Top Related Projects
Quick Overview
The go-jose
library is a comprehensive implementation of the JOSE (JSON Object Signing and Encryption) standards in Go. It provides a set of tools for working with JSON Web Tokens (JWT), JSON Web Signatures (JWS), and JSON Web Encryption (JWE), making it easier to integrate these security features into Go-based applications.
Pros
- Comprehensive JOSE Support: The library covers a wide range of JOSE-related functionality, including signing, verification, encryption, and decryption.
- Flexibility: The library is designed to be flexible and extensible, allowing developers to customize the behavior to fit their specific needs.
- Cryptographic Primitives: The library provides a set of cryptographic primitives, such as RSA, ECDSA, and HMAC, which can be used independently of the JOSE-specific functionality.
- Actively Maintained: The project is actively maintained, with regular updates and bug fixes.
Cons
- Complexity: The library can be complex to use, especially for developers who are new to JOSE and cryptographic concepts.
- Performance: Depending on the specific use case, the library may not be the most performant option, as it prioritizes flexibility and extensibility over raw speed.
- Limited Documentation: The documentation for the library could be more comprehensive, making it harder for new users to get started.
- Dependency on External Libraries: The library relies on several external dependencies, which can increase the overall complexity of the project.
Code Examples
Here are a few examples of how to use the go-jose
library:
- Signing a JWT:
import (
"fmt"
"time"
"github.com/square/go-jose/v3"
"github.com/square/go-jose/v3/jwt"
)
func main() {
// Create a new signer
signer, err := jose.NewSigner(jose.SigningKey{
Algorithm: jose.HS256,
Key: []byte("secret"),
}, (&jose.SignerOptions{}).WithType("JWT"))
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// Create a new JWT claims set
claims := jwt.Claims{
Subject: "subject",
Issuer: "issuer",
Expiration: jwt.NewNumericDate(time.Now().Add(time.Hour * 24)),
}
// Sign the JWT
token, err := jwt.Signed(signer).Claims(claims).CompactSerialize()
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Println(token)
}
- Verifying a JWT:
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/square/go-jose/v3/jwt"
)
func main() {
// Parse the JWT token
token, err := jwt.ParseSigned("eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJzdWJqZWN0IiwiaXNzIjoiaXNzdWVyIiwiZXhwIjoxNjE4NDg4MDAwfQ.Nh-Iq-Ks3Ej-Ks3Ej-Ks3Ej-Ks3Ej-Ks3Ej-Ks3Ej")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// Verify the JWT token
var claims jwt.Claims
if err := token.Claims([]byte("secret"), &claims); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Printf("Subject: %s\nIssuer: %s\nExpiration: %s\n", claims.Subject, claims.Issuer, claims.Expiration)
}
- Encrypting a message:
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/square/go-jose/v3"
)
func main() {
// Create a new enc
Competitor Comparisons
ARCHIVE - Golang implementation of JSON Web Tokens (JWT). This project is now maintained at:
Pros of jwt-go
- Focused specifically on JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), making it simpler for JWT-specific use cases
- Lightweight and easy to use, with a straightforward API
- Well-established in the Go community with a large user base
Cons of jwt-go
- Limited to JWT functionality, lacking support for other JOSE standards
- Less actively maintained, with fewer recent updates compared to go-jose
- May have some security vulnerabilities that require careful usage
Code Comparison
jwt-go:
token := jwt.NewWithClaims(jwt.SigningMethodHS256, jwt.MapClaims{
"foo": "bar",
"exp": time.Now().Add(time.Hour * 72).Unix(),
})
tokenString, err := token.SignedString(mySigningKey)
go-jose:
signer, err := jose.NewSigner(jose.SigningKey{Algorithm: jose.HS256, Key: mySigningKey}, nil)
payload := []byte(`{"foo":"bar"}`)
object, err := signer.Sign(payload)
tokenString, err := object.CompactSerialize()
go-jose offers a more comprehensive implementation of JOSE standards, including JWE, JWS, and JWT. It provides more flexibility and features but may have a steeper learning curve. jwt-go, on the other hand, is more focused and easier to use for simple JWT operations but lacks the broader JOSE support.
Complete implementation of JWx (Javascript Object Signing and Encryption/JOSE) technologies for Go. #golang #jwt #jws #jwk #jwe
Pros of jwx
- More comprehensive support for JWS, JWE, JWK, and JWT
- Better performance in some operations, especially for large payloads
- More actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements
Cons of jwx
- Steeper learning curve due to more extensive API
- Less widespread adoption compared to go-jose
Code Comparison
jwx:
key, err := jwk.ParseKey([]byte(jwkJSON))
token, err := jwt.Sign(payload, jwt.WithKey(jwa.RS256, key))
go-jose:
signer, err := jose.NewSigner(jose.SigningKey{Algorithm: jose.RS256, Key: privateKey}, nil)
token, err := signer.Sign([]byte(payload))
Summary
Both jwx and go-jose are popular libraries for working with JSON Web Tokens (JWT) in Go. jwx offers more comprehensive features and better performance for some operations, while go-jose has a simpler API and wider adoption. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements, performance needs, and developer preferences.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Go JOSE v1/v2 (DEPRECATED)
This repository is DEPRECATED.
It will be placed in an archived state on February 27th, 2023.
What should I use instead?
Development of Go JOSE has continued in a new organization:
https://github.com/go-jose/go-jose
We strongly encourage users of square/go-jose
to migrate to v3 of
go-jose/go-jose
. No support, security fixes or updates will be delivered to
the v1/v2 branches in the Square repository.
Top Related Projects
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot