Top Related Projects
A Java serialization/deserialization library to convert Java Objects into JSON and back
Main Portal page for the Jackson project
FASTJSON 2.0.x has been released, faster and more secure, recommend you upgrade.
FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library
Quick Overview
Moshi is a modern JSON library for Kotlin and Java. It makes it easy to parse JSON into Java and Kotlin classes, and to convert Java and Kotlin objects back into JSON. Moshi is designed to be efficient, easy to use, and flexible.
Pros
- Type-safe and null-safe JSON parsing and serialization
- Supports Kotlin data classes out of the box
- Customizable with adapters for complex types
- Lightweight and fast performance
Cons
- Limited built-in support for some advanced JSON features (e.g., streaming)
- Learning curve for custom type adapters
- Less mature ecosystem compared to some alternatives (e.g., Gson)
Code Examples
- Parsing JSON into a Kotlin data class:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(User::class.java)
val json = """{"name":"John Doe","email":"john@example.com"}"""
val user = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json)
println(user) // User(name=John Doe, email=john@example.com)
- Converting a Kotlin object to JSON:
data class Product(val name: String, val price: Double)
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(Product::class.java)
val product = Product("Widget", 19.99)
val json = jsonAdapter.toJson(product)
println(json) // {"name":"Widget","price":19.99}
- Using a custom type adapter:
class DateAdapter {
@ToJson fun toJson(date: Date): String {
return date.time.toString()
}
@FromJson fun fromJson(json: String): Date {
return Date(json.toLong())
}
}
val moshi = Moshi.Builder()
.add(DateAdapter())
.build()
Getting Started
To use Moshi in your project, add the following dependency to your build file:
For Gradle (Kotlin DSL):
implementation("com.squareup.moshi:moshi-kotlin:1.14.0")
For Maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.squareup.moshi</groupId>
<artifactId>moshi-kotlin</artifactId>
<version>1.14.0</version>
</dependency>
Then, create a Moshi instance and use it to parse or serialize JSON:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(YourDataClass::class.java)
// Parse JSON
val result = jsonAdapter.fromJson(jsonString)
// Serialize to JSON
val json = jsonAdapter.toJson(yourObject)
Competitor Comparisons
A Java serialization/deserialization library to convert Java Objects into JSON and back
Pros of Gson
- More mature and widely adopted library with extensive documentation
- Supports serialization of arbitrary objects without annotations
- Offers built-in TypeAdapters for common Java types
Cons of Gson
- Generally slower performance compared to Moshi
- Lacks built-in Kotlin support and nullability handling
- More complex API with multiple ways to accomplish the same task
Code Comparison
Moshi:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(User::class.java)
val user = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json)
Gson:
Gson gson = new Gson();
User user = gson.fromJson(json, User.class);
Both Moshi and Gson are popular JSON libraries for Java and Android development. Moshi, developed by Square, is designed to be a modern, Kotlin-friendly alternative to Gson. It offers better performance, built-in Kotlin support, and a more streamlined API. Gson, on the other hand, has been around longer and has a larger user base, making it easier to find resources and community support.
Moshi excels in Kotlin projects with its nullability awareness and concise syntax. It also provides better compile-time safety through its codegen artifact. Gson, while more verbose, offers greater flexibility in handling complex JSON structures without requiring annotations.
Ultimately, the choice between Moshi and Gson depends on project requirements, language preferences, and performance needs.
Main Portal page for the Jackson project
Pros of Jackson
- More comprehensive feature set, supporting a wider range of data formats (JSON, XML, YAML, etc.)
- Highly customizable with numerous modules and extensions
- Better performance for large-scale data processing
Cons of Jackson
- Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API and configuration options
- Larger library size, which may impact application size and load times
- More complex setup and configuration for basic use cases
Code Comparison
Moshi:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(User::class.java)
val user = jsonAdapter.fromJson(jsonString)
Jackson:
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
User user = mapper.readValue(jsonString, User.class);
Summary
Jackson offers a more feature-rich and versatile solution for JSON processing, supporting multiple data formats and providing extensive customization options. However, this comes at the cost of increased complexity and a larger library size. Moshi, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it a good choice for smaller projects or those primarily dealing with JSON in Kotlin or Java environments. The code comparison demonstrates that both libraries offer straightforward ways to parse JSON, with Moshi requiring slightly more setup but providing a more Kotlin-friendly API.
FASTJSON 2.0.x has been released, faster and more secure, recommend you upgrade.
Pros of Fastjson
- Higher performance and faster parsing speed
- Supports more data types and complex object structures
- More flexible configuration options for serialization/deserialization
Cons of Fastjson
- Less focus on type safety compared to Moshi
- More complex API with a steeper learning curve
- Security vulnerabilities have been reported in the past
Code Comparison
Moshi:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(User::class.java)
val user = jsonAdapter.fromJson(jsonString)
Fastjson:
User user = JSON.parseObject(jsonString, User.class);
Moshi emphasizes type safety and a clean API, while Fastjson focuses on performance and flexibility. Moshi's approach is more idiomatic for Kotlin developers, whereas Fastjson provides a simpler API for quick parsing but may require more careful handling of types.
Moshi is generally considered more maintainable and safer for long-term projects, especially in Kotlin-based applications. Fastjson, on the other hand, excels in scenarios where raw performance is crucial and when dealing with complex JSON structures.
Both libraries have their strengths, and the choice between them often depends on specific project requirements, performance needs, and the development team's preferences.
FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library
Pros of FlatBuffers
- Faster serialization and deserialization due to zero-copy design
- Supports multiple programming languages
- Smaller memory footprint for large datasets
Cons of FlatBuffers
- More complex setup and usage compared to Moshi
- Less flexible for dynamic data structures
- Steeper learning curve for developers new to the format
Code Comparison
Moshi:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(User::class.java)
val json = jsonAdapter.toJson(user)
val parsedUser = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json)
FlatBuffers:
val builder = FlatBufferBuilder(1024)
val name = builder.createString("John Doe")
val userOffset = User.createUser(builder, name, 30)
builder.finish(userOffset)
val buffer = builder.dataBuffer()
val user = User.getRootAsUser(buffer)
FlatBuffers requires more setup code but offers better performance for large datasets and cross-language support. Moshi, on the other hand, provides a simpler API and is more suitable for JSON-based applications with dynamic structures. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements, such as performance needs, data format flexibility, and target platforms.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Moshi
Moshi is a modern JSON library for Android, Java and Kotlin. It makes it easy to parse JSON into Java and Kotlin classes:
Note: The Kotlin examples of this README assume use of either Kotlin code gen or KotlinJsonAdapterFactory
for reflection. Plain Java-based reflection is unsupported on Kotlin classes.
Java
String json = ...;
Moshi moshi = new Moshi.Builder().build();
JsonAdapter<BlackjackHand> jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(BlackjackHand.class);
BlackjackHand blackjackHand = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json);
System.out.println(blackjackHand);
Kotlin
val json: String = ...
val moshi: Moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter: JsonAdapter<BlackjackHand> = moshi.adapter<BlackjackHand>()
val blackjackHand = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json)
println(blackjackHand)
And it can just as easily serialize Java or Kotlin objects as JSON:
Java
BlackjackHand blackjackHand = new BlackjackHand(
new Card('6', SPADES),
Arrays.asList(new Card('4', CLUBS), new Card('A', HEARTS)));
Moshi moshi = new Moshi.Builder().build();
JsonAdapter<BlackjackHand> jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(BlackjackHand.class);
String json = jsonAdapter.toJson(blackjackHand);
System.out.println(json);
Kotlin
val blackjackHand = BlackjackHand(
Card('6', SPADES),
listOf(Card('4', CLUBS), Card('A', HEARTS))
)
val moshi: Moshi = Moshi.Builder().build()
val jsonAdapter: JsonAdapter<BlackjackHand> = moshi.adapter<BlackjackHand>()
val json: String = jsonAdapter.toJson(blackjackHand)
println(json)
Built-in Type Adapters
Moshi has built-in support for reading and writing Javaâs core data types:
- Primitives (int, float, char...) and their boxed counterparts (Integer, Float, Character...).
- Arrays, Collections, Lists, Sets, and Maps
- Strings
- Enums
It supports your model classes by writing them out field-by-field. In the example above Moshi uses these classes:
Java
class BlackjackHand {
public final Card hidden_card;
public final List<Card> visible_cards;
...
}
class Card {
public final char rank;
public final Suit suit;
...
}
enum Suit {
CLUBS, DIAMONDS, HEARTS, SPADES;
}
Kotlin
class BlackjackHand(
val hidden_card: Card,
val visible_cards: List<Card>,
...
)
class Card(
val rank: Char,
val suit: Suit
...
)
enum class Suit {
CLUBS, DIAMONDS, HEARTS, SPADES;
}
to read and write this JSON:
{
"hidden_card": {
"rank": "6",
"suit": "SPADES"
},
"visible_cards": [
{
"rank": "4",
"suit": "CLUBS"
},
{
"rank": "A",
"suit": "HEARTS"
}
]
}
The Javadoc catalogs the complete Moshi API, which we explore below.
Custom Type Adapters
With Moshi, itâs particularly easy to customize how values are converted to and from JSON. A type
adapter is any class that has methods annotated @ToJson
and @FromJson
.
For example, Moshiâs default encoding of a playing card is verbose: the JSON defines the rank and
suit in separate fields: {"rank":"A","suit":"HEARTS"}
. With a type adapter, we can change the
encoding to something more compact: "4H"
for the four of hearts or "JD"
for the jack of
diamonds:
Java
class CardAdapter {
@ToJson String toJson(Card card) {
return card.rank + card.suit.name().substring(0, 1);
}
@FromJson Card fromJson(String card) {
if (card.length() != 2) throw new JsonDataException("Unknown card: " + card);
char rank = card.charAt(0);
switch (card.charAt(1)) {
case 'C': return new Card(rank, Suit.CLUBS);
case 'D': return new Card(rank, Suit.DIAMONDS);
case 'H': return new Card(rank, Suit.HEARTS);
case 'S': return new Card(rank, Suit.SPADES);
default: throw new JsonDataException("unknown suit: " + card);
}
}
}
Kotlin
class CardAdapter {
@ToJson fun toJson(card: Card): String {
return card.rank + card.suit.name.substring(0, 1)
}
@FromJson fun fromJson(card: String): Card {
if (card.length != 2) throw JsonDataException("Unknown card: $card")
val rank = card[0]
return when (card[1]) {
'C' -> Card(rank, Suit.CLUBS)
'D' -> Card(rank, Suit.DIAMONDS)
'H' -> Card(rank, Suit.HEARTS)
'S' -> Card(rank, Suit.SPADES)
else -> throw JsonDataException("unknown suit: $card")
}
}
}
Register the type adapter with the Moshi.Builder
and weâre good to go.
Java
Moshi moshi = new Moshi.Builder()
.add(new CardAdapter())
.build();
Kotlin
val moshi = Moshi.Builder()
.add(CardAdapter())
.build()
Voilà :
{
"hidden_card": "6S",
"visible_cards": [
"4C",
"AH"
]
}
Another example
Note that the method annotated with @FromJson
does not need to take a String as an argument.
Rather it can take input of any type and Moshi will first parse the JSON to an object of that type
and then use the @FromJson
method to produce the desired final value. Conversely, the method
annotated with @ToJson
does not have to produce a String.
Assume, for example, that we have to parse a JSON in which the date and time of an event are represented as two separate strings.
{
"title": "Blackjack tournament",
"begin_date": "20151010",
"begin_time": "17:04"
}
We would like to combine these two fields into one string to facilitate the date parsing at a
later point. Also, we would like to have all variable names in CamelCase. Therefore, the Event
class we want Moshi to produce like this:
Java
class Event {
String title;
String beginDateAndTime;
}
Kotlin
class Event(
val title: String,
val beginDateAndTime: String
)
Instead of manually parsing the JSON line per line (which we could also do) we can have Moshi do the
transformation automatically. We simply define another class EventJson
that directly corresponds
to the JSON structure:
Java
class EventJson {
String title;
String begin_date;
String begin_time;
}
Kotlin
class EventJson(
val title: String,
val begin_date: String,
val begin_time: String
)
And another class with the appropriate @FromJson
and @ToJson
methods that are telling Moshi how
to convert an EventJson
to an Event
and back. Now, whenever we are asking Moshi to parse a JSON
to an Event
it will first parse it to an EventJson
as an intermediate step. Conversely, to
serialize an Event
Moshi will first create an EventJson
object and then serialize that object as
usual.
Java
class EventJsonAdapter {
@FromJson Event eventFromJson(EventJson eventJson) {
Event event = new Event();
event.title = eventJson.title;
event.beginDateAndTime = eventJson.begin_date + " " + eventJson.begin_time;
return event;
}
@ToJson EventJson eventToJson(Event event) {
EventJson json = new EventJson();
json.title = event.title;
json.begin_date = event.beginDateAndTime.substring(0, 8);
json.begin_time = event.beginDateAndTime.substring(9, 14);
return json;
}
}
Kotlin
class EventJsonAdapter {
@FromJson
fun eventFromJson(eventJson: EventJson): Event {
return Event(
title = eventJson.title,
beginDateAndTime = "${eventJson.begin_date} ${eventJson.begin_time}"
)
}
@ToJson
fun eventToJson(event: Event): EventJson {
return EventJson(
title = event.title,
begin_date = event.beginDateAndTime.substring(0, 8),
begin_time = event.beginDateAndTime.substring(9, 14),
)
}
}
Again we register the adapter with Moshi.
Java
Moshi moshi = new Moshi.Builder()
.add(new EventJsonAdapter())
.build();
Kotlin
val moshi = Moshi.Builder()
.add(EventJsonAdapter())
.build()
We can now use Moshi to parse the JSON directly to an Event
.
Java
JsonAdapter<Event> jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter(Event.class);
Event event = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json);
Kotlin
val jsonAdapter = moshi.adapter<Event>()
val event = jsonAdapter.fromJson(json)
Adapter convenience methods
Moshi provides a number of convenience methods for JsonAdapter
objects:
nullSafe()
nonNull()
lenient()
failOnUnknown()
indent()
serializeNulls()
These factory methods wrap an existing JsonAdapter
into additional functionality.
For example, if you have an adapter that doesn't support nullable values, you can use nullSafe()
to make it null safe:
Java
String dateJson = "\"2018-11-26T11:04:19.342668Z\"";
String nullDateJson = "null";
// Hypothetical IsoDateDapter, doesn't support null by default
JsonAdapter<Date> adapter = new IsoDateDapter();
Date date = adapter.fromJson(dateJson);
System.out.println(date); // Mon Nov 26 12:04:19 CET 2018
Date nullDate = adapter.fromJson(nullDateJson);
// Exception, com.squareup.moshi.JsonDataException: Expected a string but was NULL at path $
Date nullDate = adapter.nullSafe().fromJson(nullDateJson);
System.out.println(nullDate); // null
Kotlin
val dateJson = "\"2018-11-26T11:04:19.342668Z\""
val nullDateJson = "null"
// Hypothetical IsoDateDapter, doesn't support null by default
val adapter: JsonAdapter<Date> = IsoDateDapter()
val date = adapter.fromJson(dateJson)
println(date) // Mon Nov 26 12:04:19 CET 2018
val nullDate = adapter.fromJson(nullDateJson)
// Exception, com.squareup.moshi.JsonDataException: Expected a string but was NULL at path $
val nullDate = adapter.nullSafe().fromJson(nullDateJson)
println(nullDate) // null
In contrast to nullSafe()
there is nonNull()
to make an adapter refuse null values. Refer to the Moshi JavaDoc for details on the various methods.
Parse JSON Arrays
Say we have a JSON string of this structure:
[
{
"rank": "4",
"suit": "CLUBS"
},
{
"rank": "A",
"suit": "HEARTS"
}
]
We can now use Moshi to parse the JSON string into a List<Card>
.
Java
String cardsJsonResponse = ...;
Type type = Types.newParameterizedType(List.class, Card.class);
JsonAdapter<List<Card>> adapter = moshi.adapter(type);
List<Card> cards = adapter.fromJson(cardsJsonResponse);
Kotlin
val cardsJsonResponse: String = ...
// We can just use a reified extension!
val adapter = moshi.adapter<List<Card>>()
val cards: List<Card> = adapter.fromJson(cardsJsonResponse)
Fails Gracefully
Automatic databinding almost feels like magic. But unlike the black magic that typically accompanies reflection, Moshi is designed to help you out when things go wrong.
JsonDataException: Expected one of [CLUBS, DIAMONDS, HEARTS, SPADES] but was ANCHOR at path $.visible_cards[2].suit
at com.squareup.moshi.JsonAdapters$11.fromJson(JsonAdapters.java:188)
at com.squareup.moshi.JsonAdapters$11.fromJson(JsonAdapters.java:180)
...
Moshi always throws a standard java.io.IOException
if there is an error reading the JSON document,
or if it is malformed. It throws a JsonDataException
if the JSON document is well-formed, but
doesnât match the expected format.
Built on Okio
Moshi uses Okio for simple and powerful I/O. Itâs a fine complement to OkHttp, which can share buffer segments for maximum efficiency.
Borrows from Gson
Moshi uses the same streaming and binding mechanisms as Gson. If youâre a Gson user youâll find Moshi works similarly. If you try Moshi and donât love it, you can even migrate to Gson without much violence!
But the two libraries have a few important differences:
- Moshi has fewer built-in type adapters. For example, you need to configure your own date
adapter. Most binding libraries will encode whatever you throw at them. Moshi refuses to
serialize platform types (
java.*
,javax.*
, andandroid.*
) without a user-provided type adapter. This is intended to prevent you from accidentally locking yourself to a specific JDK or Android release. - Moshi is less configurable. Thereâs no field naming strategy, versioning, instance creators,
or long serialization policy. Instead of naming a field
visibleCards
and using a policy class to convert that tovisible_cards
, Moshi wants you to just name the fieldvisible_cards
as it appears in the JSON. - Moshi doesnât have a
JsonElement
model. Instead it just uses built-in types likeList
andMap
. - No HTML-safe escaping. Gson encodes
=
as\u003d
by default so that it can be safely encoded in HTML without additional escaping. Moshi encodes it naturally (as=
) and assumes that the HTML encoder â if there is one â will do its job.
Custom field names with @Json
Moshi works best when your JSON objects and Java or Kotlin classes have the same structure. But when they don't, Moshi has annotations to customize data binding.
Use @Json
to specify how Java fields or Kotlin properties map to JSON names. This is necessary when the JSON name
contains spaces or other characters that arenât permitted in Java field or Kotlin property names. For example, this
JSON has a field name containing a space:
{
"username": "jesse",
"lucky number": 32
}
With @Json
its corresponding Java or Kotlin class is easy:
Java
class Player {
String username;
@Json(name = "lucky number") int luckyNumber;
...
}
Kotlin
class Player {
val username: String
@Json(name = "lucky number") val luckyNumber: Int
...
}
Because JSON field names are always defined with their Java or Kotlin fields, Moshi makes it easy to find fields when navigating between Java or Koltin and JSON.
Alternate type adapters with @JsonQualifier
Use @JsonQualifier
to customize how a type is encoded for some fields without changing its
encoding everywhere. This works similarly to the qualifier annotations in dependency injection
tools like Dagger and Guice.
Hereâs a JSON message with two integers and a color:
{
"width": 1024,
"height": 768,
"color": "#ff0000"
}
By convention, Android programs also use int
for colors:
Java
class Rectangle {
int width;
int height;
int color;
}
Kotlin
class Rectangle(
val width: Int,
val height: Int,
val color: Int
)
But if we encoded the above Java or Kotlin class as JSON, the color isn't encoded properly!
{
"width": 1024,
"height": 768,
"color": 16711680
}
The fix is to define a qualifier annotation, itself annotated @JsonQualifier
:
Java
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@JsonQualifier
public @interface HexColor {
}
Kotlin
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@JsonQualifier
annotation class HexColor
Next apply this @HexColor
annotation to the appropriate field:
Java
class Rectangle {
int width;
int height;
@HexColor int color;
}
Kotlin
class Rectangle(
val width: Int,
val height: Int,
@HexColor val color: Int
)
And finally define a type adapter to handle it:
Java
/** Converts strings like #ff0000 to the corresponding color ints. */
class ColorAdapter {
@ToJson String toJson(@HexColor int rgb) {
return String.format("#%06x", rgb);
}
@FromJson @HexColor int fromJson(String rgb) {
return Integer.parseInt(rgb.substring(1), 16);
}
}
Kotlin
/** Converts strings like #ff0000 to the corresponding color ints. */
class ColorAdapter {
@ToJson fun toJson(@HexColor rgb: Int): String {
return "#%06x".format(rgb)
}
@FromJson @HexColor fun fromJson(rgb: String): Int {
return rgb.substring(1).toInt(16)
}
}
Use @JsonQualifier
when you need different JSON encodings for the same type. Most programs
shouldnât need this @JsonQualifier
, but itâs very handy for those that do.
Omitting fields
Some models declare fields that shouldnât be included in JSON. For example, suppose our blackjack
hand has a total
field with the sum of the cards:
Java
public final class BlackjackHand {
private int total;
...
}
Kotlin
class BlackjackHand(
private val total: Int,
...
)
By default, all fields are emitted when encoding JSON, and all fields are accepted when decoding
JSON. Prevent a field from being included by annotating them with @Json(ignore = true)
.
Java
public final class BlackjackHand {
@Json(ignore = true)
private int total;
...
}
Kotlin
class BlackjackHand(...) {
@Json(ignore = true)
var total: Int = 0
...
}
These fields are omitted when writing JSON. When reading JSON, the field is skipped even if the JSON contains a value for the field. Instead, it will get a default value. In Kotlin, these fields must have a default value if they are in the primary constructor.
Note that you can also use Javaâs transient
keyword or Kotlin's @Transient
annotation on these fields
for the same effect.
Default Values & Constructors
When reading JSON that is missing a field, Moshi relies on the Java or Kotlin or Android runtime to assign the fieldâs value. Which value it uses depends on whether the class has a no-arguments constructor.
If the class has a no-arguments constructor, Moshi will call that constructor and whatever value
it assigns will be used. For example, because this class has a no-arguments constructor the total
field is initialized to -1
.
Note: This section only applies to Java reflections.
public final class BlackjackHand {
private int total = -1;
...
private BlackjackHand() {
}
public BlackjackHand(Card hidden_card, List<Card> visible_cards) {
...
}
}
If the class doesnât have a no-arguments constructor, Moshi canât assign the fieldâs default value,
even if itâs specified in the field declaration. Instead, the fieldâs default is always 0
for
numbers, false
for booleans, and null
for references. In this example, the default value of
total
is 0
!
public final class BlackjackHand {
private int total = -1;
...
public BlackjackHand(Card hidden_card, List<Card> visible_cards) {
...
}
}
This is surprising and is a potential source of bugs! For this reason consider defining a
no-arguments constructor in classes that you use with Moshi, using @SuppressWarnings("unused")
to
prevent it from being inadvertently deleted later:
public final class BlackjackHand {
private int total = -1;
...
@SuppressWarnings("unused") // Moshi uses this!
private BlackjackHand() {
}
public BlackjackHand(Card hidden_card, List<Card> visible_cards) {
...
}
}
Composing Adapters
In some situations Moshi's default Java-to-JSON conversion isn't sufficient. You can compose adapters to build upon the standard conversion.
In this example, we turn serialize nulls, then delegate to the built-in adapter:
Java
class TournamentWithNullsAdapter {
@ToJson void toJson(JsonWriter writer, Tournament tournament,
JsonAdapter<Tournament> delegate) throws IOException {
boolean wasSerializeNulls = writer.getSerializeNulls();
writer.setSerializeNulls(true);
try {
delegate.toJson(writer, tournament);
} finally {
writer.setLenient(wasSerializeNulls);
}
}
}
Kotlin
class TournamentWithNullsAdapter {
@ToJson fun toJson(writer: JsonWriter, tournament: Tournament?,
delegate: JsonAdapter<Tournament?>) {
val wasSerializeNulls: Boolean = writer.getSerializeNulls()
writer.setSerializeNulls(true)
try {
delegate.toJson(writer, tournament)
} finally {
writer.setLenient(wasSerializeNulls)
}
}
}
When we use this to serialize a tournament, nulls are written! But nulls elsewhere in our JSON document are skipped as usual.
Moshi has a powerful composition system in its JsonAdapter.Factory
interface. We can hook in to
the encoding and decoding process for any type, even without knowing about the types beforehand. In
this example, we customize types annotated @AlwaysSerializeNulls
, which an annotation we create,
not built-in to Moshi:
Java
@Target(TYPE)
@Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface AlwaysSerializeNulls {}
Kotlin
@Target(TYPE)
@Retention(RUNTIME)
annotation class AlwaysSerializeNulls
Java
@AlwaysSerializeNulls
static class Car {
String make;
String model;
String color;
}
Kotlin
@AlwaysSerializeNulls
class Car(
val make: String?,
val model: String?,
val color: String?
)
Each JsonAdapter.Factory
interface is invoked by Moshi
when it needs to build an adapter for a
user's type. The factory either returns an adapter to use, or null if it doesn't apply to the
requested type. In our case we match all classes that have our annotation.
Java
static class AlwaysSerializeNullsFactory implements JsonAdapter.Factory {
@Override public JsonAdapter<?> create(
Type type, Set<? extends Annotation> annotations, Moshi moshi) {
Class<?> rawType = Types.getRawType(type);
if (!rawType.isAnnotationPresent(AlwaysSerializeNulls.class)) {
return null;
}
JsonAdapter<Object> delegate = moshi.nextAdapter(this, type, annotations);
return delegate.serializeNulls();
}
}
Kotlin
class AlwaysSerializeNullsFactory : JsonAdapter.Factory {
override fun create(type: Type, annotations: Set<Annotation>, moshi: Moshi): JsonAdapter<*>? {
val rawType: Class<*> = type.rawType
if (!rawType.isAnnotationPresent(AlwaysSerializeNulls::class.java)) {
return null
}
val delegate: JsonAdapter<Any> = moshi.nextAdapter(this, type, annotations)
return delegate.serializeNulls()
}
}
After determining that it applies, the factory looks up Moshi's built-in adapter by calling
Moshi.nextAdapter()
. This is key to the composition mechanism: adapters delegate to each other!
The composition in this example is simple: it applies the serializeNulls()
transform on the
delegate.
Composing adapters can be very sophisticated:
-
An adapter could transform the input object before it is JSON-encoded. A string could be trimmed or truncated; a value object could be simplified or normalized.
-
An adapter could repair the output object after it is JSON-decoded. It could fill-in missing data or discard unwanted data.
-
The JSON could be given extra structure, such as wrapping values in objects or arrays.
Moshi is itself built on the pattern of repeatedly composing adapters. For example, Moshi's built-in
adapter for List<T>
delegates to the adapter of T
, and calls it repeatedly.
Precedence
Moshi's composition mechanism tries to find the best adapter for each type. It starts with the first
adapter or factory registered with Moshi.Builder.add()
, and proceeds until it finds an adapter for
the target type.
If a type can be matched multiple adapters, the earliest one wins.
To register an adapter at the end of the list, use Moshi.Builder.addLast()
instead. This is most
useful when registering general-purpose adapters, such as the KotlinJsonAdapterFactory
below.
Kotlin
Moshi is a great JSON library for Kotlin. It understands Kotlinâs non-nullable types and default parameter values. When you use Kotlin with Moshi you may use reflection, codegen, or both.
Reflection
The reflection adapter uses Kotlinâs reflection library to convert your Kotlin classes to and from
JSON. Enable it by adding the KotlinJsonAdapterFactory
to your Moshi.Builder
:
val moshi = Moshi.Builder()
.addLast(KotlinJsonAdapterFactory())
.build()
Moshiâs adapters are ordered by precedence, so you should use addLast()
with
KotlinJsonAdapterFactory
, and add()
with your custom adapters.
The reflection adapter requires the following additional dependency:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.squareup.moshi</groupId>
<artifactId>moshi-kotlin</artifactId>
<version>1.15.1</version>
</dependency>
implementation("com.squareup.moshi:moshi-kotlin:1.15.1")
Note that the reflection adapter transitively depends on the kotlin-reflect
library which is a
2.5 MiB .jar file.
Codegen
Moshiâs Kotlin codegen support can be used as a Kotlin SymbolProcessor (KSP). It generates a small and fast adapter for each of your Kotlin classes at compile-time. Enable it by annotating each class that you want to encode as JSON:
@JsonClass(generateAdapter = true)
data class BlackjackHand(
val hidden_card: Card,
val visible_cards: List<Card>
)
The codegen adapter requires that your Kotlin types and their properties be either internal
or
public
(this is Kotlinâs default visibility).
Kotlin codegen has no additional runtime dependency. Youâll need to enable kapt or KSP and then add the following to your build to enable the annotation processor:
KSP
plugins {
id("com.google.devtools.ksp").version("1.6.10-1.0.4") // Or latest version of KSP
}
dependencies {
ksp("com.squareup.moshi:moshi-kotlin-codegen:1.15.1")
}
Limitations
If your Kotlin class has a superclass, it must also be a Kotlin class. Neither reflection or codegen support Kotlin types with Java supertypes or Java types with Kotlin supertypes. If you need to convert such classes to JSON you must create a custom type adapter.
The JSON encoding of Kotlin types is the same whether using reflection or codegen. Prefer codegen
for better performance and to avoid the kotlin-reflect
dependency; prefer reflection to convert
both private and protected properties. If you have configured both, generated adapters will be used
on types that are annotated @JsonClass(generateAdapter = true)
.
Download
Download the latest JAR or depend via Maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.squareup.moshi</groupId>
<artifactId>moshi</artifactId>
<version>1.15.1</version>
</dependency>
or Gradle:
implementation("com.squareup.moshi:moshi:1.15.1")
Snapshots of the development version are available in Sonatype's snapshots
repository.
R8 / ProGuard
Moshi contains minimally required rules for its own internals to work without need for consumers to embed their own. However if you are using reflective serialization and R8 or ProGuard, you must add keep rules in your proguard configuration file for your reflectively serialized classes.
Enums
Annotate enums with @JsonClass(generateAdapter = false)
to prevent them from being removed/obfuscated from your code by R8/ProGuard.
License
Copyright 2015 Square, Inc.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Top Related Projects
A Java serialization/deserialization library to convert Java Objects into JSON and back
Main Portal page for the Jackson project
FASTJSON 2.0.x has been released, faster and more secure, recommend you upgrade.
FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot