wolfssl
The wolfSSL library is a small, fast, portable implementation of TLS/SSL for embedded devices to the cloud. wolfSSL supports up to TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3!
Top Related Projects
TLS/SSL and crypto library
An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible TLS library, and reference implementation of the PSA Cryptography API. Releases are on a varying cadence, typically around 3 - 6 months between releases.
LibreSSL Portable itself. This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. Pull requests or patches sent to tech@openbsd.org are welcome.
Mirror of BoringSSL
An implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols
Fast Elliptic Curve Cryptography in plain javascript
Quick Overview
wolfSSL is a lightweight, portable, C-language-based SSL/TLS library targeted for embedded, RTOS, and resource-constrained environments. It's a popular choice for IoT, automotive, and enterprise security applications due to its small footprint, speed, and extensive feature set.
Pros
- Small footprint (20-100 kB) ideal for embedded systems
- Fast performance, optimized for speed and efficiency
- Extensive platform support, including various RTOS and embedded systems
- Strong security features, including support for the latest TLS 1.3 protocol
Cons
- Less extensive documentation compared to some larger SSL/TLS libraries
- Smaller community compared to OpenSSL
- Some advanced features may require a commercial license
- Learning curve for developers new to embedded SSL/TLS implementations
Code Examples
- Initializing wolfSSL:
#include <wolfssl/ssl.h>
int ret = wolfSSL_Init();
if (ret != WOLFSSL_SUCCESS) {
// Error handling
}
- Creating a wolfSSL context:
WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx = wolfSSL_CTX_new(wolfTLSv1_2_client_method());
if (ctx == NULL) {
// Error handling
}
- Establishing a secure connection:
WOLFSSL* ssl = wolfSSL_new(ctx);
if (ssl == NULL) {
// Error handling
}
wolfSSL_set_fd(ssl, sockfd);
int ret = wolfSSL_connect(ssl);
if (ret != WOLFSSL_SUCCESS) {
// Error handling
}
Getting Started
To get started with wolfSSL:
-
Download the wolfSSL source from GitHub:
git clone https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl.git
-
Configure and build the library:
cd wolfssl ./autogen.sh ./configure make sudo make install
-
Include wolfSSL in your project:
#include <wolfssl/ssl.h>
-
Link against the wolfSSL library when compiling:
gcc -o your_program your_program.c -lwolfssl
Remember to initialize wolfSSL with wolfSSL_Init()
at the beginning of your program and clean up with wolfSSL_Cleanup()
at the end.
Competitor Comparisons
TLS/SSL and crypto library
Pros of OpenSSL
- Extensive feature set and wide protocol support
- Large community and extensive documentation
- Broad platform compatibility and hardware acceleration support
Cons of OpenSSL
- Larger codebase and memory footprint
- More complex API and steeper learning curve
- Slower release cycle for updates and patches
Code Comparison
OpenSSL example (TLS client):
SSL_CTX *ctx = SSL_CTX_new(TLS_client_method());
SSL *ssl = SSL_new(ctx);
SSL_set_fd(ssl, socket);
SSL_connect(ssl);
wolfSSL example (TLS client):
WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx = wolfSSL_CTX_new(wolfTLSv1_2_client_method());
WOLFSSL* ssl = wolfSSL_new(ctx);
wolfSSL_set_fd(ssl, socket);
wolfSSL_connect(ssl);
Both libraries offer similar APIs, but wolfSSL tends to have a more streamlined interface. OpenSSL provides more configuration options, while wolfSSL focuses on a smaller, more efficient codebase. OpenSSL is more widely adopted and has broader protocol support, whereas wolfSSL is designed for embedded systems and resource-constrained environments, offering a smaller footprint and faster performance in many cases.
An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible TLS library, and reference implementation of the PSA Cryptography API. Releases are on a varying cadence, typically around 3 - 6 months between releases.
