Pros of Material Dashboard React

• Simpler setup and configuration, making it easier for beginners to get started
• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates

Cons of Material Dashboard React

• Less modern tech stack compared to Materio (uses Create React App instead of Next.js)
• Fewer pre-built components and layout options
• Limited TypeScript support

Code Comparison

Material Dashboard React:

import React from "react";
import { makeStyles } from "@material-ui/core/styles";
import Card from "@material-ui/core/Card";

const useStyles = makeStyles({
  root: {
    minWidth: 275,
  },
});

Materio:

import React from 'react'
import Card from '@mui/material/Card'
import { styled } from '@mui/material/styles'

const StyledCard = styled(Card)(({ theme }) => ({
  minWidth: 275,
  [theme.breakpoints.up('sm')]: {
    minWidth: 300,
  },
}))

The code comparison shows that Materio uses a more modern approach with styled-components and TypeScript, while Material Dashboard React uses older Material-UI syntax and JavaScript.

Both repositories offer excellent admin dashboard templates, but Materio provides a more cutting-edge tech stack with Next.js and better TypeScript support. Material Dashboard React, on the other hand, offers a simpler setup and more extensive documentation, making it potentially more suitable for beginners or projects with simpler requirements.

Pros of Material Kit React

• More comprehensive UI components and pre-built pages
• Better documentation and examples for customization
• Active community support and regular updates

Cons of Material Kit React

• Larger bundle size due to more features
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less focus on Next.js integration

Code Comparison

Material Kit React:

import { Button, Card, Typography } from '@mui/material';

function Example() {
  return (
    <Card>
      <Typography variant="h5">Hello World</Typography>
      <Button variant="contained">Click Me</Button>
    </Card>
  );
}

Materio MUI Next.js Admin Template:

import { Button, Card, Typography } from '@mui/material';

const Example = () => {
  return (
    <Card>
      <Typography variant="h6">Hello World</Typography>
      <Button variant="contained">Click Me</Button>
    </Card>
  );
};

Both repositories use Material-UI components, but Material Kit React offers more extensive customization options and pre-built layouts. Materio focuses on Next.js integration and admin-specific features, making it more suitable for building admin dashboards. The code structure is similar, with minor differences in component usage and styling approaches.

Pros of react-saas-template

• Built with Create React App, offering a simpler setup and development process
• Includes a complete authentication flow with Firebase
• Provides more customizable components for SaaS-specific features

Cons of react-saas-template

• Less comprehensive admin dashboard features compared to Materio
• Fewer pre-built UI components and layout options
• May require more custom development for advanced admin functionalities

Code Comparison

react-saas-template:

import React, { memo } from "react";
import PropTypes from "prop-types";
import { Switch } from "@material-ui/core";
import withStyles from "@material-ui/core/styles/withStyles";

const CustomSwitch = withStyles({
  switchBase: {
    color: "#fafafa",
    "&$checked": {
      color: "#00C853"
    }
  },
  checked: {},
  track: {}
})(Switch);

materio-mui-nextjs-admin-template-free:

import { styled } from '@mui/material/styles'
import Switch from '@mui/material/Switch'

const CustomSwitch = styled(Switch)(({ theme }) => ({
  '& .MuiSwitch-switchBase': {
    '&.Mui-checked': {
      '& + .MuiSwitch-track': {
        backgroundColor: theme.palette.primary.main
      }
    }
  }
}))

Both examples show custom switch components, but Materio uses the newer MUI v5 styling approach with the styled function, while react-saas-template uses the older withStyles HOC from MUI v4.

Pros of react-material-admin

• Simpler setup and configuration, making it easier for beginners to get started
• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Includes a wider variety of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of react-material-admin

• Less customizable and flexible compared to materio-mui-nextjs-admin-template-free
• Not built with Next.js, which may limit some advanced features and optimizations
• Fewer regular updates and maintenance compared to the Materio template

Code Comparison

materio-mui-nextjs-admin-template-free:

import { ThemeProvider } from '@mui/material/styles'
import CssBaseline from '@mui/material/CssBaseline'
import themeConfig from 'src/configs/themeConfig'

function MyApp({ Component, pageProps }) {
  return (
    <ThemeProvider theme={themeConfig}>
      <CssBaseline />
      <Component {...pageProps} />
    </ThemeProvider>
  )
}

react-material-admin:

import { ThemeProvider } from '@material-ui/core/styles'
import { CssBaseline } from '@material-ui/core'
import themes from './themes'

function App() {
  return (
    <ThemeProvider theme={themes.default}>
      <CssBaseline />
      <Layout>
        {/* Your app content */}
      </Layout>
    </ThemeProvider>
  )
}

Both templates use Material-UI and implement theming, but materio-mui-nextjs-admin-template-free leverages Next.js for improved performance and SEO capabilities.