Pros of vim-textobj-user

• Provides a framework for creating custom text objects in Vim
• Allows for more granular and specific text selections
• Extensible with plugins for various language-specific text objects

Cons of vim-textobj-user

• Requires more setup and configuration compared to vim-repeat
• May have a steeper learning curve for users new to custom text objects
• Potentially more complex to use in scripts or mappings

Code Comparison

vim-textobj-user:

call textobj#user#plugin('example', {
\   'date': {
\     'pattern': '\<\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d\>',
\     'select': ['ad', 'id'],
\   },
\ })

vim-repeat:

silent! call repeat#set("\<Plug>MyAwesomeMap", v:count)

Key Differences

• vim-textobj-user focuses on creating custom text objects, while vim-repeat enhances the repeatability of plugin maps
• vim-repeat is generally simpler to use and integrate into existing workflows
• vim-textobj-user offers more flexibility in defining complex text selections

Use Cases

• Use vim-textobj-user when you need to create custom text objects for specific languages or file types
• Choose vim-repeat when you want to improve the usability of existing plugin mappings by making them repeatable

Pros of targets.vim

• Provides more precise text object selection, allowing for complex targeting of content
• Offers a wider range of text objects, including separators, arguments, and quotes
• Enhances Vim's built-in text objects with more granular control

Cons of targets.vim

• Steeper learning curve due to the additional commands and text objects
• May conflict with other plugins or custom mappings that modify text objects
• Requires more mental overhead to remember and utilize all the available options

Code comparison

targets.vim:

" Select inside next parentheses
cin)

" Select around second next quote
2an"

" Delete inside last square brackets
dil]

vim-repeat:

" Repeat last change with .
.

" Repeat a plugin map
:call repeat#set("\<Plug>MyPlugin", v:count)

Summary

targets.vim focuses on expanding Vim's text object selection capabilities, offering more precise and varied targeting options. vim-repeat, on the other hand, enhances Vim's repeat functionality, allowing for better integration with plugin commands. While targets.vim provides powerful selection tools, it comes with a steeper learning curve. vim-repeat is simpler in concept but greatly improves workflow efficiency when working with plugins.

Pros of leap.nvim

• Provides advanced motion capabilities for Neovim, enhancing navigation efficiency
• Offers a more modern and feature-rich approach to cursor movement
• Actively maintained and regularly updated

Cons of leap.nvim

• Requires Neovim, limiting compatibility compared to vim-repeat
• May have a steeper learning curve for users accustomed to traditional Vim motions
• Potentially more complex setup and configuration

Code Comparison

vim-repeat:

silent! call repeat#set("\<Plug>MyWonderfulMap", v:count)

leap.nvim:

require('leap').add_default_mappings()
require('leap').leap { target_windows = { vim.fn.win_getid() } }

Key Differences

• Purpose: vim-repeat enhances the dot command for plugin actions, while leap.nvim focuses on improving cursor movement
• Scope: vim-repeat is a utility for other plugins, whereas leap.nvim is a standalone motion plugin
• Implementation: vim-repeat is written in Vimscript, while leap.nvim uses Lua for Neovim integration

Use Cases

• vim-repeat: Ideal for users who frequently use the dot command and want to extend its functionality
• leap.nvim: Best for Neovim users seeking to optimize their navigation and cursor movement within files