Pros of free

• More frequently updated with new configurations
• Larger variety of proxy types (including Trojan, VMess, etc.)
• Better organized with categorized lists (e.g., by country, protocol)

Cons of free

• Less detailed documentation and setup instructions
• May include more unstable or short-lived proxy configurations
• Potentially higher risk of blocked or monitored servers due to public exposure

Code comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray:

ss://YWVzLTI1Ni1nY206cEtFVzhKUEJ5VFZUTHRN@172.105.180.227:4444#%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%A6CA_4444

free:

vmess://eyJhZGQiOiIxNzIuNjcuMTk5LjM0IiwiYWlkIjoiMCIsImhvc3QiOiJ3d3cuMTYyOTgwOTEueHl6IiwiaWQiOiI1ZjdkNzc0MC02YTRmLTQxNmMtOWRkYi0wNjFhMTI4NTVmOGEiLCJuZXQiOiJ3cyIsInBhdGgiOiIvZm9vdGVycyIsInBvcnQiOiI4MCIsInBzIjoi8J+HuvCfh7hVUy0xNzIuNjcuMTk5LjM0LTAxNjEiLCJ0bHMiOiIiLCJ0eXBlIjoibm9uZSIsInYiOiIyIn0=

The free repository tends to use more complex configuration strings, often including additional metadata and encoding.

Pros of new-pac

• More frequently updated, providing users with the latest configurations and tools
• Includes a wider variety of proxy tools and methods
• Offers detailed setup guides for different operating systems

Cons of new-pac

• Less organized repository structure, making it harder to navigate
• Lacks a clear contribution guide for potential collaborators

Code Comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray:

def update_config():
    # Update configuration logic
    pass

new-pac:

def update_pac():
    # Update PAC file logic
    pass

def update_vpn():
    # Update VPN configuration logic
    pass

The code comparison shows that new-pac potentially offers more granular update functions, allowing for separate updates of PAC files and VPN configurations. Share-SSR-V2ray appears to have a more generalized update function.

Both repositories aim to provide tools and configurations for bypassing internet restrictions, but they differ in their approach and organization. Share-SSR-V2ray focuses specifically on SSR and V2Ray protocols, while new-pac offers a broader range of tools and methods. Users should choose based on their specific needs and technical expertise.

Pros of multi-v2ray

• More active development with frequent updates
• Supports multiple V2Ray configurations and easy switching between them
• Includes a user-friendly CLI interface for management

Cons of multi-v2ray

• Focuses solely on V2Ray, lacking support for other protocols like SSR
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to more advanced features

Code Comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray:

bash <(curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/selierlin/Share-SSR-V2ray/master/install.sh)

multi-v2ray:

source <(curl -sL https://multi.netlify.app/v2ray.sh) --zh

Summary

multi-v2ray is a more specialized tool focusing on V2Ray configurations with active development and a user-friendly interface. It offers more advanced features but may be more complex for beginners. Share-SSR-V2ray, on the other hand, provides a broader range of protocol support, including SSR, making it potentially more versatile for users who need multiple protocol options. The installation process for both projects is straightforward, utilizing curl commands to fetch and execute their respective setup scripts.

Pros of v2rayN

• More actively maintained with frequent updates
• Offers a user-friendly GUI for easier configuration
• Supports a wider range of protocols and features

Cons of v2rayN

• Larger file size and resource consumption
• Steeper learning curve for new users
• Limited to Windows operating system

Code Comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray (Python):

def parse_ss_url(ss_url):
    if ss_url.startswith('ss://'):
        base64_str = ss_url[5:]
        decode_str = base64.b64decode(base64_str).decode('utf-8')
        parts = decode_str.split('@')
        return parts[0], parts[1]

v2rayN (C#):

public static VmessItem ParseVmessUrl(string vmessUrl)
{
    var result = new VmessItem();
    var base64Str = vmessUrl.Substring(8);
    var jsonStr = Utils.Base64Decode(base64Str);
    result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<VmessItem>(jsonStr);
    return result;
}

Both repositories focus on proxy tools, but v2rayN provides a more comprehensive solution with a GUI, while Share-SSR-V2ray is a collection of configuration files and scripts. v2rayN is more suitable for users seeking a ready-to-use application, while Share-SSR-V2ray caters to those who prefer manual configuration and have more technical expertise.

Pros of v2ray-core

• More active development with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Larger community support and wider adoption
• Better documentation and official resources

Cons of v2ray-core

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More complex configuration process
• Potentially higher resource usage due to advanced features

Code Comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray (config example):

{
  "server": "0.0.0.0",
  "server_port": 8388,
  "password": "password",
  "method": "aes-256-cfb"
}

v2ray-core (config example):

{
  "inbounds": [{
    "port": 1080,
    "protocol": "socks",
    "settings": {
      "auth": "noauth"
    }
  }],
  "outbounds": [{
    "protocol": "freedom"
  }]
}

The code comparison shows that v2ray-core has a more detailed and flexible configuration structure, allowing for more advanced setups and customization options. Share-SSR-V2ray, on the other hand, has a simpler configuration format, which may be easier for beginners to understand and set up quickly.

Pros of v2rayNG

• More actively maintained with frequent updates
• Offers a user-friendly Android app interface
• Supports a wider range of protocols and features

Cons of v2rayNG

• Focused solely on Android, limiting cross-platform usage
• May have a steeper learning curve for new users
• Requires more system resources due to its comprehensive feature set

Code Comparison

Share-SSR-V2ray (Python):

def parse_ss_url(ss_url):
    if ss_url.startswith('ss://'):
        base64_str = ss_url[5:]
        decoded_str = base64.b64decode(base64_str).decode()
        parts = decoded_str.split('@')
        return parts[0], parts[1]

v2rayNG (Kotlin):

fun parseVmessUrl(vmessUrl: String): VmessBean? {
    if (!vmessUrl.startsWith("vmess://")) {
        return null
    }
    val vmessJson = Base64.decode(vmessUrl.substring(8), Base64.NO_WRAP).toString(charset("UTF-8"))
    return Gson().fromJson(vmessJson, VmessBean::class.java)
}

Both repositories focus on handling proxy protocols, but v2rayNG offers a more comprehensive Android-specific implementation, while Share-SSR-V2ray provides a broader collection of proxy-related scripts and configurations.