Pros of Mbed TLS
- More extensive documentation and examples
- Broader platform support, including bare-metal environments
- Easier integration with ARM-based systems and IoT devices
Cons of Mbed TLS
- Generally slower performance compared to wolfSSL
- Larger code size and memory footprint
- Less frequent updates and slower adoption of new standards
Code Comparison
Mbed TLS initialization:
#include "mbedtls/ssl.h"
mbedtls_ssl_context ssl;
mbedtls_ssl_config conf;
mbedtls_ssl_init(&ssl);
mbedtls_ssl_config_init(&conf);
wolfSSL initialization:
#include <wolfssl/ssl.h>
WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx;
WOLFSSL* ssl;
ctx = wolfSSL_CTX_new(wolfTLSv1_2_client_method());
ssl = wolfSSL_new(ctx);
Both libraries offer similar APIs for SSL/TLS functionality, but wolfSSL tends to have a more streamlined approach with fewer function calls required for basic setup. Mbed TLS provides more granular control over configuration options, which can be beneficial for complex scenarios but may require more code for simple use cases.
LibreSSL Portable itself. This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. Pull requests or patches sent to tech@openbsd.org are welcome.
Pros of LibreSSL
- More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of cryptographic functions
- Better compatibility with OpenSSL, making it easier to integrate into existing systems
- More active development and frequent updates
Cons of LibreSSL
- Larger codebase and memory footprint, which may not be ideal for embedded systems
- Potentially slower performance due to its more extensive feature set
- Less focus on small-scale or resource-constrained environments
Code Comparison
LibreSSL:
SSL_CTX *ctx = SSL_CTX_new(TLS_method());
SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version(ctx, TLS1_2_VERSION);
SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version(ctx, TLS1_3_VERSION);
wolfSSL:
WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx = wolfSSL_CTX_new(wolfTLSv1_2_client_method());
wolfSSL_CTX_SetMinVersion(ctx, WOLFSSL_TLSV1_2);
wolfSSL_CTX_SetMaxVersion(ctx, WOLFSSL_TLSV1_3);
Both libraries provide similar functionality for creating SSL contexts and setting protocol versions. However, LibreSSL's API more closely resembles OpenSSL, while wolfSSL uses its own naming conventions.
Mirror of BoringSSL
Pros of BoringSSL
- Developed and maintained by Google, benefiting from their extensive resources and expertise
- Designed for performance and efficiency in modern systems
- Regularly updated with the latest security patches and improvements
Cons of BoringSSL
- Less flexible and customizable compared to wolfSSL
- Not as widely supported across different platforms and architectures
- May have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Google's coding practices
Code Comparison
wolfSSL:
int wolfSSL_CTX_use_certificate_file(WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx, const char* file,
int format)
{
WOLFSSL_ENTER("wolfSSL_CTX_use_certificate_file");
return ProcessFile(ctx, file, format, CERT_TYPE, NULL, 0, NULL);
}
BoringSSL:
int SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file(SSL_CTX *ctx, const char *file, int type) {
BIO *in;
int ret = 0;
X509 *x = NULL;
in = BIO_new(BIO_s_file());
if (in == NULL) {
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(SSL, ERR_R_BUF_LIB);
goto end;
}
Both libraries provide similar functionality for loading certificates, but BoringSSL's implementation is more verbose and includes additional error handling.
An implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols
Pros of s2n-tls
- Designed specifically for AWS services, offering seamless integration with AWS infrastructure
- Focused on simplicity and minimal code base, potentially reducing the attack surface
- Regularly audited and maintained by AWS, ensuring high security standards
Cons of s2n-tls
- Limited to TLS 1.2 and 1.3, lacking support for older protocols
- Fewer cryptographic algorithms and features compared to wolfSSL
- Less flexibility for customization and integration with non-AWS systems
Code Comparison
s2n-tls:
s2n_config *config = s2n_config_new();
s2n_connection *conn = s2n_connection_new(S2N_CLIENT);
s2n_connection_set_config(conn, config);
s2n_negotiate(conn, &blocked);
wolfSSL:
WOLFSSL_CTX* ctx = wolfSSL_CTX_new(wolfTLSv1_2_client_method());
WOLFSSL* ssl = wolfSSL_new(ctx);
wolfSSL_connect(ssl);
wolfSSL_write(ssl, message, strlen(message));
Both libraries offer straightforward APIs for establishing TLS connections, but s2n-tls focuses on AWS-specific use cases, while wolfSSL provides a more general-purpose solution with broader protocol support and customization options.
Fast Elliptic Curve Cryptography in plain javascript
Pros of elliptic
- Lightweight and focused specifically on elliptic curve cryptography
- Easier to integrate into JavaScript/Node.js projects
- More active community contributions and frequent updates
Cons of elliptic
- Limited to elliptic curve operations, not a full cryptographic suite
- Less comprehensive documentation compared to wolfSSL
- May have lower performance for certain operations on some platforms
Code Comparison
elliptic:
const EC = require('elliptic').ec;
const ec = new EC('secp256k1');
const key = ec.genKeyPair();
const signature = key.sign(msgHash);
console.log(signature.toDER('hex'));
wolfSSL:
#include <wolfssl/options.h>
#include <wolfssl/wolfcrypt/ecc.h>
ecc_key key;
wc_ecc_init(&key);
wc_ecc_make_key(&rng, 32, &key);
wc_ecc_sign_hash(hash, hashLen, signature, &sigLen, &rng, &key);
wolfSSL offers a more comprehensive cryptographic library with support for various algorithms and protocols, while elliptic focuses specifically on elliptic curve operations. elliptic is more suitable for JavaScript-based projects, whereas wolfSSL is better for C/C++ applications requiring a full-featured cryptographic suite.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
wolfSSL Embedded SSL/TLS Library
The wolfSSL embedded SSL library (formerly CyaSSL) is a lightweight SSL/TLS library written in ANSI C and targeted for embedded, RTOS, and resource-constrained environments - primarily because of its small size, speed, and feature set. It is commonly used in standard operating environments as well because of its royalty-free pricing and excellent cross platform support. wolfSSL supports industry standards up to the current TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3, is up to 20 times smaller than OpenSSL, and offers progressive ciphers such as ChaCha20, Curve25519, Blake2b and Post-Quantum TLS 1.3 groups. User benchmarking and feedback reports dramatically better performance when using wolfSSL over OpenSSL.
wolfSSL is powered by the wolfCrypt cryptography library. Two versions of wolfCrypt have been FIPS 140-2 validated (Certificate #2425 and certificate #3389). FIPS 140-3 validation is in progress. For additional information, visit the wolfCrypt FIPS FAQ or contact fips@wolfssl.com.
Why Choose wolfSSL?
There are many reasons to choose wolfSSL as your embedded, desktop, mobile, or enterprise SSL/TLS solution. Some of the top reasons include size (typical footprint sizes range from 20-100 kB), support for the newest standards (SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3, DTLS 1.0, DTLS 1.2, and DTLS 1.3), current and progressive cipher support (including stream ciphers), multi-platform, royalty free, and an OpenSSL compatibility API to ease porting into existing applications which have previously used the OpenSSL package. For a complete feature list, see Chapter 4 of the wolfSSL manual.
Notes, Please Read
Note 1
wolfSSL as of 3.6.6 no longer enables SSLv3 by default. wolfSSL also no longer supports static key cipher suites with PSK, RSA, or ECDH. This means if you plan to use TLS cipher suites you must enable DH (DH is on by default), or enable ECC (ECC is on by default), or you must enable static key cipher suites with one or more of the following defines:
WOLFSSL_STATIC_DH
WOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA
WOLFSSL_STATIC_PSK
Though static key cipher suites are deprecated and will be removed from future versions of TLS. They also lower your security by removing PFS.
When compiling ssl.c
, wolfSSL will now issue a compiler error if no cipher
suites are available. You can remove this error by defining
WOLFSSL_ALLOW_NO_SUITES
in the event that you desire that, i.e., you're
not using TLS cipher suites.
Note 2
wolfSSL takes a different approach to certificate verification than OpenSSL does. The default policy for the client is to verify the server, this means that if you don't load CAs to verify the server you'll get a connect error, no signer error to confirm failure (-188).
If you want to mimic OpenSSL behavior of having SSL_connect
succeed even if
verifying the server fails and reducing security you can do this by calling:
wolfSSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx, WOLFSSL_VERIFY_NONE, NULL);
before calling wolfSSL_new();
. Though it's not recommended.
Note 3
The enum values SHA, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 are no longer available when
wolfSSL is built with --enable-opensslextra
(OPENSSL_EXTRA
) or with the
macro NO_OLD_SHA_NAMES
. These names get mapped to the OpenSSL API for a
single call hash function. Instead the name WC_SHA
, WC_SHA256
, WC_SHA384
and
WC_SHA512
should be used for the enum name.
wolfSSL Release 5.7.2 (July 08, 2024)
Release 5.7.2 has been developed according to wolfSSL's development and QA process (see link below) and successfully passed the quality criteria. https://www.wolfssl.com/about/wolfssl-software-development-process-quality-assurance
NOTE: * --enable-heapmath is being deprecated and will be removed by end of 2024
Vulnerabilities
-
[Medium] CVE-2024-1544 Potential ECDSA nonce side channel attack in versions of wolfSSL before 5.6.6 with wc_ecc_sign_hash calls. Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the order of the elliptic curve. Analyzing the division through a control-flow revealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of k. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a significant bias large enough to reconstruct k with lattice reduction methods. Thanks to Luca Wilke, Florian Sieck and Thomas Eisenbarth (University of Lübeck) for reporting the vulnerability. Details will appear in the proceedings of CCS 24. Fixed https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7020
-
[Medium] CVE-2024-5288 A private key blinding operation, enabled by defining the macro WOLFSSL_BLIND_PRIVATE_KEY, was added to mitigate a potential row hammer attack on ECC operations. If performing ECC private key operations in an environment where a malicious user could gain fine control over the device and perform row hammer style attacks it is recommended to update the version of wolfSSL used and to build with WOLFSSL_BLIND_PRIVATE_KEY defined. Thanks to Kemal Derya, M. Caner Tol, Berk Sunar for the report (Vernam Applied Cryptography and Cybersecurity Lab at Worcester Polytechnic Institute) Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7416
-
[Low] When parsing a provided maliciously crafted certificate directly using wolfSSL API, outside of a TLS connection, a certificate with an excessively large number of extensions could lead to a potential DoS. There are existing sanity checks during a TLS handshake with wolfSSL which mitigate this issue. Thanks to Bing Shi for the report. Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7597
-
[Low] CVE-2024-5991 In the function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the Openssl compatibility function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. While calling without a NULL terminated string is very uncommon, it is still technically allowed. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non*NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator. Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7604
-
[Medium] CVE-2024-5814 A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello when downgrading from TLS 1.3. Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7619
-
[Medium] OCSP stapling version 2 response verification bypass issue when a crafted response of length 0 is received. Found with internal testing. Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7702
-
[Medium] OCSP stapling version 2 revocation bypass with a retry of a TLS connection attempt. A revoked CA certificate could incorrectly be loaded into the trusted signers list and used in a repeat connection attempt. Found with internal testing. Fixed in github pull request https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/7702
New Feature Additions
- Added Dilithium/ML-DSA: Implementation of ML-DSA-44/65/87 (PR 7622)
- AES RISC-V 64-bit ASM: ECB/CBC/CTR/GCM/CCM (PR 7569)
- Added CUDA support for AES encryption (PR 7436)
- Added support for gRPC (PR 7445)
- Added function wc_RsaPrivateKeyDecodeRaw to import raw RSA private keys (PR 7608)
- Added crypto callback for SHA-3 (PR 7670)
- Support for Infineon Modus Toolbox with wolfSSL (PR 7369)
- Allow user to send a user_canceled alert by calling wolfSSL_SendUserCanceled (PR 7590)
- C# wrapper SNI support added (PR 7610)
- Quantum-safe algorithm support added to the Linux kernel module (PR 7574)
- Support for NIST 800-56C Option 1 KDF, using the macro WC_KDF_NIST_SP_800_56C added (PR 7589)
- AES-XTS streaming mode added, along with hardware acceleration and kernel module use (PR 7522, 7560, 7424)
- PlatformIO FreeRTOS with ESP build and addition of benchmark and test example applications (PR 7528, 7413, 7559, 7542)
Enhancements and Optimizations
- Expanded STM32 AES hardware acceleration support for use with STM32H5 (PR 7578)
- Adjusted wc_xmss and wc_lms settings to support use with wolfBoot (PR 7393)
- Added the --enable-rpk option to autotools build for using raw public key support (PR 7379)
- SHA-3 Thumb2, ARM32 assembly implementation added (PR 7667)
- Improvements to RSA padding to expose Pad/Unpad APIs (PR 7612)
- Updates and API additions for supporting socat version 1.8.0.0 (PR 7594)
- cmake build improvements, expanding build options with SINGLE_THREADED and post-quantum algorithms, adjusting the generation of options.h file and using âyes;noâ boolean instead of strings (PR 7611, 7546, 7479, 7480, 7380)
- Improvements for Renesas RZ support (PR 7474)
- Improvements to dual algorithm certificates for post-quantum keys (PR 7286)
- Added wolfSSL_SessionIsSetup so the user can check if a session ticket has been sent by the server (PR 7430)
- hostap updates: Implement PACs for EAP-FAST and filter cipher list on TLS version change (PR 7446)
- Changed subject name comparison to match different upper and lower cases (PR 7420)
- Support for DTLS 1.3 downgrade when using PSK (PR 7367)
- Update to static memory build for more generic memory pools used (PR 7418)
- Improved performance of Kyber C implementation (PR 7654)
- Support for ECC_CACHE_CURVE with no malloc (PR 7490)
- Added the configure option --enable-debug-trace-errcodes (macro WOLFSSL_DEBUG_TRACE_ERROR_CODES) which enables more debug tracking of error code values (PR 7634)
- Enhanced wc_MakeRsaKey and wc_RsaKeyToDer to work with WOLFSSL_NO_MALLOC (PR 7362)
- Improvements to assembly implementations of ChaCha20 and Poly1305 ASM for use with MSVC (PR 7319)
- Cortex-M inline assembly labels with unique number appended (PR 7649)
- Added secret logging callback to TLS <= 1.2, enabled with the macro HAVE_SECRET_CALLBACK (PR 7372)
- Made wc_RNG_DRBG_Reseed() a public wolfCrypt API (PR 7386)
- Enabled DES3 support without the DES3 ciphers. To re-enable DES3 cipher suites, use the configure flag --enable-des3-tls-suites (PR 7315)
- Added stubs required for latest nginx (1.25.5) (PR 7449)
- Added option for using a custom salt with the function wc_ecc_ctx_set_own_salt (PR 7552)
- Added PQ files for Windows (PR 7419)
- Enhancements to static memory feature, adding the option for a global heap hint (PR 7478) and build options for a lean or debug setting, enabled with --enable-staticmemory=small or --enable-staticmemory=debug (PR 7597)
- Updated --enable-jni to define SESSION_CERTS for wolfJSSE (PR 7557)
- Exposed DTLS in Ada wrapper and updated examples (PR 7397)
- Added additional minimum TLS extension size sanity checks (PR 7602)
- ESP improvements: updating the examples and libraries, updates for Apple HomeKit SHA/SRP, and fix for endianness with SHA512 software fallback (PR 7607, 7392, 7505, 7535)
- Made the wc_CheckCertSigPubKey API publicly available with the define of the macro WOLFSSL_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY (PR 7599)
- Added an alpha/preview of additional FIPS 140-3 full submission, bringing additional algorithms such as SRTP-KDF, AES-XTS, GCM streaming, AES-CFB, ED25519, and ED448 into the FIPS module boundary (PR 7295)
- XCODE support for v5.2.3 of the FIPS module (PR 7140)
- Expanded OpenSSL compatibility layer and added EC_POINT_hex2point (PR 7191)
Fixes
- Fixed Kyber control-flow timing leak. Thanks to Antoon Purnal from PQShield for the report
- Fixed the NXP MMCAU HW acceleration for SHA-256 (PR 7389)
- Fixed AES-CFB1 encrypt/decrypt on size (8*x-1) bits (PR 7431)
- Fixed use of %rip with SHA-256 x64 assembly (PR 7409)
- Fixed OCSP response message build for DTLS (PR 7671)
- Handled edge case in wc_ecc_mulmod() with zero (PR 7532)
- Fixed RPK (Raw Public Key) to follow certificate use correctly (PR 7375)
- Added sanity check on record header with QUIC use (PR 7638)
- Added sanity check for empty directory strings in X.509 when parsing (PR 7669)
- Added sanity check on non-conforming serial number of 0 in certificates being parsed (PR 7625)
- Fixed wolfSSL_CTX_set1_sigalgs_list() to make the TLS connection conform to the selected sig hash algorithm (PR 7693)
- Various fixes for dual algorithm certificates including small stack use and support for Certificate Signing Requests (PR 7577)
- Added sanity check for critical policy extension when wolfSSL is built without policy extension support enabled (PR 7388)
- Added sanity check that the ed25519 signature is smaller than the order (PR 7513)
- Fixed Segger emNet to handle non-blocking want read/want write (PR 7581)
For additional vulnerability information visit the vulnerability page at: https://www.wolfssl.com/docs/security-vulnerabilities/
See INSTALL file for build instructions. More info can be found on-line at: https://wolfssl.com/wolfSSL/Docs.html
Resources
Directory structure
<wolfssl_root>
âââ certs [Certificates used in tests and examples]
âââ cmake [Cmake build utilities]
âââ debian [Debian packaging files]
âââ doc [Documentation for wolfSSL (Doxygen)]
âââ Docker [Prebuilt Docker environments]
âââ examples [wolfSSL examples]
â  âââ asn1 [ASN.1 printing example]
â  âââ async [Asynchronous Cryptography example]
â  âââ benchmark [TLS benchmark example]
â  âââ client [Client example]
â  âââ configs [Example build configurations]
â  âââ echoclient [Echoclient example]
â  âââ echoserver [Echoserver example]
â  âââ pem [Example for convert between PEM and DER]
â  âââ sctp [Servers and clients that demonstrate wolfSSL's DTLS-SCTP support]
â  âââ server [Server example]
âââ IDE [Contains example projects for various development environments]
âââ linuxkm [Linux Kernel Module implementation]
âââ m4 [Autotools utilities]
âââ mcapi [wolfSSL MPLAB X Project Files]
âââ mplabx [wolfSSL MPLAB X Project Files]
âââ mqx [wolfSSL Freescale CodeWarrior Project Files]
âââ rpm [RPM packaging metadata]
âââ RTOS
â  âââ nuttx [Port of wolfSSL for NuttX]
âââ scripts [Testing scripts]
âââ src [wolfSSL source code]
âââ sslSniffer [wolfSSL sniffer can be used to passively sniff SSL traffic]
âââ support [Contains the pkg-config file]
âââ tests [Unit and configuration testing]
âââ testsuite [Test application that orchestrates tests]
âââ tirtos [Port of wolfSSL for TI RTOS]
âââ wolfcrypt [The wolfCrypt component]
â  âââ benchmark [Cryptography benchmarking application]
â  âââ src [wolfCrypt source code]
â  â  âââ port [Supported hardware acceleration ports]
â  âââ test [Cryptography testing application]
âââ wolfssl [Header files]
â  âââ openssl [Compatibility layer headers]
â  âââ wolfcrypt [Header files]
âââ wrapper [wolfSSL language wrappers]
âââ zephyr [Port of wolfSSL for Zephyr RTOS]
Top Related Projects
TLS/SSL and crypto library
An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible TLS library, and reference implementation of the PSA Cryptography API. Releases are on a varying cadence, typically around 3 - 6 months between releases.
LibreSSL Portable itself. This includes the build scaffold and compatibility layer that builds portable LibreSSL from the OpenBSD source code. Pull requests or patches sent to tech@openbsd.org are welcome.
Mirror of BoringSSL
An implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols
Fast Elliptic Curve Cryptography in plain javascript
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot