Top Related Projects
Fast linters runner for Go
Staticcheck - The advanced Go linter
[mirror] This is a linter for Go source code. (deprecated)
errcheck checks that you checked errors.
A Pluggable Terraform Linter
Quick Overview
Gosec is a security-focused static analysis tool for Go code. It scans Go source code to detect potential security issues and vulnerabilities. Gosec integrates with various CI/CD pipelines and can be used as part of the development process to identify security problems early.
Pros
- Easy to integrate into existing workflows and CI/CD pipelines
- Covers a wide range of security checks, including hardcoded credentials, SQL injection, and more
- Regularly updated with new security rules and improvements
- Provides clear, actionable output with explanations of detected issues
Cons
- May produce false positives, requiring manual review of results
- Limited to Go language, not suitable for multi-language projects
- Some advanced security issues may require additional tools or manual analysis
- Configuration can be complex for customizing rules or excluding false positives
Getting Started
To install and run Gosec:
# Install Gosec
go install github.com/securego/gosec/v2/cmd/gosec@latest
# Run Gosec on a Go project
gosec ./...
# Run Gosec with JSON output
gosec -fmt=json -out=results.json ./...
# Run Gosec with specific rules
gosec -include=G101,G102,G103 ./...
For more advanced usage and integration with CI/CD pipelines, refer to the official documentation on the GitHub repository.
Competitor Comparisons
Fast linters runner for Go
Pros of golangci-lint
- Comprehensive: Integrates multiple linters (including gosec) for a more thorough code analysis
- Customizable: Offers extensive configuration options to tailor the linting process
- Performance: Runs linters in parallel, resulting in faster execution times
Cons of golangci-lint
- Complexity: The wide range of options can be overwhelming for new users
- False positives: May generate more false positives due to the inclusion of multiple linters
Code comparison
golangci-lint configuration example:
linters:
enable:
- gosec
- errcheck
- staticcheck
disable:
- dupl
gosec usage example:
gosec ./...
Key differences
- Scope: golangci-lint is a meta-linter that includes gosec, while gosec focuses specifically on security-related issues
- Usage: golangci-lint requires configuration but offers more comprehensive analysis, whereas gosec is simpler to use out-of-the-box for security checks
- Integration: golangci-lint is often used as part of a larger CI/CD pipeline, while gosec can be used standalone or integrated into other tools
Both tools are valuable for Go developers, with golangci-lint offering a broader range of checks and gosec providing a specialized focus on security vulnerabilities.
Staticcheck - The advanced Go linter
Pros of go-tools
- Broader scope: Includes various analysis tools beyond security, such as staticcheck and unused
- More comprehensive: Offers a wider range of checks and linters for Go code
- Active development: Regularly updated with new features and improvements
Cons of go-tools
- Less focused on security: Not specifically tailored for security-related issues like gosec
- Steeper learning curve: May require more time to understand and configure all available tools
Code Comparison
gosec example:
// gosec G104
_, err := os.Open(filename)
if err != nil {
log.Println(err)
}
go-tools (staticcheck) example:
// staticcheck SA1006
var x int
x, err := someFunction()
if err != nil {
return err
}
Both tools identify potential issues in Go code, but gosec focuses on security-specific concerns, while go-tools (specifically staticcheck in this example) covers a broader range of code quality and correctness issues.
gosec is more suitable for projects prioritizing security analysis, while go-tools provides a comprehensive suite of analysis tools for overall code quality improvement. The choice between them depends on the specific needs of the project and the desired balance between security focus and general code quality checks.
[mirror] This is a linter for Go source code. (deprecated)
Pros of lint
- Focuses on general coding style and best practices
- Integrated into the official Go toolchain
- Widely adopted and maintained by the Go community
Cons of lint
- Limited security-specific checks
- May miss critical security vulnerabilities
- Less frequent updates compared to gosec
Code Comparison
lint example:
func example() {
var x int
x = x // lint will flag this as ineffectual assignment
}
gosec example:
func example() {
password := "hardcoded_password" // gosec will flag this as a security issue
fmt.Println(password)
}
Summary
lint is a general-purpose linter that focuses on coding style and best practices, while gosec is specifically designed for security-related checks. lint is more widely adopted and integrated into the Go toolchain, but may miss critical security vulnerabilities that gosec can detect. gosec provides more frequent updates and specialized security checks, making it a valuable tool for projects where security is a primary concern. For comprehensive code quality and security, using both tools in conjunction can provide the best coverage.
errcheck checks that you checked errors.
Pros of errcheck
- Focused specifically on error checking, providing more in-depth analysis
- Lightweight and fast, with minimal setup required
- Can be easily integrated into CI/CD pipelines
Cons of errcheck
- Limited scope compared to gosec's broader security analysis
- May produce false positives in certain scenarios
- Lacks some advanced features found in gosec, such as customizable rules
Code Comparison
errcheck example:
func example() {
f, _ := os.Open("file.txt") // errcheck will flag this line
defer f.Close()
// ...
}
gosec example:
func example() {
password := "hardcoded_password" // gosec will flag this line
// ...
}
errcheck focuses on identifying unchecked errors, while gosec covers a wider range of security issues, including hardcoded credentials, SQL injection vulnerabilities, and more.
Both tools are valuable for Go developers, with errcheck being more specialized for error handling and gosec offering a comprehensive security analysis. errcheck is ideal for projects prioritizing proper error management, while gosec is better suited for overall security auditing. Developers may benefit from using both tools in conjunction to ensure both error handling and security best practices are followed.
A Pluggable Terraform Linter
Pros of tflint
- Specialized for Terraform, offering deep insights into HCL files and Terraform-specific issues
- Supports custom rules and plugins for extended functionality
- Integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and various IDEs
Cons of tflint
- Limited to Terraform files, unlike gosec which covers Go code security
- May require more frequent updates to keep up with Terraform changes
- Less comprehensive in general security scanning compared to gosec
Code Comparison
tflint example:
resource "aws_instance" "example" {
ami = "ami-12345678"
instance_type = "t2.micro"
}
gosec example:
func main() {
password := "hardcoded_password"
fmt.Println("Password:", password)
}
tflint would detect issues like hardcoded AMIs or non-compliant instance types, while gosec would identify security vulnerabilities such as hardcoded credentials in Go code.
Both tools are valuable for their respective domains, with tflint excelling in Terraform-specific linting and gosec providing broader Go code security analysis. The choice between them depends on the project's focus: infrastructure-as-code for tflint or Go application security for gosec.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
gosec - Go Security Checker
Inspects source code for security problems by scanning the Go AST and SSA code representation.
License
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"). You may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License here.
Project status
Install
CI Installation
# binary will be $(go env GOPATH)/bin/gosec
curl -sfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/securego/gosec/master/install.sh | sh -s -- -b $(go env GOPATH)/bin vX.Y.Z
# or install it into ./bin/
curl -sfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/securego/gosec/master/install.sh | sh -s vX.Y.Z
# In alpine linux (as it does not come with curl by default)
wget -O - -q https://raw.githubusercontent.com/securego/gosec/master/install.sh | sh -s vX.Y.Z
# If you want to use the checksums provided on the "Releases" page
# then you will have to download a tar.gz file for your operating system instead of a binary file
wget https://github.com/securego/gosec/releases/download/vX.Y.Z/gosec_vX.Y.Z_OS.tar.gz
# The file will be in the current folder where you run the command
# and you can check the checksum like this
echo "<check sum from the check sum file> gosec_vX.Y.Z_OS.tar.gz" | sha256sum -c -
gosec --help
GitHub Action
You can run gosec
as a GitHub action as follows:
name: Run Gosec
on:
push:
branches:
- master
pull_request:
branches:
- master
jobs:
tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
env:
GO111MODULE: on
steps:
- name: Checkout Source
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Run Gosec Security Scanner
uses: securego/gosec@master
with:
args: ./...
Integrating with code scanning
You can integrate third-party code analysis tools with GitHub code scanning by uploading data as SARIF files.
The workflow shows an example of running the gosec
as a step in a GitHub action workflow which outputs the results.sarif
file. The workflow then uploads the results.sarif
file to GitHub using the upload-sarif
action.
name: "Security Scan"
# Run workflow each time code is pushed to your repository and on a schedule.
# The scheduled workflow runs every at 00:00 on Sunday UTC time.
on:
push:
schedule:
- cron: '0 0 * * 0'
jobs:
tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
env:
GO111MODULE: on
steps:
- name: Checkout Source
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Run Gosec Security Scanner
uses: securego/gosec@master
with:
# we let the report trigger content trigger a failure using the GitHub Security features.
args: '-no-fail -fmt sarif -out results.sarif ./...'
- name: Upload SARIF file
uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2
with:
# Path to SARIF file relative to the root of the repository
sarif_file: results.sarif
Local Installation
go install github.com/securego/gosec/v2/cmd/gosec@latest
Usage
Gosec can be configured to only run a subset of rules, to exclude certain file
paths, and produce reports in different formats. By default all rules will be
run against the supplied input files. To recursively scan from the current
directory you can supply ./...
as the input argument.
Available rules
- G101: Look for hard coded credentials
- G102: Bind to all interfaces
- G103: Audit the use of unsafe block
- G104: Audit errors not checked
- G106: Audit the use of ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey
- G107: Url provided to HTTP request as taint input
- G108: Profiling endpoint automatically exposed on /debug/pprof
- G109: Potential Integer overflow made by strconv.Atoi result conversion to int16/32
- G110: Potential DoS vulnerability via decompression bomb
- G111: Potential directory traversal
- G112: Potential slowloris attack
- G113: Usage of Rat.SetString in math/big with an overflow (CVE-2022-23772)
- G114: Use of net/http serve function that has no support for setting timeouts
- G115: Potential integer overflow when converting between integer types
- G201: SQL query construction using format string
- G202: SQL query construction using string concatenation
- G203: Use of unescaped data in HTML templates
- G204: Audit use of command execution
- G301: Poor file permissions used when creating a directory
- G302: Poor file permissions used with chmod
- G303: Creating tempfile using a predictable path
- G304: File path provided as taint input
- G305: File traversal when extracting zip/tar archive
- G306: Poor file permissions used when writing to a new file
- G307: Poor file permissions used when creating a file with os.Create
- G401: Detect the usage of MD5 or SHA1
- G402: Look for bad TLS connection settings
- G403: Ensure minimum RSA key length of 2048 bits
- G404: Insecure random number source (rand)
- G405: Detect the usage of DES or RC4
- G406: Detect the usage of MD4 or RIPEMD160
- G407: Detect the usage of hardcoded Initialization Vector(IV)/Nonce
- G501: Import blocklist: crypto/md5
- G502: Import blocklist: crypto/des
- G503: Import blocklist: crypto/rc4
- G504: Import blocklist: net/http/cgi
- G505: Import blocklist: crypto/sha1
- G506: Import blocklist: golang.org/x/crypto/md4
- G507: Import blocklist: golang.org/x/crypto/ripemd160
- G601: Implicit memory aliasing of items from a range statement (only for Go 1.21 or lower)
- G602: Slice access out of bounds
Retired rules
- G105: Audit the use of math/big.Int.Exp - CVE is fixed
- G307: Deferring a method which returns an error - causing more inconvenience than fixing a security issue, despite the details from this blog post
Selecting rules
By default, gosec will run all rules against the supplied file paths. It is however possible to select a subset of rules to run via the -include=
flag,
or to specify a set of rules to explicitly exclude using the -exclude=
flag.
# Run a specific set of rules
$ gosec -include=G101,G203,G401 ./...
# Run everything except for rule G303
$ gosec -exclude=G303 ./...
CWE Mapping
Every issue detected by gosec
is mapped to a CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) which describes in more generic terms the vulnerability. The exact mapping can be found here.
Configuration
A number of global settings can be provided in a configuration file as follows:
{
"global": {
"nosec": "enabled",
"audit": "enabled"
}
}
nosec
: this setting will overwrite all#nosec
directives defined throughout the code baseaudit
: runs in audit mode which enables addition checks that for normal code analysis might be too nosy
# Run with a global configuration file
$ gosec -conf config.json .
Also some rules accept configuration. For instance on rule G104
, it is possible to define packages along with a list
of functions which will be skipped when auditing the not checked errors:
{
"G104": {
"ioutil": ["WriteFile"]
}
}
You can also configure the hard-coded credentials rule G101
with additional patterns, or adjust the entropy threshold:
{
"G101": {
"pattern": "(?i)passwd|pass|password|pwd|secret|private_key|token",
"ignore_entropy": false,
"entropy_threshold": "80.0",
"per_char_threshold": "3.0",
"truncate": "32"
}
}
Go version
Some rules require a specific Go version which is retrieved from the Go module file present in the project. If this version cannot be found, it will fallback to Go runtime version.
The Go module version is parsed using the go list
command which in some cases might lead to performance degradation. In this situation, the go module version can be easily provided by setting the environment variable GOSECGOVERSION=go1.21.1
.
Dependencies
gosec will fetch automatically the dependencies of the code which is being analyzed when go module is turned on (e.g.GO111MODULE=on
). If this is not the case,
the dependencies need to be explicitly downloaded by running the go get -d
command before the scan.
Excluding test files and folders
gosec will ignore test files across all packages and any dependencies in your vendor directory.
The scanning of test files can be enabled with the following flag:
gosec -tests ./...
Also additional folders can be excluded as follows:
gosec -exclude-dir=rules -exclude-dir=cmd ./...
Excluding generated files
gosec can ignore generated go files with default generated code comment.
// Code generated by some generator DO NOT EDIT.
gosec -exclude-generated ./...
Auto fixing vulnerabilities
gosec can suggest fixes based on AI recommendation. It will call an AI API to receive a suggestion for a security finding.
You can enable this feature by providing the following command line arguments:
ai-api-provider
: the name of the AI API provider, currently onlygemini
is supported.ai-api-key
or set the environment variableGOSEC_AI_API_KEY
: the key to access the AI API, For gemini, you can create an API key following these instructions.ai-endpoint
: the endpoint of the AI provider, this is optional argument.
gosec -ai-api-provider="gemini" -ai-api-key="your_key" ./...
Annotating code
As with all automated detection tools, there will be cases of false positives.
In cases where gosec reports a failure that has been manually verified as being safe,
it is possible to annotate the code with a comment that starts with #nosec
.
The #nosec
comment should have the format #nosec [RuleList] [-- Justification]
.
The #nosec
comment needs to be placed on the line where the warning is reported.
func main() {
tr := &http.Transport{
TLSClientConfig: &tls.Config{
InsecureSkipVerify: true, // #nosec G402
},
}
client := &http.Client{Transport: tr}
_, err := client.Get("https://golang.org/")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
}
}
When a specific false positive has been identified and verified as safe, you may
wish to suppress only that single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code,
while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within
the #nosec
annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */
or //#nosec G201 G202 G203
You could put the description or justification text for the annotation. The
justification should be after the rule(s) to suppress and start with two or
more dashes, e.g: //#nosec G101 G102 -- This is a false positive
In some cases you may also want to revisit places where #nosec
annotations
have been used. To run the scanner and ignore any #nosec
annotations you
can do the following:
gosec -nosec=true ./...
Tracking suppressions
As described above, we could suppress violations externally (using -include
/
-exclude
) or inline (using #nosec
annotations) in gosec. This suppression
inflammation can be used to generate corresponding signals for auditing
purposes.
We could track suppressions by the -track-suppressions
flag as follows:
gosec -track-suppressions -exclude=G101 -fmt=sarif -out=results.sarif ./...
- For external suppressions, gosec records suppression info where
kind
isexternal
andjustification
is a certain sentence "Globally suppressed". - For inline suppressions, gosec records suppression info where
kind
isinSource
andjustification
is the text after two or more dashes in the comment.
Note: Only SARIF and JSON formats support tracking suppressions.
Build tags
gosec is able to pass your Go build tags to the analyzer. They can be provided as a comma separated list as follows:
gosec -tags debug,ignore ./...
Output formats
gosec currently supports text
, json
, yaml
, csv
, sonarqube
, JUnit XML
, html
and golint
output formats. By default
results will be reported to stdout, but can also be written to an output
file. The output format is controlled by the -fmt
flag, and the output file is controlled by the -out
flag as follows:
# Write output in json format to results.json
$ gosec -fmt=json -out=results.json *.go
Results will be reported to stdout as well as to the provided output file by -stdout
flag. The -verbose
flag overrides the
output format when stdout the results while saving them in the output file
# Write output in json format to results.json as well as stdout
$ gosec -fmt=json -out=results.json -stdout *.go
# Overrides the output format to 'text' when stdout the results, while writing it to results.json
$ gosec -fmt=json -out=results.json -stdout -verbose=text *.go
Note: gosec generates the generic issue import format for SonarQube, and a report has to be imported into SonarQube using sonar.externalIssuesReportPaths=path/to/gosec-report.json
.
Development
Build
You can build the binary with:
make
Note on Sarif Types Generation
Install the tool with :
go get -u github.com/a-h/generate/cmd/schema-generate
Then generate the types with :
schema-generate -i sarif-schema-2.1.0.json -o mypath/types.go
Most of the MarshallJSON/UnmarshalJSON are removed except the one for PropertyBag which is handy to inline the additional properties. The rest can be removed. The URI,ID, UUID, GUID were renamed so it fits the Go convention defined here
Tests
You can run all unit tests using:
make test
Release
You can create a release by tagging the version as follows:
git tag v1.0.0 -m "Release version v1.0.0"
git push origin v1.0.0
The GitHub release workflow triggers immediately after the tag is pushed upstream. This flow will release the binaries using the goreleaser action and then it will build and publish the docker image into Docker Hub.
The released artifacts are signed using cosign. You can use the public key from cosign.pub file to verify the signature of docker image and binaries files.
The docker image signature can be verified with the following command:
cosign verify --key cosign.pub securego/gosec:<TAG>
The binary files signature can be verified with the following command:
cosign verify-blob --key cosign.pub --signature gosec_<VERSION>_darwin_amd64.tar.gz.sig gosec_<VERSION>_darwin_amd64.tar.gz
Docker image
You can also build locally the docker image by using the command:
make image
You can run the gosec
tool in a container against your local Go project. You only have to mount the project
into a volume as follows:
docker run --rm -it -w /<PROJECT>/ -v <YOUR PROJECT PATH>/<PROJECT>:/<PROJECT> securego/gosec /<PROJECT>/...
Note: the current working directory needs to be set with -w
option in order to get successfully resolved the dependencies from go module file
Generate TLS rule
The configuration of TLS rule can be generated from Mozilla's TLS ciphers recommendation.
First you need to install the generator tool:
go get github.com/securego/gosec/v2/cmd/tlsconfig/...
You can invoke now the go generate
in the root of the project:
go generate ./...
This will generate the rules/tls_config.go
file which will contain the current ciphers recommendation from Mozilla.
Who is using gosec?
This is a list with some of the gosec's users.
Sponsors
Support this project by becoming a sponsor. Your logo will show up here with a link to your website
Top Related Projects
Fast linters runner for Go
Staticcheck - The advanced Go linter
[mirror] This is a linter for Go source code. (deprecated)
errcheck checks that you checked errors.
A Pluggable Terraform Linter
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot