Top Related Projects
Quick Overview
Bats (Bash Automated Testing System) is a testing framework for Bash scripts. It provides a simple way to write and run tests for shell scripts, allowing developers to ensure their Bash code works as expected. Bats uses a familiar, TAP-compliant output format and integrates well with existing CI/CD pipelines.
Pros
- Easy to learn and use, especially for those already familiar with Bash
- Lightweight and doesn't require additional dependencies
- Integrates well with existing CI/CD tools and workflows
- Supports both unit and integration testing for shell scripts
Cons
- Limited to testing Bash scripts, not suitable for other languages
- May require additional setup for complex testing scenarios
- Less feature-rich compared to more comprehensive testing frameworks
- Documentation could be more extensive and up-to-date
Code Examples
- Basic test case:
@test "addition using bc" {
result="$(echo 2+2 | bc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
This example tests a simple addition operation using the bc
command.
- Testing a custom function:
#!/usr/bin/env bats
function add_numbers() {
echo $(( $1 + $2 ))
}
@test "add_numbers function" {
result=$(add_numbers 5 3)
[ "$result" -eq 8 ]
}
This example tests a custom function that adds two numbers.
- Using setup and teardown:
setup() {
echo "Setting up test environment" >&3
export TEMP_DIR=$(mktemp -d)
}
teardown() {
echo "Cleaning up test environment" >&3
rm -rf "$TEMP_DIR"
}
@test "create file in temp directory" {
touch "$TEMP_DIR/testfile"
[ -f "$TEMP_DIR/testfile" ]
}
This example demonstrates the use of setup
and teardown
functions to manage test environment.
Getting Started
To get started with Bats:
-
Install Bats:
git clone https://github.com/sstephenson/bats.git cd bats ./install.sh /usr/local
-
Create a test file (e.g.,
test_example.bats
):#!/usr/bin/env bats @test "example test" { result="$(echo 'Hello, World!')" [ "$result" = "Hello, World!" ] }
-
Run the test:
bats test_example.bats
This will execute the test and display the results in TAP-compliant format.
Competitor Comparisons
Bash Automated Testing System
Pros of bats-core
- More actively maintained with frequent updates and bug fixes
- Expanded test coverage and improved reliability
- Enhanced compatibility with different operating systems and environments
Cons of bats-core
- Potential compatibility issues with older bats scripts
- Slightly steeper learning curve due to additional features
Code Comparison
bats:
#!/usr/bin/env bats
@test "addition using bc" {
result="$(echo 2+2 | bc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
bats-core:
#!/usr/bin/env bats
@test "addition using bc" {
run bash -c "echo 2+2 | bc"
assert_success
assert_output "4"
}
The main difference in the code examples is that bats-core introduces the run
command and assert_*
functions, which provide more detailed output and easier assertion handling.
bats-core offers a more robust and actively maintained testing framework for shell scripts, with improved features and compatibility. However, users familiar with the original bats may need to adapt to some changes in syntax and functionality. Overall, bats-core is recommended for new projects and those seeking ongoing support and enhancements.
InSpec: Auditing and Testing Framework
Pros of InSpec
- More comprehensive infrastructure testing framework
- Supports multiple platforms and cloud providers
- Provides a domain-specific language for writing tests
Cons of InSpec
- Steeper learning curve due to more complex functionality
- Requires more setup and configuration
- Potentially overkill for simple shell script testing
Code Comparison
InSpec example:
describe file('/etc/passwd') do
it { should exist }
its('mode') { should cmp '0644' }
end
Bats example:
@test "Check /etc/passwd file" {
[ -f "/etc/passwd" ]
run stat -c "%a" /etc/passwd
[ "$output" = "644" ]
}
Summary
InSpec is a more powerful and versatile infrastructure testing tool, suitable for complex environments and cloud deployments. It offers a rich set of resources and matchers but requires more investment in learning and setup.
Bats, on the other hand, is a simpler, lightweight testing framework specifically designed for Bash scripts. It's easier to get started with and ideal for basic shell script testing, but lacks the advanced features and cross-platform capabilities of InSpec.
Choose InSpec for comprehensive infrastructure testing across multiple platforms, or Bats for quick and easy Bash script testing in simpler environments.
A home for issues that are common to multiple cucumber repositories
Pros of Common
- Supports multiple programming languages, offering broader applicability
- Provides a more comprehensive testing framework with behavior-driven development (BDD) features
- Offers better integration with continuous integration (CI) tools and reporting
Cons of Common
- Steeper learning curve due to more complex syntax and concepts
- Requires more setup and configuration compared to the simplicity of Bats
- May be overkill for simple shell script testing scenarios
Code Comparison
Bats example:
@test "addition using bc" {
result="$(echo 2+2 | bc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
Common (Cucumber) example:
Feature: Calculator
Scenario: Addition
Given I have entered 2 into the calculator
And I have entered 2 into the calculator
When I press add
Then the result should be 4 on the screen
The Bats example shows a straightforward test case for a simple addition operation, while the Common (Cucumber) example demonstrates a more verbose, human-readable format that describes the behavior of a calculator application. This illustrates the difference in approach between the two testing frameworks, with Bats focusing on simplicity and Common emphasizing readability and behavior-driven development.
Quick and Easy server testing/validation
Pros of Goss
- Designed specifically for server testing and validation
- Supports multiple output formats (JSON, YAML, JUnit)
- Can generate tests from the current system state
Cons of Goss
- Limited to system testing, less flexible for general-purpose testing
- Requires separate installation and setup
- Less extensive documentation compared to Bats
Code Comparison
Bats test example:
@test "addition using bc" {
result="$(echo 2+2 | bc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
Goss test example:
file:
/etc/passwd:
exists: true
mode: "0644"
owner: root
group: root
filetype: file
Bats focuses on shell script testing with a syntax similar to traditional unit tests, while Goss uses YAML for system validation and infrastructure testing. Bats is more versatile for general scripting tasks, whereas Goss excels in server configuration validation.
Bats has a larger community and more extensive documentation, making it easier for newcomers to adopt. However, Goss offers more specialized features for system testing and can generate tests from the current system state, which can be advantageous for infrastructure validation.
Both tools have their strengths, and the choice between them depends on the specific testing requirements and the target environment.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Bats: Bash Automated Testing System
Bats is a TAP-compliant testing framework for Bash. It provides a simple way to verify that the UNIX programs you write behave as expected.
A Bats test file is a Bash script with special syntax for defining test cases. Under the hood, each test case is just a function with a description.
#!/usr/bin/env bats
@test "addition using bc" {
result="$(echo 2+2 | bc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
@test "addition using dc" {
result="$(echo 2 2+p | dc)"
[ "$result" -eq 4 ]
}
Bats is most useful when testing software written in Bash, but you can use it to test any UNIX program.
Test cases consist of standard shell commands. Bats makes use of
Bash's errexit
(set -e
) option when running test cases. If every
command in the test case exits with a 0
status code (success), the
test passes. In this way, each line is an assertion of truth.
Running tests
To run your tests, invoke the bats
interpreter with a path to a test
file. The file's test cases are run sequentially and in isolation. If
all the test cases pass, bats
exits with a 0
status code. If there
are any failures, bats
exits with a 1
status code.
When you run Bats from a terminal, you'll see output as each test is performed, with a check-mark next to the test's name if it passes or an "X" if it fails.
$ bats addition.bats
â addition using bc
â addition using dc
2 tests, 0 failures
If Bats is not connected to a terminalâin other words, if you run it from a continuous integration system, or redirect its output to a fileâthe results are displayed in human-readable, machine-parsable TAP format.
You can force TAP output from a terminal by invoking Bats with the
--tap
option.
$ bats --tap addition.bats
1..2
ok 1 addition using bc
ok 2 addition using dc
Test suites
You can invoke the bats
interpreter with multiple test file
arguments, or with a path to a directory containing multiple .bats
files. Bats will run each test file individually and aggregate the
results. If any test case fails, bats
exits with a 1
status code.
Writing tests
Each Bats test file is evaluated n+1 times, where n is the number of test cases in the file. The first run counts the number of test cases, then iterates over the test cases and executes each one in its own process.
For more details about how Bats evaluates test files, see Bats Evaluation Process on the wiki.
run
: Test other commands
Many Bats tests need to run a command and then make assertions about
its exit status and output. Bats includes a run
helper that invokes
its arguments as a command, saves the exit status and output into
special global variables, and then returns with a 0
status code so
you can continue to make assertions in your test case.
For example, let's say you're testing that the foo
command, when
passed a nonexistent filename, exits with a 1
status code and prints
an error message.
@test "invoking foo with a nonexistent file prints an error" {
run foo nonexistent_filename
[ "$status" -eq 1 ]
[ "$output" = "foo: no such file 'nonexistent_filename'" ]
}
The $status
variable contains the status code of the command, and
the $output
variable contains the combined contents of the command's
standard output and standard error streams.
A third special variable, the $lines
array, is available for easily
accessing individual lines of output. For example, if you want to test
that invoking foo
without any arguments prints usage information on
the first line:
@test "invoking foo without arguments prints usage" {
run foo
[ "$status" -eq 1 ]
[ "${lines[0]}" = "usage: foo <filename>" ]
}
load
: Share common code
You may want to share common code across multiple test files. Bats
includes a convenient load
command for sourcing a Bash source file
relative to the location of the current test file. For example, if you
have a Bats test in test/foo.bats
, the command
load test_helper
will source the script test/test_helper.bash
in your test file. This
can be useful for sharing functions to set up your environment or load
fixtures.
skip
: Easily skip tests
Tests can be skipped by using the skip
command at the point in a
test you wish to skip.
@test "A test I don't want to execute for now" {
skip
run foo
[ "$status" -eq 0 ]
}
Optionally, you may include a reason for skipping:
@test "A test I don't want to execute for now" {
skip "This command will return zero soon, but not now"
run foo
[ "$status" -eq 0 ]
}
Or you can skip conditionally:
@test "A test which should run" {
if [ foo != bar ]; then
skip "foo isn't bar"
fi
run foo
[ "$status" -eq 0 ]
}
setup
and teardown
: Pre- and post-test hooks
You can define special setup
and teardown
functions, which run
before and after each test case, respectively. Use these to load
fixtures, set up your environment, and clean up when you're done.
Code outside of test cases
You can include code in your test file outside of @test
functions.
For example, this may be useful if you want to check for dependencies
and fail immediately if they're not present. However, any output that
you print in code outside of @test
, setup
or teardown
functions
must be redirected to stderr
(>&2
). Otherwise, the output may
cause Bats to fail by polluting the TAP stream on stdout
.
Special variables
There are several global variables you can use to introspect on Bats tests:
$BATS_TEST_FILENAME
is the fully expanded path to the Bats test file.$BATS_TEST_DIRNAME
is the directory in which the Bats test file is located.$BATS_TEST_NAMES
is an array of function names for each test case.$BATS_TEST_NAME
is the name of the function containing the current test case.$BATS_TEST_DESCRIPTION
is the description of the current test case.$BATS_TEST_NUMBER
is the (1-based) index of the current test case in the test file.$BATS_TMPDIR
is the location to a directory that may be used to store temporary files.
Installing Bats from source
Check out a copy of the Bats repository. Then, either add the Bats
bin
directory to your $PATH
, or run the provided install.sh
command with the location to the prefix in which you want to install
Bats. For example, to install Bats into /usr/local
,
$ git clone https://github.com/sstephenson/bats.git
$ cd bats
$ ./install.sh /usr/local
Note that you may need to run install.sh
with sudo
if you do not
have permission to write to the installation prefix.
Support
The Bats source code repository is hosted on GitHub. There you can file bugs on the issue tracker or submit tested pull requests for review.
For real-world examples from open-source projects using Bats, see Projects Using Bats on the wiki.
To learn how to set up your editor for Bats syntax highlighting, see Syntax Highlighting on the wiki.
Version history
0.4.0 (August 13, 2014)
- Improved the display of failing test cases. Bats now shows the source code of failing test lines, along with full stack traces including function names, filenames, and line numbers.
- Improved the display of the pretty-printed test summary line to include the number of skipped tests, if any.
- Improved the speed of the preprocessor, dramatically shortening test and suite startup times.
- Added support for absolute pathnames to the
load
helper. - Added support for single-line
@test
definitions. - Added bats(1) and bats(7) manual pages.
- Modified the
bats
command to default to TAP output when the$CI
variable is set, to better support environments such as Travis CI.
0.3.1 (October 28, 2013)
- Fixed an incompatibility with the pretty formatter in certain environments such as tmux.
- Fixed a bug where the pretty formatter would crash if the first line of a test file's output was invalid TAP.
0.3.0 (October 21, 2013)
- Improved formatting for tests run from a terminal. Failing tests
are now colored in red, and the total number of failing tests is
displayed at the end of the test run. When Bats is not connected to
a terminal (e.g. in CI runs), or when invoked with the
--tap
flag, output is displayed in standard TAP format. - Added the ability to skip tests using the
skip
command. - Added a message to failing test case output indicating the file and line number of the statement that caused the test to fail.
- Added "ad-hoc" test suite support. You can now invoke
bats
with multiple filename or directory arguments to run all the specified tests in aggregate. - Added support for test files with Windows line endings.
- Fixed regular expression warnings from certain versions of Bash.
- Fixed a bug running tests containing lines that begin with
-e
.
0.2.0 (November 16, 2012)
- Added test suite support. The
bats
command accepts a directory name containing multiple test files to be run in aggregate. - Added the ability to count the number of test cases in a file or
suite by passing the
-c
flag tobats
. - Preprocessed sources are cached between test case runs in the same file for better performance.
0.1.0 (December 30, 2011)
- Initial public release.
© 2014 Sam Stephenson. Bats is released under an MIT-style license;
see LICENSE
for details.
Top Related Projects
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot