Pros of laravel-auditing

• More flexible configuration options for customizing audit behavior
• Built-in support for console commands to manage audits
• Easier integration with custom audit drivers and storage solutions

Cons of laravel-auditing

• Slightly more complex setup process compared to laravel-activitylog
• Less extensive documentation and community resources
• Fewer out-of-the-box features for advanced logging scenarios

Code Comparison

laravel-auditing:

use OwenIt\Auditing\Contracts\Auditable;

class User extends Model implements Auditable
{
    use \OwenIt\Auditing\Auditable;
}

laravel-activitylog:

use Spatie\Activitylog\Traits\LogsActivity;

class User extends Model
{
    use LogsActivity;

    protected static $logAttributes = ['name', 'email'];
}

Both packages offer similar core functionality for logging model changes in Laravel applications. laravel-auditing provides more granular control over auditing behavior and supports custom drivers, while laravel-activitylog offers a simpler setup process and more extensive documentation. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and the desired level of customization.

Pros of laravel-log-viewer

• Simple and lightweight solution for viewing Laravel logs
• Easy to set up and use with minimal configuration
• Provides a web-based interface for browsing log files

Cons of laravel-log-viewer

• Limited to viewing standard Laravel logs
• Lacks advanced features like custom activity logging and model tracking
• Does not offer built-in filtering or search capabilities

Code Comparison

laravel-log-viewer:

Route::get('logs', '\Rap2hpoutre\LaravelLogViewer\LogViewerController@index');

laravel-activitylog:

activity()
   ->performedOn($model)
   ->causedBy($user)
   ->withProperties(['custom' => 'data'])
   ->log('Look, I logged something');

laravel-log-viewer focuses on displaying existing Laravel logs through a simple web interface, while laravel-activitylog provides a more comprehensive solution for custom activity logging and model tracking. The code examples demonstrate the simplicity of setting up laravel-log-viewer with a single route, compared to the more detailed logging capabilities of laravel-activitylog.

laravel-activitylog offers greater flexibility and control over what is logged and how, making it suitable for applications requiring detailed activity tracking. On the other hand, laravel-log-viewer is a straightforward tool for quickly viewing standard Laravel logs without additional overhead.

Pros of LogViewer

• User-friendly web interface for viewing and managing logs
• Supports multiple log files and log levels
• Includes features like log deletion and download

Cons of LogViewer

• Focused solely on log viewing, lacks activity tracking capabilities
• May require additional setup for custom log formats

Code Comparison

LogViewer:

use Arcanedev\LogViewer\Facades\LogViewer;

$logs = LogViewer::all();
$entries = LogViewer::entries($file, $date, $level);

laravel-activitylog:

use Spatie\Activitylog\Models\Activity;

activity()->log('Look mum, I logged something');
$lastLoggedActivity = Activity::all()->last();

Summary

LogViewer is primarily designed for viewing and managing log files through a web interface, while laravel-activitylog focuses on tracking and logging user activities within a Laravel application. LogViewer excels in presenting log data in a user-friendly manner, supporting multiple log files and levels. However, it lacks the ability to track custom activities that laravel-activitylog provides.

laravel-activitylog offers more flexibility in logging custom events and associating them with models, users, or specific actions. It integrates seamlessly with Laravel's ORM and provides an easy way to query and retrieve logged activities.

The choice between these packages depends on the specific needs of your project. If you require a comprehensive log viewer with a web interface, LogViewer is an excellent choice. For tracking user activities and creating custom logs within your application, laravel-activitylog is more suitable.