Pros of xss-payload-list

• More comprehensive collection with a wider variety of XSS payloads
• Better organized into categories, making it easier to find specific types of payloads
• Includes additional resources and references for XSS testing

Cons of xss-payload-list

• Larger repository size, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• Less focus on minimizing payload size compared to Tiny-XSS-Payloads
• May include some outdated or less effective payloads due to its broader scope

Code Comparison

Tiny-XSS-Payloads:

<svg/onload=alert()>
<img/src/onerror=alert()>

xss-payload-list:

<script>alert('XSS')</script>
<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>
<svg onload=alert('XSS')>

The Tiny-XSS-Payloads examples focus on minimal character count, while xss-payload-list provides more traditional and readable payloads. Tiny-XSS-Payloads uses shorter attribute names and omits quotes where possible, whereas xss-payload-list includes full attribute names and quotation marks for better readability and compatibility across different contexts.

Both repositories serve as valuable resources for XSS testing, with Tiny-XSS-Payloads excelling in payload minimization and xss-payload-list offering a more comprehensive collection for various scenarios.

Pros of PayloadsAllTheThings

• Comprehensive coverage of various attack vectors beyond XSS
• Well-organized structure with separate directories for different techniques
• Regularly updated with contributions from the security community

Cons of PayloadsAllTheThings

• Larger repository size, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• Less focused on XSS-specific payloads compared to Tiny-XSS-Payloads
• May require more time to navigate and find specific XSS payloads

Code Comparison

Tiny-XSS-Payloads:

<svg/onload=alert()>
<img/src/onerror=alert()>
<video/poster/onerror=alert()>

PayloadsAllTheThings:

<script>alert('XSS')</script>
<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>
<svg onload=alert('XSS')>

Both repositories provide concise XSS payloads, but Tiny-XSS-Payloads focuses on more compact and creative variations. PayloadsAllTheThings offers a broader range of payloads, including traditional and modern techniques.

While Tiny-XSS-Payloads excels in providing minimal XSS payloads, PayloadsAllTheThings offers a more extensive collection of security-related payloads and techniques. The choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs and level of expertise in web security testing.

Pros of AwesomeXSS

• Comprehensive collection of XSS payloads, techniques, and resources
• Well-organized with categories for different XSS types and bypass methods
• Includes additional tools and references for XSS testing

Cons of AwesomeXSS

• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the large amount of information
• Some payloads might be outdated or less effective against modern security measures
• Lacks focus on minimizing payload size for specific scenarios

Code Comparison

Tiny-XSS-Payloads:

<svg/onload=alert()>
<img/src/onerror=alert()>

AwesomeXSS:

<script>alert(1)</script>
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<svg/onload=alert(1)>

Summary

Tiny-XSS-Payloads focuses on compact, efficient XSS payloads, making it ideal for scenarios with strict character limitations. It's straightforward and easy to use for quick testing.

AwesomeXSS offers a more comprehensive approach, covering various XSS techniques, bypass methods, and additional resources. It's better suited for in-depth XSS research and testing across different scenarios.

Both repositories provide valuable XSS payloads, but they cater to different needs. Tiny-XSS-Payloads is best for minimalist, space-constrained exploits, while AwesomeXSS is more suitable for extensive XSS testing and learning.

Pros of SecLists

• Comprehensive collection of multiple types of security-related lists, not limited to XSS payloads
• Regularly updated with contributions from the security community
• Well-organized directory structure for easy navigation

Cons of SecLists

• Large repository size may be overwhelming for specific use cases
• Requires more time to find relevant payloads due to extensive content
• May include outdated or less effective payloads alongside current ones

Code Comparison

Tiny-XSS-Payloads example:

<svg/onload=alert()>

SecLists example (from XSS-Injection/XSS-Cheat-Sheet-PortSwigger.txt):

<script>alert(document.domain)</script>

Both repositories provide XSS payloads, but Tiny-XSS-Payloads focuses on compact, efficient payloads, while SecLists offers a broader range of options.

SecLists is a more extensive resource covering various security testing aspects, whereas Tiny-XSS-Payloads specializes in concise XSS vectors. SecLists is ideal for comprehensive security assessments, while Tiny-XSS-Payloads is better suited for quick XSS testing or situations where payload size matters.