projects or those preferring a minimalistic approach. router5, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive routing solution with advanced features, making it suitable for complex applications with intricate routing requirements. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project, with wouter excelling in simplicity and router5 in feature richness.

Pros of Universal Router

• Lightweight and flexible, with a smaller footprint than Router5
• Supports both sync and async route resolution
• Easy integration with React and other view libraries

Cons of Universal Router

• Less feature-rich compared to Router5
• Requires more manual setup for complex routing scenarios
• Limited built-in support for nested routes

Code Comparison

Universal Router:

const router = new UniversalRouter([
  { path: '/home', action: () => '<h1>Home</h1>' },
  { path: '/posts', action: () => '<h1>Posts</h1>' },
]);

router.resolve('/home').then(html => {
  document.body.innerHTML = html;
});

Router5:

const router = createRouter([
  { name: 'home', path: '/home' },
  { name: 'posts', path: '/posts' },
]);

router.start();
router.navigate('home');

Universal Router offers a more straightforward approach to defining routes and actions, while Router5 provides a more structured setup with named routes. Universal Router's promise-based resolution allows for easy async handling, whereas Router5 uses a more traditional event-based system for navigation.

Both routers have their strengths, with Universal Router being more lightweight and flexible, and Router5 offering a more comprehensive feature set for complex applications.

Pros of Navigo

• Lightweight and simple to use, with a smaller learning curve
• Supports hash-based routing out of the box
• Easier setup for basic routing needs

Cons of Navigo

• Less powerful for complex routing scenarios
• Fewer built-in features compared to Router5
• Limited middleware support

Code Comparison

Navigo:

const router = new Navigo('/');
router.on('/user/:id', (params) => {
  console.log(`User ID: ${params.id}`);
}).resolve();

Router5:

const router = createRouter([
  { name: 'user', path: '/user/:id' }
]);
router.start();
router.subscribe(({ route }) => {
  console.log(`User ID: ${route.params.id}`);
});

Key Differences

• Navigo uses a more straightforward API for defining routes
• Router5 employs a more structured approach with named routes
• Navigo's route handling is more direct, while Router5 uses a subscription model
• Router5 offers more advanced features like middleware and plugins
• Navigo is better suited for smaller projects, while Router5 excels in larger, more complex applications

Both routers have their strengths, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs of your project. Navigo is ideal for simpler routing requirements, while Router5 provides more flexibility and power for complex routing scenarios.