Pros of awesome-developer-streams

• Provides a curated list of valuable resources for developers interested in live coding streams
• Regularly updated with new content and streams
• Well-organized by programming languages and topics

Cons of awesome-developer-streams

• Limited to streaming content, not covering other learning resources
• May include inactive or outdated streams

Code comparison

Not applicable, as both repositories don't contain significant code samples. state-of-the-art-shitcode focuses on examples of bad coding practices, while awesome-developer-streams is a curated list of resources.

Summary

state-of-the-art-shitcode is a humorous repository showcasing examples of poor coding practices, aimed at educating developers on what to avoid. On the other hand, awesome-developer-streams is a curated list of live coding streams, providing valuable resources for developers to learn from experienced programmers in real-time.

While state-of-the-art-shitcode offers a unique approach to learning through negative examples, awesome-developer-streams provides a more traditional method of learning through observation and interaction with skilled developers.

Both repositories serve different purposes in the developer community, with state-of-the-art-shitcode focusing on code quality and best practices, and awesome-developer-streams emphasizing continuous learning and community engagement through live streaming platforms.

Pros of developer-roadmap

• Provides comprehensive learning paths for various tech roles
• Regularly updated with new technologies and industry trends
• Offers interactive roadmaps with clickable resources

Cons of developer-roadmap

• May overwhelm beginners with the sheer amount of information
• Focuses more on breadth than depth in specific technologies
• Lacks humor and entertainment value found in state-of-the-art-shitcode

Code comparison

While state-of-the-art-shitcode provides examples of poor coding practices:

function checkAge(age) {
  if (age < 18) {
    return false;
  } else {
    return true;
  }
}

developer-roadmap doesn't include code snippets but offers guidance on best practices:

## Frontend Development

- Learn HTML
  - Basic syntax
  - Semantic HTML
- Learn CSS
  - Layouts (Flexbox, Grid)
  - Responsive design

developer-roadmap focuses on structured learning paths, while state-of-the-art-shitcode humorously highlights common coding mistakes. The former is a serious educational resource, while the latter serves as an entertaining cautionary tale for developers.

Pros of Best-websites-a-programmer-should-visit

• Provides a curated list of valuable resources for programmers
• Covers a wide range of topics, from coding practice to career development
• Regularly updated with new and relevant websites

Cons of Best-websites-a-programmer-should-visit

• Lacks humor and entertainment value
• Doesn't provide direct coding examples or guidelines
• May overwhelm users with the sheer number of resources

Code Comparison

While Best-websites-a-programmer-should-visit doesn't contain code examples, state-of-the-art-shitcode provides humorous examples of bad coding practices. Here's a sample from state-of-the-art-shitcode:

function isOdd(number) {
  return !!(number & 1);
}

function isEven(number) {
  return !isOdd(number);
}

This example demonstrates unnecessarily complex ways to check for odd and even numbers, which is the opposite of what Best-websites-a-programmer-should-visit aims to promote through its curated resources.

In summary, Best-websites-a-programmer-should-visit is a serious, comprehensive resource for programmers seeking to improve their skills and knowledge. On the other hand, state-of-the-art-shitcode takes a humorous approach to highlight bad coding practices, serving as a lighthearted reminder of what to avoid in programming.

Pros of system-design-primer

• Comprehensive resource for learning system design concepts
• Well-organized content with clear explanations and diagrams
• Actively maintained with regular updates and contributions

Cons of system-design-primer

• More serious and technical in nature, lacking humor
• Requires significant time investment to fully grasp the content

Code comparison

While state-of-the-art-shitcode focuses on humorous examples of bad coding practices, system-design-primer provides practical code snippets for system design concepts. Here's a brief comparison:

state-of-the-art-shitcode:

def is_odd(n):
    return n > 0 and n % 2 == 1 or n < 0 and n % 2 == -1

system-design-primer:

def get_user(user_id):
    user = cache.get(user_id)
    if user is None:
        user = db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {}'.format(user_id))
        cache.set(user_id, user)
    return user

The state-of-the-art-shitcode example demonstrates an overly complex way to check for odd numbers, while the system-design-primer example shows a practical implementation of caching in a database query.

Pros of free-programming-books

• Extensive collection of free educational resources for programmers
• Well-organized and categorized by programming languages and topics
• Regularly updated with community contributions

Cons of free-programming-books

• Lacks practical coding examples or exercises
• May not provide guidance on which resources are best for specific skill levels

Code comparison

Not applicable, as neither repository contains significant code samples. free-programming-books is primarily a curated list of resources, while state-of-the-art-shitcode focuses on humorous anti-patterns and bad coding practices.

Additional notes

state-of-the-art-shitcode:

• Humorous approach to teaching good coding practices through bad examples
• Provides concrete examples of what not to do in code
• May be more engaging for some learners due to its satirical nature

free-programming-books:

• More comprehensive and serious approach to programming education
• Covers a wider range of topics and languages
• Suitable for self-directed learning across various programming disciplines

Both repositories serve different purposes in the programming community. state-of-the-art-shitcode offers a unique, entertaining perspective on code quality, while free-programming-books provides a vast collection of learning resources for programmers at all levels.

Pros of awesome

• Comprehensive collection of curated lists covering various topics
• Well-organized and easy to navigate
• Actively maintained with regular updates and contributions

Cons of awesome

• Can be overwhelming due to the sheer volume of information
• Some lists may contain outdated or less relevant resources
• Lacks specific focus on coding practices or techniques

Code comparison

Not applicable, as both repositories don't contain significant code samples. awesome is primarily a collection of links and resources, while state-of-the-art-shitcode focuses on describing anti-patterns and bad coding practices.

Summary

awesome is a vast collection of curated lists covering a wide range of topics in software development and technology. It serves as a valuable resource for developers seeking high-quality tools, libraries, and learning materials. On the other hand, state-of-the-art-shitcode is a humorous guide to writing terrible code, highlighting common mistakes and anti-patterns to avoid.

While awesome provides a wealth of information, it may be overwhelming for some users due to its extensive content. state-of-the-art-shitcode, although smaller in scope, offers a focused and entertaining approach to learning about code quality through negative examples.

Both repositories serve different purposes and can be valuable for developers, depending on their needs and learning preferences.